Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395是一款功能强大的 Strix Halo 系列处理器,于 2025 年 1 月首次亮相。该 APU 配备 16 个 Zen 5 CPU 内核,主频高达 5.1 GHz,拥有 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S 图形适配器和 50 TOPS XDNA 2 神经引擎。其他值得注意的功能包括 PCIe 4、USB 4 和 LPDDR5x-8000 内存支持以及大量三级缓存。

架构和功能

与 Strix Point 不同,Strix Halo 部分采用 Zen 5 核心,这里没有 Zen 5c。目前还不清楚这究竟是具有完整 AVX512 吞吐量的桌面版 Zen 5,还是移动版 Zen 5。根据 AMD 的说法,由于分支预测的改进和其他改进,Zen 5 的 IPC 比 Zen 4 提高了 16%。

在其他方面,AI Max+ 芯片支持快至 LPDDR5x-8000 的内存,并与 USB 4(以及 Thunderbolt)原生兼容。它支持 PCIe 4.0,每个通道的吞吐量为 1.9 GB/s,就像其 8000 系列的前代产品一样。集成的 XDNA 2 NPU 可提供多达 50 个 INT8 TOPS,用于加速各种人工智能工作负载。

性能

从泄露的信息中,我们得知 Ryzen 的 Geekbench 6.3 Multi 分数约为 20,700 分,这意味着它可以与 Ryzen 9 9900X 等非常强大的桌面 CPU 相媲美。

图形处理器

截至 2025 年 1 月,Radeon 8060S 是 AMD 提供的最强大的 iGPU。它拥有 40 个 RDNA 3+ 架构 CU(2560 个统一着色器),可与GeForce RTX 4050 等中低端台式机显卡相媲美。毫无疑问,这块 GPU 可以在 Ultra 上以 1080p 运行任何游戏,然而,最终的问题是笔记本电脑的散热解决方案是否足够强大,让 iGPU 大放异彩。

当然,Radeon 能够驱动四台 SUHD 4320p60 显示器。它还能高效地编码和解码最流行的视频编解码器,包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是,它不支持最新加入的 VVC 编解码器。

功耗

AI Max+ 395 的功耗最高可达 120 W,具体取决于系统及其 TDP 功率目标,最低 TDP 为 45 W。

截至 2025 年 1 月,CPU 内核采用 4 纳米台积电工艺制造,能效相当不错。

CodenameStrix Halo
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock Rate3000 - 5100 MHz
Level 2 Cache16 MB
Level 3 Cache64 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
SocketFP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
GPUAMD Radeon RX 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
45.7 pt (76%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
116.8 Points (66%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1648 Points (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
29063 Points (27%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2034 Points (86%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
791 Points (88%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11357 Points (28%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4830 Points (30%)
0245490735980122514701715196022052450269529403185343036753920416544104655Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
317 Points (89%)
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
301.8 -5%
302 -5%
303.6 -4%
303.6 -4%
305.2 -4%
306 -3%
307 -3%
311 -2%
313.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
317
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 12%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
55.9 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (89%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8728 points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
67475 points (49%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
347.1 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
38410 points (61%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
121368 MIPS (70%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6540 MIPS (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
36.2 fps (64%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.4 GB/s (76%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
23.5 GB/s (61%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
163 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
107 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18770 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
407.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
88295 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
26998 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38075 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11285 Points (48%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2978 points (76%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
21269 points (83%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2275 points (89%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
22023 points (39%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
425 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
123023 Points (100%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
317 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
358 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2274 Points (85%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
111.2 Watt (19%)
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
133.2 Watt (24%)
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
11.2 Watt (7%)
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.8 Watt (15%)
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
36.3 Points per Watt (27%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 18. 15:12:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:11:07 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.006s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18628 +0.015s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 18628 +0.008s ... 0.03s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.832s ... 0.861s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.862s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.862s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W: AMD Radeon RX 8060S, 13.40", 1.6 kg
   » AMD "Strix Halo "泄露基准测试显示 Radeon RX 8050S iGPU 性能仅次于 RTX 4060 桌面 GPU

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
   6x 3.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
   16x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
   16x - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
   16x - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Ryzen AI Max+ 395 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)