Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

AMD R9 7945HX

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX是龙腾系列中速度最快的高端笔记本处理器。它基于支持超线程（32 线程）的 Zen 4 架构，提供 16 个内核。内核频率从 2.5（基本）到 5.4 GHz（单核提升）不等。7945HX 是目前推出的速度最快的移动 Ryzen CPU，源自台式机的 Ryzen 9 7950X.

Dragon Range 系列仍然使用芯片组设计，采用 5nm 工艺制造的两个 CCD 簇（每个簇有 8 个可能的核心）和一个 IO-die（包括内存控制器和 Radeon 610M iGPU）采用 6 纳米制程。芯片集成了 4 个 USB 3.2 Gen2（10 Gbps）端口（无 USB4）、28 个 PCIe 5.0 通道（用于 GPU 和 SSD）和一个双通道 DDR5-5200 内存控制器。

性能

截至 2023 年 8 月，Ryzen 9 7945HX 是我们数据库中速度最快的处理器之一。它与 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D处于同一水平，明显领先于 酷睿 i9-13980HX就多线程基准测试成绩而言，它与 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 处于同一水平，并明显领先于酷睿 i9-13980HX。它的速度快得令人难以置信，有幸购买了这款 CPU 的笔记本电脑的用户至少在三年内不会出现性能问题。

得益于其强大的散热解决方案和 128 W 的 CPU 长期功率限制，ROG Strix Scar 17 G7 笔记本电脑的散热效果非常出色。 ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96是我们所知的最快的 7945HX 笔记本电脑之一。

R9 7945HX 的额定 TDP 为 55 瓦，最高可配置为 75 瓦（cTDP）。

CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)

Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock Rate2500 - 5400 MHz
Level 1 Cache1 MB
Level 2 Cache16 MB
Level 3 Cache64 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
Transistor Count9900 Million
Manufacturing TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
GPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2023
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
46.9 pt (78%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -9%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 -8%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
43.2 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.2 -6%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 -6%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 -4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.2 -4%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46.1 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.9
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 1%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 28%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 109.6     avg: 112.3     median: 113.1 (64%)     max: 114 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1677     avg: 1726     median: 1699 (32%)     max: 1828 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30783     avg: 33105     median: 33773 (31%)     max: 34613 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i7-14650HX
24455 -26%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24631 -26%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
26876 -19%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
27595 -17%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28225 -15%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28798 -13%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -11%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33105
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -1%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 225%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1861     avg: 1915     median: 1938 (82%)     max: 1957 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 712     avg: 740     median: 750 (83%)     max: 760 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 10025     avg: 12620     median: 13132.5 (32%)     max: 13769 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4998     avg: 5374     median: 5405 (34%)     max: 5663 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 290     avg: 303.6     median: 307.5 (86%)     max: 311 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
289 -5%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
291.7 -4%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
292.9 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
295 -3%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
297 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
299.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
301 -1%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
302 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
303.6
Intel Core i9-13980HX
303.6 0%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
305.2 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
305.9 1%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
307 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 2%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 17%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 59.93     avg: 61.9     median: 61.5 (80%)     max: 64.29 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.65     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8355     avg: 8433     median: 8462 (51%)     max: 8481 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 71582     avg: 71625     median: 71611 (52%)     max: 71681 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 127197     avg: 129227     median: 129226 (83%)     max: 131256 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15601     avg: 15745     median: 15745 (19%)     max: 15889 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 34.561     avg: 76.6     median: 36.4 (0%)     max: 158.7 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.917     avg: 2.9     median: 2 (0%)     max: 4.9 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 13822     avg: 14532     median: 14532 (23%)     max: 15242 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 123364     avg: 135443     median: 138199 (79%)     max: 140932 MIPS
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7319     avg: 7456     median: 7380 (87%)     max: 7711 MIPS
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 228     avg: 235.5     median: 235.5 (79%)     max: 243 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 360.5     avg: 368.8     median: 368.8 (85%)     max: 377 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 33.8     avg: 35.7     median: 34.8 (61%)     max: 37.6 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (79%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (71%)     max: 4.2 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 25.3     avg: 27.6     median: 27.7 (72%)     max: 29.9 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 138     avg: 151.1     median: 151 (2%)     max: 160 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 87     avg: 94.9     median: 94.5 (1%)     max: 100 Seconds
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3884     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4159 sec
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19481     avg: 19804     median: 19820 (42%)     max: 20110 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.4     avg: 6.5     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 6.624 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.9     avg: 14.1     median: 14.2 (1%)     max: 14.336 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 336.106     avg: 339.6     median: 337 (1%)     max: 345.75 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97328     avg: 100508     median: 100877 (77%)     max: 102949 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 24017     avg: 26526     median: 26667 (67%)     max: 30404 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81933     avg: 83762     median: 83370 (68%)     max: 86375 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81750     avg: 84045     median: 83540 (68%)     max: 86844 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83710     avg: 85684     median: 84333 (70%)     max: 89010 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22457     avg: 23320     median: 23455 (59%)     max: 24017 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29626     avg: 38138     median: 39095 (70%)     max: 42342 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6283     avg: 12010     median: 12827 (54%)     max: 13694 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2797     avg: 2873     median: 2878 (73%)     max: 2940 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 16223     avg: 16799     median: 16540.5 (64%)     max: 17892 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2047     avg: 2104     median: 2113.5 (83%)     max: 2158 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18372     avg: 19598     median: 19692.5 (35%)     max: 20394 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1984     avg: 2041     median: 2045 (9%)     max: 2095 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19315     avg: 19808     median: 19515 (62%)     max: 20593 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8534     avg: 8574     median: 8573.5 (86%)     max: 8613 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 75652     avg: 75959     median: 75958.5 (76%)     max: 76265 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 446     avg: 459.7     median: 456 (1%)     max: 479 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 92275     avg: 96361     median: 97339 (81%)     max: 99470 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 283     avg: 289.7     median: 290 (81%)     max: 295 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 314     avg: 352.3     median: 353 (65%)     max: 387 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1929     avg: 2060     median: 2044 (78%)     max: 2240 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.4     avg: 165.6     median: 145.2 (25%)     max: 225 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139.1     avg: 177.9     median: 166.6 (30%)     max: 221 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 35.7     median: 30.7 (20%)     max: 68.7 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 17.1     avg: 27     median: 24.1 (27%)     max: 37 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 25.1     avg: 30.3     median: 30 (22%)     max: 38 Points per Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 22. 16:17:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:31:06 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.015s ... 0.016s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14936 +0.016s ... 0.034s

#11 got single benchmarks 14936 +0.039s ... 0.072s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.196s ... 1.269s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.269s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.269s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX processor

Minisforum BD790i 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX 和 PCIe 5.0 的 Mini-ITX 主板是小型游戏 PC 的基础

Minisforum BD790i 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX 和 PCIe 5.0 的 Mini-ITX 主板是小型游戏 PC 的基础

Minisforum BD790i 主板承诺提供出色的性能，因此可以成为小型 Mini-ITX PC 的绝佳基础。我们对这款主板进行了测试，它配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX ex 处理器，专门面向高要求用户。在测试中，我们分析了该系统在执行密集型任务时的性能，并结合 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon 610M
迷你论坛 AtomMan G7 PT

Minisforum AtomMan G7 PT 评论：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX 和 Radeon RX 7600M XT 的紧凑型游戏迷你 PC

Minisforum AtomMan G7 PT 配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX 处理器和 Radeon RX 7600M XT 显卡，给人留下了深刻印象。制造商称，有了这样的组合，这款小巧的迷你 PC 可为要求苛刻的应用和游戏提供一流的性能。在本评测中，我们将通过大量的测量和基准测试，仔细研究这款迷你电...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | 2.8 kg
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 性能首次亮相：Alienware m18 R1 笔记本电脑评测

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 性能首次亮相：Alienware m18 R1 笔记本电脑评测

AMD 凭借 Ryzen 系列移动 CPU 一鸣惊人，但毫无疑问，其独立移动 GPU 却一直落后于人。Radeon RX 7900M 的性能与移动 RTX 4080 不相上下，价格却便宜了数百美元。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon RX 7900M | 18.00" | 3.9 kg
华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY笔记本电脑评测：英特尔不再是国王

华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY笔记本电脑评测：英特尔不再是国王

华硕最新的游戏笔记本电脑是市场上最快的笔记本电脑之一，它甚至不需要任何英特尔部件。不过，你还是要密切关注那些高的核心温度。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX分析--Zen4龙系列比英特尔猛禽湖-HX更快、更高效

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX分析--Zen4龙系列比英特尔猛禽湖-HX更快、更高效

AMD新的Zen4 CPU终于来了，新的旗舰产品Ryzen 9 7945HX与英特尔的猛禽湖HX型号竞争。新的Zen4核心（Dragon Range）的性能非常好，Ryzen 9也比英特尔的HX CPU更有效率。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.8 kg

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Radeon 610M
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX分析--Zen4龙系列比英特尔猛禽湖-HX更快、更高效

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX分析--Zen4龙系列比英特尔猛禽湖-HX更快、更高效

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI。游戏笔记本在新Ryzen 9的测试中给人留下深刻印象

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16笔记本回顾。带有AMD Zen4、RTX 4090和Mini-LED的多任务怪物

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16ARX8H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16ARX8H

MSI Alpha 17 C7VG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Alpha 17 C7VG

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PZ

MSI Alpha 17 C7VF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Alpha 17 C7VF

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PZ

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-LL002W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-LL002W

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W

Alienware m18 R1 AMD: AMD Radeon RX 7900M, 18.00", 3.9 kg
   » 通过显示驱动程序解决 Radeon RX 7900M Alienware m18 R1 的漏洞

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
   » 华硕为ROG Zephyrus Duo 16配备了AMD的Ryzen 9 7945HX，这是目前最快的移动处理器。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)

» AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
   12x 3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
   6x 4 GHz - 5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-14900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13980HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13950HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.5 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) R9 7945HX 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)