夏普 Aquos Crystal 智能手机简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 425.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 410.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 401.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 558:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 2.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
Gamma: 2.16
| Sharp Aquos Crystal Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 8 GB SSD | LG L Bello Mali-400 MP, MT6582, 8 GB SSD | Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Nokia Lumia 830 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -14% | 32% | 5% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 401.6 | 421 5% | 469 17% | 440 10% | 702 75% |
| Brightness | 410 | 411 0% | 452 10% | 421 3% | 671 64% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 94 1% | 87 -6% | 90 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.72 | 0.5 31% | 0.49 32% | 0.77 -7% | 0.72 -0% |
| Contrast | 558 | 842 51% | 957 72% | 571 2% | 975 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.63 | 6.75 -86% | 2.05 44% | 2.6 28% | 8.92 -146% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.84 | 5.63 -98% | 1.45 49% | 2.64 7% | 9.59 -238% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% | 2 110% | 2.32 95% | 2.75 80% |
| CCT | 6658 98% | 7472 87% | 6441 101% | 6686 97% | 9408 69% |
* ... smaller is better
Geekbench 3 | Linpack Android / IOS | Smartbench 2012 | AnTuTu v5 | AndEBench | Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | Vellamo 3.x
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Sunspider | |
| 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| Nokia Lumia 830 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| 0.9.1 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Nokia Lumia 830 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos Crystal | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 | |
| Huawei Ascend G730 | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 5617 points | |
Help | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| Sharp Aquos Crystal Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 8 GB SSD | LG L Bello Mali-400 MP, MT6582, 8 GB SSD | Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 Adreno 320, 600 APQ8064T, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Nokia Lumia 830 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 29% | 9% | 16% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1413 | 1107 -22% | 1642 16% | 1808 28% | |
| WiFi | 514 | 522 2% | 734 43% | 533 4% | 721 40% |
| Load | 178 | 276 55% | 188 6% | 230 29% | 174 -2% |
屏幕和外观设计是一款智能手机的核心，它们对给用户的第一印象有着很重要的影响。这也是Aquos Crystal做的最成功的一点，它前卫的外观保证了吸引打算购买一款新手机的用户的眼球的魅力。而当用户看到它的售价仅150美元到200美元的合约价或单机价时，这款设备的吸引力也响应随之上升了。
尽管夏普采用了无边玻璃屏幕的独特设计，Aquos Crystal依然是一款实惠型手机。它的机身采用了塑料材质，相机的质量也只是一般，扬声器的音量也较低，而注重性能的用户大概也会被入门级的Snapdragon 400整合芯片，720p屏幕，和缺少对NFC和无线ac标准的支持而弄得兴趣缺缺。透过无边式的屏幕设计，你可以看到的仍然只是一款标准的安卓手机。
幸运的是，它简约的功能并不会影响它的实际可用性。它的系统性能和响应速度对于一款低价设备来说都十分出色，而无线网络通话功能也是个非常方便的功能，可惜并不是那么普及。
在美国使用GSM网络的用户，如AT&T，略微遗憾无法使用Aquos Crystal，但用户仍然值得看一眼它的新颖设计。它的外观唯美，运行流畅，且售价低廉。较小的尺寸也让Crystal可以成为觉得5寸手机有些太大了的用户的最佳选择。我们当然也虔诚的期待着旗舰级的5.5寸Aquos Crystal X可以更快的在全球市场正式发布。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
