Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

AMD R9 6900HX

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX是一款基于Rembrandt一代的大型(游戏)笔记本电脑的处理器。R9 6900HX集成了基于Zen 3+微架构的所有八个核心。它们的时钟频率为3.3(保证基本时钟)至4.9 GHz(涡轮),并支持SMT/超线程(16个线程)。该芯片采用现代6纳米台积电工艺制造。名称中的 "X "表示该CPU的超频能力。

新的Zen 3+是对Zen 3架构的刷新,应该不会有很多变化。然而,芯片本身提供了很多新功能,如支持USB 4(40 Gbps)、PCI-E Gen 4、DDR5-4800MT/s或LPDDR5-6400MT/s、WiFi 6E、蓝牙LE 5.2、DisplayPort 2和AV1解码。

由于更高的提升时钟(+100 MHz),处理器的性能应该比旧的Ryzen 9 5980HX高一点。然而,具有14个核心的新Alder Lake移动CPU(如Core i9-12900HK)应该提供更高的多核心性能。与最快的型号Ryzen 9 6980HX相比,6900HX的提升时钟低了100 MHz,因此性能略低。

一个大的创新是集成GPU Radeon 680M,它现在基于RDNA2架构,提供12个CU,频率高达2.4 GHz。它应该是公布时所有iGPU中最快的。

该APU的TDP被指定为45瓦(默认),如果OEM愿意,X系列CPU可以配置得更高。得益于改进的6纳米工艺和6000系列的额外省电功能,其电源效率应该非常好。

CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)

Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate3300 - 4900 MHz
Level 1 Cache512 KB
Level 2 Cache4 MB
Level 3 Cache16 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 16
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology6 nm
Max. Temperature95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
GPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/04/2022
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
36.9 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 91     avg: 91.5     median: 91.5 (51%)     max: 92 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 666     avg: 695     median: 695 (13%)     max: 724 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9709     avg: 13307     median: 13497 (13%)     max: 15100 Points
AMD E1-2100
202 -98%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
12629 -5%
12733 -4%
12768 -4%
12884 -3%
12957 -3%
13029 -2%
13103 -2%
13220 -1%
13277 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
13307
13315 0%
13325 0%
13439 1%
13559 2%
13674 3%
13794 4%
13839 4%
13985 5%
14303 7%
...
32782 146%
max:
107681 709%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1516     avg: 1565     median: 1558 (66%)     max: 1616 Points
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
1536 -2%
Intel Core i7-11390H
1537 -2%
1548 -1%
1551 -1%
1553 -1%
1559 0%
Intel Core i5-1240U
1559 0%
1559 0%
1563 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1565
1578 1%
1580 1%
1581 1%
1585 1%
1587 1%
1590 2%
Intel Core i7-1265U
1595 2%
Apple M2
1595 2%
1596 2%
...
2270 45%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2348 50%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 595     avg: 610     median: 610 (68%)     max: 631 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3742     avg: 5162     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5813 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1588     avg: 2163     median: 2231 (14%)     max: 2411 Points
0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 241     avg: 250.1     median: 249 (70%)     max: 261 Points
AMD A4-1200
19 -92%
...
245.5 -2%
245.7 -2%
246 -2%
246 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
246 -2%
247 -1%
247.8 -1%
249 0%
249.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
250.1
251.2 0%
251.6 1%
252 1%
252.3 1%
255.3 2%
255.6 2%
256.3 2%
257 3%
257.4 3%
...
311 24%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 42%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 19.01     avg: 23.9     median: 23.9 (31%)     max: 26.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (69%)     max: 3.07 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6405     avg: 7252     median: 6545.5 (40%)     max: 12330 points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 32313     avg: 42271     median: 39524 (29%)     max: 67558 points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 55915     avg: 69650     median: 70044 (45%)     max: 77450 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11870     avg: 12332     median: 12239.5 (15%)     max: 12943 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 93.19     avg: 114.7     median: 104.8 (1%)     max: 149.369 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.461     avg: 4     median: 3.8 (1%)     max: 4.688 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6795     avg: 6875     median: 6875 (11%)     max: 6980 points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49526     avg: 60091     median: 61333 (35%)     max: 65336 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5090     avg: 5799     median: 5817 (69%)     max: 6070 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 93.25     avg: 115.2     median: 114.5 (38%)     max: 127.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 240.5     avg: 253.9     median: 255.5 (59%)     max: 262.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 16.7     median: 17 (30%)     max: 18.7 fps
0510152025Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.857     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.3     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 11.8     median: 11.9 (31%)     max: 13.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 360     avg: 416.7     median: 407 (5%)     max: 558 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 212     avg: 238.7     median: 231 (2%)     max: 357 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4627     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12154     avg: 13269     median: 13274 (28%)     max: 14115 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.328     avg: 7.8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 8.567 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.719 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.531     avg: 622     median: 656.5 (3%)     max: 692.859 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 38061     avg: 64608     median: 67158 (52%)     max: 72267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15855     avg: 18161     median: 17908 (45%)     max: 21036 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 71056     avg: 77629     median: 77862 (63%)     max: 83820 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 68580     avg: 77428     median: 77897 (63%)     max: 84038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 76107     avg: 80997     median: 80616 (67%)     max: 84711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13091     avg: 17827     median: 18435 (47%)     max: 19474 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18389     avg: 24551     median: 25524 (46%)     max: 27338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6621     avg: 9584     median: 9706 (41%)     max: 11039 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2148 points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1523     avg: 1589     median: 1589 (62%)     max: 1652 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8313     avg: 9642     median: 9647 (17%)     max: 10490 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1531     avg: 1561     median: 1557 (7%)     max: 1603 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9220     avg: 9880     median: 10144 (32%)     max: 10426 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6191     avg: 6642     median: 6698 (67%)     max: 6804 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 36780     avg: 39028     median: 39852 (40%)     max: 39852 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 564     avg: 588     median: 586.5 (1%)     max: 607 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 200     avg: 222.4     median: 227 (64%)     max: 233 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 248     avg: 280.3     median: 286 (52%)     max: 304 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1476     avg: 1621     median: 1610 (62%)     max: 1743 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.7     avg: 96.5     median: 95.8 (17%)     max: 135.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.6     avg: 92.1     median: 90.6 (17%)     max: 134 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.35     avg: 11.9     median: 10.9 (7%)     max: 19.4 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (15%)     max: 17 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 23.6     median: 22 (16%)     max: 34.6 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 02. 04:51:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:30:03 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14084 +0.017s ... 0.025s

#13 got single benchmarks 14084 +0.057s ... 0.082s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.936s ... 1.018s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.001s ... 1.019s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.019s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX processor

Geekom AS 6

Geekom AS 6回顾:专业人士和游戏玩家的终极迷你电脑,配备Ryzen 9 6900HX和Radeon 680M

Geekom AS 6作为AS 5的继任者已经进入竞技场,这个小设备带来了真正的冲击。AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX带来了动力,其强大的iGPU足以满足偶尔的游戏会话。但这还不是全部--Geekom AS 6还有很多东西要提供。你可以在这篇评论中阅读所有重要的内容。 ...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon 680M | 753 g
王牌魔术师AM08 Pro

王牌魔术师AM08 Pro游戏迷你电脑配备Radeon 680M和Ryzen 9 6900HX,在我们的广泛测试中!

Ace Magician AM08 Pro是为游戏玩家和所有在非常紧凑的情况下寻求最大性能的人提供的终极迷你PC。凭借其现代和强大的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX处理器和AMD Radeon 680M,它提供了大量的游戏性能,同时仍然足够小,可以放入任何袋子。在这篇包含大量基准测试的广泛评论中,我们可以发现王牌魔...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon 680M | 874 g
摩尔芬M600

Morefine M600台式电脑评论:配备AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX、32GB DDR5和USB4的现代迷你电脑

拥有AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX的Morefine M600是基于AMD最新的Rembrandt SoC。我们仔细观察了该机型,并将其性能与竞争对手进行了比较,这些竞争对手在一定程度上具有类似的硬件。通过阅读这篇详细的评论,可以发现比赛的赢家,其中有一系列的基准测试和测量。...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon 680M | 779 g
Minisforum Neptune系列HX99G

Minisforum Neptune Series HX99G评测。配备AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX和AMD Radeon RX 6600M的紧凑型游戏PC还包括USB4和Thunderbolt接口

那些目前正在寻找小型游戏PC的人肯定应该仔细看看Minicforum的Neptune系列HX99G。在这篇评论中,看看这台配备了AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX和专用AMD Radeon RX 6600M的小型台式电脑能够做些什么。在连接方面,还包括了USB4和Thunderbolt的最新标准。...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | 1.6 kg
维纳斯系列 UM690

Minisforum Venus Series UM690台式机评测:配备Ryzen 9 6900HX和USB4的小型办公电脑

中国系统制造商MINISFORUM提供了大量为广泛的应用量身定做的紧凑型台式电脑。维纳斯系列的UM690使用AMD最新的Rembrandt SoC,支持USB4和Thunderbolt。在这篇包含大量基准和测量的深入评论中,我们将告诉你这个设备有哪些优势,以及它在竞争中的地位如何。...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon 680M | 621 g

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » 笔记本电脑评论中的Alienware m17 R5。全AMD游戏机,潜力巨大,但驱动问题。

Beelink GTR6: AMD Radeon 680M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink GTR6 Ryzen 9 6900HX迷你电脑评论。比大多数英特尔NUC更快

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » 申科XMG Neo 15游戏笔记本电脑评测。带有液体冷却端口的Ryzen 6000

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkBook 16p Gen 3 ARH笔记本电脑评测。戴尔XPS 15的挑战者

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » Radeon RX 6850M XT性能首次亮相。联想Legion 7 16ARHA7笔记本电脑评测

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 申克XMG Neo 17 M22的回顾。配备Cherry MX机械按键的高性能游戏笔记本

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16回顾。一个不寻常的游戏笔记本,拥有良好的电池寿命

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX首次亮相。雷蛇Blade 14笔记本电脑评测

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)

HP Omen 16-n0007ns: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-n0007ns

HP Omen 16-n0598nd: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-n0598nd

Asus VivoBook Pro 16X M7600RE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16X M7600RE

Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7: AMD Radeon RX 6800S, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713RW-LL009: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713RW-LL009

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7

Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RX 6850M XT: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RX 6850M XT

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3080 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3080 Ti

Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RTX 3070 Ti : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713RW-LL103W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713RW-LL103W

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW-HQ021W: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW-HQ021W

Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RTX 3060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R5, 6900HX RTX 3060

ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro: AMD Radeon 680M, 0.9 kg
   » Chatreey AM08:迷你PC焕然一新,提供AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX和Ryzen 7 7735HS选项

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Radeon RX 6850M XT比许多GeForce RTX 3080 Ti笔记本电脑更快,但耗电量可能会超标

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Rembrandt (Zen 3+)

» AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.75 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.75 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7435H
   8x 3.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
   8x 3.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.75 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.75 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.75 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.55 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
   6x 2.9 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
   6x 2.9 GHz - 4.55 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
   6x 2.9 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 3 7335U
   4x 3 GHz - 4.3 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-13620H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ Intel Core i5-14450HX
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-12700H
   14x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-1370P
   14x 1.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
- Intel Core i5-13450HX
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12650H
   10x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
- Apple M1 Max
   10x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
- Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
   10x 2.42 GHz - 3.7 GHz
- Apple M1 Pro
   10x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-05-19)