Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 M265

AMD Radeon R7 M265

AMD Radeon R7 M265是一款支持DirectX 11的中低端笔记本显卡。与较老的Radeon HD 8750M一样,它基于Mars芯片设计(GCN架构),提供384个着色核心,24个TMU和8个ROP。它的核心频率最高可达825MHz,支持最大2GB的DDR3显存(1000MHz,128位)。 性能 Radeon R7 M265的性能与Nvidia GeForce GT 640M和GeForce GT 730M相当。最新的和2013/2014年要求较高的游戏只能够在低分辨率和细节设定下流畅运行。不过在较老的游戏中,它可以运行于更高的设定下。 384个着色器可以通过OpenCL 1.2用于一般运算(作为6个运算单元)。相比于较老的TeraScale 2芯片,基于GCN的Mars芯片架构在这方面提供了更好的性能。 特性 R7 M265提供了对MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and Flash的硬解码支持。同样支持的还有Multi-View Codec(MVC)和MPEG-4 part 2(DivX, xVid)格式的高清视频。 R7系列也提供了在集成显卡和独立显卡间自动转换的功能。名为Enduro的这项技术替代了AMD的Dynamic Switchable Graphics技术,与Nvidia的Optimus相似。而且,当Enduro禁用时,M265借助于Eyefinity技术可以提供对多显示器的支持。 其他的特性还包括了用于降低屏幕关闭时的能耗的ZeroCore技术,和可以关闭没有在使用的芯片区域的Power Gating技术。PowerTune技术提供了在TDP范围内自动超频和降频的可能性。例如,它会在运行一些测试软件如FurMark和OCCT时降频,但在运行最新游戏如Lost Planet,Crysis或Resident Evil 5时则会自动超频。 集成的高清音频处理器可以通过HDMI或DisplayPort(如当播放蓝光视频时)传输高清音频信号(TrueHD或DTS Master Audio)。另外,它支持通过新的DDMA(Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio)技术同时传输音频信号给多个设备。 功耗 它的功耗和较老的HD 8750M或Nvidia GeForce GT 730M相近。因此,R7 M265最适合于13寸或更大的笔记本电脑。 

Radeon R7 M200 Series

Radeon R7 M275DX 896
Radeon R7 M260X 384 @ 0.72 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
Radeon R7 M270 384 @ 0.83 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M265 384 @ 0.83 - 0.98 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M260 384 @ 0.72 - 0.98 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
CodenameOpal XT / Mars
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed825 - 980 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Transistor Count1 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesMantle, PCIe 3.0, Zero Core, PowerTune
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2014

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.6 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -89%
...
AMD Radeon R7 M340
0.534 -9%
0.535 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
0.541 -8%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
0.556 -6%
0.564 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
0.567 -4%
0.572 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
0.576 -2%
0.583 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M265
0.59
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
0.592 0%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.61 3%
0.612 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
0.617 5%
0.627 6%
0.64 8%
Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.64 8%
0.645 9%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
0.65 10%
...
20.4 3358%
max:
33.3 5544%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4013     avg: 5204     median: 5334.5 (5%)     max: 6547 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5428     avg: 7997     median: 8401.5 (2%)     max: 9003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 908     avg: 1170     median: 1211 (2%)     max: 1302 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1042     avg: 1288     median: 1336 (2%)     max: 1397 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 36377     avg: 43804     median: 45208 (5%)     max: 50241 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1899     avg: 2020     median: 2012 (3%)     max: 2241 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1880     avg: 1926     median: 1882 (2%)     max: 2073 Points
171.8 -91%
...
1823 -5%
1831 -5%
1843 -4%
1846 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
1858 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
1891 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
1903 -1%
1913 -1%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
1916 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M265
1926
Qualcomm Adreno 685
1927 0%
1934 0%
Qualcomm Adreno 680
1936 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
1942 1%
1969 2%
1981 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
1985 3%
2003 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
2004 4%
...
59943 3012%
max:
104201 5310%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 5737     avg: 6175     median: 6175 (2%)     max: 6613 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5791     avg: 5977     median: 5976.5 (3%)     max: 6162 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
5717 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
5735 -4%
5833 -2%
5870 -2%
5896 -1%
5926 -1%
5948 0%
5957 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
5961 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M265
5977
5987 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
5995 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
6000 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
6027 1%
6111 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
6139 3%
Intel HD Graphics 630
6208 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
6327 6%
6414 7%
...
132443 2116%
max:
170928 2760%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 7170     avg: 8889     median: 8876 (12%)     max: 10622 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4043     avg: 4564     median: 4563.5 (3%)     max: 5084 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 25.34     avg: 32.9     median: 32.6 (11%)     max: 38.36 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 27.93     avg: 32.9     median: 32.9 (2%)     max: 37.77 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
69  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
83.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
32.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
136.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
53.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
24.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
55.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
46.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
39.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
59.6 64.2 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.4 43.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.2 28.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
52.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.2 35.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.4 28.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
14 15.4 21 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.8 12.9 17.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.2 12 14.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.9 19.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.1 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
51.2 56 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.2 27.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.1 12.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24.3 44.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.1 35.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
73  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
64.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
49.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
81.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
med. 1366x768
53.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
28.2 36.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 28.9 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.3 17.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
45.8 53.4 68 71.8 71.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32 35.7 39.9 40 42.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25 30.9 33.2 33.3 35.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 10.9 11 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
156.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
141.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
59.4 68.6 69 74 95.2 104.5 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.2 43.1 45.2 45.6 45.8 51.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1 30.7 30.9 31.4 31.5 34.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 14.7 14.8 14.8 16.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
32.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
126.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
41.5 46.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.9 35.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.3 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.8 30.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.4 25.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.1 18.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
79.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
59.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
68.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
82.4 87.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.3 59 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.1 48.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 31.5 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
90 109.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42 50.9 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
55.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
high 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
127.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
15.4
low 1024x768
149  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
29.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
FIFA 166949.127.5
World of Warships83.256.428.120.8
Metal Gear Solid V6048.718.311.4
Mad Max32.41613.9
Batman: Arkham Knight25177
The Witcher 322.915.98.8
Dirt Rally136.640.621.312.6
Battlefield Hardline53.34217.310.8
Evolve34.826.214.813
Dragon Age: Inquisition4228.710.77
Far Cry 4392813.510
Assassin's Creed Unity17.312.98
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare45.828.714.77.9
Civilization: Beyond Earth2519.313
F1 201433272317
Ryse: Son of Rome28.319.89.9
Alien: Isolation33.628.317.613.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor31.324.111.9
Sims 49033.72620.1
GRID: Autosport55.824.321.514
Watch Dogs30.221.63.22.1
Wolfenstein: The New Order46.339.818.510.1
The Elder Scrolls Online6241277.3
Titanfall52.5332710.1
Thief1713123.4
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag18149.34.2
X-Plane 10.255426114.2
Need for Speed: Rivals3026.723
Call of Duty: Ghosts32.831.18.6
Battlefield 4342626.7
Batman: Arkham Origins734315
Fifa 14306060
Total War: Rome II64.751.142.47.5
Saints Row IV2822.217.7
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified49.130.420.9
Splinter Cell: Blacklist4334.717.5
Dota 281.555.127.68
Company of Heroes 230.0924.0413.8
GRID 253.739.115.6
Metro: Last Light3225166.4
BioShock Infinite62383210
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm156.977.644.215
SimCity141.534.322.3
Tomb Raider78443014
Crysis 332.8921
Dead Space 3126.657.145.9
Far Cry 34433198.3
Hitman: Absolution2925187.96
Call of Duty: Black Ops 279.846.5426.618.18
Medal of Honor: Warfighter59.339.0930.6411.89
Dishonored68.35548.5527.37
Max Payne 326.9824.78
Diablo III85554730
Alan Wake39.425.913.2
Anno 2070100462914
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim55.138.5128.6716.65
Batman: Arkham City94743115
Deus Ex Human Revolution5223
Total War: Shogun 2127.731.9614.21
StarCraft 2149553722
World of Warcraft949429.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
26
16
6
26
29
4
41
13
1
41
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 13:41:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.031s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5217 +0.024s ... 0.054s

#12 got single benchmarks 5217 +0.017s ... 0.072s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.292s ... 0.364s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.364s

#16 Got 283 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.382s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.382s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 0.418s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +1.871s ... 2.289s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.293s

#21 return log +0s ... 2.293s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R7 M265 graphics card

戴尔 Inspiron 15-5547 笔记本电脑简短评测

戴尔 Inspiron 15-5547 笔记本电脑简短评测

简约,仍有魅力? 你希望买一款设计时髦且有不错游戏性能的实惠多媒体笔记本电脑吗?如果是的话,戴尔的Inspiron 15-5547可能是个不错的选择。我们的评测将会告诉你以低于600欧元的价格可以达到什么样的质量水平。...
Intel Core i5-4210U | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | 15.60" | 2.2 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE

Dell Inspiron 15-5545: AMD A10-7300, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15-5545

Acer Aspire E5-551G-83ED: AMD A8-7100, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-551G-83ED

Acer Aspire E5-551G-F1EW: AMD FX-7500, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-551G-T0JN

Acer Aspire V5-561G: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-561G

Dell Inspiron 15-5547: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15-5547

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 20-core GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter