Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 540

AMD Radeon RX 540

是基于Polaris 12芯片(最有可能)用于笔记本电脑的移动中档显卡。采用改进的14 nm FinFET工艺制造。性能应该在MacBook Pro 2016系列中同样基于Polaris架构的Radeon Pro 450和455之间。AMD以1.2 TFLOPS(Pro 450 1 TFLOP,Pro 455 1.3 TFLOP)定制RX 450。与英伟达显卡相比,游戏性能应该在GeForce GTX 950M和GTX 960M之间。

Radeon RX 540的特点和比它更快的RX 460以及所有其他Polaris芯片相同。 在这查看Polaris构架以获取更多细节。

根据AMD的博客文章,性能更好的Radeon Pro 460的功耗是35瓦。由于性能较差,Radeon RX 540的耗能略少。

Radeon RX 500 Series

Radeon RX 590 2304 @ 1.47 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 2304 @ 1.26 - 1.34 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 570 2048 @ 1.17 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) 2304 @ 1 - 1.08 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) 2048 @ 0.93 - 1.21 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.17 - 1.28 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.09 - 1.29 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) 640 @ 1.29 - 1.48 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540X 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
Power Consumption75 Watt
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.6 pt (5%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -96%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
1.504 -8%
1.541 -5%
1.543 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1.545 -5%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1.545 -5%
1.545 -5%
1.61 -1%
1.614 -1%
1.617 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 540
1.628
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1.629 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
1.636 0%
1.653 2%
1.662 2%
AMD FirePro M6100
1.695 4%
1.72 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
1.724 6%
1.771 9%
1.788 10%
...
20.4 1153%
max:
33.3 1945%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 643     avg: 869     median: 869 (3%)     max: 1095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 566     avg: 787     median: 787 (2%)     max: 1008 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -86%
...
650 -17%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
670 -15%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
673 -14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
724 -8%
733 -7%
744 -5%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
744 -5%
758 -4%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
763 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 540
787
AMD Radeon 540X
797 1%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
811 3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
820 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
821 4%
862 10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
872 11%
875 11%
936 19%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
952 21%
...
19434 2369%
max:
36259 4507%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
138197 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
67875 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 9431     avg: 12236     median: 12853.5 (12%)     max: 13804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 18704     avg: 23165     median: 24170 (6%)     max: 25616 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2495     avg: 3053     median: 3059 (5%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3242     avg: 3623     median: 3686 (4%)     max: 3876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 83467     avg: 89575     median: 89574.5 (10%)     max: 95682 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3783     avg: 4673     median: 4664 (6%)     max: 5273 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4443     avg: 4699     median: 4646 (4%)     max: 4983 Points
171.8 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
4338 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4348 -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
4380 -7%
4404 -6%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
4502 -4%
4554 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
4634 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
4655 -1%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
4698 0%
AMD Radeon RX 540
4699
4735 1%
4787 2%
4894 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
4913 5%
4957 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
4974 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
5054 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
5134 9%
5179 10%
...
59943 1176%
max:
104201 2118%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 12248     avg: 13720     median: 13719.5 (4%)     max: 15191 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 11597     avg: 12907     median: 12906.5 (7%)     max: 14216 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
11562 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
11600 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
11620 -10%
12199 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
12290 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
12567 -3%
12606 -2%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
12634 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
12715 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 540
12907
13008 1%
13156 2%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
13209 2%
13296 3%
13341 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
13403 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
13518 5%
13716 6%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
14047 9%
...
132443 926%
max:
170928 1224%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
48274 Points (25%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
20313 Points (22%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
18965 -7%
19079 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
19100 -6%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
19187 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
19268 -5%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
19383 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
19694 -3%
19971 -2%
20171 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 540
20313
20551 1%
20818 2%
20861 3%
20882 3%
20968 3%
21013 3%
21185 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
21189 4%
21266 5%
...
68064 235%
max:
87172 329%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14964     avg: 16481     median: 15818 (21%)     max: 18661 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19.3 fps (6%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
31.2 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
17.3 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 31.9     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 47.6 fps
0.6 -98%
...
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
36.4 -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
36.8 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
36.8 -7%
37 -7%
37.4 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
37.5 -6%
37.81 -5%
AMD FirePro M5100
39.1 -2%
39.5 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 540
39.75
40.2 1%
40.9 3%
AMD Radeon 540X
41.3 4%
41.7 5%
41.87 5%
41.95 6%
42.5 7%
43.3 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
43.95 11%
...
532 1238%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8002     avg: 9285     median: 9285 (7%)     max: 10568 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 86.4     median: 94 (31%)     max: 95 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 72.7     avg: 76.8     median: 76.4 (4%)     max: 81.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
31.8 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
46.1 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 414     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (2%)     max: 447 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 811     avg: 858     median: 858 (2%)     max: 905 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 990     avg: 1565     median: 998 (1%)     max: 2708 points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.5     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (8%)     max: 58.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 68.1     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (15%)     max: 69.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 fps per Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.1 fps per Watt (8%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
32 42 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12 25 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.8 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 12 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11 24.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3 9.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2 4.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
89.2 180 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.1 70 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3 55 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 35 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
42.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
62.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22 55 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10 29 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
34.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
39 98 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 39 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 27 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
115.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
40.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
55 92 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 40 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
68
low 1280x720
52 75 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2 31 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
46
low 1280x720
65.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
103.9 150 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.7 63 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2 42 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 27 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
79
low 1280x720
152.9 182 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 86 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 58 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
102
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
92.2 108 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.9 71 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3 58 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 40 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
91
low 1280x720
51.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) FXAA 1366x768
58
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84.9 135 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.6 61 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
88
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset TXAA 1920x1080
22
low 1280x720
99.7 174 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.9 137 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8 70 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
89
low 1280x720
54.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
40
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
25
low 1280x720
40 48 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8 35 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 2xAF 1920x1080
22
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
83.6 95 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 78 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 52 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
63
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
29.7 70 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.5 54 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 28 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
40
low 1280x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
37
low 1280x720
43.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
50.8 59 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6 38 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 16 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
105.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
93.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
74.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
48 50.8 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3 37 39 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
74.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147 150.7 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.9 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61 62.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
139 145 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62 75.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.5 61 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 1800541811
The Division 25639378
Anthem242017
Far Cry New Dawn40181716
Battlefield V63312921
Hitman 22918128
Shadow of the Tomb Raider55262116
F1 201862402821
Monster Hunter World60252117
Far Cry 537192117
X-Plane 11.1129.823.319.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance3713107
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1863
Fortnite135463422
Star Wars Battlefront 242.911.29.1
Need for Speed Payback2513.910.7
Call of Duty WWII62.827.712.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins39202215
Destiny 234.418.815.5
ELEX30.315.310.9
The Evil Within 225.711.19.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of War69271920
FIFA 18115.854.840.240
Ark Survival Evolved40.610.510.4
F1 201774312221
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)64232019
Team Fortress 265.5636054
Dirt 4127483018
Rocket League1677045
Prey100554229
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III51.424.622.220
Mass Effect Andromeda70342015
For Honor6420.518.914.8
Resident Evil 7110482713
Dishonored 245293118
Farming Simulator 17137934659
Battlefield 154.230.812.210.7
Civilization VI74523223
Mafia 3423222
Deus Ex Mankind Divided4431179
Overwatch89644227
Doom50392025
Ashes of the Singularity361615
Hitman 201653472019
The Division43.721.29.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider55301613
Rainbow Six Siege105.556.32821.1
World of Warships93.762.132.725.2
Dota 2 Reborn74.462.547.138.3
The Witcher 34935117
GTA V74.963.716.76.2
Thief6350.344.438
BioShock Infinite149766227
Tomb Raider142696032
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
22
20
6
25
20
9
38
13
3
33
6







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 10:14:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 7952 +0.025s ... 0.052s

#17 got single benchmarks 7952 +0.02s ... 0.071s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.677s ... 0.748s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.748s

#21 Got 271 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.765s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.765s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.034s ... 0.799s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +1.872s ... 2.671s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.676s

#26 return log +0s ... 2.676s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon RX 540 graphics card

戴尔Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme (i7-8650U, RX540) 笔记本电脑评测

戴尔Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme (i7-8650U, RX540) 笔记本电脑评测

Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme绝对是坦克级别的。 Latitude 7424将一台高性能的计算机包裹在防尘防水的外壳中,可以毫不费力地对抗任何冲击。然而,这种耐用性的成本很高——首当其冲的便是重量和尺寸。...
Intel Core i7-8650U | AMD Radeon RX 540 | 14.00" | 3.5 kg

Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged: Intel Core i5-8350U, 14.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged

Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged, 8650U, RX540: Intel Core i7-8650U, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged, 8650U, RX540

Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme: Intel Core i7-8650U, 14.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme, 8650U, RX540

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ICN: Intel Core i3-8121U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ICN

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR

Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15IKB-81F5009JMX: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15IKB-81F5009JMX

HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JY07ES: Intel Core i7-8550U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JY07ES

HP EliteBook 850 G5-3RS15UT: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 850 G5-3RS15UT

Acer Aspire 5 A515-41G-17E9: AMD FX-9800P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-41G-17E9

Samsung Notebook 9 Pro NP940X5M: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Notebook 9 Pro NP940X5M-X01US

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter