Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

AMD Radeon R7是AMD A10-7850K的集成显卡的命名。它是基于用于Hawaii系列桌面型显卡(如R9 290)的GCN1.1(或2.0)架构的,无独立显存的处理器集成显示核心。它的结构为适应APU处理器的非对称架构(HSA)而相对做了一些改变。 在AMD A10-7850K处理器中,这款集成显卡提供512个着色器核心(8个运算核心),运行于最高720MHz的频率下。它提供了对DirectX 11.2的硬件支持,这是它相对于其他竞争者的一个很大优势(如Intel Haswell支持11.1,Nvidia的Kepler和Maxwell仅支持11.0)。 它的游戏性能在我们的测试中略高于Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200显卡(在Schenker S413笔记本电脑)。它们分别在不同的游戏中有更好的表现,但R7处于领先的游戏相对多两个(在2014年3月时)。 测试系统:华硕A88XM-PLUS主板,16GB DDR-2133 AMD Gamer内存

Radeon R (Kaveri) Series

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 512 @ 0.72 GHz
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 384 @ 0.72 GHz
Radeon R7 (Kaveri) 512 @ 0.55 - 0.69 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R6 (Kaveri) 384 @ 0.53 - 0.65 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Kaveri) 256 @ 0.51 - 0.63 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R4 (Kaveri) 192 @ 0.53 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaveri Spectre
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed720 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2, OpenGL 4.3
technology28 nm
FeaturesHSA, OpenCL 2.0, DirectCompute 5.0
Date of Announcement14.01.2014
CPU in Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A10-7850K4 x 3700 MHz, 95 W720 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.7 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -91%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
0.676 -5%
0.681 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
0.682 -4%
0.695 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
0.695 -3%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
0.697 -2%
0.704 -1%
0.705 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
0.709 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
0.714
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.716 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
0.716 0%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
0.728 2%
0.757 6%
0.757 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
0.763 7%
AMD FirePro W4190M
0.771 8%
0.773 8%
0.777 9%
...
33.3 4564%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
567 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
508 Points (1%)
112 -78%
...
409.5 -19%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
410 -19%
417 -18%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
419.6 -17%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
442.5 -13%
450.5 -11%
452.3 -11%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
471 -7%
493 -3%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
508
AMD Radeon 610M
511 1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
539 6%
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
547 8%
550 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
552 9%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
555 9%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
558 10%
570 12%
577 14%
...
36259 7038%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
91999 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
58792 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
6770 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
10341 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1477 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1616 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
85679 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2444 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2302 Points (2%)
171.8 -93%
...
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
2198 -5%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
2208 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
2213 -4%
2215 -4%
AMD FirePro W4190M
2221 -4%
2245 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2272 -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
2275 -1%
2300 0%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2302
AMD FirePro W4170M
2315 1%
2327 1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2328 1%
2341 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2353 2%
2355 2%
2371 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8850M
2381 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
2396 4%
...
104201 4427%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
7550 Points (4%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
7181 -5%
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
7243 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
7268 -4%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
7362 -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
7387 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
7412 -2%
ATI Radeon HD 4850
7436 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
7444 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
7535 0%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
7550
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
7570 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
7591 1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
7610 1%
7614 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
7631 1%
7645 1%
7691 2%
7782 3%
7906 5%
...
170928 2164%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
29153 Points (15%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
14908 Points (16%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
14502 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
14510 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
14564 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
14733 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
14773 -1%
14777 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
14852 0%
AMD Radeon HD 6570M
14855 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
14869 0%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
14908
AMD Radeon R7 M260
14924 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
14938 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
14952 0%
15011 1%
15058 1%
15064 1%
15249 2%
15284 3%
15365 3%
...
87172 485%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
9878 Points (13%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
6.9 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
19.7 fps (7%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
17.6 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
26.8 fps (5%)
0.6 -98%
...
24 -10%
24 -10%
24.01 -10%
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
24.5 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
25.4 -5%
26 -3%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
26.1 -3%
Intel HD Graphics 630
