三星 Galaxy Tab S 10.5 平板电脑简短评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
Brand: Samsung

闪亮之星。 三星的 Galaxy Tab S 10.5 采用了一颗韩国自产的处理器，这是它为何在性能上相比Note 10.1稍低的原因。电池续航时间略显不足，不过仍然处于非常优秀的范围。Tab S的亮点显然在于它非常出色的屏幕。

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/02/2014 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Tablet Android

Microsoft Surface 2 Nokia Lumia 2520 Google Nexus 10 Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Apple iPad Air 1 2013 DIN A5 ❌


280 cd/m²	275 cd/m²	274 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	287 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 314 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 290.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 290 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.03 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.45

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	13908 Points
Microsoft Surface 2	14281 Points +3%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	14858 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	15407 Points +11%
Nokia Lumia 2520	16812 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	18806 Points +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	13791 Points
Microsoft Surface 2	14812 Points +7%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	18868 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	15111 Points +10%
Nokia Lumia 2520	18048 Points +31%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	19518 Points +42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	14333 Points
Microsoft Surface 2	12692 Points -11%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	8520 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	16539 Points +15%
Nokia Lumia 2520	13562 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	16678 Points +16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	14 fps
Google Nexus 10	7.9 fps -44%
Microsoft Surface 2	24 fps +71%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	21 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	15 fps +7%
Nokia Lumia 2520	27 fps +93%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	27.5 fps +96%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	22.8 fps
Google Nexus 10	12.4 fps -46%
Microsoft Surface 2	16 fps -30%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	27 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	24 fps +5%
Nokia Lumia 2520	19 fps -17%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	27.6 fps +21%

AnTuTu v4 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	35010 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	35455 Points +1%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	32525 Points -7%

Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	382.8 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 10	134.2 MFLOPS -65%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	558 MFLOPS +46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	455.6 MFLOPS +19%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	347.9 MFLOPS -9%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	770 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 10	189.9 MFLOPS -75%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	977 MFLOPS +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	917 MFLOPS +19%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	600 MFLOPS -22%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	920 Points
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	1479 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	956 Points +4%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	915 Points -1%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5	2712 Points
Apple iPad Air 1 2013	2687 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition	2995 Points +10%
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet	2327 Points -14%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 10 Samsung Exynos 5250 Dual, ARM Mali-T604 MP4, 32 GB SSD

Microsoft Surface 2 Nvidia Tegra 4, NVIDIA GeForce Tegra 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad Air 1 2013 Apple A7, PowerVR G6430, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia Lumia 2520 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	851 Points
Nokia Lumia 2520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash	542 Points -36%
Google Nexus 10 Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD	652 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface 2 GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	909 Points +7%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013 PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1855 Points +118%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4588 Points
Nokia Lumia 2520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2714 Points -41%
Microsoft Surface 2 GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3368 Points -27%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013 PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5113 Points +11%

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1112 ms *
Nokia Lumia 2520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash	560 ms * +50%
Microsoft Surface 2 GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash	384.5 ms * +65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	633 ms * +43%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013 PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash	385.5 ms * +65%

WebXPRT 2013 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	306 Points
Nokia Lumia 2520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash	292 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface 2 GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash	365 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	233 Points -24%
Apple iPad Air 1 2013 PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash	563 Points +84%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	89.8 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Adreno 330, 801 APQ8074AB, 32 GB eMMC Flash	63.3 MB/s -30%
Google Nexus 10 Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD	99.5 MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	104 MB/s +16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15.72 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Adreno 330, 801 APQ8074AB, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.6 MB/s +56%
Google Nexus 10 Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD	20.02 MB/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.35 MB/s +42%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12.1 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Adreno 330, 801 APQ8074AB, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.9 MB/s -2%
Google Nexus 10 Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD	10.35 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15.97 MB/s +32%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1.56 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet Adreno 330, 801 APQ8074AB, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.54 MB/s -1%
Google Nexus 10 Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD	1.27 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2.09 MB/s +34%

Max. Load

Idle


31.5 °C	39.6 °C	31.9 °C
30.9 °C	33.1 °C	31.6 °C
30.8 °C	32.2 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 32.5 °C


29.3 °C	36.4 °C	29.6 °C
30.3 °C	33 °C	30.7 °C
30.2 °C	31.1 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 36.4 °C
Average: 31.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.7 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	2.1 / 3.4 / 3.9 Watt
Load	7.4 / 10.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 14min
WiFi Surfing		10h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 33min

In Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 LTE

三星Galaxy Tab S 10.5毫无疑问是一款凝聚最新科技结晶的平板设备。不过它在性能上略有瑕疵。Exynos处理器无法和最新的Qualcomm芯片齐头并进。它在图形性能上的表现也落后于Adreno 330。不过，这款平板搭配谷歌Android 4.4 KitKat的系统表现仍然非常好。另外，它的存储空间可以扩展，也提供了对高速LTE移动网络连接的支持。

它的机身采用了大量的塑料材质和一些玻璃材质。在这方面，这款测试机的质量与iPad相距甚远。不过，Tab S 10.5比苹果的明星产品更薄。但是，索尼的Xperia Z2 tablet在厚度控制上更加出色且提供了防水防尘功能。Galaxy Tab S并没有特别大的缺陷：所有的缺点都可以算是吹毛求疵。它只有扬声器的质量生产商需要再做些改进。

它相比Galaxy Note 10.1没有S-pen手写笔让我们感到十分可惜。这也说明了三星希望同时销售这两款设备。Tab S 10.5由于配备了绚丽的Super-AMOLED屏幕显然更适合于作为轻薄多媒体播放设备，Note 10.1则更适合于商务办公使用。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Google Android KitKat 4.4系统和三星TouchWiz用户界面。

Please share our article, every link counts!

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa 8 x 1.9 GHz, Cortex-A7/-A15

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T628 MP6, Core: 600 MHz

Memory

3 GB

Display

10.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1600 pixel, 电容型，10点触控, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.55 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持128GB（SDXC）, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: 加速传感器, 位置感应, 旋转感应, 环境光传感器, G-传感器, 数字指南针, WiFi-Direct, OTG, 红外通信模组, DLNA, GPS, Glonass, Baidou, MHL 2.1, Ant+

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM/EDGE/GPRS (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 和2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100 和2600 MHz), 体辐射值: 0.20 W/kg

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.6 x 247.3 x 177.3

Battery

30 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 7900 mAh, 3.8 V

Operating System

Android 4.4 KitKat

Camera

Webcam: 210万像素前置, 主相机 800万像素 + LED 闪光灯

Additional features

Speakers: 两个立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器, 数据线, 使用说明, SideSync 3.0, Paper Garden, 多用户模式, 儿童模式, WebEx, 远程PC连接, Hancom Office, Evernote, 其他三星应用, Samsung TouchWiz UI, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

470 g, Power Supply: 65 g

Price

600 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Devices with the same GPU

三星 Galaxy Tab S 8.4 平板电脑简短评测
Mali-T628 MP6, Exynos 5420 Octa, 8.40", 0.301 kg

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 评测--配备 S Pen 和皱纹的经济型平板电脑
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos Exynos 1280, 10.40", 0.467 kg

三星Galaxy Tab Active5 5G 平板电脑评测--方便、坚固、电池可拆卸
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.433 kg

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 评测--90 赫兹平板电脑，4 年更新，别无所求
Adreno 619, Snapdragon SD 695 5G, 11.00", 0.48 kg

三星Galaxy Tab A9 评测--配备 GPS、LTE 和 4 年更新的实用入门级平板电脑
Mali-G57 MP2, Mediatek Helio G99, 8.70", 0.332 kg

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测--配备 S Pen 和明亮显示屏的 XXL 防水平板电脑
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.627 kg

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 平板电脑评测--填补空白的产品
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.524 kg

Pros

+ 出色的屏幕

+ 轻薄设计

+ 丰富的接口

+ 可扩展的存储空间

+ 支持LTE

+ 可以拨打电话

+ 有闪光灯的高质量相机

+ 优秀的电池续航

Cons

- 扬声器效果不好

- 仅支持USB 2.0

- 无S-pen手写笔

- 无三防属性

- 一般的麦克风质量

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 - 2014-08-14 08/14/2014 v4 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

78 / 80 → 98%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

52 / 65 → 80%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery

92%

Display

90%

Games Performance

61 / 68 → 90%

Application Performance

49 / 76 → 64%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

73 / 85 → 86%

Average

77%

88%

Tablet - Weighted Average

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy Tab S 10.5 平板电脑简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2014-09- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Specifications

More articles related to this device

Pros

Cons