Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-8700P

AMD A10-8700P

AMD A10-8700P是2015年面向主流笔记本电脑的Carrizo架构系列处理器中的中端型号。这块整合芯片中包括两颗Excavator处理器模组（四个整数和两个浮点运算核心，合称为四个运算核心），一颗有6个运算核心（384个着色器）的Radeon R7显卡，一个DDR3-2133（35瓦定制热设计功率型号）内存控制器和一个视频引擎（包括UVD 6以及HEVC/H.265硬件解码）。

它的处理器和显卡核心的性能根据定制热设计功率而有所不同。范围在12到35瓦之间，它可以适合不同型号的笔记本电脑的散热系统。因此，运算核心的时钟频率会有所变化，例如在3DMark 11（P)中显卡的得分会在1764（15瓦）到2359（35瓦，高出34%）之间不等。35瓦型号处理器的性能将会相比Kaveri架构A10-7400P略高。如果是15瓦的型号，它将会明显更慢，因为加速将无法持续很长时间。

SeriesAMD Carrizo
CodenameCarrizo

Series: Carrizo Carrizo

AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P « 1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock Rate1800 - 3200 MHz
Level 2 Cache2 MB
Number of Cores / Threads4 / 4
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)12 - 35 Watt
Transistor Count3100 Million
Manufacturing Technology28 nm
SocketFP4 BGA
FeaturesHSA 1.0
GPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date06/03/2015
Product Link (external)products.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 190.1     median: 194 (1%)     max: 198 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -84%
...
AMD Pro A8-8600B
181 -5%
Intel Core M-5Y70
182 -4%
Intel Core i5-4302Y
185 -3%
AMD A10-4600M
187 -2%
AMD A8-5550M
188 -1%
Intel Core m5-6Y57
189.3 0%
Intel Core i3-4030U
189.9 0%
Intel Pentium 3825U
190 0%
Intel Core M-5Y10a
190 0%
AMD A10-8700P
190.1
Intel Core m3-8100Y
190.8 0%
Intel Core i7-4610Y
192 1%
AMD Pro A10-8700B
192 1%
Intel Core m3-6Y30
192.5 1%
Intel Core M-5Y31
193.8 2%
Intel Core i3-4158U
194 2%
Intel Core i3-2350M
196 3%
AMD 3020e
196 3%
Intel Celeron N4505
197.5 4%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 2846%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 8234%
0%
100%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (21%)     max: 75 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -72%
...
Intel Core i5-4302Y
65 -4%
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
65 -4%
AMD A10-4600M
65.1 -4%
Intel Core i5-4210Y
65.5 -3%
Intel Core i3-4010U
65.5 -3%
Intel Pentium 3556U
65.5 -3%
Intel Core M-5Y10c
66 -2%
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y
66.6 -1%
Intel Pentium 3558U
67 -1%
AMD A10-8700P
67.6
AMD A8-5550M
68 1%
Intel Celeron N4100
68.1 1%
AMD A6-9220
68.5 1%
AMD Pro A8-8600B
69 2%
Intel Core i3-4030U
69.6 3%
AMD Pro A10-8700B
70 4%
Intel Celeron N4000
70.3 4%
Intel Celeron J4115
70.6 4%
AMD PRO A8-9600B
71 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 360%
max:
Intel Core i9-14900K
332 391%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.12     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.36 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.68     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.89 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2170     avg: 2294     median: 2334 (14%)     max: 2389 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4808     avg: 6140     median: 6394 (5%)     max: 6443 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8279     avg: 8769     median: 8924.5 (6%)     max: 8949 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3080     avg: 3212     median: 3251.5 (4%)     max: 3264 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 507     avg: 536     median: 509 (6%)     max: 591 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.56     avg: 17.1     median: 17.2 (3%)     max: 17.47 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1316     median: 1328 (2%)     max: 1328 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (5%)     max: 15.23 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72.2     avg: 73.5     median: 73.7 (17%)     max: 74.4 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.18     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.188 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.28     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.303 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (4%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2776     avg: 2985     median: 2977.5 (6%)     max: 3186 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.91     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 22.25 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.38     avg: 46.1     median: 44.8 (2%)     max: 50.4 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 954     avg: 984     median: 964 (4%)     max: 1072 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6309     avg: 6653     median: 6586 (6%)     max: 7129 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1794     avg: 2134     median: 2150.5 (6%)     max: 2310 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13862     avg: 19941     median: 20873.5 (17%)     max: 22998 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 13248     avg: 20904     median: 21997.5 (18%)     max: 23111 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (20%)     max: 24168 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1774     avg: 1897     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2456     avg: 2673     median: 2685 (5%)     max: 2803 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4550     avg: 4670     median: 4676.5 (8%)     max: 4775 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1941     avg: 1974     median: 1975 (39%)     max: 2006 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (8%)     max: 5105 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (32%)     max: 2170 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2229     avg: 2673     median: 2285.5 (3%)     max: 3488 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164.3 (2%)     max: 363.6 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8324     avg: 11931     median: 11800 (10%)     max: 15801 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 24. 01:01:19

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 05:31:45 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.007s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6845 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#13 got single benchmarks 6845 +0.027s ... 0.039s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.734s ... 0.773s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.773s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.773s

Reviews for the AMD A10-8700P processor

华硕 X555DA (A10-8700P, 全高清) 笔记本电脑评测

华硕 X555DA (A10-8700P, 全高清) 笔记本电脑评测

又慢又过时。 AMD的Carrizo平台尚未成熟。性能比U级英特尔处理器慢，同时提供的电池续航更短和体验更差。
AMD A10-8700P | AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
惠普 ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT 笔记本电脑简短评测

实惠AMD商务本。 AMD设备比搭载同样配置的英特尔处理器的ProBook 450便宜至少200美元。可惜，当与你的标准型超低电压版酷睿ix 处理器对比时，它的性能和电池续航有着明显的不足。 ...
AMD A10-8700P | AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
联想 IdeaPad 500-15ACZ 笔记本电脑简短评测

联想 IdeaPad 500-15ACZ 笔记本电脑简短评测

失望。 我们很久没有测试搭配AMD双显卡的笔记本电脑了。不过，从它在测试中各方面的糟糕表现来看，联想这次并不成功。...
AMD A10-8700P | AMD Radeon R6 M340DX | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
惠普 Pavilion 15-ab052ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 Pavilion 15-ab052ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

性价比破坏者？ 惠普承诺了Pavilion 15会是一台杰出的多媒体笔记本电脑，搭配全高清屏幕，大量存储空间，而售价不足500欧元。在仔细审视之后，我们发现这款15寸设备也存在一些缺点。...
AMD A10-8700P | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
惠普 Pavilion 17-g054ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

惠普 Pavilion 17-g054ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

正路前行。 售价仅600欧元（约4251人民币）的Pavilion 17-g054ng提供了最新的四核APU结合Crossfire显卡，大容量硬盘和出色的全高清屏幕。AMD平台的表现性比英特尔平台的设备又如何呢？...
AMD A10-8700P | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | 17.30" | 2.7 kg

Toshiba Satellite L50D-C-19D: AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50D-C-19D

HP Pavilion 15-ab111ng: AMD Radeon R7 M360, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-ab111ng

Toshiba Satellite L50D-C-13G: AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50D-C-13G

HP Envy 15-ah00sa: AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ah00sa

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Carrizo

» AMD FX-8800P
   4x 2.1 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» AMD Pro A12-8800B
   4x 2.1 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» AMD A10-8700P
   4x 1.8 GHz - 3.2 GHz
» AMD Pro A10-8700B
   4x 1.8 GHz - 3.2 GHz
» AMD A8-8600P
   4x 1.6 GHz - 3 GHz
» AMD Pro A8-8600B
   4x 1.6 GHz - 3 GHz
» AMD A6-8500P
   2x 1.6 GHz - 3 GHz
» AMD Pro A6-8500B
   2x 1.6 GHz - 3 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i3-2350M
   2x 2.3 GHz
+ Intel Core i3-2348M
   2x 2.3 GHz
+ Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
   2x 2.8 GHz
+ Intel Core m5-6Y57
   2x 1.1 GHz - 2.8 GHz
+ Intel Core m5-6Y54
   2x 1.1 GHz - 2.7 GHz
» AMD A10-8700P
   4x 1.8 GHz - 3.2 GHz
- AMD Pro A10-8700B
   4x 1.8 GHz - 3.2 GHz
- Intel Pentium Silver N6005
   4x 2 GHz - 3.3 GHz
- Intel Pentium Silver N6000
   4x 1.1 GHz - 3.3 GHz
- Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
   2x 2.8 GHz
- Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
   2x 2.8 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD A-Series A10-8700P 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2015-07-23)