26.6 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
26.8
27.3 2%
27.56 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M375
27.9 4%
27.9 4%
28.1 5%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
28.3 6%
28.32 6%
28.5 6%
28.65 7%
...
532 1885%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
28.9 fps (7%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
5.9 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
9.2 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
4.9 fps (1%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
14.6 fps (4%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.3 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
14.8 fps (6%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
16.9 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
7410 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
41 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
43.5 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
33.5 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
128 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
266 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
470 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1495 points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
93.7 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.1 fps per Watt (6%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
40.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
40.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
25.7
low 1280x720
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
60.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
70  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
49.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.8 24.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
36.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
27.3
low 1280x720
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
68  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
58  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
58.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
86.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
54.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
35.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
47  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
42.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
151  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
36.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
49.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1280x720
48.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
54.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
92.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
80.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
72.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
71.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ultra 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
high 1366x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
68  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
high 1366x768
57.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
med. 1280x720
42.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 201940.516.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms28
For Honor40.614.9
Dishonored 219.1
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare32.4
Titanfall 260.345.216.6
Farming Simulator 177027.3
Civilization VI49.718.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided2317.4
Mirror's Edge Catalyst36.3
Overwatch5946.322.3
Far Cry Primal3114
XCOM 2289.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider3118.9
Rainbow Six Siege6843.923.717.4
Just Cause 326.624.414.1
Call of Duty: Black Ops 34828.914.3
FIFA 16845829.6
Metal Gear Solid V58.746.418.1
Mad Max35.918.2
Dota 2 Reborn86.363.529.126.2
Batman: Arkham Knight20
The Witcher 330.920.210.35.5
Dirt Rally1504926.513.8
GTA V54.447.6135.3
Evolve35.727.515.713
The Crew4130.616.1
Dragon Age: Inquisition4731128
Far Cry 442.530.814.7
Assassin's Creed Unity24.316.9
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare54.733.620.410.4
Civilization: Beyond Earth652415.614
The Evil Within26.921.912
Ryse: Son of Rome37.724.311.3
Alien: Isolation584021.716.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor4128.51712.4
Fifa 15816129
Sims 41265129.524.1
Risen 3: Titan Lords4928.512.59.9
GRID: Autosport151713717.5
Watch Dogs36.625.88.1
Wolfenstein: The New Order49.948.434
The Elder Scrolls Online604629.915.4
Titanfall6045.137.523.1
Thief33.22217.58.3
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag42.633.318.47.7
X-Plane 10.2554.523.211.38.5
Call of Duty: Ghosts55
Battlefield 46245.830.411.1
F1 201394736130
Fifa 1477
Total War: Rome II7054.548.113
Dota 230.1
Company of Heroes 229.526.716.76.6
GRID 292.366.653.219
Metro: Last Light4132199
BioShock Infinite80.3
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm72.847.616.9
Tomb Raider1035334.517
Crysis 34325.9187
Hitman: Absolution44.535.919.58.4
Dishonored7054.251.529.1
Borderlands 26446.634.122.9
Sleeping Dogs71.554.728.98
Diablo III40.5
Anno 207037.117.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim6845.433.118.9
Deus Ex Human Revolution57.426.2
Total War: Shogun 242.117.2
World of Warcraft21
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
9
30
18
3
22
27
6
34
14
2
38
3
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 04:36:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.028s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5444 +0.027s ... 0.055s

#13 got single benchmarks 5444 +0.008s ... 0.063s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.745s ... 0.808s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.808s

#17 Got 208 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.812s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.812s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.042s ... 0.854s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +1.839s ... 2.694s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.699s

#22 return log +0s ... 2.699s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 64 Desktop
RX Vega 56 Desktop
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R9 Fury Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
Arc A380 Desktop
GeForce GTX 970 Desktop

Class 3

T1000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 960 Desktop
Radeon R7 370 Desktop
GeForce GTX 950 Desktop
T600 Desktop
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
FirePro W4100 Desktop
FirePro W2100 Desktop

Class 4

VideoCore VII *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter