DevilTech HellMachine 笔记本测评

Processor

To meet demands for high performance, Deviltech equip the HellMachine with a powerful quad core CPU. Because of its decent price-performance ratio we opted for a Core i7-3630QM.

This high-end CPU contains 1.4 billion transistors and, alike all other Ivy Bridge models, it is manufactured using 22 nm lithography. In contrast to the more expensive Core i7-3840QM it »only« houses 6 instead of 8 MB L3 cache.

Typically Intel, the present processor generation supports a lot of features. In addition to Hyper Threading (simulates virtual cores), especially the Turbo Boost technology is interesting. The base clock is automatically increased by several 100 MHz under load. The Core i7-3630QM supports a maximum of 3.4 GHz. The TDP of 45 Watt exceeds the average of notebooks (dual core CPUs: maximum of 35 Watt).

Because of SLI compatibility the HD Graphics 4000 can not be used. We will analyze whether it is worth buying a more powerful CPU model by means of several benchmarks.

处理器

为了满足对高性能的需求，Deviltech装备HellMachine一个强大的四核心CPU。由于其体面的价格性能比，我们选择了酷睿i7-3630QM。

这种高端的CPU包含140亿晶体管和，都Ivy Bridge的所有其他机型，它采用22纳米光刻技术制造的。在较昂贵的核心酷睿i7-3840QM呢？“的房子，而不是8 MB的L3高速缓存。

通常情况下，本处理器英特尔新一代支持的特定功能。除了超执行绪（模拟虚拟内核），特别是Turbo Boost技术是有趣的。基准时钟数100 MHz的负载下自动增加。酷睿i7-3630QM，支持最高3.4 GHz的。 45瓦的TDP超过笔记本电脑（双核CPU：最大35瓦）的平均水平。

由于SLI兼容性的高清显卡4000不能使用。我们将分析是否值得购买更强大的CPU模型，通过几个基准。

Dual GPU solutions like the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI are controversial. They improve the performance. If the GPU driver supports an appropriate profile, the frame rates can sometimes increase by up to 80 to 100 %. 

But, high waste heat and huge energy demands requiring a good cooling system and a big power supply are negative aspects. The HellMachine comes with a 1.6 kg 300 watt model. Another problem is micro stuttering. Sometimes it comes to large time intervals between images. So, the movements do no longer appear to be smooth to the human eye. In extreme scenarios games look smoother on single card systems. Moreover, 3D programs can even run slower without SLI profile. This is currently true for Need for Most: Most Wanted. Fortunately, Nvidia offers a handy update function.

Regardless of the upgrade, we recommend checking whether Nvidia made a completely new version available after some weeks. The beta driver 310.61 used in the benchmarks installs without troubles.

GeForce®（精视™）GTX670MX SLI双GPU解决方案，如存在争议。它们改善了性能。如果GPU驱动程序支持一个适当的配置文件，帧速率有时可以增加高达80至100％。

但是，高浪费的热和巨大的能源需求，需要一个良好的冷却系统和一个大的电源是消极的方面。该HellMachine配备了一个1.6公斤300瓦的。另一个问题是，微口吃。有时，它到大图像之间的时间间隔。所以，运动不再出现是光滑的人的眼睛。在极端的情况下，游戏看起来更平滑的单卡系统。此外，3D节目，甚至可以没有SLI配置文件的运行速度较慢。这是目前最需要最期待的。幸运的是，NVIDIA提供了一个方便的更新功能。

无论在升级，我们建议您检查，是否Nvidia的几个星期后，一个全新的版本。 310.61测试版驱动程序的基准测试中使用的安装麻烦。

Technically, the GeForce GTX 670MX is based on the modern Kepler architecture, which uses 28 nm lithography. The clock rates of 600 and 1,400 MHz (core/memory) are a little lower than the GTX 670M's (598/1,500 MHz), which, other than its name would suggest, belongs to the older Fermi generation and uses 40 nm lithography.

Due to more shaders (960 vs. 336, not directly comparable) and more transistors (2.54 vs. 1.95 billions) the GTX 670MX is nevertheless faster while the Kepler GPU is, as expected, slower that the GeForce GTX 675M. The Fermi model not only scores points because of its wider interface (256 vs. 192 Bit).

However, it is a different story, how a dual GPU solution of two GTX 670MX cards performs. Can the Kepler model in SLI mode maybe even best Nvidia's flagship, the GeForce GTX 680M? Our benchmarks will provide the answer.

从技术上讲，GeForce®（精视™）GTX670MX是基于现代开普勒架构，它采用28纳米光刻技术。的时钟速率为600和1400兆赫（核心/显存）是有点低比的GTX670M的（一分之五百九十八，500兆赫），它的名字将建议，所属的老费米代，并采用40纳米光刻技术。

由于着色器（960比336，没有直接的可比性）和更多的晶体管（2.54与1.95亿元）GTX670MX仍然是更快，，而开普勒GPU，符合市场预期，速度较慢，GeForce®（精视™）GTX6.75亿。 Fermi模型不仅得分点，因为其更广泛的接口（256 - 192位）。

然而，这是一个不同的故事，如何在双GPU解决方案，两个GTX670MX卡的执行。开普勒模型，甚至最好的NVIDIA®（英伟达™）的旗舰产品，GeForce®（精视™）GTX680M SLI模式吗？我们的基准，将提供答案。

The 120 GB model of the brand new Samsung SSD 840 delivers mixed performance. Let's start with the positive aspects: In sequential reading the seven mm flat SATA-III model does not only outperform its SSD 830 predecessor (505 MB/s @ One M73-2N), but also the popular Crucial Real SSD M4 (489 MB/s @ Gigabyte U2442N). 512 MB/s in the AS SSD benchmark suggest a great performance.

It's a pity, that the results in the writing tests are anything but outstanding. In achieving 130 MB/s it is significantly slower than the RealSSD M4 (~200 MB/Sek) and the SSD 830 (~330 MB/s). But, the access times are rather decent. 0.08 ms in writing can only be bested be few competitors. Overall, the performance of the Samsung SSD 840 is decent.

Windows appears to run significantly slower with an HDD. You'll soon learn to appreciate the advantages of the SSD technology (shorter boot, load and transfer times).

全新的三星SSD840可提供120 GB型号不一。让我们先在积极的方面：在顺序读取的7个毫米平SATA-III模型不仅优于其SSD830的前身（505 MB / s的@一M73-2N），但也的流行关键的实时SSD M4（489 MB / S @，技嘉U2442N）。 512 MB/ s的AS SSD Benchmark的建议的一大表现。

遗憾的是，在编写测试的结果是什么，但优秀的。在达到130 MB/ s的显着慢于光RealSSD M4（约200 MB / SEK）和SSD830（330 MB/秒）。但是，访问的时间是相当体面的。 0.08毫秒以书面形式只能被击败竞争对手少。总体而言，性能的三星SSD840是体面的。

运行Windows出现显着慢的硬盘。您会很快学会欣赏的SSD技术的优势（更短的启动，负载和传输时间）。

We ran 25 games on the HellMachine for the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI to leave a lot of footprints in our database. With a few exceptions (e. g. Dirt Showdown) the second graphics card was always active and provided a huge improvement.

Most of the titles ran about twice as fast in SLI mode. Summarizing over all games, a single GTX 670MX is about 66% slower in ultra settings (1,920 x 1,080, maximum graphics details). Two GeForce GTX 680Mk are »only« about 40 % (Schenker XMG U702) to 50 % (Schenker XMG P722) faster than a single one.

Speaking of the GTX 680M: Depending on the game Nvidia's premium model is faster or slower than the GTX 670MX SLI. There is no clear winner. As the two are about equally fast, and the GTX 680M costs nearly 200 Euro more, price-conscious gamers should definitely consider the SLI combo.

Nearly all titles run without stuttering with a second GeForce GTX 670MX in maximum details. Sometimes there are even reserve capacities for high-quality anti-aliasing. You'll find a detailed table at the end of the article.

我们跑了25场比赛的HellMachine SLI GeForce®（精视™）GTX670MX在我们的数据库中留下了很多的脚印。除少数例外（如污垢摊牌）第二个图形卡始终处于激活状态，并提供一个巨大的进步。

大部分的标题以最快的速度在SLI模式下跑两次。总结以上所有的游戏，一个单一的GTX670MX超的设置（1920×1080，最大图形细节）慢了约66％。两个GeForce GTX680Mk的是只«约40％（全球国际货运代理XMG U702）至50％（全球国际货运代理XMG P722）的速度比一个单一的。

说到GTX680M：根据游戏Nvidia的溢价模型，是比GTX670MX SLI更快或更慢。有没有明确的赢家。由于两人都同样快，和GTX680M花费近200欧元，对价格敏感的玩家一定要考虑的SLI组合。

几乎所有的冠军运行，无口吃第二的GeForce®（精视™）GTX670MX最大的细节。有时甚至有储备能力，高画质反锯齿，。在文章的结尾，你会发现一个详细的表。

Considering it is a gaming notebook, the case temperatures are surprisingly low. Even under stress we only measured 30 °C on the keyboard side and 29 °C on the bottom side. The Schenker XMG P722 reached 36 °C on average. While running Office or Internet tasks the 17-incher remains pleasantly cool. Left running idle for two hours, the HellMachine leveled out at lukewarm 26 °C.

Inside the case: no rude surprise too. The temperature of the Core i7 3630QM increased to nearly 90 °C (CPUID Hardware Monitor) in the stress test, but this is not yet a critical level. At the end of the stress test the Nvidia GPUs reached temperatures of 80 and 60 °C, while the GTX 680M in the Schenker XMG P722 exceeded 90 °C.

考虑到这是一个游戏笔记本的情况下，温度出奇的低。即使在压力下，我们只测量30°C在键盘上侧和29°C底部。全球国际货运代理XMG P722平均达到36°C。在运行Office或Internet任务的17英寸依然凉爽宜人。左怠速运转两小时，HellMachine夷为平地，在不冷不热26°C。

里面的情况：没有粗鲁的惊喜。的酷睿i73630QM的温度上升到接近90°C（CPUID硬件监控）在压力测试，但是这还不是一个临界水平。 Nvidia的GPU（图形处理器）的压力测试结束时达到了80和60°C的温度，而在全球国际货运代理XMG P722 GTX680M超过90°C。

Although the laptop comes with a powerful 8-cell battery, the battery runtimes cannot convince. Depending on the load and the display brightness, the 17-incher only runs 1.5 - 3.5 hours.

High-end laptops which only contain a single GPU and use Nvidia's Optimus technology, can be used significantly longer away from an outlet. The battery life of the MSI GT70 exceeds 5.5 hours under ideal conditions. The Asus G75VW and Samsung 700G7C deliver equally poor values.

With the 17-inch HellMachine, Deviltech sell an extremely fast desktop replacement. Due to its quad core CPU (Ivy Bridge) and two gaming graphics cards (Kepler) the notebook outperforms nearly all competitors.

The case is decent too. In addition to the lit keyboard we appreciate its rich connectivity (4x USB 3.0!). The high-end non-glare panel, the decent sound and the rather cool surfaces are further pros.

However, the HellMachine does not really win fame in the system noise, battery life, touchpad and power consumption categories. Because of its high weight (about 4 kg) and big 300 watt power adapter, the 17-incher is primarily designed for stationary use.

You might be willing to ignore the weaknesses as there are many upgrade and maintenance options. In our opinion 1,637 Euro is a reasonable price.

随着17英寸HellMachine的，Deviltech一个非常快速的台式机替代品出售。由于四核心CPU（Ivy Bridge的）和两个游戏显卡（开普勒）笔记本的性能优于几乎所有的竞争对手。

的情况下是不错的。除了背光键盘，我们体会到它的丰富的连接（4个USB3.0！）。高端无眩光面板，体面的声音和冷的表面而更多的优点。

然而，HellMachine并没有真正赢得名声系统中的噪音，电池寿命，触摸板和电力消费类别。由于其高重量（约4公斤）和大300瓦的电源适配器，17英寸，主要是用来固定使用。

你可能会愿意忽略的弱点，因为有很多升级和维护选项。在我们看来，1637欧元是一个合理的价格。