Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon HD 4250

AMD的ATI Radeon HD 4250(有时也称为ATI的Mobility Radeon HD 4250)是一个内建的图形芯片(共享内存)的RS880M芯片组。它是基于HD 3400图形核心,并采用了UVD视频引擎,高清视频解码。 HD 4200相比,4250提供类似的性能,但功耗可能会好一点。老HD 3200相比,4250支持DirectX 10.1和,拥有UVD2视频解码器。的UVD视频引擎,能够解码高清视频(H.264和VC-1,MPEG2 IDCT的所有阶段),可以流畅的播放高清视频(如蓝光),相对较低的CPU利用率(称为的Avivo HD)。在HD 4250的UVD 2支持两路视频流解码,并因此得到了一个完整的蓝光支持。的Mobility Radeon HD 3400系列的HD 4250图形核心源于,因此DirectX 10.1的能力。由于缺少图形内存,网卡性能比HD34x0低一点。 Theroretically,可以直接添加专用的内存芯片到芯片上,使其成为一个专门的图形卡(板载)。由于价格目前还不清楚,如果任何制造商将增加内存的芯片。的3D性能在很大程度上取决于所使用的处理器。例如凭借快速的Phenom II CPU要求不高的游戏像左4人死亡星际争霸2在低设置和决议播放。然而,随着缓慢的V-系列CPU,只有老游戏,如Doom 3的或Quake4播放。相比老onboad图形芯片(如GMA 4500MHD),HD 4250的速度要快得多。全新的英特尔HD Graphics的IX的Arrandale处理器的核心,提供了一个类似的性能,但驱动程序支持AMD应该会更好。移动的Radeon HD 4250应该是相同的桌面版本(桌面HD 4250可能是最小的,更高的主频),但速度更快的处理器在台式机系统中使用,可能会导致更好的基准。

Radeon HD 4000 Series

Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 40 @ 0.35 GHz
CodenameRS880M
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0
technology55 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display Cache
Date of Announcement01.05.2010

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 194     avg: 227     median: 227 (0%)     max: 260 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 147     avg: 172     median: 172 (0%)     max: 197 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -64%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
96 -44%
112 -35%
ATI Radeon HD 4250
172
179 4%
179.5 4%
202.7 18%
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
204 19%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
234 36%
281 63%
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
286 66%
363 111%
414 141%
...
132443 76902%
max:
170928 99277%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 6344     avg: 7995     median: 8689 (9%)     max: 8953 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2652     avg: 3622     median: 3754 (2%)     max: 4343 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2811     avg: 3127     median: 3103 (3%)     max: 3585 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -96%
...
2790 -11%
ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
2800 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600
2800 -10%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
2872 -8%
2926 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
2943 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3002 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
3091 -1%
3100 -1%
ATI Radeon HD 4250
3127
3153 1%
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
3195 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
3207 3%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
3241 4%
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
3265 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
3270 5%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
3290 5%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3372 8%
3385 8%
...
68166 2080%
max:
87172 2688%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
1738 points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
1706 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1016     avg: 1362     median: 1372 (2%)     max: 1652 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
2110 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 4.2     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (66%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (47%)     max: 4.5 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1350     avg: 1940     median: 2117 (2%)     max: 2342 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.62 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
14 44 56 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
13.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
45  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
55  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
18 42 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
4 14 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 2389.6
Risen13.146.22
Left 4 Dead4516
Trackmania Nations Forever5512
World in Conflict - Benchmark3095
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark27
World of Warcraft3117
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5

4


4











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 08. 04:08:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1789 +0.013s ... 0.04s

#12 got single benchmarks 1789 +0.073s ... 0.112s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.353s ... 0.465s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.465s

#16 Got 18 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.47s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.47s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.473s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.129s ... 0.602s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.604s

#21 return log +0s ... 0.604s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter