Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 760M

AMD Radeon 760M

AMD Radeon 760M 是 Ryzen 7040 系列笔记本电脑(Phoenix,如 Ryzen 5 7640HS)的集成 GPU。iGPU 基于全新的RDNA3架构,12 个 CU 中的 8 个(= 512 着色器)主频高达 2.8 GHz(取决于 CPU 型号)。与 前代 Radeon 660M一样,760M 也支持硬件光线追踪技术,但其性能太慢,无法在当前游戏中使用。

由于采用了新的架构和更高的时钟频率,Radeon 760M 的速度应明显快于旧的 Radeon 660M.

由于采用了现代 4 纳米工艺和巧妙的省电功能,功耗相对较低(据 AMD 称)。前两个型号的整个芯片的 TDP 可以配置在 15 - 54 瓦之间。

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed1500 - 2800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 760MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS6 x 4300 MHz, 45 W? MHz2600 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS6 x 3500 MHz, 28 W? MHz2600 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS6 x 4300 MHz, 45 W? MHz2600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2600 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 -14%
2.34 -14%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.34 -14%
2.45 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.5 -8%
2.58 -5%
2.62 -3%
2.68 -1%
2.69 -1%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.71
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 3%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.8 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 7%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.91 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 10%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3.01 11%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 11%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.03 12%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 13%
...
20.4 653%
max:
33.3 1129%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2244     avg: 2372     median: 2371.5 (7%)     max: 2499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1997     avg: 2116     median: 2115.5 (6%)     max: 2234 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -95%
...
1810 -14%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
1814 -14%
1890 -11%
1989 -6%
2021 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2046 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2049 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 -3%
2070 -2%
AMD Radeon 760M
2116
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 4%
AMD Radeon 680M
2219 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 9%
2472 17%
2601 23%
2717 28%
2766 31%
2805 33%
...
19434 818%
max:
36259 1614%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27608     avg: 28339     median: 28339 (27%)     max: 29070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 40615     avg: 41767     median: 41767 (10%)     max: 42919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5664     avg: 5694     median: 5694 (10%)     max: 5724 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6121     avg: 6142     median: 6141.5 (7%)     max: 6162 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
287628 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3382 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9564     avg: 9782     median: 9781.5 (13%)     max: 9999 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 9356     avg: 9603     median: 9603 (8%)     max: 9850 Points
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -13%
8553 -11%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 -9%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 -8%
9448 -2%
9523 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 0%
AMD Radeon 760M
9603
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 1%
9840 2%
9910 3%
9950 4%
10005 4%
AMD Radeon 680M
10018 4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 7%
10498 9%
...
59943 524%
max:
104201 985%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
32985 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
28693 Points (16%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
25270 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
25293 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
25664 -11%
AMD FirePro W7170M
25898 -10%
26569 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
27315 -5%
AMD Radeon 680M
27350 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 -3%
28186 -2%
AMD Radeon 760M
28693
29214 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29448 3%
29844 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 4%
30252 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 10%
31800 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 13%
...
132443 362%
max:
170928 496%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
35337 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14191 points (10%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 187.2     avg: 189.3     median: 189.3 (11%)     max: 191.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
48.6 fps (9%)
3.3 -93%
...
AMD Radeon 660M
33.5 -31%
34.74 -29%
37.4 -23%
42.4 -13%
43.21 -11%
44.4 -9%
44.86 -8%
45 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -1%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 2%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 7%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 8%
53.4 10%
59.4 22%
61.4 26%
62.5 29%
62.7 29%
62.7 29%
...
536 1003%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
123.2 fps (9%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 196.8     median: 196.8 (1%)     max: 289 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 6104     avg: 14630     median: 14630 (4%)     max: 23156 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
510 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
981 Samples/s (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57.6 Watt (8%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.5 Watt (8%)
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.2 Watt (13%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.4 fps per Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (35%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
35
low FSR 68 1280x720
51
low 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
64.1
low 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
67
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.7
low 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
42.1
low 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
91.6
low 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
48.9
low 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
35.9
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
47.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
66.3
low 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
105.5
low 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
88
low 1920x1080
28.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
74.7
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.9
low 1920x1080
77.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
47.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
104.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
117.9
low 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
53.8
low 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 40.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 32.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 28.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
62.3
low 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
71.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
123.1
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 16.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 13.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 13.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
29.6
low 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
35.5
low 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
86
low 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
132.2
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
172.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
121 133.3 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.2 52.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.8 44.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.8 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
45.1 48.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1 36.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7 29.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.3 61.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.5 30.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 22.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
143.7 151.6 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
110.9 113.4 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.2 75.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.8 68.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
115 123 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.9 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
141 150.4 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
126.2 138.4 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.2 50.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1 18.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
101.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
103.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Black Myth: Wukong2015
Once Human27.119.914.914.2
The First Descendant36.623.11915.4
F1 245850.438.5
Senua's Saga Hellblade 225.515.8
Ghost of Tsushima43.638.430.528.522.7
Horizon Forbidden West23.820.615.414.7
Last Epoch45.235.328.821.515.3
Helldivers 228.121.619.218.4
Enshrouded16.214.912.99.48
Palworld47.936.723.620.9
The Finals54.238.835.424.813.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202348433227
EA Sports WRC28.919.816.815.4
Alan Wake 216.413.7
Total War Pharaoh77.86247.442.924.1
EA Sports FC 2447.9
Counter-Strike 2104.977.439.426.215.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty33.22617.817.7
Baldur's Gate 329.52519.1
Lies of P33.727.924
The Crew Motorfest252319
Starfield14.37.995.04
Armored Core 62016142315.8
Immortals of Aveum15.413.3
Atlas Fallen31.129.224.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart20.5
F1 2371.663.645.5
Star Wars Jedi Survivor877
Resident Evil 4 Remake23.516.814.6
Company of Heroes 346.438.929.6
Sons of the Forest3219.619
Atomic Heart38.628.816.7
Returnal201917
Hogwarts Legacy25.819.815.2
Dead Space Remake20.719.716.216.1
The Witcher 3 v4.0048.237.315
High On Life50.628.823.5
A Plague Tale Requiem18.815.713.7
F1 2275.966.549
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6302418
F1 2021172.182.561.626.1
Strange Brigade127514437
Far Cry 574383533
X-Plane 11.11473529
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark582922
Dota 2 Reborn1481127367
The Witcher 3119763623
GTA V1461325018
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
20
18
6
4
27
11
7
1
30
12
2
18
4
1
6





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 19:07:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.026s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11566 +0.024s ... 0.05s

#10 got single benchmarks 11566 +0.015s ... 0.065s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.53s ... 0.595s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.595s

#14 Got 197 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 0.617s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.617s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.028s ... 0.645s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +1.476s ... 2.121s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.125s

#19 return log +0s ... 2.125s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 760M graphics card

惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 评测:依靠 Zen 4 的强大办公笔记本电脑

惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A 评测:依靠 Zen 4 的强大办公笔记本电脑

惠普的一些笔记本给人的感觉更像是塑料炸弹,而 ZBook Firefly 看起来却相当高端。我们测试了目前基于 AMD 的 14 英寸 G10 A 机型,并揭示了它的优缺点。...
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | AMD Radeon 760M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
使用新驱动程序测试 AMD Radeon 780M 和 760M iGPU 的性能

使用新驱动程序测试 AMD Radeon 780M 和 760M iGPU 的性能

在我们首次评测全新集成 Radeon 780M 近三个月后,AMD 终于发布了该 GPU 的官方驱动程序。因此,我们将使用合成和游戏基准测试再次检验 Radeon 780M 和性能较弱的 Radeon 760M 的性能。...
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS | AMD Radeon 760M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg

Lenovo Yoga 7 16AHP9: AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 16AHP9

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AHP9

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AHP9: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AHP9

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9

Lenovo Yoga 7 14APH9: AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14APH9

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14AHP9

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A

Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter