Alcatel Shine Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED-Blitz
Price comparison
Average of 19 scores (from 30 reviews)
Reviews for the Alcatel Shine Lite
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s clear that Alcatel has managed to squeeze itself inside the crowded sub-Php10K segment with the Shine Lite. It is equipped with nice features like LTE, Dragontrail Glass, fingerprint scanner, and Android Marshmallow. However, most of its efforts are placed on the premium build which might shun users who prioritize performance over aesthetics after considering the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 92% performance: 60% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android User DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 78% display: 70% mobility: 75%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2017
Rating: price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 60% features: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% display: 50% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 62% price: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2016
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 56% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 50%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 50% display: 50% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 88%
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6737:
基于ARM的64位四核处理器(4个Cortex-A53核心),频率最高可达1.3GHz。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.