华硕 ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G 超极本简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG LP125WF2-SPB2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 433 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 395.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 433 cd/m²
Contrast: 921:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.05% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.55% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 Touch | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G1 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 Touch | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G1 | |
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Transfer Rate Minimum:
46.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
104 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
82.5 MB/s
Access Time:
17.7 ms
Burst Rate:
248 MB/s
CPU Usage:
1 %
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 | |
| Dell Latitude E7240 Touch | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G1 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2504 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2120 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2115 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3066 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G1 | |
| HP Envy X2-j001ng | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303LN-R4141H | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 4525 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 835 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 31711 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4069 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 508 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 38.9 | 19.8 | 11.2 | 6.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.6 | 14.9 | 12.1 | 4.1 |
| Dota 2 (2013) | 57.9 | 30 | 12.5 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 30.1 / 30.6 / 31.7 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33 / 33 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 3.7 / 8.3 / 9 Watt |
| Load |
28.8 / 30.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Extech Power Analyzer 380803 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | HP EliteBook 820 G1 | Dell Latitude E7240 Touch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 62% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 463 | 719 55% | 813 76% | 621 34% |
| H.264 | 182 | 323 77% | 327 80% | |
| WiFi | 218 | 363 67% | 392 80% | 300 38% |
| Load | 113 | 107 -5% | 124 10% | 83 -27% |
我们已经习惯于高端商务设备超过1000欧元（约7660人民币）的售价了——特别是如果你不想要一块平庸的TN屏幕面板的话。但是现在AsusPro Advanced BU201LA证明了它们并不一定要那么贵：只要800欧元左右，你就可以得到一款有丰富功能，出色输入设备和低噪音发热的优秀商务设备。我们必须再一次提到它出色的IPS屏幕和易用的键盘，他甚至可以与备受好评的ThinkPad键盘不相伯仲。
遗憾的是华硕为这款小巧的亚笔记本配备了这么小容量的电池。它在实际使用中无法坚持超过3到4小时，特别是它也没有可选的额外电池。我们也很希望它能够有像如惠普 EliteBook 820 G1一样方便的维护升级选项。
但是华硕仍然为我们提供了一款成功的产品，现在寻找性价比如此优秀的一款设备并不容易。这对于惠普、联想和戴尔的用户来说也是一件好事，因为它们的产品更加全面——一些价格压力并不会影响商务市场的秩序。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
