Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11

ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11

ARM Immortalis-G715MC11 是一款用于智能手机的集成高端图形卡,拥有 16 个可能核心中的 11 个。它基于 ARM 的第三代 Valhall 架构,性能比上一代提升了 15%。ARM 还声称,机器学习性能明显提高(2 倍架构改进)。G715 是首款支持硬件光线追踪的移动 GPU,还支持可变速率着色(VRS)。Immortalis 名称用于 10 核或更多核的 G715 型号。

CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines11 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.2, ASTC, AFBC
Date of Announcement30.11.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Immortalis-G715 MP11GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 92008 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 12830     avg: 14605     median: 14604.5 (63%)     max: 16379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 25136     avg: 26537     median: 26537 (58%)     max: 27938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 10301     avg: 12590     median: 12589.5 (53%)     max: 14878 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 19231     avg: 20857     median: 20857 (52%)     max: 22483 Points
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -100%
...
ARM Mali-G78 MP24
12146 -42%
12830 -38%
13503 -35%
14801 -29%
15156 -27%
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
15185 -27%
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
16088 -23%
17826 -15%
18081 -13%
ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11
20857
24115 16%
25100 20%
25517 22%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 23%
29177 40%
36299 74%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 11678     avg: 12667     median: 12831 (6%)     max: 13492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3011     avg: 3419     median: 3454 (4%)     max: 3792 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 23.7     median: 24 (10%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 50.3     median: 51 (9%)     max: 58 fps
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -99%
...
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
39.23 -22%
40.29 -20%
41.17 -18%
42.17 -16%
Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
45.93 -9%
47.83 -5%
49 -3%
Apple A12X Bionic GPU
49.55 -1%
49.95 -1%
ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11
50.3
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
52.5 4%
Apple A17 Pro GPU
54 7%
60.8 21%
62.7 25%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 44%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 48%
75.6 50%
77.7 54%
79.8 59%
...
118.5 136%
max:
536 966%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 116     median: 111 (8%)     max: 136 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 58     avg: 83.3     median: 89 (9%)     max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 112     avg: 139.3     median: 113 (2%)     max: 193 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 156     avg: 240     median: 265 (11%)     max: 299 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 306     avg: 420.3     median: 451 (4%)     max: 504 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 509971     avg: 516244     median: 513865 (51%)     max: 524895 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 95.34     avg: 143.5     median: 157.1 (4%)     max: 178.08 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 8365     avg: 9356     median: 8784 (3%)     max: 10919 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 7601     avg: 8454     median: 8086 (2%)     max: 9674 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.96     avg: 9.9     median: 9.8 (4%)     max: 14.8 Watt
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
med.
30 59 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
115  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact4530
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile60606040
Dead Trigger 2115
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1

1
1


3

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 12:50:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11578 +0.013s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 11578 +0.018s ... 0.058s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.316s ... 0.374s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.374s

#12 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.377s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.377s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.379s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.081s ... 0.46s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.462s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.462s

Notebook reviews with ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 graphics card

测试中Oppo Find N3 Flip

Oppo Find N3 翻盖智能手机评测--配备三摄像头的可折叠手机

OPPO 想在可折叠手机领域分一杯羹。Find N3 Flip 依靠大容量电池和三摄像头配置,与三星和摩托罗拉等老牌竞争对手一较高下。这足以夺得 Flip 的桂冠吗?我们将揭示可折叠手机的所有优缺点。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 6.80" | 201 g
小米 13T Pro 智能手机评测

小米 13T Pro 评测--搭载徕卡摄像头的强大智能手机已经长大成人

小米 13T Pro 不仅是一款硬件强大的高端手机,而且在软件更新方面也拉开了与竞争对手的差距。五年的更新、亮度接近 2500 尼特的 AMOLED 屏幕和高端芯片组,这些都是购买小米手机的理由。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 6.67" | 206 g
vivo X90 Pro智能手机评测

vivo X90 Pro智能手机评测--联发科的高端SoC能否跟上骁龙8代的步伐?

虽然vivo X90系列的Pro+机型依靠的是高通骁龙8代,但X90 Pro使用的是新的联发科Dimensity 9200。我们的审查将告诉大家该芯片组在日常使用中的表现如何,以及vivo X90 Pro有哪些不足之处。 ...
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 6.78" | 214.9 g

Vivo T3 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T3 Ultra

Vivo V40 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V40 Pro

Vivo S19 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S19 Pro

Vivo S18 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S18 Pro

Xiaomi 13T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 13T Pro

Oppo Find N3 Flip: MediaTek Dimensity 9200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find N3 Flip

Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra

Vivo X90s: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X90s

Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro

Oppo Find X6: MediaTek Dimensity 9200, 6.74", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X6

Vivo X90 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9200, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X90 Pro

Oppo Find X6: MediaTek Dimensity 9200, 6.74", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X7 Ultra:官方渲染图和预告视频揭示了这款哈苏相机旗舰令人印象深刻的玻璃皮革设计

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Arc B580

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Adreno 710 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 512 *
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter