Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon R7 250是一款为台式电脑设计的低端显卡,最早发布于2013年10约。它基于“Oland”显卡芯片,采用28纳米技术制造。这块显卡提供了384个着色器单元和128位的显存界面(1GB GDDR5,74GB/s)。它也有一些采用较慢的DDR3显存的版本。


架构


R7 250采用了与较老的Radeon HD 8570和8670相同的芯片。Oland是基于GCN架构的芯片,提供了384个着色器,24个TMU和8个ROP。相比HD 8670,R7 259的频率较高,核心频率为1050MHz,GDDR5显存频率为1150MHz(4600MHz有效频率)。和高端的R9 290X相同,R7 250也支持DirectX 11.2(仅第一级),但缺少新的Trueaudio功能。


性能


根据游戏和设定的不同,Radeon R7 250与Nvidia GeForce GTX 650的性能相近。因此,这款显卡与快速的中端笔记本显卡水平相近,例如GeForce GT 755M。最新的游戏(2013年)可以在1366x768像素和中高设置下流畅运行。对于一些更老或要求较低的游戏,使用更高的分辨率或开启AA/AF设置也是可能的。


特性


R7 250支持一些著名的功能如Eyefinity(最多两个显示器),也支持一些创新的功能,如一个新的加速模式。根据功耗和温度的不同,它的核心可以加速到1050MHz。因此,它并没有官方的基础频率数据,只有一个最低频率作为规格。


功耗


得力于动态频率调整和Zero Core技术,R7 250在待机状态下的能效很高。在负载下,这款显卡的典型功耗为65W。

CodenameOland XT
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1050 MHz
Memory Speed1800 - 4600 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption65 Watt
Transistor Count1 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesMantle, App Acceleration, CrossFire, PowerTune, ZeroCore, HD3D
Date of Announcement01.10.2013
InformationPCI-E 3.0, HDMI mit 4K-Support
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.9 pt (3%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06416 -93%
...
0.863 -9%
0.877 -8%
0.883 -7%
0.884 -7%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book
0.918 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
0.926 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
0.932 -2%
AMD FirePro W5130M
0.934 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
0.94 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 250
0.949
0.959 1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
0.962 1%
0.973 3%
0.977 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
0.993 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
1.005 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
1.005 6%
1.012 7%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.027 8%
...
33.3 3409%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
12202 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15080 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2051 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2145 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
129924 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3148 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2775 Points (2%)
171.8 -94%
...
2658 -4%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
2681 -3%
2693 -3%
2702 -3%
2707 -2%
2709 -2%
2729 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
2762 0%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2766 0%
AMD Radeon R7 250
2775
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
2801 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
2811 1%
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
2817 2%
2821 2%
2872 3%
AMD Radeon HD 6790
2887 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
2911 5%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
2930 6%
2941 6%
...
105674 3708%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12581 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10708 Points (6%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
10067 -6%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
10150 -5%
10211 -5%
10234 -4%
AMD Radeon 540X
10287 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
10511 -2%
10514 -2%
AMD FirePro M5100
10561 -1%
10701 0%
AMD Radeon R7 250
10708
10755 0%
10861 1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
10953 2%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
10958 2%
11019 3%
11047 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
11100 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
11255 5%
11385 6%
...
170928 1496%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
16215 Points (21%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
27.4 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
38 fps (7%)
0.6 -98%
...
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
36.4 -4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
36.8 -3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
36.8 -3%
37 -3%
ATI Radeon HD 5770
37 -3%
37.4 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
37.5 -1%
ATI Radeon HD 5850
37.7 -1%
37.81 0%
AMD Radeon R7 250
38
AMD FirePro M5100
39.1 3%
39.5 4%
39.75 5%
40.2 6%
40.9 8%
AMD Radeon 540X
41.3 9%
41.7 10%
41.87 10%
41.95 10%
...
532 1300%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
9.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
7.5 fps (4%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
28.1 fps (21%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
3.4 fps (4%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
15 fps (11%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
31.1 fps (33%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
25.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
9.5 fps (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.3 Points (92%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.3 Points (92%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
98.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
127  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
110  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
203.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
123.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
79.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
141.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
66.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
165.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
76.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Ghosts8469.332.913.5
Battlefield 498.266.742.714.9
F1 201313312711042
Company of Heroes 245.437.321.78.1
GRID 2203.3123.67924.8
Metro: Last Light79.357.33014.3
BioShock Infinite141.178.466.820.3
Tomb Raider165.883.355.324.1
Crysis 376.246.128.710.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
4
4

3
4
2
2
4
3
8
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 22. 03:13:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:33:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5072 +0.025s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 5072 +0.006s ... 0.062s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.425s ... 0.487s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.487s

#12 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.489s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.489s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.495s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.386s ... 0.881s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.884s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.884s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 64 Desktop
RX Vega 56 Desktop
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R9 Fury Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
Arc A380 Desktop
GeForce GTX 970 Desktop
T1000 Desktop

Class 3

GeForce GTX 960 Desktop
Radeon R7 370 Desktop
GeForce GTX 950 Desktop
T600 Desktop
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
FirePro W4100 Desktop
FirePro W2100 Desktop

Class 4

VideoCore VII *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter