Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 35 scores (from 70 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
高续航,低性能。 华硕 ZenFone 3 Max 意在以它的高容量电池给用户留下深刻的印象并满足所有追求长续航的用户的需求。但是,在我们的测试中我们发现,为达到长续航的目的,华硕不得不在其他方面做出妥协。
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At this price point, it holds up well for daily usage. Great for worry free travels for the casual traveller.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As we expected, the available 4130mAh battery is Zenfone 3 Max’s key advantage in its battle with the competitive models in this price range. Apart from ensuring high durability, it is also complemented by several battery saving modes which can significantly increase battery life between separate charges. They are part of the feature-rich Zen user interface by ASUS which complements the Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS in the best possible way. Additionally, you get an HD display which ensures good enough image detail plus high brightness levels allowing easy use when outdoors.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Source: PC Quest EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Bottomline: If you’re looking for a great battery phone but don’t want to carry weight, then this is the right device with good overall performance, but a bit expensive. So, if you are ready to spend 18k then it’s a perfect choice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 90% performance: 100%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’re looking to grab a member of the ASUS ZF3 family and have limited funds, then you can’t do any better than the 5.5-inch version of the ZF3 Max. It has many of the same features that both the ZF3 Laser and the smaller ZF3 Max have – big battery, fast performance and insane battery life – at a price that’s hard to beat.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max 5.5 (ZC553KL) is yet another quality smartphone from Asus. Although, it’s already above the Php10k mark making it a bit difficult to suggest among budget consumers who prefers long battery life. At Php10,995, it’s a good balance for what you’re getting and this makes it the second cheapest Zenfone 3 member you can purchase.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
People already wants a phone with longer battery life and you are the one, consider it if you like the brand value. There are some alternatives to it like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which also comes to play when it’s a showdown for the battery runtime, but only if you want a phone without a recognized brand and yes, the camera of course. Even though its smaller sized form factor, I like the design, the camera, and its battery life. What I would expect here would be a better CPU at this price range. Overall, the long battery run is a deal breaker. Not to mention it can charge other phones, consider it also as a 4,100 mAh pocket power bank.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2016
Source: Mobile and Apps EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you need a smartphone that packs a great battery, you might need to look at the Asus ZenFone 3 Max. It is one of the many phones that Asus has released in its lineup and promises steady performance on the user end.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/24/2016
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The only thing missing now is price – there’s no pricing for the 5.5-inch ZF3 Max in the Philippines yet unfortunately, but if India pricing is anything to go by, it’ll probably retail close to the SRP of the Zenfone 3 Laser. That’s why we think that ASUS may discontinue the ZF3 Laser, since their prices are so close to each other anyway. The 5.5 ZF3 Max having an almost identical feature set with the ZF3 Laser means that the two phones will cannibalize each other in the market if they’re both available.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Tech Magnifier EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max impresses when it comes to gaming performance, video playback and battery backup. The battery lasts more than a day in average usage and about a day in heavy usage. The screen is visible in direct sunlight and color is rendering is also appropriate. But considering the price there are better options available such as Le eco Le Max 2, One plus 3 and Mi Max Prime.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL is a good handset, quad core but quite powerful and heat up is under control. Battery life is very good. Handset has got a premium feel and the price is on the higher side. I was expecting it to be somewhere under Rs. 10,000.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, if your pain-point is battery and you just need good performance overall on other fronts, then this is among the best bets in the market at the moment. Given the price, the Asus ZenFone 3 Max seems good value for money given that it offers a dependable piece of hardware that will keep most users happy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Given that the hardware is relatively low powered along with the display, the 4,100 mAh battery should offer a plenty of uptime. It is priced at ₹12,999 and available on online and offline stores.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max is no doubt one of the best handsets in the particular series I've come across so far. It has a huge battery capacity of 4100mAh, which is not the highest but good enough to keep the device running for over a full day of use. There are other battery-focussed handsets too in the market but are priced higher.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I can’t for the life of me figure out why Asus has priced the ZenFone 3 Max as they did. I appreciate the battery life and the build quality at this asking price of Rs 17,999, but that sluggish SoC completely ruins the experience for me. The camera is also lack-lustre. The elephant in the room is, of course, the Redmi Note 3, and that device sells for about Rs 5,000 to Rs 7,000 less than the ZenFone 3 Max. It also offers a massive performance bump, a better camera and the same battery life. Why would anyone in their right minds pick a ZenFone 3 Max over the Redmi Note 3, at the current pricing?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Then there's the pricing. The ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) will cost buyers Rs 17,999. That's right. It's mighty expensive and easily forgettable. Especially, when a phone like the Redmi 3S Prime offers so much more (even equally good battery life, at just about Rs 9,000) in actual usage. Not to forget, phones like the Moto G4 Plus and the Lenovo Vibe K5 Note are equally competitive.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZenFone 3 Max Review: Maximised the battery experience The Zenfone 3 Max comes out as a decent smartphone to keep in your wish list. The battery output and camera performance are impressive. Even the performance will not disappoint.. The only issue that Asus needs to sort out at the earliest in to remove bloatware they need to give users freedom to choose what they want to download.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZenFone Max name no longer means you're getting a one-trick pony, as this new model aims to offer a well-rounded solution to aspiring smartphone buyers. This shows in the new aesthetics, improved display and cameras, and of course, solid battery life. It would have made a perfect rival to Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 3, but Asus has priced the ZenFone 3 Max in line with higher aspirations. Keep in mind that the ZC520TL variant does fall in the Redmi's price range but it doesn't seem to match up to it, at least on paper. It's also important that you check the model number behind the box carefully as its easy to confuse the two versions.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Zenfone 3 Max is quite a decent smartphone and this is something that can be said for the entire Zenfone range. It however lacks a differentiating factor. In fact even within it’s own product lineup, Asus would find it hard to set the Max aside given that phones like the Zenfone 3 Laser too have really good battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ASUS ZenFone 3 Max will have a tough time measuring up to its own past model and rivals. For an extra S$50, you get a 1080p display and better battery life with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, but the same price will net you the older ZenFone Max that comes with a larger battery capacity and significantly longer battery life - exactly what we expect out of a "Max" class ZenFone product.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 40% features: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Zenfone 3 Max is more of an update rather than an upgrade for the Max series of the Zenfone. The smaller screen size is the culprit behind the shrunken battery capacity. While it’s still above the standard Android phone battery life, it’s not as impressive as before or even when compared to its Zenfone 3 siblings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZF3 Max is shaping up to be a promising smartphone on its own right – we’re in the middle of the review process of the phone and the review should be out by next week. Stay tuned till then.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the original Zenfone Max delivered insane battery endurance, it sacrificed everything else to get that legendary battery performance. That’s not the case with the Zenfone 3 Max – while it performs a little worse in the battery department because of the smaller capacity, it’s a better phone in almost every other category. ASUS compromised a little bit on the battery to give users a phone that’s not just a glorified powerbank, and they’ve succeeded.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That’s pretty much it for this initial review for the Zenfone 3 Max. We’ll be running PCMark’s battery benchmark as soon as possible on this phone so you can watch out later on to see just how far the Zenfone 3 Max can go on a single charge. The Zenfone 3 Max is available to buy now, priced at Php 8,995.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 97% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Android Pit - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Ocaholic.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Target HD PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Source: MrInformatica IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2017
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Source: Tecno User IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 95% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 90%
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 85% features: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Optima IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85%
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: Hardwareready.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/03/2016
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 90% features: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/26/2016
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 78% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84% ergonomy: 82%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Lupo Kkio IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 89% workmanship: 72%
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Inceleme.co TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/24/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/18/2016
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: Digitalportal.sk SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6737:
基于ARM的64位四核处理器(4个Cortex-A53核心),频率最高可达1.3GHz。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.