Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

AMD Z1 Extreme

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 是凤凰系列中速度最快的高端笔记本电脑处理器，也是 U 系列中速度最快的机型。它基于Zen 4 架构，提供 8 个内核（八核心），支持 SMT（超线程，16 线程）。内核频率从 3.3（基本）到 5.1 GHz（单核提升）。处理器包含 8 MB 二级缓存和 16 MB 三级缓存。

根据工作负载的不同，R7 7840U 的性能仅略低于Ryzen 7 7840HS(更高的基本时钟速度和 TDP）。与上一代产品相比Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U相比，由于采用了 Zen 4 架构和更高的时钟速度，7840U 的速度明显更快。与同类产品相比 Ryzen 7 7840U相比，Z1 Extreme 没有提供 AI 引擎。

该芯片集成了名为Radeon 780M配备 12 个 CU，主频高达 2.7 GHz。此外，Phoenix 系列还包括一个具有 AV1 de- 和编码功能的视频引擎、一个基于 Xilinx FPGA 的全新XDNA AI 加速器（Ryzen AI），其速度应该比Apple M2 SOC 中的 AI 引擎更快；以及一个双通道 DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 内存控制器（支持 ECC）。连接功能包括 2 个可能的 USB 4（40 Gbps）端口和 20 个 PCIe 4.0 通道，用于 GPU 和 SSD。

Phoenix 系列采用单芯片设计（不同于 7045HX 系列的芯片组设计），在台积电采用现代4 纳米工艺制造。TDP 可在 15 至 30 瓦之间配置。

SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)

Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix (Zen 4)

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate3300 - 5100 MHz
Level 1 Cache512 KB
Level 2 Cache8 MB
Level 3 Cache16 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 16
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)30 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date03/25/2023
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
38.9 pt (65%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
37.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
38.2 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
38.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
38.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-12700H
38.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
38.6 -1%
Intel Core i5-13500HX
38.6 -1%
Intel Core i7-12800H
38.7 -1%
Intel Core i7-13620H
38.7 -1%
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
38.9
Intel Core i7-12850HX
38.9 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
38.9 0%
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.2 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.3 1%
Intel Core i7-1370P
39.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
39.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 1%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 1%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 22%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 54%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13004     avg: 14361     median: 14960 (14%)     max: 15120 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1748     median: 1733 (74%)     max: 1779 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 672     avg: 679     median: 672 (75%)     max: 692 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5109     avg: 5576     median: 5794 (14%)     max: 5825 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2050     avg: 2261     median: 2336 (15%)     max: 2397 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
012024036048060072084096010801200132014401560168018001920204021602280Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 262     avg: 270     median: 268 (75%)     max: 280 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 56966     avg: 61359     median: 62657 (36%)     max: 64454 MIPS
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6077     avg: 6197     median: 6196.5 (73%)     max: 6316 MIPS
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.8     median: 18.4 (32%)     max: 18.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 365     avg: 392.3     median: 366 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 213     avg: 213.5     median: 213.5 (2%)     max: 214 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15202     avg: 18467     median: 18941.5 (48%)     max: 20784 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15761 Points (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19305     avg: 23844     median: 24785 (44%)     max: 26499 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6281     avg: 8599     median: 8764.5 (37%)     max: 10587 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2530     avg: 2537     median: 2534 (65%)     max: 2550 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 10872     avg: 11404     median: 11358.5 (45%)     max: 12026 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1907.5 (75%)     max: 1956 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9589     avg: 10256     median: 10258 (18%)     max: 10917 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 536     avg: 546     median: 546 (1%)     max: 556 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86617     avg: 89260     median: 89260 (74%)     max: 91903 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 248     avg: 262.5     median: 262.5 (74%)     max: 277 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 345.3     median: 304 (56%)     max: 432 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1693     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (65%)     max: 1718 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 59.6 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.7 Watt (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.09     avg: 10.5     median: 10.4 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.95     avg: 7.7     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 12.3 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
36.1 Points per Watt (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 07:36:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.016s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.013s ... 0.041s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.534s ... 0.576s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.576s

#12 return log +0s ... 0.576s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme processor

华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池，成为最佳游戏掌上电脑

华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池，成为最佳游戏掌上电脑

新款华硕 ROG Ally X 是 ROG Ally 的升级版，仍然使用相同的 AMD 处理器和 7 英寸 IPS 面板，但几乎所有其他方面都有所改进。除了改进人体工学设计和更好的操纵杆外，这款游戏掌机还配备了额外的内存和更大的 80 Wh 电池。...
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | AMD Radeon 780M | 7.00" | 685 g
联想Legion Go 评测

联想Legion Go 游戏掌上电脑评测：创意不错，但执行不够完美

联想Legion Go 是一款与众不同的可拆卸设备。在这款设备上，你只需取下两个控制器，而不是取下键盘，就能把游戏掌上电脑变成平板电脑。它的 FPS 模式尤其有趣，可以把控制器变成鼠标和键盘。遗憾的是，在我们的测试中，并非一切运行都很流畅。...
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | AMD Radeon 780M | 8.80" | 845 g
华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机

华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机

华硕ROG Ally是一款强大的游戏掌机，是Valve的Steam Deck的直接竞争对手。得益于来自AMD的强大硬件，基于最新的Zen4 Phoenix移动处理器，这款游戏掌机甚至可以流畅地处理现代游戏。 ...
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | AMD Radeon 780M | 7.00" | 611 g

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Radeon 780M, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally X

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Radeon 780M, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Radeon 780M, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Go

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Radeon 780M, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » 借助华硕 ROG Ally 显示屏和 Gamescope 中的 VRR 支持，SteamOS 向第三方手持设备靠拢

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Radeon 780M, 7.00", 0.6 kg
   » 华硕ROG盟友：高管证实玩家可以暂缓最近麻烦的BIOS更新

   » 华硕ROG Ally：开启预购，更便宜的AMD Ryzen Z1型号将随后推出

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Phoenix (Zen 4)

» AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
   8x 4.2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
   8x 4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z1
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7545U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 3 7440U
   4x 3 GHz - 4.7 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
   6x 4 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
   6x 3.5 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Z1 Extreme 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)