Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

AMD的Radeon HD7520G+ HD7670M双显卡是一个集成了AMD Radeon HD7520G APU处理器的图形卡和一个专用的入门级的AMD Radeon HD7670M显卡交火组合的结合。这就是所谓的AMD双图形或不对称的交火,并使用AFR(交替帧渲染),呈现不同的帧上的两个图形核心。因此,组合也有从微观口吃(两幅图像之间不同的空间导致口吃,虽然足够高的帧率流畅的游戏只有一个GPU)。双显卡解决方案的性能在很大程度上取决于驱动程序支持的游戏。在一些游戏中的表现,甚至可能降低10%-15%,相比只使用APU的图形卡。因此,由于微口吃和性能问题,双显卡可以征收更多的问题比带来的性能提升。只有在最好的情况下的表现几乎一致的GeForce GT635M。两片显卡的PureVideo HD(UVD3)或OpenCL支持的功能,如类似。由于两个显卡渲染帧时,功耗是明显高于使用只有一个GPU。

Radeon HD 7600M Series

Radeon HD 7690M XT 480 @ 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Radeon HD 7690M 480 @ 0.6 - 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 3600/1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 862 @ 0.69 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 736 @ 0.66 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 736 @ 0.66 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7670M 480 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7650M 480 @ 0.45 - 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7630M 480 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 656 @ 0.66 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 7610M 400 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1600 MHz
ArchitectureTerascale 3
Pipelines736 - unified
Core Speed655 / 600 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.2
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement15.05.2012

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1458     avg: 1480     median: 1480 (2%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1597     avg: 1621     median: 1621 (1%)     max: 1645 Points
171.8 -89%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 617
1541 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
1542 -5%
1577 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
1583 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
1588 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
1597 -1%
1600 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1600 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1602 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1621
1625 0%
1628 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M320
1652 2%
1656 2%
1671 3%
1674 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
1684 4%
1689 4%
Intel HD Graphics 630
1696 5%
...
59943 3598%
max:
104201 6328%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3241     avg: 3755     median: 3755 (1%)     max: 4269 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3261     avg: 3968     median: 3968 (2%)     max: 4675 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -98%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
3741 -6%
3750 -5%
3752 -5%
3804 -4%
3858 -3%
3860 -3%
3866 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
3868 -3%
3881 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
3968
3969 0%
3995 1%
4005 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
4032 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
4123 4%
4133 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
4151 5%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
4169 5%
4212 6%
...
132443 3238%
max:
170928 4208%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21697 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
11853 Points (13%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
11294 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
11355 -4%
11395 -4%
11469 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
11550 -3%
Intel HD Graphics 520
11565 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
11672 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
11777 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
11811 0%
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
11853
11878 0%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
12054 2%
12228 3%
12278 4%
12418 5%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
12469 5%
12505 6%
12573 6%
12578 6%
...
68064 474%
max:
87172 635%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6785     avg: 7282     median: 7282 (10%)     max: 7779 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
20.4 fps (4%)
0.6 -97%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 -10%
18.7 -8%
18.8 -8%
19.03 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
19.4 -5%
19.5 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M340
19.8 -3%
19.95 -2%
20.3 0%
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
20.4
20.93 3%
21.2 4%
21.2 4%
22 8%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 8%
23.1 13%
23.35 14%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
23.4 15%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
23.87 17%
...
532 2508%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
2.8 fps (2%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
11.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
5.9 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
16.3 fps (17%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
12 fps (6%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
3.5 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.3 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4501     avg: 4782     median: 4782 (3%)     max: 5063 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 18.4     avg: 23.2     median: 23.1 (8%)     max: 27.89 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
70.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
50.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
41.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
31.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
80.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
25.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
48.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
79.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.4 45.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.7 34.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
36.3 37.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.7 31.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 22.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
88.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
83.7 105.8 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
60.2 67.5 67.7 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
47 52.5 54.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
72.2 74.9 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43.2 45.1 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
52.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
116.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
46.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
42.1 43.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
30.2 32.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
22.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Guild Wars 220.611.16.6
Counter-Strike: GO70.657.150.843.9
Darksiders II41.924
Sleeping Dogs31.622.6187.2
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier25.419.68
Max Payne 316.415.210.88.2
Dirt Showdown29.618.716.49.3
Diablo III80.854.646.230.4
Risen 2: Dark Waters25.923.917.67.7
Mass Effect 348.536.823
Alan Wake29.5199.4
Anno 207079.6433013.6
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim37322212
CoD: Modern Warfare 388.26141.423.5
Battlefield 32218.315.76.3
Batman: Arkham City5648148
Fifa 1295655146.4
F1 201144302619
Deus Ex Human Revolution744421.1
Crysis 252.234.325.410.5
StarCraft 2116.846.328.617.6
Metro 2033433122.98.3
Need for Speed Shift3629.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
7
7
7
11
2
13
7

19
3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 10. 17:57:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:29:51 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.031s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 3390 +0.012s ... 0.043s

#17 got single benchmarks 3390 +0.008s ... 0.051s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.296s ... 0.346s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.347s

#21 Got 100 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.35s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.35s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.362s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +0.66s ... 1.023s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.026s

#26 return log +0s ... 1.026s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 20-core GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)