Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

AMD R9 8945HS

Ryzen 9 8945HS是一款重新命名的 Ryzen 9 7940HS两者之间几乎没有任何区别。具体来说，8945HS 是一款功能强大的 Hawk Point 系列笔记本电脑芯片，拥有 8 个 Zen 4 内核，主频为 4.0 GHz 至 5.2 GHz。这款 APU 于 2023 年下半年面世，其所有内核均支持 SMT，共有 16 个处理线程。

这款功能强大的 Ryzen 9 系列处理器配备了第二代 Ryzen AI 技术。处理器 Radeon 780M作为集成图形适配器。

架构和功能

Hawk Point 系列芯片采用 Zen 4 架构，就像 Phoenix 和 Dragon Range 系列芯片一样。这并不是说三者之间没有区别。与 7040 系列 APU 相比，Hawk Point 芯片的人工智能生成性能最多可提升 40%，使 DaVinci Resolve 和 Adobe Photoshop 等应用程序更加强大。

与 Zen 3 不同的是，Zen 4 支持 AVX512，并进行了大量其他改进，包括全面扩大缓存/寄存器/缓冲区，预计将比 Zen 3 实现两位数的 IPC 提升。

在其他方面，8945HS 拥有 16 MB 三级缓存，支持超快内存（最高 LPDDR5x-7500 或 DDR5-5600；不支持 ECC）。该处理器兼容 USB 4，因此也兼容 Thunderbolt；对 PCIe 的支持仅限于 4.0 规格，每通道吞吐量为 1.97 GB/s。提供 20 个通道。

操作系统支持仅限于 64 位版本的 Windows 11 和 Windows 10，当然也包括 Linux。需要注意的是，该芯片不可超频，用户也不可更换，因为它会被永久焊接（FP7、FP7r2、FP8 插座接口）。

性能

8945HS 是 R9 7940HS变相的 R9 7940HS，因此，期望该芯片的速度略高于 酷睿 i9-12900HK和 Ryzen 7 7840HS就多线程性能而言。

具体情况可能会有所不同，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高以及系统散热解决方案的能力有多强。

图形性能

显卡 Radeon 780M有 12 个 CU（768 个着色器），运行频率高达 2,800 MHz。截至 2023 年底，这是一款非常快速的 iGPU。它可让您使用多达 4 台分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p 的显示器，还能对最广泛使用的视频编解码器（包括 AVC、HEVC 和 AV1）进行硬件编码和硬件解码。更重要的是，它的速度足以满足 1080p 游戏的需要，只要中低细节设置即可。

具体情况可能会有所不同，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高、系统的散热解决方案有多强、系统内存的速度有多快（这里没有专用的 VRAM）。

功耗

Ryzen 9 系列芯片的长期功耗限制（默认 TDP）为 35 W 至 54 W，笔记本电脑制造商可以在更长的电池寿命和更高的性能之间做出选择。无论如何，使用该芯片的系统都必须采用主动散热解决方案。

8945HS 采用台积电的 4 纳米工艺制造，具有很高的能效（截至 2023 年底）。

SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate4000 - 5200 MHz
Level 1 Cache512 KB
Level 2 Cache8 MB
Level 3 Cache16 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date12/06/2023
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
40.2 pt (67%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
Intel Core i7-1370P
39.3 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.3 -2%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39.4 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
39.4 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 -2%
Intel Core i7-12800HX
39.5 -2%
Intel Core i7-13700H
39.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.2
Intel Core i7-13650HX
40.3 0%
Intel Core i7-13705H
40.3 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
40.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
40.6 1%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 2%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.9 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 18%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 50%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 105.7     median: 106.1 (60%)     max: 108 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 934     avg: 963     median: 967 (18%)     max: 988 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16795     avg: 17082     median: 17079 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1805     avg: 1810     median: 1805 (77%)     max: 1825 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 698     avg: 701     median: 698 (77%)     max: 711 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6591     avg: 6670     median: 6652 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2640     avg: 2683     median: 2659 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 281     avg: 282.5     median: 281 (79%)     max: 287 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 30.85     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.31 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.38     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (81%)     max: 3.45 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7748     avg: 7786     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7823 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 49273     avg: 49299     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 49325 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
90144 Points (58%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14561 Points (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 67.933     avg: 132.2     median: 132.2 (2%)     max: 196.4 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.563     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7843     avg: 14109     median: 14108.5 (22%)     max: 20374 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 71534     avg: 71941     median: 71704 (41%)     max: 72821 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5994     avg: 6290     median: 6249.5 (74%)     max: 6668 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
150.7 fps (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
298 fps (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.9     avg: 21.4     median: 21.3 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (40%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (40%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 293     avg: 307.5     median: 312 (4%)     max: 313 Seconds
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 186     avg: 191.5     median: 192 (1%)     max: 196 Seconds
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4452 sec
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15675     avg: 15978     median: 15893.5 (34%)     max: 16449 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.045     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.549     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 576.7     avg: 601     median: 600.7 (3%)     max: 624.748 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 80974     avg: 82908     median: 83079 (64%)     max: 84498 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17239     avg: 22329     median: 22978 (58%)     max: 25276 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 84862     avg: 86592     median: 86389.5 (70%)     max: 88725 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83482     avg: 86356     median: 86411 (70%)     max: 89119 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86520     avg: 88475     median: 88401.5 (73%)     max: 90575 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13624     avg: 19288     median: 20977.5 (53%)     max: 21573 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23442     avg: 27490     median: 27732 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10444     avg: 11185     median: 11298 (48%)     max: 11856 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2632     avg: 2671     median: 2684 (68%)     max: 2707 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 13155     avg: 13385     median: 13283 (52%)     max: 13715 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1934     median: 1965 (77%)     max: 2039 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11564     avg: 12071     median: 12368 (22%)     max: 12481 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1906     avg: 1918     median: 1918 (8%)     max: 1930 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12315     avg: 12351     median: 12350.5 (39%)     max: 12386 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8178     avg: 8228     median: 8228 (82%)     max: 8278 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 49269     avg: 49462     median: 49461.5 (49%)     max: 49654 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488     avg: 501     median: 505 (1%)     max: 509 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94227 Points (79%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 250     avg: 259.7     median: 260 (73%)     max: 269 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 303     avg: 314.3     median: 316 (58%)     max: 324 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1767     avg: 1821     median: 1830 (70%)     max: 1866 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.5     avg: 97.5     median: 93.6 (16%)     max: 126.4 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73.7     avg: 99.2     median: 93.5 (17%)     max: 130.5 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.93     avg: 11     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 21.6 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.62     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 22.5 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.4     avg: 32.1     median: 32.1 (24%)     max: 35.8 Points per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 16. 21:53:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:31:01 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#10 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.02s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.026s ... 0.063s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.093s ... 1.156s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.157s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.157s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS processor

Geekom A8 评测：高级 0.5 升迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Geekom A8 评测：高级 0.5 升迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Geekom A 系列将卓越的性能与极其紧凑的外形结合在一起。制造商已经通过 Geekom A7 证明了这一理念的可行性。Geekom A8 基于 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，听起来很有前途，但它应该能提供更强的性能。我们仔细观察了这款新旗舰，并根据多项基准测试分析了其性能。...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 432 g
Razer Blade 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen AI，面向未来

Razer Blade 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen AI，面向未来

新年伊始，雷蛇（Razer）对其最小的刀锋（Blade）系列进行了小幅而扎实的更新。大多数用户都会忽略 CPU AI 的提升，但 GPU 的细微变化却帮助 2024 Blade 14 超越了去年的机型。...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
测试中的 AMD Ryzen 8000 Hawk Point - Zen4 更新版在数字运算和 GPU 性能方面优于 Meteor Lake

测试中的 AMD Ryzen 8000 Hawk Point - Zen4 更新版在数字运算和 GPU 性能方面优于 Meteor Lake

AMD 最新的 Ryzen 8000 处理器（品牌为 Hawk Point）是去年 Phoenix CPU 的重大升级。在测试中，我们评估了华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 中全新 Ryzen 9 8945HS 的性能，并将其与前代产品 7945HS 和全新英特尔流星湖酷睿 7 155H 进行了比较。...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | AMD Radeon 780M
华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 G-Sync OLED 的游戏/多媒体笔记本电脑

华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 G-Sync OLED 的游戏/多媒体笔记本电脑

新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 不再将重点放在最高性能上，而是借助更轻薄、更紧凑的铝制外壳，面向更多的用户。因此，这款令人惊叹的游戏/多媒体混合型笔记本电脑不仅性能卓越，而且缺点也不多。...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

HP Omen 17-db0000: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 17-db0000

MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG

MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UV

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UU

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UI : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UI

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 OLED GA403UV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 OLED GA403UV

Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U

   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 和 G16 上市，配备 OLED 显示屏，起价 1,899 欧元

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)

» AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 8540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 3 8440U
   4x 3 GHz - 4.7 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-13705H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-13700H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i5-14500HX
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) R9 8945HS 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-12-10)