Notebookcheck Logo

宏基 Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass 小型笔记本电脑测评

迷你超级本. 一个方便的11.6英寸笔记本电脑低电压Core i5处理器,USB3.0 HD 4000。的Aspire成本明显小于一款入门级的Ultrabook,但属于短期的一些流动性的因素。
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass: Mini ultrabook or performance subnotebook?
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass: Mini ultrabook or performance subnotebook?

One year ago, Acer started the ultrabook era with the Aspire S3-951-6646. Since then, the next generation processors (Ivy Bridge) became available in the successor and the price of 700 Euros (~$901) for an entry-level ultrabook remained the same. The 11.6-inch form factor was represented only by expensive models such as the Asus UX21E. There are many netbooks and AMD Fusion devices (E-Series APU) in this handy form factor, but considering the poor performance, they are not always the best choice.

Is there something missing in the price range between 500 and 600 Euros (~$644 and $772)? How about a low-voltage Core processor in an inexpensive plastic chassis? High-tech gadgetry, such as SSD or IPS panel, is not an option. There is a simple, rotating HDD08/15-glare type display, and a small 37 Wh battery. An acceptable compromise? Or should mobility fans save for a real ultrabook?

一年前,宏碁的Ultrabook时代的Aspire S3-951-6646。从那时起,在继承的下一代处理器(Ivy Bridge的)成为一个入门级的Ultrabook的价格为700欧元(约$901)保持不变。 11.6英寸的外形,只以昂贵的机型,如华硕UX21E。在这个方便的形式因素有很多上网本和AMD的Fusion器件(E-系列APU),但考虑表现不佳,他们并不总是最好的选择。

 

有500和600欧元(〜$644和772美元,)之间的价格范围内缺了点什么呢?在廉价的塑料底盘低电压酷睿处理器的怎么样呢?高科技产品,如SSD或IPS面板,是不是一种选择。有一个简单的,旋转的硬盘驱动器,08/15-glare型显示器,和一个小的37瓦时电池。一个可以接受的妥协?流动性的球迷还是应该保存为一个真正的Ultrabook?

Case

Tight hinges, no teetering
Tight hinges, no teetering

The chassis of the Aspire V5-171 is an offspring of the Aspire One 756, a low-end consumer model with either a Pentium or a Celeron low-voltage. Aside from the attempt to make the device look of higher quality with the aluminum pattern, the cases are identical in every detail. Thus, our test unit also inherits the negative characteristics

The finish is not the glittering one of the One 756 and with its matte, mostly fingerprint repellent surface, is fit for office use. The display frame is still very shiny and picks up a lot of fingerprints. The battery can be removed, when using the notebook on a desk.

The chassis is 24 mm (0.94 inches) high at its thickest point (without the feet). The display lid is relatively thin and flexible within limits. The surface on the other hand, does not give in. The hinges are tightly fixed to the base unit. You will need both hands to open the notebook. 

The lid does not wobble, thanks to the tight hinges, and has an end position of 180 degrees. The palm rests and the bottom cover do not give in. The keyboard is solid and the battery does not wobble.

The reason for the flexible chassis is the large maintenance cover, which gives access to the whole interior. But it can hardy withstand tensile forces. The lid and base unit are clamped together firmly. The hinges hold the base unit and the lid tightly together.

Aspire V5-171的底盘的Aspire One756,低端的消费模式,无论是奔腾或赛扬低电压的后代。除了从企图更高的质量,以使该设备的外观与铝图案,在每一个细节的情况下是相同的。因此,我们的测试样机上也继承了负面特征。

 

终点是一个756的闪闪发光的,大多指纹防水表面,磨砂,适合办公室使用。显示框仍然是非常有光泽,并提取了大量的指纹。可取出电池,使用笔记本电脑时,在桌子上。

 

机箱高24毫米(0.94英寸),在其最厚点(无脚)。在一定限度内是相对薄且柔性的显示盖。另一方面的表面上,不退让,铰链紧紧固定到基座单元。您将需要双手打开笔记本。

 

不晃动,该盖由于紧张的铰链,并具有180度的端部的位置。掌托和底盖不放弃。的键盘是固体,的电池不会摇晃。

 

究其原因,灵活的底盘是大保养盖,它可以访问整个内部。但它顽强的承受拉力。的盖和底座单元夹紧在一起的牢固。铰链有基座单元和盖紧紧地握在一起。

 

Front: card reader
Front: card reader
Left side: Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.0
Left side: Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.0
Rear: no interfaces
Rear: no interfaces
Right side: audio combo, 2 x USB 2.0, AC, Kensington
Right side: audio combo, 2 x USB 2.0, AC, Kensington

Connectivity

Communication

The above interfaces are the bare minimum and can also be found on a netbook. Even USB 3.0 is available on a lot of low-cost devices, such as the Lenovo Ideapad S206 (from 275 Euros, ~$353). The Ethernet port (RJ45, Gigabit-LAN) seems mandatory. Confusing: Some ultrathin devices use a USB-LAN adapter instead (for example, the Asus UX32A).  Wireless "Internet" is available via the Broadcom BCM4322. The WLAN adapter supports Draft-N and also encompasses the Bluetooth 4.0 module. As before, we recommend using the RJ45 cable and the Gigabit switch for the transfer of large amounts of data.

The 1.3 MP webcam looked pixelated. Our sample images of 1280x720 and 640x480 pixels are significantly blurred (noise). This is a bad result for daylight. A small status LED in the TFT frame indicates activity. Thus the user can be sure whether or not he is being recorded.

通讯

 

上面的接口是最低限度的,在上网本上也可以找到。即使USB 3.0提供了很多低成本的设备,如联想Ideapad S206(从275欧元〜$353)。 (RJ45以太网端口,千兆LAN)似乎是强制性的。混乱:一些超薄的设备使用一个USB-LAN适配器,而不是(例如,华硕UX32A)的。可以通过Broadcom的BCM4322无线“上网本”。 WLAN适配器支持Draft-N的,也包括了蓝牙4.0模块。一如以往,我们建议使用RJ45电缆和大量数据传输的千兆交换机。

 

130万像素的摄像头看起来是像素化的。我们的样本为1280×720和640×480像素的图像模糊(噪声)。这是一个坏的结果日光。一个小的状态LED在TFT帧的指示活动。因此,用户可根据需要确定他是否被记录下来。

 

Webcam 1280x720 (max.)
Webcam 1280x720 (max.)
Webcam 1280x720 (max.)
Webcam 1280x720 (max.)
Webcam 640x480 (VGA)
Webcam 640x480 (VGA)

Accessories

In the box we find a set-up pamphlet, the warranty terms, and a polishing cloth

Simple maintenance
Simple maintenance

Maintenance

The access to the hardware could not be any easier. Remove the screw, push towards the front, done. One system memory slot (4 GB) is taken; there is a second one available for another 4 GB. The HDD is held without screws in a rubber mount. The fan can easily be cleaned.

Warranty

12 months bring-in (sending at own costs) is the minimum warranty for a notebook. For 35 Euros (~$45) this can extended to three years. For 80 Euros (~$102) the Advantage warranty option will cover the sending costs. This even includes insurance with 100 Euros (~$127) deductible.

保养

 

硬件的访问不可能是任何容易。卸下螺丝,推向前方,完成。采取一个系统内存插槽(4 GB),有一个第二个可为另外4 GB。 HDD是一个橡胶装置无螺丝举行。的人都可以很容易地清洗。

 

 

12个月带来(发送自己的成本)的最低保修的笔记本电脑。对于35欧元(约45美元),这可以延长至三年。 80欧元(约102美元)的优势的保修选项将覆盖发送费用。这甚至包括保险100欧元(约$127)可抵扣。

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keys have a large gap, which allows for comfortable typing. In practice, even larger hands will have enough room. The firm, but not hard, stop confirms the solid keyboard. The typing feel is still not satisfactory, since the keys are perfectly flat and not concave. There is almost no tactile differentiation. In addition there are the short stroke and a pressure point, which is clear only right before hitting the key. The latter is also not clear enough. A positive aspect of the keyboard is the spacious layout and the clear caption.

Touchpad

The surface is decently rough (generated friction noise), relatively large, and is sensitive up to the edges. The Synaptics ClickPad V8.1 supports all of the multi-touch gestures (resize, scroll, rotate, etc.). The two mouse buttons are located at the front left and right, under the surface.

In addition, the pad registers a push in the middle or upper area as a left click. The higher you go, the harder this becomes. The short stroke diminishes the enjoyment of this input method. It took some getting used to, but after a short time we could click an object with one finger (press anywhere on the ClickPad and hold) and move it with another. The handling can be adjusted to individual taste in the ClickPad settings.

键盘

 

该键有一个很大的差距,这使得舒适的打字。在实践中,即使大手将有足够的空间。这家公司,但不硬,停止印证了实体键盘。打字的手感仍然是不令人满意的,因为是完全平坦的,而不是凹的关键。有几乎没有触觉分化。此外,还有短行程和压力点,这是明确的,唯一正确的击球前的关键。后者也不够清晰。键盘上的一个积极方面是宽敞的布局和清晰的标题。

 

触摸板

 

体面粗糙表面(生成的摩擦噪声),相对较大,并且是敏感的边缘。 Synaptics的ClickPad的V8.1支持的多点触摸手势(调整大小,滚动,旋转等)。的两个鼠标按键位于左前方,右,下表面。

 

此外,焊盘寄存器中的中间或上部区域作为左点击推送。你飞得越高,就越难成为。的短行程减少了享受这种输入法。花了一些时间来适应,但在很短的时间,我们可以用一个手指(按上任何地方的ClickPad,持有),单击“对象”,将它与另一个移动。的处理,可以调整在的ClickPad设置个人口味。

Touchpad with separate buttons (Click-Pad)
Touchpad with separate buttons (Click-Pad)
Chiclet keyboard with unclear pressure point
Chiclet keyboard with unclear pressure point
but full utilization of the space
but full utilization of the space

Display

The 11.6-inch screen (Type N116BGE-L42) has a resolution of 1366x768 pixels. The HD resolutions have become a standard and there are almost no alternatives. The panel is not anti-glare. The glare type strategy is typical of Acer (see One 722/725/756).

The competition has been offering a matte screen for years, even in low-cost systems (Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130/E135, Samsung 305U1A; in 11.6-inch, Acer only has the TravelMate B113-M). Still, the glare type provides optically high-contrast colors. However, the measured contrast ratio is only 181:1.

11.6英寸的屏幕(类型N116BGE-L42),分辨率为1366×768像素。 HD决议已成为一种标准,几乎没有任何的替代品。面板没有防眩光。强光型战略是典型的宏碁(见一个722/725/756)。

 

竞争已经提供了多年的雾面屏幕,即使在​​低成本系统(联想ThinkPad Edge E130/E135,三星305U1A,在11.6英寸,宏碁的TravelMate B113-M)。不过,在强光型光学提供高对比度的颜色。然而,所测得的对比度只有181:1。

193
cd/m²
196
cd/m²
186
cd/m²
194
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
174
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
180
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMN N116BGE-L42 tested with Gossen Mavo-Monitor
Maximum: 199 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 189.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 199 cd/m²
Contrast: 181:1 (Black: 1.1 cd/m²)42.39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

The color space is very small in comparison to AdobeRGB and sRGB. But the competition does not offer anything better. Even the ultrabook Asus UX21E for more than 1000 Euros (~$1287) has a TN panel. But the color space reproduction is only important for professional image editing, which is rarely done on an 11.6-inch notebook.

比较AdobeRGB的和sRGB色彩空间是非常小的。但竞争并不提供更好的东西。即使是Ultrabook的华硕UX21E超过1000欧元(〜$1287)是TN面板。但再现的色彩空间是唯一重要的专业图像编辑的11.6英寸的笔记本电脑,这是很少做。

AS V-171 vs AdobeRGB(t)
AS V-171 vs AdobeRGB(t)
AS V-171 vs sRGB(t)
AS V-171 vs sRGB(t)
AS V-171 vs Asus UX21E HD TN(t)
AS V-171 vs Asus UX21E HD TN(t)

The brightness of 190 cd/m² is sufficient for indoor or night use. But it is not enough to counteract the reflection in daylight. Even with a matte panel, a minimum of 250 cd/m² brightness is needed in order to easily read from the display. But now, depending on the light, slight up to extreme reflections prevent any work. Reading from the screen becomes a torture. The Aspire V5-171 does not have a light sensor for adaptive luminance adjustment.

190 cd /m²的亮度是足够的室内或夜间使用。但它是不足够的,以抵消在日光的反射。即使采用了磨砂面板,最低为250坎德拉/平方米亮度是必要的,以便轻松地读取显示。但现在,视光,轻微的极端反射防止任何工作。从屏幕上阅读成为一种折磨。的Aspire V5-171不具有光传感器,用于自适应亮度调整。

Outdoor: direct sunlight
Outdoor: direct sunlight
Outdoor: indirect sunlight, frontal
Outdoor: indirect sunlight, frontal
Outdoor: direct sunlight, reflections
Outdoor: direct sunlight, reflections

The horizontal viewing angles are tight, but still better than the vertical ones. Only up to 45 degrees from the central position are the colors and structure unaltered. Then the colors are inverted (ghost images). Vertically tolerates almost no deviation. Text is only readable up to 30 degrees. But the color inversion begins at 10 degrees. The Asus UX31A with an IPS panel, which offers viewing angles of almost 90 degrees on each side, shows that this can be done better.

水平可视角度是紧张,但仍优于垂直的。从中心位置仅达45度的颜色和结构不变。然后被反转的颜色(重影)。垂直容忍几乎没有偏差。文本是仅可读高达30度。但是,的颜色反转开始在10度的。华硕UX31A的IPS面板,它提供了几乎每边90度的视角,显示,这是可以做的更好。

Viewing angles Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
Viewing angles Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass

Performance

The Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass is equipped with an Intel Core i5-3317U (2 x 1.7 GHz). The Ivy Bridge processor can be found only in ultrabooks starting at 800 Euros (~$1029), for example the Asus Zenbook UX32VDMacBook Air 11-inch 2012-06Samsung Series 5 530U3C-A01DE. The cheaper ultrabooks from 700 Euros (~$899) rely mostly on Core i3-2367M. The same goes for Acer: the V5-171-32364G50ass with this i3 costs 480 Euros (~$617). 

The i5 CPU can increase its clock frequency via the Turbo Boost 2.0 (2.6 GHz), which make it interesting in comparison to the i3, especially in CPU heavy programs. The 17 W processor (TDP) belongs to the ultra-low voltage category and is thus suitable for small subnotebooks.

配备了英特尔酷睿i5-3317U(2×1.7千兆赫)的Aspire V5-17153314G50ass的。可以发现,只有在800欧元(〜$1029),例如在开始的ultrabooks的Ivy Bridge处理器的华硕ZENBOOK UX32VD,MacBook Air的11英寸2012-06,三星系列5530U3C的,A01DE。最便宜的ultrabooks从700欧元(约$ 899)主要依赖于酷睿i3-2367M。这同样适用于宏碁:V5-171-32364G50ass本酷睿i3费用为480欧元(约$617)。

 

酷睿i5的CPU可以增加它的时钟频率通过睿频加速2.0(2.6千兆赫),这使得它有兴趣的i3相比,尤其是在CPU沉重的方案。 17 W处理器(TDP)属于超低电压等级的,因此适合为小亚笔记本电脑。

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM SPD
Systeminfo GPUZ Intel HD 4000
Systeminfo HWinfo Zusammenfassung
DPC Latenzen Idle: ohne Latenz
DPC Latenzen WLAN Off/On: Latenz selten
 
System information Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass

Processor

CPU load: Prime95 Solo @2.4 GHz
CPU load: Prime95 Solo @2.4 GHz

Has the Core i5 really got the same performance as in the 13.3- and 14-inch ultrabooks? The Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi test result (2.38 points) is the same as the Samsung Series 9 900X4C. The cooling system of the small chassis manages to keep the temperatures within the Turbo limits. 

