Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD R9 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS是凤凰系列的一款快速高端笔记本处理器。它基于支持超线程（16 线程）的Zen 4 架构，提供 8 个内核（八核心）。内核频率从 4（基本）到 5.2 GHz（单核提升）不等。处理器包含 8 MB 二级缓存和 16 MB 三级缓存。

性能

在我们的数据库中，7940HS 的平均性能与 酷睿 i9-12900HK和 Ryzen 7 7840HS的多线程基准测试成绩。

得益于出色的散热解决方案和 80 W 的 CPU 长期功耗限制，ROG Zephyrus G14 的性能得到了进一步提升。 ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY是我们所知的最快的 7940HS 笔记本电脑之一。截至 2023 年 8 月，它在 CPU 负载工作负载中的速度比我们数据库中采用相同芯片的最慢系统快约 15%。

该芯片集成了名为 Radeon 780M配备 12 个 CU，主频高达 2.8 GHz。此外，Phoenix 系列还包括一个具有 AV1 de- 和编码功能的视频引擎、一个基于 Xilinx FPGA 的新型XDNA AI 加速器（Ryzen AI），其速度应该比Apple M2 SOC 中的 AI 引擎更快；以及一个双通道 DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 内存控制器（支持 ECC）。连接功能包括 2 个可能的 USB 4（40 Gbps）端口和 20 个 PCIe 4.0 通道，用于 GPU 和 SSD。

Phoenix 系列采用单芯片设计（不同于 7045HX 系列的芯片组设计），在台积电采用现代4 纳米工艺制造。TDP 可在 35 至 45 瓦之间配置。

CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)

Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate4000 - 5200 MHz
Level 1 Cache512 KB
Level 2 Cache8 MB
Level 3 Cache16 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 16
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)35 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2023
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
40.9 pt (68%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 -4%
Intel Core i7-12800HX
39.5 -3%
Intel Core i7-13700H
39.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39.8 -3%
Intel Core i7-13705H
40.3 -1%
Intel Core i7-13650HX
40.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
40.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
40.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.9
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 0%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 0%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
41.1 0%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.8 2%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.3 3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 4%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 47%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106.3     median: 107 (60%)     max: 108 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 917     median: 946 (18%)     max: 972 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16867     median: 16946 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1788     median: 1790 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6604     median: 6605.5 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2673     median: 2661 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 277     avg: 283.4     median: 283.5 (80%)     max: 288 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.4     median: 30.5 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (80%)     max: 3.46 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7866     median: 7837 (47%)     max: 7963 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48859     median: 48751 (35%)     max: 49845 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86849     median: 87296 (56%)     max: 88529 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14232     avg: 14421     median: 14300 (17%)     max: 14731 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 87.3     median: 97 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.699 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7503     median: 7490 (12%)     max: 7580 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70912     median: 71085.5 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6417     avg: 6645     median: 6651.5 (78%)     max: 6776 MIPS
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.3     median: 144.2 (48%)     max: 150.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 288     avg: 295     median: 292.5 (67%)     max: 304.5 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (41%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15.1 (39%)     max: 15.2 GB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 307.6     median: 308 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 191.1     median: 189 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15630     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 16149 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 572     median: 532.8 (2%)     max: 653.976 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 81139     median: 81099.5 (62%)     max: 86583 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22367     median: 22422 (57%)     max: 25006 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88924     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88753     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91061     median: 91304.5 (76%)     max: 96047 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19897     median: 20990 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28183     median: 28247 (50%)     max: 30876 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11222     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2426     avg: 2628     median: 2661.5 (68%)     max: 2746 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 9899     avg: 12333     median: 12348 (48%)     max: 13470 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1983     median: 1986 (78%)     max: 2032 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11902     median: 12111 (22%)     max: 12500 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1880     median: 1905 (8%)     max: 1918 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11682     median: 11526 (36%)     max: 12141 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7923     median: 8014.5 (80%)     max: 8253 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 47560     median: 47496.5 (47%)     max: 49341 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 498.5     median: 501 (1%)     max: 515 ms
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (74%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (74%)     max: 271 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 320.2     median: 317 (58%)     max: 349 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1787     median: 1797 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 100.7     median: 98.9 (17%)     max: 130.1 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 103.6     median: 107.6 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.76     avg: 12.4     median: 13.9 (9%)     max: 20.1 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 27.4     median: 25.8 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 21. 12:49:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:30:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.016s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.017s ... 0.033s

#11 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.047s ... 0.08s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.164s ... 1.243s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.244s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.244s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor

Geekom AE7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、DDR5 内存、现代接口和一个问题的 NUC 迷你 PC

Geekom AE7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、DDR5 内存、现代接口和一个问题的 NUC 迷你 PC

Geekom AE7 迷你 PC 与著名的英特尔 NUC 型号相对应，现在由华硕负责销售。CPU 采用的是 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS，其强大的 iGPU 让它大有可为。不过，最重要的是 CPU 的可用功率，这对性能有重大影响。在本次评测中，我们对 Geekom AE7 进行了所有基准测试，并对这款迷你 PC...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 578 g
Geekom A7

带 0.5 升机箱的 Geekom A7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD 的高级迷你 PC

从外观上看，Geekom A7 的时尚设计给人留下了深刻印象。看一下数据表，你也会对 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 抱有很大期望。因此，从定价来看，Geekom A7 主打高端市场。我们将通过大量的测量和基准测试来分析这款迷你电脑是否符合这一要求。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 417 g
Radeon RX 7700S 性能首秀：框架笔记本 16 评测

Radeon RX 7700S 性能首秀：框架笔记本 16 评测

名字可能很普通，但设计却与众不同。环保型 Laptop 16 继承了 Laptop 13.5 的所有优点，并将其提升了一个档次，配备了更多可升级和可定制的组件，包括可拆卸的 Radeon RDNA 3 GPU。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | AMD Radeon RX 7700S | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
华硕 TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI 笔记本电脑评测：140 瓦GeForce RTX 4070 售价 1400 美元

华硕 TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI 笔记本电脑评测：140 瓦GeForce RTX 4070 售价 1400 美元

与华丽的 ROG 系列相比，它的外观显得 "朴素"，但对于预算有限的玩家来说，注重速度和简洁才是最重要的。不过，潜在买家应注意所有的偷工减料。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.5 kg
华硕 ROG Flow X13 GV302XV (2023) 评测：配备 AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 60 W Nvidia RTX 4060 的轻薄游戏敞篷跑车

华硕 ROG Flow X13 GV302XV (2023) 评测：配备 AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 60 W Nvidia RTX 4060 的轻薄游戏敞篷跑车

与前几代产品相比，今年的华硕 ROG Flow X13 在许多方面都有所改进。新款 Flow X13 GV302XV 在 13.4 英寸可折叠小机身中配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 Nvidia RTX 4060 智能处理器。ROG Flow X13 的竞争对手并不多，在我们的测试中也基本达到了预期。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 13.40" | 1.3 kg

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro: AMD Radeon 780M, 0.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus 系列 UM790 Pro 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 Radeon 780M 使其优于竞争对手

Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 14 Zen 4笔记本电脑回顾：很多重要的变化

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: AMD Radeon RX 7600S, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » 华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版FA617XS评测：拥有长达20小时运行时间的AMD笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00"
  Review » AMD Radeon 780M iGPU分析--AMD新的RDNA-3 GPU对其竞争对手的挑战

  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS分析--Zen4 Phoenix的理想效率是Apple

  Review » 华硕ROG Zephyrus G14评测--配备AMD Zen4 Phoenix和RTX 4090的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R3S4: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R3S4

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41, R9 7940HS: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41, R9 7940HS

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M6500XV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 15 M6500XV

Framework Laptop 16: AMD Radeon RX 7700S, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Framework Laptop 16

HP Omen 16-xf0000ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-xf0000ng

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XI

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI

Acer Swift X SFX16-61G: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX16-61G

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XZ

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XI

Razer Blade 14 RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 RTX 4060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XV

Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: AMD Radeon RX 7600S, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY

Framework Laptop 16: AMD Radeon RX 7700S, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Framework Laptop 16 现在支持四块 M.2 固态硬盘，存储容量高达 16 TB

   » Framework 笔记本电脑砖系统可利用乐高脚垫、轮子、电缆支架等扩展笔记本电脑

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Phoenix (Zen 4)

» AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
   8x 4.2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z1
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7545U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 3 7440U
   4x 3 GHz - 4.7 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i5-14500HX
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13650HX
   14x 1.9 GHz - 4.9 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)