Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT是基于 RDNA2 体系结构的高端桌面 GPU,使用 TSMC 7nm 制造的 Navi 21 芯片。GPU 包括 80 个计算机单元 (CU)/5,120 个着色器单元和 16GB VDDR。 GPU 支持 RDNA2 体系结构的硬件加速光线跟踪。

特点

RDNA2 是 Navi 21 图形芯片的基础,是 Navi 10 图形芯片之前的 RX 5700 系列的后续产品。 许多新功能,如 SAM (Smart Access Memory) 和 Infinity Cache,RX 6800 系列非常有趣。 PCI Express 4.0和RIS(Radeon Image Sharpening)仍然可用。 新的媒体引擎最多可解码 8K 分辨率视频,新的显示引擎最多可支持 60Hz 的 8K 屏幕,包括 144Hz 的 HDR 或 4K HDR。

表演

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 的性能介于 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 和 RTX 3090(如果未使用 Raytracing)。 使用 Raytracing 时,RTX 卡可以加快 Raytracing 渲染速度,因此性能会下降(因游戏而异)。 RX6900XT是2021年最快的台式机卡之一,非常适合4K游戏。 有关更多信息,请参见 RX6900XT 的详细评论。

耗电量

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT的功耗由制造商量化为300瓦特(TGP),因此比GeForce RTX 3080(320瓦特)稍微低一些。

ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2
Pipelines5120 - unified
Core Speed1825 - 2250 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed16000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.5, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption300 Watt
Transistor Count26.8 Billion
technology7 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.1 VRR, PCIe 4.0, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 8K24, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90. 8K24 decode)
Date of Announcement08.12.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
113573 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
66566 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
160895 Points (62%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
200.8 fps (61%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
167 fps (41%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
47.7 fps (7%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
241 fps (53%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
88.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
151 fps (41%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
30.8 fps (28%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
127 fps (51%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
292 fps (48%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
318 fps (56%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
214 fps (57%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
85.8 fps (10%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
241 fps (53%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
395 fps (45%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
60.6 fps (20%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
292 fps (43%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
468 fps (52%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
317 fps (55%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
85 fps (9%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
30.4 fps (29%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
266 fps (43%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
32.6 fps (5%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
65.4 fps (31%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
44.6 fps (29%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
5084 Samples/s (18%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
31400 Samples/s (55%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
40857 points (44%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
456.8 Watt (65%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
488.3 Watt (68%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.3 fps per Watt (28%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
352.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
283.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
279.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
269.4 276.2 ~ 273 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
213.1 213.1 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
127.8 128.4 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
350.9
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
139  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
121  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
83  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
298  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
198  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
169  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
115  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
68.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Ultra Ray Tracing 1920x1080
69.5
low 1280x720
227  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
169  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125 148 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
102 115 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63 68 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
191  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
190  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
170  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120 121 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
91.1 91.4 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
53.5 53.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
55.6
55.5
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
245  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
205  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
184  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
164  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
136  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
520  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
442  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
395  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
275 291 ~ 283 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
220 228 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
136 137 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
495.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
338.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
249  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
175.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
136.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
624  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
480  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
416  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
411  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
328  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
185  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
208  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
196  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
197  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
169  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
130 131 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
105 107 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57.1 59.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
198
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
240  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
234  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
174 175 ~ 175 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
113 113 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
53.9 54.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
73.1
76.2
low 1280x720
429.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
263  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
180.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
223  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
139  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
70.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
52  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
217  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
190  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
157  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
66.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
141  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
117  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
101  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
274  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
214  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
102  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
66.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
90.5
low 1280x720
196  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
195  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
196  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
197  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
196  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
134  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
101
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
99  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
350  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
283  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
279  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
247 248 ~ 248 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
218 243 ~ 231 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
152 172 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
248  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
213  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
199 202 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
155 163 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
84 86 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
251
low 1024x768
589  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
375  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
323  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
163.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
122  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
76.6
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
369
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hitman 3352.8283.2279.9273213128
Cyberpunk 2077 1.016015212710672.334.8
Immortals Fenyx Rising13912612712212183
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War29819816915311568.1
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla22716914213710966
Watch Dogs Legion1911901701219154
Mafia Definitive Edition16014213812067
Horizon Zero Dawn24520518416413676
F1 2020520442395283224137
Gears Tactics495.8338.1249175.1136.474.1
Doom Eternal624480416411328185
Red Dead Redemption 22081961509882.154.6
Borderlands 319716915213110658
Control24023417511354
Total War: Three Kingdoms429.7263180.3141.392.944.9
Anno 180022316213987.170.752
The Division 221719015713811866.6
Far Cry New Dawn141126123118117101
Metro Exodus27421415412310266.7
Battlefield V196195196197196134
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey124117106989968
Forza Horizon 4350283279248231162
Shadow of the Tomb Raider24822221320115985
The Witcher 3589375323163.6122
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



24


1
23


1
23


5
17


13
10

7
11
6

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 03. 00:49:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:31:17 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10664 +0.013s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 10664 +0.008s ... 0.05s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.613s ... 0.662s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.663s

#12 Got 165 rows for game benchmarks. +0.052s ... 0.715s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.715s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.732s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +1.483s ... 2.214s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.219s

#17 return log +0s ... 2.219s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 64 Desktop
RX Vega 56 Desktop
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R9 Fury Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
Arc A380 Desktop
GeForce GTX 970 Desktop

Class 3

T1000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 960 Desktop
Radeon R7 370 Desktop
GeForce GTX 950 Desktop
T600 Desktop
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
FirePro W4100 Desktop
FirePro W2100 Desktop

Class 4

VideoCore VII *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter