Asus ZenFone 3 ZE520KL
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 21 scores (from 43 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus ZenFone 3 ZE520KL
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you don’t run high intensive tasks and games, but want a beautiful looking smartphone with a great camera, it’s a yes. A great advantage for all the ZenFones is they are available in offline stores too. Furthermore, it also bundles earphones while many others don’t. But, if you want to run graphics intensive games and heavy applications that require more CPU power, we would suggest you l
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The front 8 MP camera also captures some great shots in daylight. Images captured under low lights tend to blur slightly otherwise is good for selfie needs. Due to its wide angle lens, it can cover a large group of people. The front camera records 1080p videos.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So should you buy it? The ASUS ZenFone 3 is available at ₹21,999. If you don’t run high intensive tasks and games, but want a beautiful looking smartphone with a great camera, it’s a yes. A great advantage for all the ZenFones is they are available in offline stores too. Furthermore, it also bundles earphones while many others don’t. But, if you want to run graphics intensive games and heavy applications that require more CPU power, we would suggest you look at the other similar priced smartphones before you buy ZenFone 3.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: Techniqued EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you are in the market for a good all-round device and not really worried about the processor, then ASUS Zenfone 3 is a good buy at 21,999. It offers superior build, good software with decent performance, above average camera and decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Its companion Zenfone 3 Deluxe uses a Super AMOLED display. I would certainly tell that if Zenfone 3 used an AMOLED display, the results would even more surprising. And well, it could be gone even better if the battery capacity had been increased to 3000 mAh at least. Nevertheless, Zenfone 3 battery life is much satisfying as compared to other smartphones offering a 3000 mAh battery.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If we talk about the pricing, Zenfone 3 is available at ₹21,999 while the Chinese flagships such as Xiaomi Mi 5 and LeEco Le Max 2 are very close competitors offering more performance and features with similar price. Having said that specifications is not the only thing to see while seeing the prices, it’s the overall experience with the device that matters at the end.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At Rs. 27,999, the Asus Zenfone 3 is not the best smartphone to buy for those looking for a whole package. You can consider this smartphone for its battery, and even the camera is above average, but as a complete smartphone, the Zenfone 3 is well behind the OnePlus 3 and LeEco Le Max 2.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 60%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Wintech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2017
Source: Wiz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2016
Source: Giz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2016
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/22/2016
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 95% display: 78% mobility: 86% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2016
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2017
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Mobilizujeme CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2016
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.