华硕 F751LDV-TY178H 笔记本电脑简短评测
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 207 cd/m²
Contrast: 650:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
50% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q | |
HP Pavilion 17-e126sg | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q | |
HP Pavilion 17-e126sg |
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q | |
HP Pavilion 17-e126sg |
PCMark 7 Score | 2841 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | 356 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2486 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2462 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3321 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H | |
Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk | |
Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q | |
HP Pavilion 17-e126sg |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1384 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 47380 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4558 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 840 points | |
Help |
Asus F751LDV-TY178H GeForce 820M, 4210U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q GeForce 840M, 4210U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | HP Pavilion 17-e126sg Radeon HD 8670M, 4200M, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | Acer Aspire E1-772G 54208G1TMnsk GeForce 820M, 4200M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite | 48% | 3% | ||
1280x720 Very Low Preset | 55.1 | 79.9 45% | 58.7 7% | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | 31.4 | 47.7 52% | 31.1 -1% | |
1366x768 High Preset | 26.4 | 38.7 47% | 27 2% | |
Tomb Raider | -26% | -1% | ||
1024x768 Low Preset | 78 | 53 -32% | 77.5 -1% | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x | 38.4 | 27.8 -28% | 37.9 -1% | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | 21.9 | 17.8 -19% | 21.7 -1% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 48% /
48% | -26% /
-26% | 1% /
1% |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 78 | 38.4 | 21.9 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 55.1 | 31.4 | 26.4 | |
Alien: Isolation (2014) | 40 | 27 | ||
F1 2014 (2014) | 95 | 64 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31.7 / 33.5 / 33.7 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34.1 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 37.6 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.6 / 39.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 6 / 9.8 / 9.8 Watt |
Load |
43.2 / 55.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
华硕F751LDV是一款名副其实的全能型笔记本。它的输入设备十分易用,我们特别喜欢的是它大尺寸触控板的流畅多指触控功能。不过,它的屏幕质量非常值得质疑。像Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q一样的全高清屏幕面板应该是个更理想的选择。另外,它在像素密度和亮度上都比较欠缺。它的应用程序性能很高,与同配置的直接竞争对手都水平相当。对我们的测试机来说,玩游戏也不是太大的问题,不过图形设置需要相应地降低。如果用户需要更好的游戏体验的话,可以考虑售价高50欧元(约380人民币)的Acer Aspire E5-771G-553Q,它配备了Nvidia GeForce 840M独立显卡。
几乎没有另外一款产品可以和这台华硕笔记本在散热和噪音控制的方面相媲美。用它来工作时几乎不会被噪音和尖锐的风扇声或滚烫机身所干扰。
打算购买这款笔记本的用户可以得到一款整体上相当不错的笔记本电脑。不过,它的竞争对手也应该纳入考虑范围,用户可根据自己的需要谨慎选择购买。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。