The same goes for the Cinebench R11.5 Single test (1.05 points). Here the above mentioned Samsung scores 1.07 points. De facto, there is no difference. It gets even better: on battery power the user does NOT need to give up performance. The R11.5 Multi-test showed identical results.

The alternatives, available with i3 (Sony Vaio SVT1311M1EAsus UX32A-R3001V), fall significantly behind, as the following table shows. The i3 is still the faster alternative to the Pentium 987 in the Aspire One 756.

 酷睿i5真正得到了相同的性能,在13.3英寸和14英寸的ultrabooks? CINEBENCH R11.5 CPU多的测试结果(2.38点)作为三星系列9900X4C的是一样的。小机箱的冷却系统的管理的Turbo范围内的温度保持。

 

这同样适用于CINEBENCH R11.5单测试(1.05分)。在这里,上述的三星分数1.07分。事实上,没有任何区别。它会变得更好:在电池供电的用户并不需要放弃性能。 R11.5多的测试显示出相同的结果。

 

可用的替代品,与I3(索尼Vaio SVT1311M1E,华硕UX32A-R3001V),下降显着后面,如下表所示。酷睿i3仍然是更快的替代方案的奔腾987的Aspire One756。

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4348 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
9107 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
3863 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
10.46 fps
Help
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
2.38 Points
HP Envy Spectre XT 13-2000eg
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Samsung MZMPC128HBFU
2.41 Points +1%
Acer Aspire S3-391-53314G52add
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 + 20 GB SSD Cache
2.4 Points +1%
Sony Vaio SVT1311M1ES
HD Graphics 3000, 2367M, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K320 HTS543232A7A384
1.34 Points -44%
Asus UX32A-R3001V
HD Graphics 3000, 2367M, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 + 32 GB SanDisk i100 SSD Cache
1.32 Points -45%
Acer Aspire One 756 NU.SH0EG.007
HD Graphics 2000, 987, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
1.13 Points -53%
Samsung 535U4C
Radeon HD 7550M, A6-4455M, Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 HTS547550A9E384
0.85 Points -64%
OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
10.46 fps
HP Envy Spectre XT 13-2000eg
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Samsung MZMPC128HBFU
14.99 fps +43%
Acer Aspire S3-391-53314G52add
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 + 20 GB SSD Cache
11.4 fps +9%
Sony Vaio SVT1311M1ES
HD Graphics 3000, 2367M, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K320 HTS543232A7A384
7.38 fps -29%
Asus UX32A-R3001V
HD Graphics 3000, 2367M, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 + 32 GB SanDisk i100 SSD Cache
8.32 fps -20%
Acer Aspire One 756 NU.SH0EG.007
HD Graphics 2000, 987, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
6.68 fps -36%
Samsung 535U4C
Radeon HD 7550M, A6-4455M, Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 HTS547550A9E384
20.77 fps +99%

System Performance

PCMark 7 Scores
PCMark 7 Scores

The application performance in PCMark Vantage (2008) and PCMark 7 (2011) is good. Systems with an SSD and 3317U, such as Satellite Z930-119 (+100% @PCMark Vantage) or Samsung 900X4C-A04DE(+42%, slow SSD), are faster than our test unit. The differences in PCMark 7 are similar. 

i3-2367M systems with a normal HDD are 25% to 40% slower (Asus UX32A-R3001V @PCMark Vantage). Factors with an impact here are the faster HD 4000 (instead of the HD 3000 in i3) and the more or less slow HDDs in the other devices. A Pentium-987 system is 40% slower (Acer Aspire One 756, HDD @PCMark Vantage).

(2008年)在PCMark Vantage和PCMark7(2011)应用程序的性能还是不错的。系统,如卫星Z930-119(+100%PCMark Vantage的)或三星900X4C A04DE(+42%,速度慢SSD),SSD和3317U的速度比我们的测试样机。在PCMark7的差异是相似的。

 

与正常的HDD的i3-2367M系统是25%至40%的速度较慢(华硕UX32A R3001V PCMark Vantage的)。与这里产生影响的因素是更快的HD4000(而不是在i3的HD 3000)和硬盘驱动器中的其他设备的更多或更少的缓慢。一个奔腾-987系统是慢了40%(宏碁Aspire One756,HDD@ PCMark Vantage的)。

 

4.7
Windows 7 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
6.9
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
5.9
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
4.7
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
6.2
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.9
PCMark Vantage Result
5759 points
PCMark 7 Score
2317 points
Help

Storage Devices

Regardless of Core i3 or i5, a significantly greater impact on real operating speed was the hard drive. So if you are to swap the HDD for an SSD (from 45 Euros, ~$57), then the cheaper i3 model will also be fairly quick. When purchasing, users should note the 7 mm installation height.

The Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 is a 7 mm high HDD with 320 GB capacity, but with a rotational speed of only 5400 RPM. Evidently, it has a high performance, indicated by the sequential read rates of 85 to 102 MB/s. Smaller files are read significantly slower (4K: 0,316 MB/s) and with a great delay, because of the high access time of 20 ms. Because of this, the HDD scores in PCMark Vantage (3029 points) and PCMark 7 (1313 points) are below average. Quick 7200RPM HDDs are 32% faster (Dell Vostro 3360).

 无论是酷睿i3或i5,显着影响较大,​​实际运行速度是硬盘驱动器。所以,如果你要交换的固态硬盘(HDD从45欧元〜$57),那么便宜的酷睿i3模型也将是相当快的。购买时,用户应注意安装高度7毫米。

 

日立Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380是7毫米高的硬盘驱动器320 GB的容量,但只有5400 RPM的转速。显然,它具有较高的性能,所表示的顺序读出的85至102 MB / s的速率。较小的文件中读取显着慢(4K:0316 MB /秒)和与一个伟大的延迟,因为高的存取时间为20毫秒。正因为如此,在PCMark Vantage(3029点)和PCMark7(1313点)的HDD分数低于平均水平。快速7200RPM硬盘快32%(戴尔Vostro成就3360)。

Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 7mm height 500 GB
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 7mm height 500 GB
Crystal Disk Mark 101 MB/s read
Crystal Disk Mark 101 MB/s read
HD Tune  85 MB/s read
HD Tune 85 MB/s read
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
Transfer Rate Minimum: 50.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 110.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 85.4 MB/s
Access Time: 20.4 ms
Burst Rate: 156.5 MB/s
CPU Usage: 1 %

Graphics Card

The HD 4000 in this ULV processor is overclocked (1050 MHz) and downclocked (350 MHz) via the Turbo mode. On battery power this makes it somewhat more hesitant, but the Cinebench R11.5 GL benchmarks remain the same. On AC power, the GPU performance, in contrast to the CPU tests, falls up to 40% behind the 3317U systems (also IGP HD 4000). Only the Lenovo IdeaPad U310 was as bad in the GL-benchmark.

The 3DMark 2006 also showed a weak performance; other ultrabooks (3317U, IGP) are 7 to 35% faster. The old 3DMark is heavily dependent on the CPU, which further proves that, given the high CPU performance (see Cinebench tests), the GPU in our V5-171 is at a disadvantage to other devices. The HD Graphics 3000 in the Core i3 alternatives cannot keep up (-10% @Toshiba Portégé Z830-10N).

 在此ULV处理器的HD 4000超频(1050 MHz的)和downclocked的的(350 MHz)的通过Turbo模式。电池供电,这使得它有点犹豫,但在的CINEBENCH R11.5 GL基准保持不变。在交流电源上,GPU(图形处理器)性能,相反,CPU测试,落在背后3317U系统(也IGP HD4000)的40%。只有联想IdeaPad U310是最坏的GL-基准。

 

在3DMark2006年也表现出软弱的表现;其他的ultrabooks(3317U,IGP)是7〜35%的速度。旧的3DMark是严重依赖于CPU,这进一步证明,高CPU性能(见CINEBENCH测试),在我们的V5-171的GPU是处于劣势到其他设备。高清显卡3000的酷睿i3替代品跟不上(-10%@东芝PortégéZ830-10N)。

HD Graphics 4000: 350 MHz @Idle
HD Graphics 4000: 350 MHz @Idle
OpenGL R11.5: 850-1050 MHz battery power
OpenGL R11.5: 850-1050 MHz battery power
OpenGL R11.5: 950-1050 MHz AC power
OpenGL R11.5: 950-1050 MHz AC power
3DMark 06 Standard Score
3641 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The integrated graphics card is enough for the occasional game, if the user can make do with reduced resolution and deactivated anti-aliasing (lower details). The performance, compared to technically identical ultrabooks, is rather poor; the HD 4000 always falls short of expectations. In Risen (low) the Samsung 900X4C-A04DE was 38% faster. In Anno 2070 the Satellite Z930-119 managed 41% better. For Mass Effect 3, Battlefield 3 and FIFA 13 we do not have any results of the 3317U.

集成显卡是不够的,偶尔的游戏,如果用户可以凑合用降低分辨率和禁用抗锯齿(下)。的性能,技术上是相同的ultrabooks相比,是比较差的HD 4000总是达不到预期。在复活(低)三星900X4C A04DE快38%。 Z930-119的卫星安诺2070管理41%。质量效应3“,”战地3和FIFA13中,我们不会有任何结果的3317U。

low med. high ultra
Risen (2009) 42.4 19.6
Battlefield 3 (2011) 12.1
Anno 2070 (2011) 32.6 16.6
Mass Effect 3 (2012) 21.1
Fifa 13 (2012) 78 48 30
Anno 2070 - 1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
32.6 fps
Samsung 535U4C
Radeon HD 7550M, A6-4455M, Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 HTS547550A9E384
36 fps +10%
Toshiba Satellite Z930-119
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, TOSHIBA THNSNS256GMCP
46 fps +41%
Asus UX32A-R3001V
HD Graphics 3000, 2367M, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380 + 32 GB SanDisk i100 SSD Cache
32 fps -2%
Acer Aspire One 756 NU.SH0EG.007
HD Graphics 2000, 987, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
18.9 fps -42%
Risen - 800x600 all off/low AF:0x (sort by value)
Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380
42.4 fps
Samsung 900X4C-A04DE
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, SanDisk U100 128 GB
58.6 fps +38%
Acer Aspire One 756 NU.SH0EG.007
HD Graphics 2000, 987, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
26 fps -39%

Emissions

The fan is easy to clean
The fan is easy to clean

System Noise

The Aspire V5-171 is nice and quiet only in idle, when the constantly running fan provides a noise level of 30.5 dB(A) to 31.3 dB(A). The difference is so small that the user will perceive it as a constant whisper of the fan. But under load, the small cooling system can really turn on: 40 dB(A) during the stress test and 39 dB(A) during the 3DMark 2006 (same as gaming). The results are identical to those of the Aspire One 756

系统噪声

 

的Aspire V5-171是不错的,安静的,只有在空闲时,不断运行的风扇的噪音水平为30.5分贝(A),31.3分贝(A)。的差别是如此之小,用户将感知它作为一个恒定耳语风扇。但负载下,的小冷却系统可以真的变成:40分贝(A)在压力测试的3DMark2006(游戏)和39分贝(A)。的结果是相同的Aspire One756。

Noise Level

Idle
30.5 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A)
HDD
32 dB(A)
Load
38.9 / 40.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance)

Temperature

Stress test: at the start @1.9 GHz
Stress test: at the start @1.9 GHz
Stress test: after a couple of minutes @1.7 GHz
Stress test: after a couple of minutes @1.7 GHz

The Aspire V5 is no heater, but it can be used to warm your hands in the coming winter - especially when the notebook is under load. In idle we measured an average of 34 oC on the top and 36 oC on the bottom side. This is almost lukewarm (~36 oC), but still acceptable. 

The 11.6-inch notebook becomes excessively warm during the stress test with Prime 95 and Furmark. The bottom cover reaches up to 61 oC. This increases the average to 48 oC (bottom side). Thankfully, the top side remains cooler, but the V5-171 is still not ideal for lap use. All in all the heat corresponds to the available performance, especially since high performance tasks are either rare or carried out on a desk.

Good news: the system went through several hours of extreme testing for the CPU and HD 4000 without CPU throttling. The Turbo dropped the CPU frequency after a couple of minutes down to 1.7 GHz, which is the default one. Throttling would mean that the frequency has dropped below this value. As we previously mentioned, the results of the CPU tests are on the typical level for an i5-3317U. The theoretical single-core Turbo frequency of 2.6 GHz was reached during the Cinebench R11.5 single-core tests (fluctuating around 2.5 GHz, at a constant level).

Aspire V5是没有取暖器,但它可用于在即将到来的冬季温暖你的手 - 尤其是当笔记本电脑是在负载下。在空闲,我们测量了34℃时的平均的顶部和36度的底侧上。这几乎是不冷不热(约36℃),但还是可以接受的。

 

11.6英寸的笔记本电脑变得过于热烈在与总理95和Furmark的压力测试。的的底部覆盖率达到了61 OC。这增加了平均48℃(底部侧)。幸运的是,排在前面的保持冷却,但V5-171仍是不理想的搭接使用。在所有的热量相当于可用的性能,特别是因为高性能的任务是稀有或进行的桌子上。

 

好消息:没有CPU节流系统经历了几个小时的极端测试CPU和HD 4000。涡轮增压下降一两分钟后,CPU的工作频率为1.7 GHz的,这是默认的。节流意味着低于此值的频率已经下降。正如我们前面所提到的,CPU的测试的结果是典型的水平的i5-3317U。的理论单核的Turbo频率为2.6 GHz达到在Cinebench里R11.5单核测试(大约2.5 GHz的波动,在一个恒定的水平)期间。

 

Max. Load
 42.6 °C50.6 °C40 °C 
 42.5 °C47.3 °C38.5 °C 
 40.3 °C43.5 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 50.6 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
40.7 °C53 °C48.5 °C
42.7 °C54 °C45.6 °C
39.8 °C60.9 °C43.5 °C
Maximum: 60.9 °C
Average: 47.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.2 °C | Room Temperature 25.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-360
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.9 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-15.2 °C / -27.4 F).

Speakers

One should not expect much of the two speakers on the 11.6-inch notebook. The two stereo speakers, located under the palm rests, can at least cover the lowest level of quality: they do not distort the sound at higher volume. Confusing: The highs-heavy sound without any trace of bass is no bliss. External speakers, connected via the 3.5 mm jack or HDMI port, are a must for music fans.

人们不应该指望了11.6英寸的笔记本电脑上的两个扬声器。两个立体声扬声器,位于掌托下,可以至少包括最低级的品质:他们不扭曲的声音在较高的音量。令人困惑:高位重的声音没有任何痕迹的低音是没有幸福的。通过3.5毫米插孔或HDMI端口连接的外部扬声器,为音乐爱好者是必须的。

Battery Life

 

Power Consumption

The energy consumption is between 7-9 W in idle and 31 W under load with 3DMark2006. The power consumption in office use is between 9 and 25 W, depending on the energy profile, brightness, and the activity of the wireless modules. 

Only AMD's APU systems in 11.6-inch notebooks are more efficient than our Core i5 low-voltage system: Lenovo ThinkPad X130e (4-8 W Idle, about 26 Watt @ 3D). The difference is not significant, especially since no customer buys a notebook for its power consumption when plugged in. The 65 W power supply is oversized for this energy consumption. But this way there is sufficient power left for charging the batter, even under high load.

耗电量

 

7-9 W的闲置和31 W负载下3DMARK2006的能源消耗。办公室使用中的功率消耗是在9和25瓦之间,这取决于能量分布,亮度,和活性的无线模块。

 

AMD的APU系统在11.6英寸的笔记本电脑比我们的酷睿i5低电压系统更有效:联想ThinkPad X130e(4-8 W闲置,约26瓦@3D)。差异不显着,特别是因为没有顾客购买时的功耗笔记本电脑插上电源65 W电源,这种能量消耗过大。但是,这种方式存在左充电面糊,即使在高负载下的足够的功率。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.9 / 8.2 / 9.6 Watt
Load midlight 31.1 / 35.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 960
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

The 37 Wh battery (4 cells) proved to be what we expected, because of its lower capacity, and these are no record runtimes. 11.6-inch notebooks, such as the ultrabook UX21 with 217 minutes, are not necessarily better. The vast majority of 13.3- and 14-inch ultrabooks (3317U) manage 260, or even 315 to 344 minutes (WLAN test). 

In idle the 11.6-inch notebook lasted 6:36 hours. This is even a bit more than the Pentium based Aspire One 756. The idle runtime is impractical, since it only utilizes minimum brightness and inactive WLAN and CPU. The WLAN surfing test shows a more practical result. Here brightness is set at 150 cd/m² and a script reloads the websites every 40 seconds (some with multimedia content).

With a 48 Wh battery, the 11.6-inch notebook could have easily managed five hours. Customers would have surely tolerated a battery sticking out. In comparison the APU system tends to perform better, mainly because the manufacturer has equipped them with larger batteries. The 8:45 hours of the Samsung 305U1A (11.6-inch, 66 Wh) or the 7:07 hours of the Lenovo ThinkPad X130e (62 Wh) serve as an example. But with these lower-priced devices, the user must take into account the lower processing power.

37 Wh电池(4节电池)被证明是我们所期望的,由于其较低的容量,而这些都是没有记录运行时。 11.6英寸的笔记本电脑,如217分钟的Ultrabook UX21,并不一定是更好的。绝大多数的13.3英寸和14英寸的ultrabooks(3317U)管理260,甚至315至344分钟(WLAN测试)。

 

11.6英寸的笔记本电脑在空闲历时6:36小时。这甚至比基于奔腾的Aspire One756。空闲运行时是不切实际的,因为它只能采用最低的亮度和不活跃的WLAN和CPU。 WLAN上网测试结果显示了一个更实际的。这里的亮度为150 cd /m²的和一个脚本重新加载该网站每40秒(与多媒体内容)。

 

与48瓦时电池,11.6英寸的笔记本电脑可以轻松地管理五个小时。客户有一定的耐受性伸出的电池。相比较而言,APU系统往往会表现得更好,这主要是因为制造商已经配备更大的电池。 8:45小时305U1A,三星(11.6英寸,66瓦时)或7:07小时的联想ThinkPad X130e(62瓦时)作为一个例子。但是,与这些价格较低的设备,用户必须考虑的低级处理能力。

 

Idle 396 minutes
Idle 396 minutes
WLAN surfing 213 minutes
WLAN surfing 213 minutes
Under load 86 minutes
Under load 86 minutes
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 36min
WiFi Surfing
3h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min

Verdict

Acer Aspire V5-171
Acer Aspire V5-171

Small notebook, big punch? Not completely true. We must disappoint those seeking a good price-performance ratio in the Acer Aspire V5-171. Sure, on the performance side the 11.6-inch notebook is almost on the level of an entry-level ultrabook. This was expected, since the Core i5-3317U is the same processor as in most of these. 

Then the descent begins, at which end lies a good, but in some details negative, rating. Flexible chassis, weak key feedbackonly three hours battery life, and high temperatures under load. The most criticism goes to the glare type panel with narrow viewing angles and low brightness.

Those who rarely use the 11.6-inch notebook in daylight and keep it mostly as an office PC connected to the USB 3.0 dock, will surely receive a lot of performance for a small price. Hardware enthusiasts will buy a 128 GB SSD for almost 80 Euros (~$102) and will thus significantly decrease the loading times.

Tip: Lenovo offers its old ThinkPad X121e with Intel Core i3-2367M starting from 390 Euros (~$501, Free DOS Version). It has similar performance (up to the HD Graphics), longer battery life, matte display, and a better keyboard at a lower price.

小笔记本电脑,大冲?不完全是这样。我们必须寻求一个良好的价格性能比,宏碁Aspire V5-171失望。当然,在性能方面,11.6英寸的笔记本电脑几乎是水平的入门级Ultrabook的。这是意料之中的,因为酷睿i5-3317U是相同的处理器在大多数的这些。

 

然后开始下降,在年底在于一个良好的,但在一些细节上的负面,评级。灵活的底盘,弱密钥的反馈,只有3个小时的电池寿命,以及高负载下的温度。最多的批评与窄视角和低亮度的镜面面板。

 

那些很少使用了11.6英寸的笔记本电脑在白天和保持它主要是作为办公室的电脑连接到USB 3.0码头,以较低的价格,一定会收到很多的性能。硬件发烧友会买一个128 GB的SSD近80欧元(约102美元),从而显着减少加载时间。

 

提示:联想提供的ThinkPad X121e英特尔酷睿i3-2367M从390欧元(〜$501,免费的DOS版)。它有类似的表现(HD图形),更长的电池寿命,雾面显示屏,和一个更好的键盘在一个较低的价格。

 

Please share our article, every link counts!
In Review: Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass
In Review: Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass

Specifications

Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass (Aspire V5 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-3317U 2 x 1.7 - 2.6 GHz, Ivy Bridge
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, 1 x 4096 MB
Display
11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, CMN N116BGE-L42, TN-LED, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel HM77 (Panther Point)
Storage
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E380, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Soundcard
Intel Panther Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Out/Mic combo, Card Reader: SD, SDHC
Networking
Broadcom NetLink BCM57785 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Broadcom BCM4322 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.4 x 285 x 202
Battery
37 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells, 2500mAh 14,8V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1.3MP 1280x720
Additional features
Speakers: 2 x Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, Polishing cloth, Microsoft Office Starter, Windows Live Essentials, Recovery Manager, Clear.fi Media/Photo, EuroSportPlayer, Crystal Eye Webcam, , 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.326 kg, Power Supply: 387 g
Price
599 Euro

 

Ultrabooks are too expensive?
Ultrabooks are too expensive?
The battery is secured via a recessed lock
The battery is secured via a recessed lock
and can be unlocked only with a pen or a screwdriver.
and can be unlocked only with a pen or a screwdriver.
Its capacity of 17 Wh is only enough, even with the efficient hardware, for not too long runtimes (three hours WLAN test).
Its capacity of 17 Wh is only enough, even with the efficient hardware, for not too long runtimes (three hours WLAN test).
The whole bottom cover can be removed after releasing a single screw.
The whole bottom cover can be removed after releasing a single screw.
The 2.5-inch HDD can be exchanged for an SSD.
The 2.5-inch HDD can be exchanged for an SSD.
Warning! The bay allows a height of 7 mm. Normally this is 9 mm.
Warning! The bay allows a height of 7 mm. Normally this is 9 mm.
The fan can be cleaned when necessary (with compressed air).
The fan can be cleaned when necessary (with compressed air).
There is still space: A second RAM module can be added.
There is still space: A second RAM module can be added.
Acer Aspire V5-171: Office input devices would need better feedback.
Acer Aspire V5-171: Office input devices would need better feedback.
Acer Aspire V5-171: The performance is almost as good as an ultrabook (HDD).
Acer Aspire V5-171: The performance is almost as good as an ultrabook (HDD).
Acer provides only a brief instructions leaflet and a polishing cloth.
Acer provides only a brief instructions leaflet and a polishing cloth.
It delivers up to 65 W, which is more than enough for all usage scenarios.
It delivers up to 65 W, which is more than enough for all usage scenarios.
We would have preferred the power supply as a small AC adapter (see Aspire One 756).
We would have preferred the power supply as a small AC adapter (see Aspire One 756).
Why not make a compromise?
Why not make a compromise?
The Acer Aspire V5-171 has the same processor as most ultrabooks (Intel Core i5-3317U),
The Acer Aspire V5-171 has the same processor as most ultrabooks (Intel Core i5-3317U),
but costs only 550 Euro (market price).
but costs only 550 Euro (market price).
For this you get a fairly stable plastic case
For this you get a fairly stable plastic case
with a modern Click-Pad (without separate mouse buttons).
with a modern Click-Pad (without separate mouse buttons).
The keyboard has a weak, unclear feedback.
The keyboard has a weak, unclear feedback.
This is due to the somewhat unclear pressure point. But the keyboard has a firm base.
This is due to the somewhat unclear pressure point. But the keyboard has a firm base.
The interfaces include not only VGA, Ethernet, and HDMI,
The interfaces include not only VGA, Ethernet, and HDMI,
but also a USB 3.0 port.
but also a USB 3.0 port.
The card reader with its SD dummy is located on the left of the front side.
The card reader with its SD dummy is located on the left of the front side.
Acer Aspire V5-171: The glare type panel is a real mood killer in the sunshine.
Acer Aspire V5-171: The glare type panel is a real mood killer in the sunshine.

Similar Notebooks

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

宏基 Aspire S7-191 超级本测评
HD Graphics 4000, Core i7 3517U
华硕 VivoBook S200E 小型笔记本测评
HD Graphics 4000, Core i3 3217U

Devices with the same GPU

微星S30-i3U465的超薄笔记本电脑测评
HD Graphics 4000, Core i3 3217U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
回顾华硕VivoBook S300CA亚笔记本
HD Graphics 4000, Core i3 3217U, 13.30", 1.76 kg
回顾谷歌Chromebook的像素笔记本
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3427U, 12.90", 1.52 kg
东芝 Satellite U940-101 超级本测评
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3317U, 14.00", 1.72 kg

Links

  • Manufacturer's information

Price Comparison

Pros

+ 轻,方便
+ 维修方便访问
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 几乎没有足够的电池寿命
- 灵活的底盘
- 高负载下的温度
- TFT防眩光
- 颤抖键盘
- 没有AC适配器

Shortcut

What we like

Very quiet in normal use. Low power consumption for energy savers. 

What we'd like to see 

Energy saving hardware, but a glossy screen and a weak battery. The low battery runtime is self-inflicted.

What surprises us 

How much the hard drive slows down the system performance. 

The competition

Rating

Acer Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass - 09/23/2012 v3 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
72%
Keyboard
78%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
65%
Weight
93%
Battery
82%
Display
67%
Games Performance
61%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
60%
Noise
89%
Add Points
78%
Average
76%
79%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏基 Aspire V5-171-53314G50ass 小型笔记本电脑测评
Sebastian Jentsch, 2012-12-24 (Update: 2014-06-13)