Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M 是适用于笔记本电脑的 Ryzen 7040 系列中的集成 GPU（Phoenix，例如 Ryzen 9 7940HS）。 iGPU 基于新的 RDNA3 架构，具有 12 个 CU（= 768 个着色器），主频高达 3 GHz（取决于 CPU 型号）。与前身 Radeon 680M 一样，780M 支持硬件光线追踪，但性能太慢，无法在当前游戏中使用。

得益于新的架构和更高的时钟速度，Radeon 780M 应该明显比旧的 Radeon 680M 更快。这意味着要求最高的游戏应该可以在最低图形设置下运行（例如《赛博朋克 2077》），而要求较低的游戏（例如《FIFA 23》）可以在更高的设置和分辨率 (1080p) 下运行。 2023 年初，Radeon 780M 成为市场上最快的 iGPU。

得益于现代 4 纳米工艺和巧妙的节能功能，功耗相对较低（根据 AMD 的说法）。前两种型号的整个芯片可配置在 15 - 54 瓦 TDP 之间。

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines768 - unified
TMUs48
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed1500 - 3000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 780MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G8 x 4200 MHz, 65 W2900 MHz? MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H8 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS8 x 4000 MHz, 45 W? MHz2800 MHz
» show 12 more
min. - max.? - 2900 MHz2700 - 2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.5 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.24 -8%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.3 -7%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.36 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.44 -3%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.5 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.53
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.59 2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65 3%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.74 6%
Intel Arc A310
3.74 6%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.78 7%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.96 12%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 16%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.09 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 478%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 843%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1707     avg: 3029     median: 3164.5 (9%)     max: 3517 Points
+ 56 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1496     avg: 2717     median: 2831 (7%)     max: 3196 Points
+ 56 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 -24%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2070 -24%
AMD Radeon 760M
2116 -22%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -19%
AMD Radeon 680M
2219 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
2472 -9%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
2601 -4%
AMD Radeon 780M
2717
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 7%
Intel Arc A350M
2993 10%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 10%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3075 13%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 615%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
36259 1235%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 343466     avg: 420881     median: 429810 (43%)     max: 451929 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 165917     avg: 182479     median: 173430 (20%)     max: 226039 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25056     avg: 34534     median: 35532 (34%)     max: 39559 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 27771     avg: 46628     median: 48112 (12%)     max: 53972 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4187     avg: 7156     median: 7376 (12%)     max: 8172 Points
+ 56 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4550     avg: 7746     median: 7986.5 (9%)     max: 8816 Points
+ 56 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 208360     avg: 248943     median: 233585 (26%)     max: 317851 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
4696 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2548     avg: 4874     median: 4968 (6%)     max: 5972 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 25137     avg: 28425     median: 28846.5 (27%)     max: 29800 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 31799     avg: 34069     median: 34446 (13%)     max: 35538 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7732     avg: 12187     median: 12346 (16%)     max: 13985 Points
+ 53 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7868     avg: 12467     median: 12785 (11%)     max: 14249 Points
+ 54 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305 -9%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
11314 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -5%
Intel Arc A310
11915 -4%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11984 -4%
Intel Arc A370M
12066 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
12289 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
12467
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
12479 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
12583 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
12797 3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12801 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13515 8%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
13524 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13581 9%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
13714 10%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 381%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
104201 736%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 29746     avg: 40726     median: 41622 (12%)     max: 44741 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 25423     avg: 35269     median: 35758 (20%)     max: 38818 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 41483     avg: 54811     median: 55425.5 (61%)     max: 64978 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 -20%
AMD Radeon 680M
43633 -20%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
44877 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46269 -16%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47870 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48758 -11%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
50971 -7%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
52117 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54320 -1%
AMD Radeon 780M
54811
Intel Arc A770M
55811 2%
AMD Radeon 890M
58138 6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61850 13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61993 13%
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
68064 24%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
87172 59%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
45913 Points (60%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 37928     avg: 42738     median: 42703 (56%)     max: 45612 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 17.7     avg: 22.5     median: 23.1 (7%)     max: 25 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 93     avg: 108.2     median: 110 (27%)     max: 117 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 58.9     avg: 72.1     median: 74.5 (11%)     max: 77.6 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 25.2     avg: 29.1     median: 30.1 (7%)     max: 32 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 29.45     avg: 53.2     median: 56 (14%)     max: 65 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 60.8     avg: 68.3     median: 68.5 (19%)     max: 75 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 18.1     avg: 22     median: 20.1 (18%)     max: 40.9 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 44.3     avg: 52.4     median: 53.3 (21%)     max: 56.6 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 65.5     avg: 81.8     median: 86.5 (14%)     max: 90.9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 75.6     avg: 82.5     median: 84.2 (15%)     max: 87.4 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 89.7     avg: 99.6     median: 98.9 (27%)     max: 109 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 99.64     avg: 127.2     median: 134 (15%)     max: 140 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.2     avg: 28     median: 28.6 (6%)     max: 31.8 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 53.2     avg: 68.4     median: 69.2 (14%)     max: 79.8 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 83.66     avg: 101.8     median: 105 (12%)     max: 109 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 18.4     avg: 22.1     median: 22.2 (7%)     max: 25.8 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 70.44     avg: 86.9     median: 87.7 (13%)     max: 93.6 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 83.02     avg: 116.1     median: 124 (14%)     max: 132 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 68.89     avg: 80.9     median: 82.4 (14%)     max: 86.1 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 47.09     avg: 60.9     median: 67.7 (13%)     max: 67.9 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 114.18     avg: 134     median: 134 (22%)     max: 148 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 22.8     avg: 35.5     median: 36.2 (24%)     max: 41.5 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 99.81     avg: 122.1     median: 122.9 (14%)     max: 133 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 20.3     avg: 22.7     median: 22.6 (15%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.04     avg: 56.7     median: 57.5 (28%)     max: 62 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 25.34     avg: 34.7     median: 36.2 (22%)     max: 38.9 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 25.7     avg: 35.1     median: 36.3 (11%)     max: 39.9 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 17.4     avg: 24.4     median: 25.3 (7%)     max: 27.2 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 52.3     avg: 60.8     median: 61.4 (6%)     max: 65.9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 7.51     avg: 11.2     median: 11.6 (11%)     max: 13 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 39     avg: 46.2     median: 47.1 (8%)     max: 50.1 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 11.2     avg: 17     median: 14.9 (2%)     max: 31 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 26.1     avg: 31.2     median: 31.3 (15%)     max: 35.6 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 19.7     avg: 23.5     median: 24.3 (16%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 14     avg: 19.8     median: 20.7 (9%)     max: 21.1 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11162     avg: 16037     median: 16792.5 (12%)     max: 17730 points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
0 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 117.1     avg: 186.7     median: 188.6 (11%)     max: 253 fps
+ 51 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 99.6 %
+ 51 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 27.1     avg: 47.8     median: 27.3 (11%)     max: 88.9 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 58.3     avg: 59.4     median: 59.2 (11%)     max: 60.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.4 -25%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
44.86 -24%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
45 -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -19%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -17%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 -12%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -12%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
53.4 -10%
AMD Radeon 780M
59.4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
61.4 3%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
62.5 5%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
62.7 6%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 6%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 7%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 9%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 9%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
65.5 10%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 802%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 112.3     avg: 133.3     median: 141 (10%)     max: 146.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 159.6     avg: 160.3     median: 160.3 (18%)     max: 161 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 217     avg: 220.5     median: 220.5 (5%)     max: 224 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 288     avg: 294.5     median: 294.5 (17%)     max: 300.9 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 552.4     avg: 563     median: 563.2 (4%)     max: 574 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 49.9     avg: 166.9     median: 104.6 (1%)     max: 315 fps
+ 49 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 8     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 26 fps
+ 23 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 15316     avg: 28786     median: 29609 (9%)     max: 33077 points
+ 51 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 29145     median: 29851.5 (8%)     max: 35544 points
+ 50 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 597     avg: 893     median: 817 (3%)     max: 1173 Samples/s
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 991     avg: 1696     median: 1522 (3%)     max: 2312 Samples/s
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 7230     avg: 9327     median: 9801 (11%)     max: 10495 points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.4     avg: 62.2     median: 60 (9%)     max: 106 Watt
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 58.2     median: 57.8 (8%)     max: 84 Watt
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 33.3     avg: 57.6     median: 54.5 (12%)     max: 83.5 Watt
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (43%)     max: 0.754 fps per Watt
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.301     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (41%)     max: 0.797 fps per Watt
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 37.6     avg: 61     median: 60.4 (19%)     max: 81.3 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.8     avg: 70.8     median: 69.9 (9%)     max: 104.4 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.1983     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (38%)     max: 0.4004 fps per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 32.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (63%)     max: 47 dB(A)
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

2024
low 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
82
Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.1
EA Sports FC 25

EA Sports FC 25

2024
low 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Settings 1280x720
116.6
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
34.6
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
26
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
31.7
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
7.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
20.1
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
21 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
49
low FSR 68 1280x720
59
Once Human

Once Human

2024
low 1920x1080
39.3 39.3 49.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.2 26.6 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.7 21.6 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 19.1 25.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
96.1
77.3
71.8
The First Descendant

The First Descendant

2024
low 1920x1080
44.3 59.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9 37.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.8 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.9 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
98.1
71.9
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
43.3 53.6 69 73 76.8 83.4 83.4 85.9 90.9 91.5 92.1 94.8 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.4 37.1 61.1 64.4 65 70.9 71.9 72.1 75.5 78.2 78.3 80.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3 27.1 43.8 46 47.3 51.3 51.4 52.3 55.1 57 57.7 59.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4 9.5 10.1 11.1 12.6 13.4 13.9 14.4 14.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.3 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.2 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
10.6 26.9 32.5 32.5 33.3 34.9 36.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5 21.4 24.6 25.6 26.5 28.3 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 18.8 21.4 21.8 23 25.3 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 11.8 14.9 16.3 16.7 19.7 20.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
0 (!)
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
27.7 28.5 29.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.6 25.2 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5 17.7 18.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
42.6
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
65.5 75 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.3 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
94.8
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
38.4 46.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
95
90.4
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
34 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
57
52
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
23 30.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
48.8
37.6
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
16.8 24.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6 20.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10 14.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
45.9
29.1
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
37.9 46.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.3 39.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5 29.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
87.5
72.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
141.1 158.4 173.5 175.6 175.8 178.2 179.9 ~ 169 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.2 127.7 134.9 134.9 137.7 139.4 143 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 120.2 127.1 128.9 130.5 133 135.5 ~ 126 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
52.7 57.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.8 53.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.4 51.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 34.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
70.2 76.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.7 58.5 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.8 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.6 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
125.6
119.9
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
15 19 25 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 17 22 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 14 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
37
23
30
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
52 56 68 68 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 50 57 61 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29 36 38 45 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 31 37 41 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
122
101
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
30.6 42.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 25.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
99.3
76.9
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
22.4 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.6 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.7
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
24 33.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.4 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.3 9.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
58.3
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
81.9 87.1 87.9 89.5 89.6 89.9 90.8 92.2 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.8 65.1 65.6 68 68.6 71.6 75.5 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2 38.6 40.4 43.8 54.1 58.1 61 61.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 30.3 32 34.7 46.9 53.9 55.2 55.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
154.3
159.8
142
162.8
147.8
165.3
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
62
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
101.2 107.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.6 98.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73 78.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 71.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
169.1
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
102.4 134.8 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.4 96.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7 61.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 38.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
167.8
126.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
32.5 32.6 32.7 33.8 33.9 34.3 35.5 36.1 37.3 37.4 37.8 38 38.5 38.5 38.7 39.1 39.2 40.4 40.5 40.5 41 41.3 41.4 41.5 41.5 41.9 42.4 42.4 43.4 43.8 43.9 44 44.1 44.6 45 45.4 46.3 47.9 52.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3 24.8 26.1 26.4 26.5 27.8 28.5 28.6 29.4 29.5 29.5 29.9 29.9 30.3 31 31.1 31.7 31.8 31.8 31.8 32.2 32.6 32.9 33.1 33.4 33.7 33.9 34.3 34.5 35 35.1 35.2 35.6 37.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8 20.1 21 21.5 21.9 22.1 22.1 22.4 23.5 23.6 23.6 23.7 23.7 23.8 23.8 24.8 24.9 25 25 25.1 25.3 25.8 25.8 26.3 26.3 26.7 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.7 27.8 28.2 29 29.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5 16.9 18.7 18.9 19.1 19.1 19.8 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.4 20.4 20.5 21.5 21.7 21.7 21.8 22 22.4 22.9 23 23.3 23.4 23.4 24.3 24.4 24.5 25.8 26.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
74.1
53.9
62.7
59.6
77.4
76.4
61.7
58.5
73.4
80.6
55.4
69.7
53.6
60.6
72.6
76.3
69
69.1
65.2
62.8
62.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
4.8
3.9
5.2
Steam Deck 1280x720
58.5
55.1
52.2
52.2
Ultra Preset (FSR on) 1920x1080
26.2
31.6
23.1
33.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.9
18
21.7
21.6
21.6
22.4
18.1
20.7
19.2
21.6
22.4
20.7
20.7
20.2
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2 20.4 30.2 31 32.4 33 33.3 35 38 38.5 38.6 39.1 39.2 39.6 40.1 40.5 41.1 41.6 42 42.5 42.8 43.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7 15.7 24.3 25.6 25.7 26.3 27.4 28.5 29.9 30 30.4 30.8 30.9 31.4 31.5 31.5 31.7 32.1 32.7 33 33.3 33.7 34.8 36.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.8 13.8 21.1 21.6 21.7 22.2 22.6 22.9 24.5 24.7 25.1 25.3 25.7 25.8 26 26.1 26.2 26.6 27 27.5 27.5 28.1 28.9 29.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.4 13.5 20.2 21.2 21.2 21.2 21.9 22.2 24 24.4 24.6 24.6 25.1 25.4 25.7 25.7 25.8 26 26.5 27 27 28 29.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
56.3
51.3
64.7
30.7
60.3
45.8
48.9
63.4
67.4
60.8
65.9
66.7
60.5
57
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
42.2
40.3
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
51 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.3 37.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
90.2
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
26 27 30.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22 23 26.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19 19 21.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15 16 19.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45
Armored Core 6

Armored Core 6

2023
low 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Immortals of Aveum

Immortals of Aveum

2023
low 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atlas Fallen

Atlas Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

2023
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7 20.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
42.4 43.2 44.9 58.9 67.3 69.9 72.1 73.2 74.1 75.3 75.4 76 76.6 78.7 79.3 79.4 81.2 81.6 82 83.2 85.5 85.9 89.6 89.8 90.3 90.8 92.1 93.8 94.5 95.4 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1 38.6 39.9 52.4 54.4 61.4 62.5 63.4 64.5 65.8 65.9 65.9 67 70.2 70.6 71.2 72.3 72.4 72.7 75.5 76.4 76.7 79 79 80.3 80.6 83.1 83.6 84.3 84.4 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3 28.4 29.1 38.9 43.7 43.8 44.1 44.1 45.6 46.1 48.1 48.2 49.2 49.9 50 51.3 51.6 51.8 52.5 52.7 53 53.8 56.5 56.6 57.2 57.6 57.8 59.8 60.8 60.9 61.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 7.6 8.9 9.6 10 10 10.6 11.3 11.6 11.6 11.9 12.1 12.2 13 13 13.6 13.9 13.9 13.9 14.5 14.6 14.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.9 7.4 8.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
127.3
74.7
123.1
108.5
98.9
110.7
155
130.9
154.4
133.5
139.3
75.8
137.8
124.6
122
151.1
130.6
150
151.3
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.1
Star Wars Jedi Survivor

Star Wars Jedi Survivor

2023
low 1920x1080
22.7 23.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20 20.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 18.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Ray Tracing 1920x1080
8.7
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 4 Remake

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3

2023
low 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sons of the Forest

Sons of the Forest

2023
low 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atomic Heart

Atomic Heart

2023
low 1920x1080
40.4 58.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6 46 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1 27.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6 21.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
98.9
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
22 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
42
Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy

2023
low 1920x1080
29.8 35.2 37.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.9 24.8 26.2 36 37.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.7 19.4 19.5 26.3 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.7 14.8 14.9 21.1 22.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
14.9 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Space Remake

Dead Space Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Witcher 3 v4.00

The Witcher 3 v4.00

2023
low 1920x1080
52.6 52.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.2 42.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.9 36.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.6 32 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
91
High On Life

High On Life

2023
low 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Callisto Protocol

The Callisto Protocol

2022
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed Unbound

Need for Speed Unbound

2022
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Spider-Man Miles Morales

Spider-Man Miles Morales

2022
low 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022

2022
low 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
A Plague Tale Requiem

A Plague Tale Requiem

2022
low 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Quarry

The Quarry

2022
low 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
47 62.3 65.4 68.2 68.9 70.2 72.2 75.3 77 77.6 79 79.7 80.4 80.6 82.6 83.5 84.2 86.6 88.3 92.5 94.2 94.6 94.8 94.9 94.9 96.9 98.8 99 99.5 99.6 99.8 99.8 109.9 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.5 52.7 58.4 59.3 60 62.1 65.2 67.5 68.3 68.4 70.2 71 71.3 72.5 72.9 74.3 74.7 77.3 77.9 80.7 82.7 83.6 83.6 85.4 85.7 85.9 85.9 86.7 87.6 88.4 88.4 89.8 95 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.7 40.2 42.6 43.7 45.3 46 46.6 50.3 50.5 50.5 51.8 52 52.6 53.6 54.2 54.8 55.2 56.7 57.9 61.5 62.2 62.3 62.6 63 64.6 64.8 65.1 65.6 66.2 66.3 66.6 66.7 70.6 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9 11.4 11.6 12 12.4 12.8 13.3 13.6 13.9 14 14.3 14.6 15.1 16.9 17.6 17.7 17.8 17.9 17.9 18 18.2 18.4 18.4 18.5 19.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
133.5
152.8
100.4
166.2
151.3
85.4
143.8
121.8
164.2
133.2
106.1
112.5
163.5
141.8
171.9
149.8
170
172.5
143.9
126.9
167.9
186.7
160.6
128.2
111.8
145.7
130.7
132.1
Vampire Bloodhunt

Vampire Bloodhunt

2022
low 1920x1080
84.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ghostwire Tokyo

Ghostwire Tokyo

2022
low 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9 43.2 43.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.3 38.2 45.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.4 41.2 45 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.2 26.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
34.3 44.3 48.2 48.8 49.8 51.6 55.8 60.4 62 62.6 62.7 63.4 63.4 63.7 64.7 65.8 71.6 72 72.8 73.9 74.6 74.9 77.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.4 28.6 36.2 37.1 38 39.9 39.9 42.5 44.8 44.8 45.6 46.8 47 47.1 47.4 49.1 52 52.2 52.8 53.3 53.4 54.7 55.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.6 21.4 24 24.9 26.3 27.5 29.8 29.9 30.2 30.4 31.5 32 32 32.7 33.3 34.5 36.6 36.7 36.8 37.1 37.1 37.9 38.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5 17.2 19.5 19.8 22.2 23.8 23.9 24.1 25 25.2 25.2 25.3 26.5 27.1 28.1 29.5 29.6 29.6 29.8 30 30.3 30.6 31.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
116.9
128.4
131.4
140.6
111.8
62.6
87.8
151.2
108.8
98.6
118.1
139
147.5
116.3
97.4
130.8
142.1
126.3
84.3
84.1
127.9
121
110.1
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

2022
low 1920x1080
22 26.3 26.7 30 38 38.6 39.3 39.5 42 43.9 44.6 53.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 20.7 20.8 25 29.9 30.2 30.9 31.2 34 34.6 36.3 42 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 15.1 17.3 20 24 24.4 24.4 24.6 25 26.9 28.6 30.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 15.9 22.3 23 23.3 24.8 25.2 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
88.6
75
56.7
71.5
65.5
43.1
43
GRID Legends

GRID Legends

2022
low 1920x1080
73.5 93.4 102.1 103.4 104.4 105.7 106.1 117.3 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.4 74.6 80.5 81 81.7 82.3 86.3 92.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.3 55.5 56.4 61 62.3 62.5 62.5 68.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.8 42 42.4 46.7 48.4 49.2 49.4 52.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
141.6
150.6
139.5
112
136.1
115.9
141.4
136.2
Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2

2022
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Extraction

Rainbow Six Extraction

2022
low 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
God of War

God of War

2022
low 1920x1080
24.7 27.5 32 34.8 39.2 39.9 42.3 42.6 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5 22.5 25.8 29 31.7 32.5 34.1 34.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2 17.9 20.5 22.8 25.6 25.7 27.2 27.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.3 12.8 15.1 17.4 18.1 18.1 18.3 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.8
54.5
56.5
62.2
55.9
45.2
57
Farming Simulator 22

Farming Simulator 22

2021
low 1280x720
133.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
126.2
Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5

2021
low 1280x720
66 100 102 106 113 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 61 65 74 78 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 56 60 62 69 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 19 31 32 36 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
77.1 80 83 84.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43 45.1 47.2 48 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 37.9 39.1 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30 34.3 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
50
53.1
55.2
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
112.6 163.3 169.6 182.4 190.3 191.7 196.8 197.8 204 207 216 219 223 225 225 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9 73.2 81.9 84.8 91 93.7 96.2 100.1 102.4 104.9 104.9 105.5 110.1 113 113.4 115 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.6 55.4 64.2 65.1 69.9 72 75.4 77 78.4 79.5 79.9 80.9 80.9 84.5 86.5 87.1 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 24.6 26.6 27.6 29 30 31.5 31.5 32.3 34.4 34.6 34.9 35.9 36 36.5 37.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

2020
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

2020
med. 1920x1080
41 48 51 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 37 42 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 37 38 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22 23 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
177.5 178.1 184.7 194.4 197.3 199.1 201 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.9 87.8 94.7 96.9 100.2 100.3 101.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7 69.3 73.6 76.4 78.7 79.3 79.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.2 46 52.4 53.2 54 54.3 54.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
75.7 80.5 90.4 97.3 100.3 100.5 101.9 102.5 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.6 42.8 43.7 45.2 46 48.6 50.3 51.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.8 27.8 28.4 29 30.2 31.7 32.7 33.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22 22.2 23.1 23.4 24.3 25.3 26 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
70
78.6
63.4
65.2
76.6
65.2
71.8
74.9
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
106.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
145.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
64 64 70 72 74 75 75 76 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42 43 43 44 44 46 47 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40 41 41 41 41 44 44 45 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37 38 38 38 39 41 41 42 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
low 1280x720
76.6 81.1 83.1 86.9 89 89.2 90.7 92.5 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.2 34.3 34.5 35.8 37 37.4 37.4 37.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25 25.3 26.6 27.5 27.9 28.7 28.7 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 20.9 22 23 23.8 23.8 24.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
61 65.9 88 91 94.1 95.5 96.7 97 100 100 101.2 103.8 104 109.2 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5 27 36 37.1 39.8 40 40.3 41 41 42 42.9 43 43 43.3 43.3 45.6 46 47 48 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.4 24 32 32 32.1 36.2 36.3 37.7 38 38 39.5 40 40.3 41 41.2 42 42 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 21 22.4 27 31.2 31.5 33 33 33 33.9 35 35 35.1 35.3 35.6 36 37 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
62
67
77
58.9
68.1
71.5
71
42.8
72.1
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
74.1 77.8 83.3 130.5 134.7 138.2 138.9 139.8 139.8 140.2 141 141.9 141.9 143.2 145.5 145.7 147.5 147.5 147.6 148.8 149.3 150.4 150.5 151.1 153 155 156.3 157.4 158.3 158.5 159.7 161.1 161.1 161.3 162.3 163.2 163.6 164 165.3 166.4 166.8 167.7 167.8 168.4 168.8 170.5 173.7 175.9 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.7 33.3 46.2 53.8 56.8 58.5 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.8 59.9 60.3 60.6 60.8 61 61.1 61.2 61.5 62.4 62.6 63.4 64.3 64.4 64.4 64.8 64.9 65.2 65.2 65.3 65.4 65.5 65.6 65.6 66 66.4 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.9 67.6 67.8 67.9 68 68.1 68.2 68.9 69 70.1 70.9 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3 28.9 38.8 45.3 47 49.4 49.5 49.6 49.7 49.8 50.2 50.4 50.5 50.7 51 51.3 51.5 51.9 52.5 52.8 53 53.3 53.3 53.4 53.9 54 54.8 55.6 55.7 55.8 55.8 56 56.1 56.5 56.6 56.9 56.9 57 57 57.3 57.8 57.9 58 58 58.1 58.1 58.7 60 60.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5 25 32.8 37.3 39.9 41.3 41.7 42.2 42.6 42.6 42.8 43 43 43.3 43.4 43.7 44 44.1 44.6 45.1 45.1 45.2 45.4 45.6 45.6 45.7 46.3 46.6 46.9 47.7 48.1 48.2 48.2 48.2 48.4 48.6 48.7 48.8 49 49 49 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.3 49.6 50 50.8 51.6 52.1 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.9 31.7 32.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.3 16.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
42 47 47 48 53 58 60 62 63 65 66 69 69 69 71 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 75 75 77 78 78 78 80 83 84 84 84 86 86 87 88 88 89 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22 24 25 28 34 35 35 36 36 37 38 38 39 39 39 40 40 41 42 43 44 45 45 45 45 46 46 46 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 49 49 49 49 50 51 51 51 54 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21 22 23 26 32 32 32 33 33 34 35 36 36 36 36 37 37 39 39 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 49 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21 21 22 24 29 30 30 31 31 33 33 34 34 35 35 35 35 36 37 37 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 45 45 45 47 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
23 27 27 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
51
42
58
24
52
52
56
54
55
53
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
39 39.3 40 42 43.1 43.2 43.5 45.7 45.8 45.9 46.2 47.1 47.3 47.3 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.8 47.9 48 48.1 48.7 48.8 48.8 48.9 49.1 49.2 50.3 50.8 51.2 51.9 52.8 53 53.1 53.6 54 54 54.1 55 57.2 57.8 58.6 60 60.3 60.8 62.6 64.2 64.2 64.4 64.9 65.4 65.6 65.9 65.9 66.3 67.6 69.1 69.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 27.1 27.5 28.6 29.9 31 32.1 32.8 33 33.1 33.1 33.2 33.5 33.9 34.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.7 35.8 36.2 36.5 36.6 37 37.3 37.5 37.7 37.8 38.1 38.4 38.4 39 39.3 39.3 40.2 40.6 40.9 41.2 41.3 42.3 43 43.1 43.5 44.1 44.4 44.9 46.3 46.7 46.8 47.1 47.1 47.3 47.8 47.8 47.8 48 48.2 48.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.5 25.4 26.6 26.7 27.1 27.4 27.6 27.8 27.9 27.9 28 28.1 28.2 28.2 28.4 29 29 29.1 29.4 29.5 29.7 29.9 30.3 30.3 30.9 31 31.5 31.5 31.8 32.2 32.3 32.3 32.4 32.8 33.2 33.8 33.8 34.1 35.4 35.9 36.5 36.5 37.5 37.5 38.1 38.7 39.2 39.6 39.6 39.7 39.8 39.9 40.1 40.1 40.6 40.7 41.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.2 33.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
27.8 41.1 41.8 44.7 50.5 54.4 56.6 57.7 60.5 62.6 63.2 64.5 66.6 66.6 67 68.6 68.8 69.2 69.7 69.8 70.3 70.4 70.6 71.1 71.3 72.3 72.7 73.2 73.6 74 74.3 74.4 74.9 75.1 75.2 75.6 75.8 76.5 77.6 77.7 77.9 77.9 77.9 78 78.3 78.4 78.7 79.1 79.3 79.7 80.7 80.8 81.9 84.5 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 21.1 24 25.1 27.4 30.5 32.3 32.3 32.7 33.3 33.4 33.6 34 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.3 34.4 34.4 34.8 34.9 35.2 35.2 35.3 35.7 35.7 35.9 36 36.2 36.4 36.4 36.9 37.2 37.4 37.4 37.6 37.8 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.3 38.3 38.5 38.7 38.7 38.7 38.8 39.1 39.3 39.3 39.3 39.6 40.2 40.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9 16.1 19.3 19.5 21.2 22.5 23.7 24.1 24.4 24.5 24.5 25 25 25.2 25.2 25.6 25.7 25.7 25.9 26 26.3 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.7 27 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.3 27.5 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.7 28 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 28.9 28.9 29.2 29.3 29.3 29.4 29.4 30 30.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11.4 17.7 18.8 19.3 20.3 20.9 20.9 21 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
34.7 103.7 107.9 108.7 110.4 112.4 113.7 114.3 114.4 115.1 115.2 116.4 116.5 116.9 117.4 117.5 118.1 118.5 119.3 120.7 121.3 122.7 122.9 123.7 127.1 127.2 128 128 128.1 131 133.2 134.1 134.8 136.1 141.3 142 146.3 148.3 148.3 148.4 150.2 151.9 152.7 154.1 155.8 156.9 157.5 159.5 159.7 160.1 160.6 161.2 161.5 163 163.1 164.8 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6 84.3 87.5 89.5 89.6 89.9 90.2 90.4 92.7 93.7 93.9 94.3 94.9 95 96 96.1 96.6 96.7 98.1 101.4 101.5 102.4 102.7 103.7 105.2 105.3 105.8 107.1 108.1 108.4 109.2 110.1 110.5 111.7 111.9 113.9 116.1 116.1 117.7 117.9 117.9 119.3 120.6 120.7 121.1 122.9 123.3 123.9 124.8 126 126.5 127.5 127.9 130.1 130.1 130.2 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.6 54.9 56 57.9 61.1 62.7 62.8 63.8 65.4 66.7 66.8 67.8 69 73 73.8 74.5 75 75.9 76.2 76.2 76.4 76.9 77.9 77.9 79.9 80.3 80.4 80.5 80.6 81.9 82.1 82.9 83.1 83.9 84.1 85.6 85.9 86.1 86.5 86.6 86.9 87.6 88 88.2 88.3 88.9 89.8 89.9 94.8 95.1 95.5 95.9 96.8 97.5 98.8 98.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 51.3 51.5 53.1 55 57 58.6 59.7 60.4 61.4 62 62.2 62.6 64.6 65.4 65.8 66.7 66.7 67 69.1 69.5 69.9 70.1 70.5 70.6 71 71.2 71.6 71.6 71.9 72.2 73.2 73.2 75 75.1 75.5 76.2 76.8 77.7 78.6 78.7 79.2 80.2 80.3 81 81.2 82.3 83.2 85.1 85.5 85.6 86.5 87.4 88.5 90.4 91.2 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
74 74.4 109.8 116.7 117.3 119 119 119.8 120.3 129 129.2 129.5 131 135.1 136.2 137 138 140 140.3 142 145.5 147 147.5 148.1 148.9 148.9 149 153.5 153.5 154.6 155.1 157 157 157 160 160.7 163.3 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
47.7 75.3 76.5 82 83.2 85 85.2 85.9 88.3 91 94 95.3 96.6 96.8 97.1 97.3 99 99.3 101.1 101.5 103.8 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.3 22 27.5 34.9 35.6 36.1 39 39.1 40 40.7 41.5 42 42 43 43.3 43.3 45 45.5 45.7 45.8 45.9 46 46.2 46.4 47 47 47.1 47.2 47.6 48 48.1 49 49 49.1 49.1 49.3 49.6 50 50 50 50.2 50.9 51 51.9 52.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 17.5 18 20.4 22.2 24 24.1 24.2 24.9 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.7 26.1 26.3 26.4 27.5 28.1 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 29 29.4 29.5 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.8 30 30 30.2 30.4 30.5 30.5 30.8 31.1 31.5 31.6 31.6 31.7 32 32.4 32.5 33.3 33.9 36 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20 20.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
15 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
11
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
51.7
58.4
26.6
59.2
57.7
58
56.7
51.3
57.7
40.6
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
91.6 98.8 100.5 116.5 118 121 126.3 126.9 130.4 132.3 133.9 136 136.1 137.5 138.6 139.3 140 141 141.1 144.5 144.7 145 145.3 145.8 146.9 147.5 148.1 149.8 150.7 153 153.7 155.3 157.3 157.8 160.8 162.2 163.4 164.1 164.4 164.4 164.7 165.1 165.1 166 166.9 167.5 168 169.4 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.2 100.6 106.7 117 122.2 124.8 124.9 125.2 125.9 128.7 130.6 132.9 133.2 133.7 133.8 134.3 134.3 134.7 135.9 137.9 141.5 143.7 144 146 147.2 147.2 149.8 152.6 152.9 153.8 154.8 156.1 156.2 157 157.4 158 158.3 158.4 159 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.5 32.7 41.4 43.3 50.1 52.6 52.9 53.9 54.4 56.3 56.6 56.8 58 58.6 58.7 58.7 58.8 59.2 59.5 59.7 60.5 61.7 61.9 62.2 63.6 63.7 64.1 64.1 64.2 64.2 64.5 64.7 65 65 65.1 65.3 65.7 65.8 65.9 66.1 66.5 66.6 66.7 66.9 67.7 68.3 68.4 68.5 68.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 12.5 18.6 19.5 20.4 21 21 22.3 23.6 23.6 23.7 23.9 24.2 24.5 24.6 24.6 24.9 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.3 25.3 25.7 25.7 25.7 26 26 26 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.2 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.7 26.8 26.8 26.8 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.5 27.6 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.4 19.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
8.8
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
128
117.6
77.1
132.3
107.2
102.2
99.6
106.6
131.2
114.4
114.2
112.2
116.1
64.9
131.5
101
128.7
109.3
129
115.3
133.5
104.4
129.6
120.9
130.2
132.3
124
79.6
123.7
115.3
115.6
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
125.4
113.4
72.9
129.1
106.3
108.1
101
119.7
113.6
107.5
127.2
114.5
121
114.3
117.7
60.9
127.1
103.2
124.7
110.3
124.7
116
130.2
109.4
125.6
127.9
129.3
119.9
81.2
117.2
117.4
114.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 648433026
Until Dawn322012.710.2
EA Sports FC 2572.447.739.739.4
God of War Ragnarök25.425.221.619.1
Final Fantasy XVI15.515.11311.5
Space Marine 221.11816.615.1
Star Wars Outlaws1412.19.097.59
Black Myth: Wukong2521169
Once Human43292221
The First Descendant52332621
F1 2478664812
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2171310
Ghost of Tsushima30252214
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West29251817
Alone in the Dark7053431911.3
Last Epoch4336.732.826.916.5
Skull & Bones37332619
Helldivers 22721191813.2
Enshrouded21181512
Palworld4235252317.78.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown16913212675.939.8
Ready or Not5549473020.59.2
The Finals7355503422.19.7
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora20171512
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023615237342815
EA Sports WRC3725222116
Alan Wake 2232120135.98
Lords of the Fallen29231511.783.4
Total War Pharaoh8969494222.110.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage443936282011
EA Sports FC 2410594765651.726.8
Counter-Strike 21198248302711.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty4031252116.37.16
Baldur's Gate 3372924248
Lies of P5346403724.211.9
The Crew Motorfest35332724
Starfield28242017127
Armored Core 650.341.236.730.3
Immortals of Aveum2521.419.2
Atlas Fallen31.529.226.421.7
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart23.9241820.2
F1 237768491273.24
Diablo 450.543.938.638
Star Wars Jedi Survivor23201917
Dead Island 251.845.231.427.3
The Last of Us24.818.615.212.9
Resident Evil 4 Remake25.319.916.9
Company of Heroes 369.548.936.635.7
Sons of the Forest32.821.119.819.4
Atomic Heart49392319
Returnal27252319
Hogwarts Legacy3429221715
Dead Space Remake23.622.518.717.7
The Witcher 3 v4.005340342821.310.5
High On Life55.433.92920.6
The Callisto Protocol31.52118.111.8
Need for Speed Unbound39.23224.920.3
Spider-Man Miles Morales34.430.626.323.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202249453330
A Plague Tale Requiem19.416.714.512.1
The Quarry37.227.822.315.6
F1 2285755615
Vampire Bloodhunt84.354.246.443.2
Ghostwire Tokyo32.640383924
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands62453126
Cyberpunk 2077 1.63729232215.86.42
GRID Legends101826147
Dying Light 222.919.618
Rainbow Six Extraction65484533
God of War35292316
Farming Simulator 22133.494.373.860.4
Forza Horizon 597635624
Far Cry 681463933
F1 2021195977431
Watch Dogs Legion72413318
Horizon Zero Dawn47403523
F1 2020190957551
Borderlands 394463024
Control106.135.927.917.48.11
Total War: Three Kingdoms145.360.660.651.2
Far Cry New Dawn71454239
Metro Exodus86362723
Shadow of the Tomb Raider93413631
Strange Brigade1496253453217
Far Cry 5724239372712
X-Plane 11.1153393326
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark7035261911.2
Dota 2 Reborn132107797131.2
The Witcher 31379044282015
GTA V14513960251820.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		22
33
25
8		33
39
15
2		46
35
8
1		55
25
2
1		27
2
1
24
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 20:52:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.026s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11564 +0.029s ... 0.056s

#10 got single benchmarks 11564 +0.162s ... 0.218s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.218s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.898s ... 1.115s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.398s ... 1.513s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 1.514s

#15 Got 2881 rows for game benchmarks. +0.468s ... 1.982s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.982s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.07s ... 2.053s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +3.84s ... 5.893s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.013s ... 5.906s

#20 return log +0s ... 5.906s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 780M graphics card

Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Ninkear A16 Pro 是一款令人惊喜的国产笔记本电脑，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价约为 840 美元。凭借出色的功能，它的性能超过了其姊妹机型 N16 Pro，甚至接近小米红米笔记本 Pro 16。我们在测试过程中发现了具体有多接近。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Zotac Zone 评测：丰富的显示屏与同级领先的输入

Zotac Zone 评测：丰富的显示屏与同级领先的输入

Zone 配备了许多新颖的想法和目前最好的输入设备，但这款配备 7 英寸 OLED 显示屏的掌上电脑在软件方面可能还需要进一步改进。 ...
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | AMD Radeon 780M | 7.00" | 692 g
Minisforum MS-A1 评测：工作站支持各种 AMD CPU 并提供四个固态硬盘空间

Minisforum MS-A1 评测：工作站支持各种 AMD CPU 并提供四个固态硬盘空间

Minisforum MS-A1 是一款迷你 PC，被宣传为紧凑型工作站。我们的测试检验了基于 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G 的 MS-A1 在日常和苛刻任务（如视频编辑和游戏）中的表现。尽管体积小，但它却拥有高性能和多种应用选项，非常适合需要小空间、大功率的用户。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | AMD Radeon 780M | 1.7 kg
申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手

申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手

申克 XMG Evo 14 是一款小巧的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，具有大量连接和良好的维护选项。它采用高分辨率 120 Hz IPS 雾面面板，客户可以选择 AMD 和英特尔的 CPU。...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Geekom AX8 Pro AI NUC PC 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD，0.47L 机箱

Geekom AX8 Pro AI NUC PC 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD，0.47L 机箱

Geekom 利用最近 NUC 设计升级的机会，现在也开始在紧凑的外壳中出货 AMD SoC。该制造商并不惧怕安装 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS。在这篇评测中，我们对 Geekom AX8 Pro 进行了近距离观察，并根据大量测量和基准测试对其性能进行了分类。 ...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H | AMD Radeon 780M | 548 g

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：性能平平的紧凑型 Ryzen 机器

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池，成为最佳游戏掌上电脑

Geekom AE7: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Geekom AE7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、DDR5 内存、现代接口和一个问题的 NUC 迷你 PC

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER8 PC 评论：Mac Mini-inspired 设计与 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7445 二合一可转换机型评测：从 Ryzen-U 过渡到 Ryzen-HS

Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Aoostar GEM12 迷你电脑评测：AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS，32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 OCuLink 接口

GPD Win Mini 2024 7": AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » GPD Win Mini Zen 4 手持设备评测：华硕 ROG Ally 的可靠替代品

Geekom A8: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 0.4 kg
  Review » Geekom A8 评测：高级 0.5 升迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen 7040 的大型 ThinkPad 更加出色

BOSGAME M1: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » BOSGAME M1 迷你 PC 评测：Ryzen 7 7840HS 仍是一头猛兽

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Envy x360 2 合 1 16 评论：Ryzen 7 8840HS 击败酷睿 7 155U

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测 - AMD 版 Zenbook 配备了较弱的 1080p OLED 屏幕

Minisforum V3: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Minisforum V3 三合一平板电脑评测：首款采用 AMD Hawk Point APU（又称 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U）的 Windows 平板电脑

Acemagic AM18: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Acemagic AM18 评测：采用抢眼赛博朋克外观的游戏迷你 PC，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 和 32 GB 内存

GMK NucBox K6: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.5 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K6 迷你电脑评测：与最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 笔记本电脑一样强大

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和 120-Hz OLED 的强大超便携产品

Minisforum Mercury Series EM780: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 0.2 kg
  Review » Minisforum Mercury 系列 EM780 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的超小型迷你 PC

Geekom A7: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.4 kg
  Review » 带 0.5 升机箱的 Geekom A7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD 的高级迷你 PC

HP EliteBook 865 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 865 G10笔记本电脑评测--被Sure View毁掉的高性能商务笔记本电脑

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
  Review » 测试中的 AMD Ryzen 8000 Hawk Point - Zen4 更新版在数字运算和 GPU 性能方面优于 Meteor Lake

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 8.40", 0.9 kg
  Review » OneXPlayer 2 Pro 游戏手持设备、平板电脑或可拆卸设备评测：配备强大 Ryzen 7 的多面设备

Ayaneo Kun: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 8.40", 0.9 kg
  Review » Ayaneo Kun 游戏掌上电脑评测：个人主义者的性能野兽

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad P16s G2 AMD 评测：这款工作站笔记本电脑内含强劲动力和 OLED 显示屏

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评测--配备 AMD Zen4 和 120Hz 显示屏的 Linux 超极本

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 AMD 评测：快速、便携、直观

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 笔记本电脑评测：联想对戴尔 XPS 13 的回应

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Go 游戏掌上电脑评测：创意不错，但执行不够完美

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G8 笔记本电脑评测--AMD Zen4 并非自动更好

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad T14 G4 AMD 笔记本电脑评测：小巧的 ThinkPad 中的 Ryzen 功能

Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.8 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 和 Radeon 780M 的迷你 PC 已获得 OCuLink 和 USB-4 连接

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Ryzen 7 笔记本电脑评测：所有正确位置的变化

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkPad T14s G4评测：采用 AMD Zen4 的商务笔记本电脑更出色

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G8 AMD 评测--定制 Zen4 CPU 与出色的 2.9K OLED 相得益彰

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power : AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 5.50", 0.4 kg
  Review » 测试中的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 游戏掌上电脑 - 口袋里的 Zen4 Power

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift Edge 16 Ryzen 7 7840U 笔记本电脑评测：Zen 4 CPU 和 3.2K 120 Hz OLED 提升

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » 框架笔记本 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U 评测：比英特尔版本好太多

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：凭借 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 和无与伦比的价格，商务笔记本电脑给人留下深刻印象

Beelink SER7: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Beelink SER7 迷你 PC 评测：配备蒸汽室冷却系统的 Ryzen 7 7840HS

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普EliteBook 845 G10评测：配备 AMD Zen4 的近乎完美的商务笔记本电脑

  Review » 使用新驱动程序测试 AMD Radeon 780M 和 760M iGPU 的性能

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus 系列 UM790 Pro 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 和 Radeon 780M 使其优于竞争对手

Beelink GTR7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS性能首次亮相：Beelink GTR7迷你电脑评测

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Ally Z1 Extreme评测--拥有120赫兹显示屏和AMD Zen4的游戏掌机

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 14.00"
  Review » AMD Radeon 780M iGPU分析--AMD新的RDNA-3 GPU对其竞争对手的挑战

  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS分析--Zen4 Phoenix的理想效率是Apple

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9, R7 8845HS

Acer Nitro Blaze 7: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro Blaze 7

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-63, R7 8845HS

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5

Acer Aspire 15 A15-41M: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 15 A15-41M

Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook X16 Plus 2024

Acer Swift Edge SFE16-44: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16-44

HP Envy x360 14-fa0000: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 14-fa0000

HP Pavilion Aero 13-bg0000: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Aero 13-bg0000

Lenovo Yoga 7 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14AHP9

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406UA

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406UA

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally X

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10, R7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10, R7 7840HS

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA

HP EliteBook 865 G10, R7 PRO 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G10, R7 PRO 7840U

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE

HP EliteBook 865 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G10

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16APH8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16APH8

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES

Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (L23): AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (L23)

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl

Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH8

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16APH8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16APH8

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Go

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023

Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43

Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 6

GPD Win Mini 2024 7": AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, 7.00", 0.5 kg
   » GPD 公布 Pocket 4 售价：搭载 AMD 处理器的超便携笔记本电脑即将上市

Asus ROG Ally X: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.7 kg
   » 借助华硕 ROG Ally 显示屏和 Gamescope 中的 VRR 支持，SteamOS 向第三方手持设备靠拢

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » Framework 笔记本电脑砖系统可利用乐高脚垫、轮子、电缆支架等扩展笔记本电脑

Minisforum Mercury Series EM780: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 0.2 kg
   » Minisforum Mercury 系列 EM780 在 1/4 L 机箱中内置 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 和 32 GB DDR5 内存

Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 快速、明亮、实用：配备 Ryzen 7 和 Radeon 780M 的联想 ThinkPad P16s G2 AMD 评测

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
   » 华硕ROG盟友：高管证实玩家可以暂缓最近麻烦的BIOS更新

   » 华硕ROG Ally：开启预购，更便宜的AMD Ryzen Z1型号将随后推出

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 32-core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon 890M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
Arc 8-Core *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
Arc 130V *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Radeon 740M *
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter