Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD R7 8845HS

Ryzen 7 8845HS是一款功能强大的 Hawk Point 系列芯片，我们认为它是 Ryzen 7 7840HS的伪装。R7 8845HS 于 2023 年下半年面世；它拥有 8 个核心（由于支持 SMT，因此有 16 个线程），运行频率高达 5.1 GHz。这款 APU 不仅可以充分利用 Zen 4 架构，还拥有第二代 Ryzen AI 技术。最后但并非最不重要的是 Radeon 780M作为集成 GPU。

架构与功能

Hawk Point 系列芯片采用 Zen 4 架构，就像 Phoenix 和 Dragon Range 系列芯片一样。这并不是说三者之间没有区别。凭借 Hawk Point，AMD 推出了第二代 Ryzen AI 技术，这意味着新处理器的 AI 生成性能预计将比 7040 系列 APU 提升 40%。截至 2023 年底，DaVinci Resolve 等数十款流行应用都支持这项技术。

与 Zen 3 不同的是，Zen 4 支持 AVX512，并进行了大量其他改进，包括全面扩大缓存/寄存器/缓冲区，预计 IPC 性能将比 Zen 3 提升两位数。

在其他方面，8845HS 拥有 16 MB 三级缓存和快速内存控制器（最高 LPDDR5x-7500 和最高 DDR5-5600，包括支持 ECC 的内存）。PCI-Express 每通道速度上限为 1.97 GB/s，符合 4.0 规格。

这款 Ryzen 7 系列芯片可运行 64 位 Windows 11、64 位 Windows 10 或 Linux；请注意，它不可超频，用户也不可更换。请注意，它不能超频，也不能由用户更换，而是焊接在主板上（FP7、FP7r2、FP8 插座接口）。

性能

由于 8845HS 是 7840HS变相的 7840HS，因此可以肯定的是，它只比 酷睿 i9-13900H和 Ryzen 9 7940HS就多线程性能而言。截至 2023 年第三季度，这是一款非常快的芯片。

您的使用情况可能会有所不同，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高，以及您系统的散热解决方案有多好。

图形

显卡 Radeon 780M(12 个 CU / 768 个着色器，频率高达 2,700 MHz）可同时支持 4 台显示器，分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p。此外，它还能对最广泛使用的视频编解码器（AV1、HEVC、AVC）进行硬件编码和硬件解码。就游戏而言，只要你能接受中等画质设置，它就能让你在 1080p 下玩大多数游戏。长话短说，截至 2023 年下半年，这就是用钱能买到的最好的 iGPU。

您的选择可能会有所不同，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高、系统的散热解决方案有多好以及系统内存的速度有多快（这里没有专用的 VRAM）。

功耗

Ryzen 7 系列芯片的长期功耗限制（默认 TDP）为 35 W 至 54 W，这让系统制造商可以在提高电池续航时间和让所设计的系统达到超快速度之间做出选择。无论如何，笔记本电脑或基于该 APU 的迷你 PC 都必须采用主动散热解决方案。

R7 8845HS 采用台积电的 4 纳米工艺制造，具有很高的能效（截至 2023 年底）。

SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate3800 - 5100 MHz
Level 1 Cache512 KB
Level 2 Cache8 MB
Level 3 Cache16 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date12/06/2023
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
39.8 pt (66%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.2 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.3 -1%
Intel Core i7-1370P
39.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 -1%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
39.4 -1%
Intel Core i7-12800HX
39.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-13700H
39.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39.8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.2 1%
Intel Core i7-13650HX
40.3 1%
Intel Core i7-13705H
40.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
40.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
40.6 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.9 3%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 3%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 19%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 51%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.1     median: 103 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 853     median: 890 (17%)     max: 956 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16111     median: 16111.5 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1745     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1783 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 685     median: 684 (76%)     max: 698 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6304     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2552     median: 2561.5 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 275.9     median: 276 (78%)     max: 283 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (38%)     max: 29.76 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.32 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7475     median: 7474.5 (45%)     max: 7523 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47416     median: 47416 (34%)     max: 47500 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
85872 Points (55%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14163 Points (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 98.896     avg: 134.4     median: 134.4 (2%)     max: 170 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7327     avg: 13168     median: 13167.5 (21%)     max: 19008 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 67678     median: 67063.5 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6256     median: 6291.5 (74%)     max: 6714 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
143.7 fps (48%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289 fps (67%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20     median: 19.5 (34%)     max: 22.7 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (37%)     max: 14.4 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 330.5     median: 328.5 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 202.7     median: 203 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4336     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15479     avg: 15724     median: 15724 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82496     median: 82495.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22218     median: 22102 (56%)     max: 26212 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 84429     avg: 86446     median: 86445.5 (70%)     max: 88462 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84932     avg: 86619     median: 86618.5 (70%)     max: 88305 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86520     avg: 89786     median: 89786 (74%)     max: 93052 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20187     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27264     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11294     median: 10824 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2614     median: 2616.5 (67%)     max: 2698 points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12828     median: 12830.5 (51%)     max: 14014 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1920     median: 1942 (76%)     max: 2004 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11884     median: 11836 (21%)     max: 12726 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1895     avg: 1903     median: 1900 (8%)     max: 1914 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 11979     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8049     median: 8048.5 (80%)     max: 8063 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 47690     median: 47689.5 (48%)     max: 47777 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 539     median: 530 (1%)     max: 664 ms
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (75%)     max: 96330 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 245     avg: 261.4     median: 256 (72%)     max: 314 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 303.6     median: 305 (56%)     max: 334 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1765     median: 1790 (69%)     max: 1939 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.9     avg: 86.3     median: 82.4 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 60.5     avg: 83.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 7.9     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 14.4 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 7.8     median: 6.8 (8%)     max: 11.8 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 32.2     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 38.7 Points per Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 08:12:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#10 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.016s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.04s ... 0.07s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.096s ... 1.166s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.167s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.167s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS processor

Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Ninkear A16 Pro 是一款令人惊喜的国产笔记本电脑，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价约为 840 美元。凭借出色的功能，它的性能超过了其姊妹机型 N16 Pro，甚至接近小米红米笔记本 Pro 16。我们在测试过程中发现了具体有多接近。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
惠普 ZBook Power 16 G11 A 评测：配备 AMD Zen 4 的强大工作站

惠普 ZBook Power 16 G11 A 评测：配备 AMD Zen 4 的强大工作站

ZBook Power 15 系列已成长为更现代的 16 英寸外形。但遗憾的是，更大更重的尺寸并没有带来更快的图形处理性能。
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.2 kg
申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手

申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手

申克 XMG Evo 14 是一款小巧的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，具有大量连接和良好的维护选项。它采用高分辨率 120 Hz IPS 雾面面板，客户可以选择 AMD 和英特尔的 CPU。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
惠普预兆 17（2024）评测：RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7 在游戏笔记本电脑中大显身手

惠普预兆 17（2024）评测：RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7 在游戏笔记本电脑中大显身手

Omen 17 令人印象深刻地展示了 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑的性能，提供了稳定且高水平的中端性能，同时，由于成功实现了控制，散热工作的噪音水平出奇地适中。只有一些综合性能稍显落后。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑

申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑

申克 VIA 14 Pro 已经更新，现在配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS，并采用了更亮的 IPS 显示屏。此外，制造商还将易脏外壳的批评记录在案，并使用了不同的涂层。广泛的连接性和两个 M.2 SSD 插槽得以保留。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Beelink SER8: AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER8 PC 评论：Mac Mini-inspired 设计与 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.30", 2.1 kg
  Review » SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测：来自德国的高级金属外壳游戏机

Aoostar GEM12: AMD Radeon 780M, 0.7 kg
  Review » Aoostar GEM12 迷你电脑评测：AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS，32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 OCuLink 接口

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 120-Hz OLED 的强大超便携产品

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS

Acer Nitro V14 ANV14-61: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V14 ANV14-61

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9

Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41, R7 8845HS RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41, R7 8845HS RTX 4060

Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41, RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41, RTX 4050

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401UV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401UV

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16AHP9: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16AHP9

Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16AHP9, RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16AHP9, RTX 4060

Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024: AMD Radeon 780M, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024

HP Omen 17-db0079ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 17-db0079ng

Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42

Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-42: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 17 AN17-42

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UU, R7 8845HS: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UU, R7 8845HS

Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41, RTX 3050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 ANV16-41, RTX 3050

Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16AHP9: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16AHP9

MSI Katana 15 AI B8VE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 AI B8VE

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)

» AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 3 8440U
   4x 3 GHz - 4.7 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13650HX
   14x 1.9 GHz - 4.9 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) R7 8845HS 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-12-10)