夏普 Aquos Crystal 智能手机简短评测

Name: Sharp Aquos Crystal
Brand: Sharp

Sharp的边缘。 “无边框”这个词已经成为了一个常用的宣传语，现在几乎所有移动设备屏幕都采用了类似的设计，但夏普现在把它又带到了一个新的高度。请阅读我们的评测以了解为何Aquos Crystal可以获得2015年CES创新奖，以及它震撼力与魅力并存的设计细节。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/24/2014 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen


407.4 cd/m²	397.8 cd/m²	425.8 cd/m²
410.2 cd/m²	401.6 cd/m²	419.9 cd/m²
408.3 cd/m²	406.2 cd/m²	414.6 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 425.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 410.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 401.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 558:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.16

	Sharp Aquos Crystal Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 8 GB SSD	LG L Bello Mali-400 MP, MT6582, 8 GB SSD	Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash	Nokia Lumia 830 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-14%	32%	5%	-25%
Brightness middle	401.6	421 5%	469 17%	440 10%	702 75%
Brightness	410	411 0%	452 10%	421 3%	671 64%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	94 1%	87 -6%	90 -3%
Black Level *	0.72	0.5 31%	0.49 32%	0.77 -7%	0.72 -0%
Contrast	558	842 51%	957 72%	571 2%	975 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.63	6.75 -86%	2.05 44%	2.6 28%	8.92 -146%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.84	5.63 -98%	1.45 49%	2.64 7%	9.59 -238%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.12 ^104%	2 ^110%	2.32 ^95%	2.75 ^80%
CCT	6658 ^98%	7472 ^87%	6441 ^101%	6686 ^97%	9408 ^69%

* ... smaller is better

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1125 Points
LG L Bello	1140 Points
Google Nexus 5	2239 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1889 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	1160 Points
HTC One M8	2785 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	337 Points
LG L Bello	347 Points
Google Nexus 5	694 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	679 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	352 Points
HTC One M8	957 Points

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	238.6 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 5	273.8 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	618 MFLOPS
Huawei Ascend G730	244.1 MFLOPS
HTC One M8	576 MFLOPS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	84.3 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 5	95 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	304.8 MFLOPS
Huawei Ascend G730	88.9 MFLOPS
HTC One M8	337.5 MFLOPS

Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	3132 points
Google Nexus 5	4347 points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	2709 points
Huawei Ascend G730	2798 points
HTC One M8	3935 points
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	5070 points
Google Nexus 5	4966 points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	7353 points
Huawei Ascend G730	4154 points
HTC One M8	5021 points

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	17918 Points
Google Nexus 5	35256 Points

AndEBench
Java (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	283 Iter./s
Google Nexus 5	407 Iter./s
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	581 Iter./s
Huawei Ascend G730	362 Iter./s
HTC One M8	505 Iter./s
Native (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	5998 Iter./s
Google Nexus 5	11344 Iter./s
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	14007 Iter./s
Huawei Ascend G730	7027 Iter./s
HTC One M8	17104 Iter./s

Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - --- (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	8550 points
Google Nexus 5	11103 points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	12566 points
Huawei Ascend G730	5781 points
HTC One M8	24045 points

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	756 Points
Google Nexus 5	1155 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1094 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	754 Points
HTC One M8	1291 Points
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	2423 Points
Google Nexus 5	1829 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	2509 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	2346 Points
HTC One M8	3356 Points
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1807 Points
Google Nexus 5	2424 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	2967 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	1987 Points
HTC One M8	4438 Points
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	8665 Points
Google Nexus 5	8021 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	9161 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	3972 Points
HTC One M8	17200 Points
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	7370 Points
Google Nexus 5	9380 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	14415 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	9349 Points
HTC One M8	17999 Points
System (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	2411 Points
Google Nexus 5	2984 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	3430 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	2387 Points
HTC One M8	4433 Points

Vellamo 3.x
Metal (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	715 Points
Google Nexus 5	1295 Points
Multicore Beta (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1192 Points
Google Nexus 5	1544 Points
Browser (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1554 Points
Google Nexus 5	2884 Points

Legend

Sharp Aquos Crystal Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

LG L Bello Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP, 8 GB SSD

Google Nexus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T, Qualcomm Adreno 320, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Huawei Ascend G730 Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 4 GB Flash

HTC One M8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Sunspider
1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1550 ms *
LG L Bello	1424 ms *
Google Nexus 5	1090 ms *
Google Nexus 5	716 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1168 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	1381 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	1238 ms *
HTC One M8	594 ms *
0.9.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1553 ms *
Google Nexus 5	839 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1095 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	1195 ms *

WebXPRT 2013
Offline Notes (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	2239 ms *
Google Nexus 5	30.35 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1525 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	4796 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	2796 ms *
HTC One M8	1355 ms *
Stocks Dashboard (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	2319 ms *
Google Nexus 5	57.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1540 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	3743 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	2477 ms *
HTC One M8	952 ms *
Face Detection (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	3043 ms *
Google Nexus 5	1211 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	4474 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	7866 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	5915 ms *
HTC One M8	4534 ms *
Photo Effects (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1914 ms *
Google Nexus 5	28.05 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1297 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	2584 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	2043 ms *
HTC One M8	949 ms *
Overall (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	177 Points
Google Nexus 5	302 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	218 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	96 Points
Nokia Lumia 830	137 Points
HTC One M8	271 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	16530 ms *
LG L Bello	16674 ms *
Google Nexus 5	7852 ms *
Huawei Ascend G730	28996 ms *
Nokia Lumia 830	27129 ms *
HTC One M8	8990 ms *

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1624 Points
Google Nexus 5	3032 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	2222 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	1154 Points
Nokia Lumia 830	1152 Points

Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	569 Points
Google Nexus 5	835 Points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	555 Points
Huawei Ascend G730	582 Points
Nokia Lumia 830	297 Points
HTC One M8	1164 Points

Browsermark
2.1 (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	889 points
Google Nexus 5	1375 points
Nokia Lumia 830	632 points
--- (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5	2803 points
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	2502 points
Huawei Ascend G730	2365 points
HTC One M8	2653 points

Legend

Sharp Aquos Crystal Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

LG L Bello Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP, 8 GB SSD

Google Nexus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T, Qualcomm Adreno 320, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Huawei Ascend G730 Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 4 GB Flash

Nokia Lumia 830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One M8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB iNAND Flash

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	1.19 MB/s
LG L Bello	0.8 MB/s -33%
Google Nexus 5	0.84 MB/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	1.13 MB/s -5%
Huawei Ascend G730	0.27 MB/s -77%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	13.44 MB/s
LG L Bello	7.5 MB/s -44%
Google Nexus 5	9.88 MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	12.28 MB/s -9%
Huawei Ascend G730	11.12 MB/s -17%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	12.63 MB/s
LG L Bello	7.2 MB/s -43%
Google Nexus 5	15.52 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	13.11 MB/s +4%
Huawei Ascend G730	5.64 MB/s -55%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sharp Aquos Crystal	116.4 MB/s
LG L Bello	61.8 MB/s -47%
Google Nexus 5	74.9 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505	75.1 MB/s -35%
Huawei Ascend G730	43.56 MB/s -63%

Legend

Sharp Aquos Crystal Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

Nokia Lumia 830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG L Bello Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP, 8 GB SSD

Google Nexus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T, Qualcomm Adreno 320, 16 GB iNAND Flash

Huawei Ascend G730 Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 4 GB Flash

3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		5617 points
Help

Max. Load

Idle


34.2 °C	38.2 °C	38.4 °C
36 °C	38.4 °C	38.4 °C
35.6 °C	37.6 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 37.2 °C


33.2 °C	38.2 °C	36.8 °C
34.4 °C	38.4 °C	38.6 °C
34.2 °C	38.4 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 36.7 °C

Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 33min
WiFi Surfing		8h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 58min

	Sharp Aquos Crystal Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 8 GB SSD	LG L Bello Mali-400 MP, MT6582, 8 GB SSD	Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash	Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505 Adreno 320, 600 APQ8064T, 16 GB iNAND Flash	Nokia Lumia 830 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8926, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		29%	9%	16%	22%
Reader / Idle	1413		1107 -22%	1642 16%	1808 28%
WiFi	514	522 2%	734 43%	533 4%	721 40%
Load	178	276 55%	188 6%	230 29%	174 -2%

屏幕和外观设计是一款智能手机的核心，它们对给用户的第一印象有着很重要的影响。这也是Aquos Crystal做的最成功的一点，它前卫的外观保证了吸引打算购买一款新手机的用户的眼球的魅力。而当用户看到它的售价仅150美元到200美元的合约价或单机价时，这款设备的吸引力也响应随之上升了。

尽管夏普采用了无边玻璃屏幕的独特设计，Aquos Crystal依然是一款实惠型手机。它的机身采用了塑料材质，相机的质量也只是一般，扬声器的音量也较低，而注重性能的用户大概也会被入门级的Snapdragon 400整合芯片，720p屏幕，和缺少对NFC和无线ac标准的支持而弄得兴趣缺缺。透过无边式的屏幕设计，你可以看到的仍然只是一款标准的安卓手机。

幸运的是，它简约的功能并不会影响它的实际可用性。它的系统性能和响应速度对于一款低价设备来说都十分出色，而无线网络通话功能也是个非常方便的功能，可惜并不是那么普及。

在美国使用GSM网络的用户，如AT&T，略微遗憾无法使用Aquos Crystal，但用户仍然值得看一眼它的新颖设计。它的外观唯美，运行流畅，且售价低廉。较小的尺寸也让Crystal可以成为觉得5寸手机有些太大了的用户的最佳选择。我们当然也虔诚的期待着旗舰级的5.5寸Aquos Crystal X可以更快的在全球市场正式发布。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。