Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 890M

AMD Radeon 890M

AMD Radeon 890M是一款功能强大的 RDNA 3+ 架构 iGPU,于 2024 年 6 月首次亮相。它配备 16 个计算单元(1024 个统一着色器),运行频率高达 2,900 MHz;与 700 系列 Radeon iGPU 一样,它支持多达 4 台显示器,分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。它的游戏性能足以应付任何 2023 或 2024 年的游戏,只要 1080p 分辨率和低细节即可。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameStrix Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
CPU in Radeon 890MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37512 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37012 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 37012 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4.2 pt (13%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
3.65 -14%
3.74 -12%
3.74 -12%
3.78 -11%
3.85 -9%
3.96 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 -4%
4.09 -3%
4.11 -3%
AMD Radeon 890M
4.23
4.28 1%
4.39 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.46 5%
4.51 7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
4.53 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
4.57 8%
4.61 9%
4.66 10%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
4.97 17%
...
20.4 382%
max:
33.3 687%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3768     avg: 3895     median: 3882 (11%)     max: 4073 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3421     avg: 3526     median: 3533 (9%)     max: 3676 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
3197 -9%
3231 -8%
3242 -8%
3269 -7%
3324 -6%
3364 -5%
3430 -3%
3492 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 -1%
AMD Radeon 890M
3526
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 1%
3601 2%
3610 2%
3650 4%
3689 5%
3837 9%
3883 10%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3960 12%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
4155 18%
...
19434 451%
max:
36259 928%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
258947 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 38501     avg: 39406     median: 39499 (37%)     max: 40338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 53940     avg: 55890     median: 55908 (14%)     max: 58319 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7644     avg: 8622     median: 8770 (15%)     max: 9188 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8188     avg: 9200     median: 9573 (11%)     max: 10037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 325729     avg: 367315     median: 367315 (41%)     max: 408901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6855     avg: 7239     median: 7239 (8%)     max: 7623 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13042     avg: 14886     median: 15122.5 (19%)     max: 15873 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13345     avg: 15642     median: 16023 (14%)     max: 16800 Points
171.8 -99%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 -9%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 -8%
14428 -8%
14692 -6%
14725 -6%
15135 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15223 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
15433 -1%
15592 0%
AMD Radeon 890M
15642
15823 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
15837 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
16233 4%
16564 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
17028 9%
17113 9%
17562 12%
17690 13%
17711 13%
...
59943 283%
max:
104201 566%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 39557     avg: 42959     median: 42958.5 (12%)     max: 46360 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 34479     avg: 37785     median: 37785 (21%)     max: 41091 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
35209 -7%
35269 -7%
35807 -5%
36137 -4%
36214 -4%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 -4%
36405 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -3%
37644 0%
AMD Radeon 890M
37785
38502 2%
38910 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 4%
39213 4%
39319 4%
40134 6%
40146 6%
40643 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 12%
...
132443 251%
max:
170928 352%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
58138 Points (64%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 45168     avg: 45977     median: 45976.5 (60%)     max: 46785 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 30.5     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (9%)     max: 31.6 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
153 fps (25%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
156 fps (17%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
67.2 fps (33%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
40.7 fps (25%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
46.5 fps (15%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
62.9 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
37.6 fps (18%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
27.3 fps (18%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
26.8 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 207     avg: 260.5     median: 268 (16%)     max: 304 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
84.6 fps (15%)
3.3 -96%
...
63.8 -25%
64.7 -24%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -23%
65.5 -23%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -14%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -12%
78.4 -7%
78.8 -7%
80.5 -5%
AMD Radeon 890M
84.6
87.1 3%
87.5 3%
89.3 6%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 8%
93.2 10%
94.7 12%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 13%
96.8 14%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 20%
...
536 534%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
194 fps (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 524     median: 104.6 (1%)     max: 1992 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 46.9     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 176.8 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 34259     avg: 39938     median: 41299 (12%)     max: 43082 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 38270     avg: 44974     median: 46776 (13%)     max: 48393 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 886     avg: 922     median: 922 (3%)     max: 958 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1529     avg: 1561     median: 1560.5 (3%)     max: 1592 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 10785     avg: 11377     median: 11376.5 (12%)     max: 11968 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50     avg: 60.1     median: 56.6 (8%)     max: 72.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.8     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (8%)     max: 73.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 49.2     avg: 58.6     median: 58.6 (19%)     max: 67.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.7     avg: 67.2     median: 68.7 (9%)     max: 79.2 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3083     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (56%)     max: 0.4176 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 87.2 104.6 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 75.4 91.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 53.4 66 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 12.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
81.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
168.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
90.3 100 101.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.9 81.9 82.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 63.2 63.7 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.2 54.4 54.7 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
40 43.7 46 46 49.6 49.9 51.5 52.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.3 32.3 36.3 38.1 39.4 40.5 40.7 40.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4 26.8 28.7 29.3 30.4 30.8 31.6 32.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1 23.8 25.4 25.5 26.2 27 27.8 28.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
76.7
82.2
85.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
5.2
6.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.5
25.3
20.9
24.9
27
low 1920x1080
35 35.8 43.7 44.5 45.2 46 47.1 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.1 29.2 35.4 35.8 36.4 37.5 37.7 37.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.1 25.6 28.2 28.5 28.9 30.2 30.9 31.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24 24.9 28.4 29.1 29.6 30.7 31.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
64.2
58.9
73.4
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
41.9
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
72.8 88.3 106.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.3 76.4 96.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.6 58.6 70.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1 12.3 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
81 107.3 110.1 110.5 111.2 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8 98.2 100.3 100.8 102.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.2 74.3 76.8 77 78.1 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 20.9 21.2 22 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
178.8
186.8
low 1920x1080
86.9 88.3 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.1 62.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.2 41.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.5 34.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
172.1
170.3
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
165.1 166.8 186.1 186.7 189.2 193 199.8 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.1 71.5 75.7 76.3 77.7 79 82 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.7 60.2 63.8 64.3 65.2 66.7 69.8 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.8 51.4 54.2 54.6 55.7 57.6 59.7 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
75 81 93 98 98 98 101 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42 50 57 58 58 59 60 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39 46 53 53 53 54 55 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33 36 50 50 51 51 52 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
66.5 71.7 77.3 78.2 85.1 87 91.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4 56 58.6 60 67.6 67.9 69.9 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 44.2 46.2 46.7 51.1 51.6 53.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
75.5 75.5 78.9 82.9 92.8 93.7 94.6 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37 38.3 44 44.5 46.3 47.5 48.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.6 28.6 31.2 31.5 33.2 33.3 34.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
132.3 154.3 155.6 158.1 161.1 170.6 171.8 175.6 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
121.4 123.1 125.7 128 133.2 133.6 134.1 135.7 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.8 35.8 35.8 37.9 45.7 46.4 99.2 100 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.4 33.1 33.6 36 43.6 44.7 87.4 89.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
155 164 167 169 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48 51 52 55 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 32 33 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
157.8 158.6 161.3 166.1 166.6 167 168.9 174.3 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.6 150.1 151.3 157.2 158.9 160.8 161.5 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.4 73.5 78.2 79 79.1 79.5 79.9 80.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.4 31.1 31.5 31.6 31.9 32.2 32.4 33.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
146.1
143.2
145.5
139.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
150.4
146.6
150.9
139.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Once Human51.638.330.225
The First Descendant59.13527.823.6
F1 246456406
Senua's Saga Hellblade 220.816.612.6
Ghost of Tsushima34.62819.418.7
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West30.627.321.119.9
Last Epoch60.444.93830.2
Skull & Bones48413426
Helldivers 241.631.930.126.8
Enshrouded23.222.920.314.5
Palworld81.562.336.230.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown209168.4160.3
Ready or Not75.359.843.827.5
The Finals94.669.960.246.2
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22201712
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202377644943
Alan Wake 221.620.219.8
Lords of the Fallen26.123.918.713.2
Total War Pharaoh97775950
Assassin's Creed Mirage52444232
Counter-Strike 2117.390.752.335.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty47372926
Baldur's Gate 343352828
Lies of P62.553.946.338.4
The Crew Motorfest40363026
Armored Core 649.843.340.133.1
Atlas Fallen
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart31.82621.520.9
F1 2389816214
Resident Evil 4 Remake
Company of Heroes 393.165.349.849.1
Atomic Heart59.34626.821.3
Returnal32302622
Hogwarts Legacy42.636.824.819.3
F1 22104967421
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands88624233
Strange Brigade184766455
Far Cry 592555046
X-Plane 11.11806248
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark854431
Dota 2 Reborn1601295450
The Witcher 31645233
GTA V1651537732
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5
15
16
4
8
18
11
3
14
21
5
1
20
16

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 13:48:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12524 +0.029s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 12524 +0.03s ... 0.087s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.839s ... 0.926s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.926s

#13 Got 547 rows for game benchmarks. +0.099s ... 1.025s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.025s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.03s ... 1.055s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.571s ... 2.626s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.631s

#18 return log +0s ... 2.631s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 890M graphics card

Beelink SER9 评测:AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快

Beelink SER9 评测:AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快

Beelink 在大多数竞争对手之前就采用了 AMD 最新的 Ryzen 9 CPU,从而提升了迷你 PC 领域的竞争力。不过,价格也相应上涨,使其成为该制造商推出的价格较高的产品之一。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 814 g
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 性能首次亮相:惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14 笔记本电脑评测

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 性能首次亮相:惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14 笔记本电脑评测

OmniBook Ultra 14 仅售一千多元,与同价位的其他超极本相比,性能大幅提升。虽然在显示屏上做了一些删减,但大多数用户都能接受。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | AMD Radeon 890M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测:Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现

华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测:Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现

在 Zenbook S16 内的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 仅在有限的范围内发挥了性能潜力之后,我们大胆地再次尝试,看看 VivoBook S 14。这样一来,也就引出了 Radeon 890M iGPU 能否接近英特尔 Arc 8 的问题。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

在推出全新 Zen 5 移动处理器的同时,AMD 还更新了集成显卡。Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 等顶级机型采用了全新的 Radeon 890M。我们已对多款笔记本电脑内的这款新 iGPU 进行了详细分析。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M
AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

在推出全新 Zen 5 移动处理器的同时,AMD 还更新了集成显卡。Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 等顶级机型采用了全新的 Radeon 890M。我们已对多款笔记本电脑内的这款新 iGPU 进行了详细分析。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较

  Review » 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra 14

HP EliteBook X G1a: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G1a

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟:Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩,即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟:Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩,即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟:Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩,即使测试功耗仅为 17 W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter