Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Specifications
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 万像素 F1.8光圈,小物镜上27mm等效焦距,6p物镜,0.03秒自动对焦,LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 深度感应,84°视野
Price comparison
Average of 21 scores (from 38 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
华硕ZenFone Max Pro(M2)已经在印度市场上销售了一段时间,华硕在2019年移动世界大会之后将该型号推向更广阔的市场。ZenFone Max Pro(M2)的亮点是其5000毫安的大电池,改进的设计和更强大的硬件,这些都向我们暗示,华硕意识到了上一代的不足。请继续阅读,了解华硕是否已经做了足够的努力,使ZenFone Max Pro(M2)在其竞争激烈的市场中脱颖而出。
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Starting at 12,999 rupees in India, and about $320 in the U.S. via Amazon, the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 is a well-rounded affordable smartphone that punches above its weight. There are upgrades across the board from the last generation. Asus really moved the line forward, rather than adding small iterative changes.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If long-lasting battery life is a priority when you choose a smartphone in the mid-range scene, then we can definitely recommend giving the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 a look. It’s what the Max line from Asus has always promised and it’s what the Max Pro M2 delivers with a bit more oomph under the hood too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, this Asus smartphone is a good buy if you are searc ..
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZenFone Max Pro M2 punches well above its weight, and it looks, feels and handles like a much more expensive device. If you're on a tight budget for your next phone purchase, and you're looking to get the most bang for your buck, right now, there's no better purchase than the Max Pro M2 - if it gets stocked in retail.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Mobile Geeks DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 95%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2019
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/20/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 9% price: 80% display: 69% mobility: 97% workmanship: 69%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 68% features: 84%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% features: 79% display: 83% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2019
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% mobility: 100%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2019
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/18/2018
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 67% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% features: 70% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2019
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 660:
高性能中档ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中的4个高速2.2 GHz内核和2个省电1.8 GHz内核)和Adreno 512 GPU。采用14纳米工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.26":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.