Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

ARM Mali-G68 MP4（或G68MC4）是基于ARM的SoC（主要是基于Android）的集成中端显卡。MP4版本使用六个可能的集群/核心中的四个。

它于2021年中期在联发科Dimensity 900中推出。 它基于Valhall架构，被ARM宣传为 "次高级GPU"。它提供Mali-G78系列的所有功能，包括对电池运行时间和机器学习的改进。

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines4 - unified
Shared Memoryno
technology5 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
48592 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4505     avg: 5078     median: 5061 (22%)     max: 5612 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5193     avg: 5883     median: 6021 (13%)     max: 6313 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3514     avg: 4058     median: 4173 (19%)     max: 4362 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3678     avg: 4183     median: 4213 (13%)     max: 4406 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -98%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 530
2996 -28%
NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU
3178 -24%
Apple A11 Bionic GPU
3244 -22%
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
3246 -22%
ARM Mali-G71 MP20
3293 -21%
Qualcomm Adreno 620
3435 -18%
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
3443 -18%
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
3997 -4%
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
4023 -4%
ARM Mali-G68 MP4
4183
Qualcomm Adreno 540
4231 1%
ARM Mali-G610 MP3
4258 2%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6
4689 12%
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
4798 15%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
5208 25%
Qualcomm Adreno 710
5272 26%
Qualcomm Adreno 630
5424 30%
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
5565 33%
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
5606 34%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 515%
max:
Qualcomm Adreno 830
33560 702%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4021     avg: 4779     median: 4796 (43%)     max: 5335 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4927     avg: 5628     median: 5747 (34%)     max: 6110 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3378     avg: 3886     median: 3887 (19%)     max: 4225 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3580     avg: 4104     median: 4085.5 (14%)     max: 4372 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2001     avg: 2208     median: 2237.5 (1%)     max: 2401 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 567     avg: 609     median: 617 (1%)     max: 641 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.1     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 4.8 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (2%)     max: 12 fps
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -97%
...
IMG BXM-8-256
6.975 -34%
Qualcomm Adreno 619
7.448 -29%
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
7.61 -28%
ARM Mali-G52 MP6
7.8 -26%
Qualcomm Adreno 620
8.289 -21%
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
8.314 -21%
Qualcomm Adreno 530
8.433 -20%
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
8.56 -18%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
9.68 -8%
ARM Mali-G68 MP4
10.5
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
10.8 3%
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
11 5%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6
11 5%
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
12 14%
ARM Mali-G610 MP3
12 14%
Qualcomm Adreno 710
12.15 16%
Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT
12.2 16%
Apple A11 Bionic GPU
12.3 17%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
13.4 28%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 1029%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 5005%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 27.6     median: 28 (2%)     max: 30 fps
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 25.2     median: 25 (3%)     max: 27 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 41.9     median: 42 (1%)     max: 46 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 64.5     median: 64.5 (4%)     max: 69 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 91     avg: 100.7     median: 101.5 (1%)     max: 108 fps
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 109691     avg: 127408     median: 128282 (13%)     max: 140863 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 25.38     avg: 34.4     median: 33.2 (1%)     max: 39.37 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 2243     avg: 2305     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2394 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 2298     avg: 2329     median: 2310.5 (1%)     max: 2376 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13104     avg: 21255     median: 21981 (8%)     max: 26121 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4174     avg: 20359     median: 22932.5 (38%)     max: 27937 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.95     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (2%)     max: 7.55 Watt
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
29.8 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
30.5 32 37 43.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
23 27 34.6 35 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 30 40 58.7 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
28 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
71  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact3630
Armajet76
PUBG Mobile48453739.8
Dead Trigger 271
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers80
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4


1


2
3

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 02. 03:53:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:31:17 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#27 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#29 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#30 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#31 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#32 composed specs +0s ... 0.025s

#33 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#34 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#35 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.014s ... 0.039s

#36 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.064s ... 0.103s

#37 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#38 min, max, avg, median took s +0.363s ... 0.467s

#39 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.467s

#40 Got 65 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.48s

#41 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.48s

#42 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.483s

#43 benchmarks composed for output. +0.132s ... 0.615s

#44 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.617s

#45 return log +0s ... 0.617s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G68 MP4 graphics card

Doogee V Max Plus 评测--配备怪兽电池的坚固智能手机

Doogee V Max Plus 评测--配备怪兽电池的坚固智能手机

Doogee V Max Plus 当然不是一款袖珍智能手机，但它以 22,000 毫安电池和坚固的设计为目标。此外，它还配备了 200 万像素三摄像头和夜视功能、大容量内存和 120 Hz IPS 显示屏。阅读测试，看看这些是否足以让人信服。...
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.58" | 539 g
联想 Tab P12 Paper（配备雾面显示屏）评测--中端平板电脑中的屏幕革命？

联想 Tab P12 Paper（配备雾面显示屏）评测--中端平板电脑中的屏幕革命？

联想 Tab P12 的哑光显示屏是一个有趣的新功能：这款平板电脑的显示屏反光较少，据说在使用输入笔时感觉就像纸张一样。但是，仅凭这块哑光显示屏就值得多付 50 美元吗？...
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 12.70" | 615 g
三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 评测

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 评测--配备 S Pen 和皱纹的经济型平板电脑

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 是一款经济实惠的中端平板电脑，配有一支触控笔。在我们的评测中，您将发现这款三星平板电脑的第二版是否仍然值得购买。...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 10.40" | 467 g
测试三星Galaxy A25 5G 智能手机

三星 Galaxy A25 5G 智能手机评测--多彩、可持续、真不错！有什么问题吗？

从价格上看，Galaxy A25 属于中端产品，它提供 4 次大型Android 更新和 5 年的安全更新，比一些高端智能手机拥有更多的软件支持。内置 OIS、非常明亮的 120 Hz Super AMOLED 显示屏和 3.5 毫米音频接口使Galaxy 这款手机值得你关注。...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.50" | 197 g
三星Galaxy M34

三星Galaxy M34 5G 智能手机评测--330 美元的续航之王

经过长达一年的休整，三星Galaxy M 设备作为经济实惠的中端系列回归了。Galaxy M34 5G 配备了 6000 毫安大容量电池、120 赫兹屏幕和超快存储。在这篇评测中，你可以了解到它的回归是否成功。...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.50" | 208 g

Realme 11 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 11 Pro+ 评测--高品质智能手机中的 2 亿像素摄像头

Realme 11 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 11 Pro 智能手机评测--拥有快速内存的设计师手机

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  Review » 联想 Tab P12 评测--功能强大的 XXL 平板电脑，配件丰富

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G智能手机评论：中端产品中的2亿像素摄像头

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A34 5G智能手机评论：负担得起的全能型手机，拥有超亮的OLED显示屏

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G评测 - 旗舰级的超薄5G智能手机与OIS？

Gigaset GX6: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.60", 0.3 kg
  Review » Gigaset GX6智能手机评测--稳定、快速、可更换电池

Samsung Galaxy M53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy M53 5G智能手机评论。有方位问题的中档手机

Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy M33 5G智能手机评论--120赫兹在中档手机中是否足够？

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A33 5G评论。几乎在每个方面都比前代产品好

Vivo V23 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  Review » vivo V23 5G评测--拥有奢华色彩的自拍智能手机

Samsung Galaxy A53: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A53 5G智能手机评测：Galaxy 手机，采用明亮的AMOLED显示屏

Oppo Find X5 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X5 Lite评论。光学伪装的中档智能手机

Realme 9 Pro Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme 9 Pro Plus智能手机评测--大量的性能和体面的低光拍照

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G评论。90赫兹智能手机，三年更新，价格诱人

Oppo Reno6 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno6 5G的评论。高质量的中档智能手机

Oppo Reno11 A: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11 A

Doogee V Max Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max Pro

Oppo F27 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F27 5G

Doogee S200: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.72", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee S200

Doogee V Max Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max Plus

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12 matte display

Oppo F27 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F27 Pro+

Cubot KingKong X: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong X

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024: Samsung Exynos 1280, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024

Realme Narzo 70: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 70

Realme P1 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme P1 5G

Realme Narzo 70 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 70 Pro

Oppo F25 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F25 Pro 5G

Realme 12+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 12+

Oppo Reno11 F: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11 F

Blackview BL8000: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.78", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Blackview BL8000

Umidigi A15 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A15 Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A25 5G

Ulefone Power Armor 18 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18 Ultra

Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra

Doogee V30 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30 Pro

Oppo A2 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A2 Pro

Doogee V31 GT: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V31 GT

Samsung Galaxy F34 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F34 5G

Samsung Galaxy M34 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M34 5G

Realme Narzo 60 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 60 Pro

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12

Oppo Reno10: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno10

Realme 11 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 11 Pro

Doogee V30T: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30T

Realme 11 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 11 Pro+

Doogee V Max: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max

Vivo Y100: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y100

Vivo iQOO Z7: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z7

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

Doogee V30: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30

Honor 80 SE: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 80 SE

Ulefone Power Armor 18T: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18T

Infinix Zero 5G 2023: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero 5G 2023

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer (Discovery): unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer (Discovery)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro

Infinix Zero Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero Ultra

Vivo X80 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X80 Lite

Realme 10 Pro+: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 10 Pro+

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Gigaset GX6: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GX6

Vivo V25 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44"
  External Review » Vivo V25 5G

Realme Narzo 50 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 50 Pro

Samsung Galaxy M53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M53 5G

Xiaomi 11i: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 11i

Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.50", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro 5G

Umidigi Bison GT2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.50", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison GT2 5G

Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M33 5G

Honor 60 SE: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60 SE

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Samsung Galaxy A53: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A53

Oppo Find X5 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X5 Lite

Infinix Zero 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero 5G

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G

Realme 9 Pro Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 Pro Plus

Xiaomi Mi 11i HyperCharge: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 11i HyperCharge

Vivo T1x: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1x

Oppo Reno7 SE 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7 SE 5G

Coolpad Cool 20 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Cool 20 Pro

Vivo V23 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V23 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+

Vivo iQOO Z5x: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z5x

Vivo S10e: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S10e

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro (China): MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro

Honor X30 Max: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 7.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X30 Max

Honor X20: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X20

Honor Play5 Youth: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor Play5 Youth

Honor Tab V7: unknown, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Tab V7

Oppo Reno6 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 新的全球小米Redmi Note 12系列细节泄露

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 新的全球小米Redmi Note 12系列细节泄露

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

A18 Pro GPU *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Mali-G615 MP2 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 710 *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 613 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter