Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 28 scores (from 61 reviews)
Reviews for the Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
实时评测 // 无触控也同样超凡? 全新的MacBook Pro笔记本电脑来了。它最独特的新功能是代替传统功能键的Touch Bar。Apple依然同时销售这个没有新触控功能条的机型,作为面向“入门”市场的设备,售价为1699欧元(1499美元,约10324人民币)。我们编辑部得到了一台这个系列的机型,我们将在接下来的实时评测中与大家分享一些测试成绩。
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I know what I’m doing more with Windows than with a Mac. But I must say that this entry level 13 inch MacBook Pro makes the thought of switching extremely tempting.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% performance: 90%
Source: Reviewed.com
If you're looking for the best all-around MacBook in the 2016 lineup, you should definitely get the one that has an updated Retina screen, fast Intel Core i chip, plenty of pots, and a great keyboard. The problem? This laptop doesn't exist. While it's not too late to pick up a 2015 MacBook Air that comes close, our ideal MacBook continues to be imaginary.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Source: Digital Spy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
More than laptop evolution, the 2016 MacBook Pro Touch Bar is computing revolution, and not just because of its innovative new input option. Yes, the OLED strip is a brilliant way to speed up whatever you're working on, but it's still early in its evolution cycle. There are already dozens of programmes that support it, and this figure is only set to grow. What really wows though, is how the whole package works together.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Bill Bennett EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 13-inch MacBook Pro starts up in 12.6 seconds, pretty respectable. This is also running macOS 10.12.1 Sierra. Interestingly, there is no obvious startup button any more, you just hold down the rightmost end of the Touch Bar (it has a slight depression so you can find it with a finger tip) for a couple of seconds. You have to put in your passcode, starting up from off, but hereafter you can use a fingertip on this zone (you set this ability when you first set up your…
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I think the easiest way to think of the new MacBook Pro notebooks is this: if you don’t mind the ports and the high price, then the new MacBook Pro notebooks are one of the best notebooks you can buy. It’s fantastically well made; it has a wonderful display, keyboard, and trackpad; and it offers really great performance for a 13-inch notebook with no discrete graphics.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 65% performance: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cult of Mac EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So the main question, is the new MacBook Pro worth its premium price tag? To be honest, I’m a little bit split. For a starting price of $1,799 for the base model, you want to be sure you need the upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Source: Business News Daily EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's easy to complain about the Touch Bar's shortcomings, but I'm not ready to write the feature off completely. It can seem a bit confusing and gimmicky at times, but it's bound to get a lot more use than the top row of keys you get on other laptops. And the potential for genuinely useful functionality is certainly there, even if a full touch screen would provide similar functionality in a more intuitive manner.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I think the easiest way to think of the new MacBook Pro notebooks is this: if you don’t mind the ports and the high price, then the new MacBook Pro notebooks are one of the best notebooks you can buy. It’s fantastically well made; it has a wonderful display, keyboard, and trackpad; and it offers really great performance for a 13-inch notebook with no discrete graphics.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 65% performance: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That doesn’t mean there’s not plenty of potential for a small, full-color display that leaves your primary screen uncluttered and allows you to manipulate tools with one hand while you use the trackpad with the other. Just as Thunderbolt 3 needs time to gain traction, so the Touch Bar is dependent on third-party support and imagination to really come into its own. Life on the cutting edge is, inevitably, something of a gamble as you wait for everyone else to catch up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's lots to like about the new MacBook Pro: its slimmed-down design, brighter screen, improved audio, faster graphics and disk speeds. But by doing things like removing full-sized USB ports, the memory card reader and even the Function row, Apple seems to forgotten how many of us actually work. An even better MacBook Pro would be one that doesn't require users to make drastic changes to their workflow.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro with Touch Bar is the first major laptop that tries to replicate that dream — not with individually reprogrammable keys, but with a thin touchscreen strip that can do even more. It adds touchscreen buttons and ever-changing digital controls to the familiar set of physical keys, and it has the potential to remake the keyboard in a way we've never seen before.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Fast Company EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Such a MacBook would be the modern-day descendant of the one that Steve Jobs put in the consumer/portable quadrant of his 1997 grid. Did I mention you can't make everybody happy with one kind of computer?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For someone in my shoes, this 13-inch MacBook Pro is preferable to the 12-inch MacBook in Apple’s current lineup, and a solid replacement for my aging 13-inch MacBook Air. Its speed gains over the early 2015 13-inch MacBook Pro are marginal, but the graphics performance is much improved. If this machine isn’t Pro enough to do your best work, the Touch Bar models (especially the 15-inch version) have better specs—or you could try to hold out even longer for next year’s models, which will hopefully have Kaby Lake processors and perhaps 32GB of RAM.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The new MacBooks announced the week before last were conservative except for the new Touch Bar. Don’t read conservative as easy. We must at the same time acknowledge, though, that like the iPhone 7, Apple changed almost everything with the new MacBooks. So how can you change everything and be conservative? Aside from Touch Bar, we had seen the Trackpad, keyboard, WiFi, Bluetooth and display core technologies in prior products and Intel’s Skylake notebooks have been shipping over a year.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2016
Source: Six Colours EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Would I choose this model over the new MacBook Pro models with the Touch Bar and Touch ID? If money was no object, probably not. But if you’re a MacBook Air user (or were considering buying a MacBook Air), money will probably be relevant. This model is a tweener, to be sure, but it’s got a lot more than the MacBook can provide without the higher price tag of the Touch Bar models. Surely there’s a sweet spot there.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/06/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, I know that Apple’s prices have gone up across the board, but it’s far from the only tech company to make such a move, and when I look at what else you can get for similar money to this entry-level MacBook Pro I don’t see a great deal of temptation. Sure the Surface Book will tick more boxes for a certain type of user, but I’d say that this is the more universal device. I know one thing’s for sure: it’s going to feel like a big step back in time when Apple comes to collect this new MacBook Pro and I’m left with the chunky, ungainly 2015 model that I was still in love with just a few short days ago.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Digital Spy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Given its size, this entry-level MacBook Pro feels like as much of an overpowered MacBook Air replacement as a halfway house between the MacBook and Touch Bar-packing Pros. The lack of the Touch Bar is a bit of a shame, sure, but this machine serves a purpose in its own right.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Apple and its fans would have you believe that the decisions made are common sense and of course this MacBook Pro is going to be suitable. Others will be convinced this has damaged the brand and usefulness of the laptop. The truth will lie somewhere in between.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The new MacBook Pro is as beautiful and desirable as ever, but using it is alienating to anyone living in the present. I agree with Apple’s vision of the future. I’m just not buying it today.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the MacBook Pro is impressive, with improved screen quality and battery life over the previous model, and its use of 6th Generation Intel processors helps boost performance as well. Troubling though, is the move to USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 and the removal of on-board ports for Thunderbolt 2 and USB 2.0/3.0 (Type-A) devices. On the bright side, other PC makers are adopting USB-C and Thunderbolt 3, so many more compatible peripherals will be available soon. But should you buy one?
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 13-inch MacBook Pro improves upon its predecessor in nearly every way. It’s faster, lighter and more compact, and it offers a brighter display and considerably longer battery life than most Windows machines. I also like the rich and powerful stereo speakers. However, while I’m glad Apple included 2 fast Thunderbolt 3 ports, I wish it kept a traditional USB 3.0 port around for charging the iPhone and connecting other peripherals, as well as an SD card slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On the upside, even though I don't think anyone thought that the already very slim outgoing Pro models needed to be even skinnier, this is a very good looking and portable machine. Materials, build and aesthetics are top notch. The display is one of the best I've seen on a 13" laptop, and it has low reflectance even when not set to high brightness. Performance is fine, though it's not faster than competing 13" Ultrabooks in the $1,000 tier (though storage is faster than most). Though the lack of currently popular ports is a problem, it's great to have two forward looking Thunderbolt 3 ports (though 1 is occupied by the charger). On the more expensive model, the 4 ports feel just about right.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar and faster processor – and more USB-C ports – will go from $1,799 (approximately RM7,565), while the beefier and bigger 15-inch model retails from a whopping $2,399 (around RM10,090). The most affordable 13-inch MacBook Pro will start shipping today in the US, while the two higher-end models will only be available sometime in the next two to three weeks.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The entry-level MacBook Pro delivers a flagship laptop design from Apple that many will be happy with, without getting caught up in the new Touch Bar and Touch ID option. The looks, design, new keyboard and trackpad are all lovely. The screen is delicious too, certainly in comparison to the MacBook Air, making this a great entry-level (if you can say that for a £1449 laptop) machine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Business News Daily EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As previously mentioned, you get a Touch ID fingerprint reader on all Touch Bar-equipped models, which will give workers a nice security boost. Additionally, the trackpad has been scaled up (it's huge), and the keyboard has been updated to Apple's second-generation "butterfly switch" buttons. Exceedingly slim laptops don't always provide a great typing experience, though, so we're eager to put the slim new MacBook Pro's layout through its paces.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Adding the Touch Bar is a more innovative move. It gives Apple MacBook Pro users greater touch control they are probably used to without making the entire screen one big touch screen like the iPad. That was something that Steve Jobs always said was a big "no, no". But by adding touch elements that change an adapt, the laptop becomes a lot more intelligent, and smudge free.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Pro's performance is still excellent in this respect, anyway. If you have specific needs that prioritise lightness and battery life, you might consider the 13-inch MacBook Air, but for the majority of users, this entry-level 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display is by far the better value.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild - 26/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: GMX Österreich DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2016
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2016
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 74% features: 51% display: 100% mobility: 95% ergonomy: 100%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Notebookinfo DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 97% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 100% emissions: 92%
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Geeknetic ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Saggiamente IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Tweakers NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tweakers NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tweakers NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tweakers NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 70%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 61%
Source: 3DNews.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 50% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70% performance: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Comment
Intel Iris Graphics 540:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
6360U: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
13.30":
大体上,这个屏幕尺寸常见于亚笔记本电脑,超极本和变形本中。对这三类产品来说这个尺寸都较大。亚笔记本中尺寸最大的机型是采用这个屏幕尺寸。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
1.37 kg: 这是11到13寸的超大尺寸平板电脑,亚笔记本电脑,超极本和变形本的常见重量。
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.