Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M3 Max 16-Core

Apple Apple M3 Max 16-Core

Apple M3 是Apple 于 2023 年底推出的笔记本电脑片上系统（SoC）。它集成了一个新的 8 核 CPU，其中 4 个性能内核的主频高达 4.06 GHz，4 个效率内核的主频高达 2.75 GHz。Apple 声称，该 CPU 比旧的 M2（3.5 GHz）快 20%。 Apple M2（3.5 GHz）.

由于更高的时钟频率和架构改进，该处理器在基准测试中的性能也明显优于 M2（见下文 Geekbench 等），并能在短时间的单核测试中赶上最快的 CPU（如 Raptor Lake i9-13950HX).

M3 还集成了新的显卡，具有动态缓存、网格着色和光线跟踪加速功能。根据Apple 的数据，它比 M2 的 M2 的 GPU 快 20% 。.芯片再次集成了 10 个 GPU 内核，但更便宜的型号只提供 8 个内核（如入门级 iMac）。此外，GPU 仅支持 2 个显示器（在内部显示器之外增加一个 6K60 显示器）。

GPU 和 CPU 可一起访问软件包上的统一内存。它仍有 8 GB、16 GB 和 24 GB 三种规格可供选择，并提供相同的 100 GB/s 最大带宽（与 Pro 机型不同的是，Pro 机型的内存带宽有所降低）。

集成的 16 核神经引擎也进行了修改，现在可提供 18 TOPS 的峰值性能（M2 为 15.8 TOPS，而新的 A17 Pro 为 35 TOPS）。视频引擎现在支持硬件 AV1 解码。H.264、HEVC 和 ProRes（RAW）仍可解码和编码。

遗憾的是，集成的无线局域网只支持 Wi-Fi 6E（不支持 Wi-Fi 7），而且由于只支持单个外接显示器，该芯片也不支持 Thunderbolt 4（官方支持 Thunderbolt 3/USB4，速度为 40 Gbit/s）。

该芯片采用台积电目前的 3 纳米工艺（最有可能是 N3B）制造，包含 250 亿个晶体管（与Apple M2 相比增加了 25%）。3 纳米工艺还有助于提高芯片的效率。在负载情况下，M3 CPU 的功耗约为 20 瓦。

SeriesApple M3

Series: M3

Apple M3 Max 16-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock Rate2748 - 4056 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
12 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)78 Watt
Transistor Count92000 Million
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set
GPUApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date10/30/2023
Product Link (external)www.apple.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 139     avg: 139.5     median: 139.5 (78%)     max: 140 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1532     avg: 1572     median: 1572 (29%)     max: 1612 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24020     avg: 24022     median: 24022 (22%)     max: 24024 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1950     avg: 1959     median: 1959 (83%)     max: 1968 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 492     avg: 494.5     median: 494.5 (55%)     max: 497 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5920     avg: 6124     median: 6123.5 (15%)     max: 6327 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3225     avg: 3297     median: 3264 (21%)     max: 3401 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 271     median: 271 (76%)     max: 273 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (2%)     max: 196 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (2%)     max: 217 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 3096     avg: 3127     median: 3126.5 (80%)     max: 3157 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 21243     avg: 21254     median: 21253.5 (83%)     max: 21264 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2318     avg: 2325     median: 2324.5 (91%)     max: 2331 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22816     avg: 22938     median: 22937.5 (41%)     max: 23059 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 379.2     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (0%)     max: 391.7 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 94770     avg: 96363     median: 96362.5 (80%)     max: 97955 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 416     avg: 421     median: 421 (77%)     max: 426 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2032     avg: 2042     median: 2041.5 (78%)     max: 2051 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 91.8     avg: 92.3     median: 92.3 (17%)     max: 92.7 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.81     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (3%)     max: 6.49 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.63     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.91 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 35.1     avg: 35.9     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 36.7 Points per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 21. 17:02:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:30:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.014s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15113 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 15113 +0.009s ... 0.026s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.366s ... 0.392s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.392s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.392s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series M3

» Apple M3 Max 16-Core
   16x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
» Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
» Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
   12x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
» Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
   11x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
» Apple M3
   8x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
   16x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-12950HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-12900HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
+ Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
» Apple M3 Max 16-Core
   16x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
   12x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x - 5.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-12-10)