HTC U Ultra
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix ƒ/2.0, 自录音频, 录像@1080p/30fps
Price comparison
Average of 58 scores (from 136 reviews)
Reviews for the HTC U Ultra
翻盘? 旗舰机U Ultra 目的在于为HTC迫切需要的回归踏平道路。智能助手,高音质技术以及副屏幕都可能使得它成功。但测试结果最后还是让我们对它产生了怀疑。接下来的测试报告中我们将会提供我们最终的想法。
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Back in January, HTC introduced its new smartphone lineup – the U series. One of them is the 5.7-inch phablet with a secondary screen, Snapdragon 821 processor, and a 12MP Ultrapixel camera – the HTC U Ultra. One of the best things about it is it’s going to be officially offered in the Philippines. Will the U Ultra help solidify HTC’s return in the country?
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, the HTC U Ultra is a solid offering for those who are looking for a premium-tier smartphone. It has a beautiful design and construction, high-resolution display, good camera, and performance. The only thing we didn’t like here is the battery life, but you can easily remedy that with a power bank.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While I'll recommend HTC products any day of the week, I just don't see why you would pick this one over the two others that I just mentioned above. But hey, if you really want that secondary display, go for it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC’s U Ultra isn’t perfect, but really, very few smartphones are. It’s a little on the large side, plus the battery life could be better. In exchange for those negatives you’re getting a fairly powerful phone with a large screen and a great camera that looks great to boot. We’re reserving final judgement pending local pricing, but if this phone manages to retail under 30K when it’s offered in the Philippines, then HTC definitely has a solid product in their hands to spearhead their return.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC U Ultra is flagship device by HTC and it has perfect flagship features. It has two screens which we have explained in design section furthermore it is mechanized with 64GB ROM and 4GB RAM. The camera section has brilliant camera results further everything is accessible in it but the bad point of HTC U Ultra is lack of audio jack like IPhone 7. It is little bit expensive device because it has some extra ordinary features. Battery should be more than 3000 mAh because users expect bigger battery in flagship devices.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC has their own UI overlay that they apply on their phones dubbed SenseUI. But where other manufacturers add unnecessary features and bloatware with their UI, HTC does the complete opposite: they removed bloatware when they saw that Google was doing a better job. The company also added Sense Companion, a supposedly AI-driven virtual assistant that that means to offer suggestions based on your habits. If it does work, we won’t see anything yet since we’ve literally started using the phone just today, so we’ll have to see in the next few days if it really works.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So overall, we think that the U Ultra is not bad. The ultra beautiful design is a fan favourite, the screen is big as well for entertainment (perhaps too big), but you have the Dual Display to assist you, while image quality is great as well. However, we feel that HTC should have added more battery juice, as 3000 mAh is certainly not enough to last, especially for heavy users.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra isn't a bad phone, but it just doesn't offer enough to justify its S$898 price tag. With the rise of brands like OnePlus and Xiaomi, HTC needs to offer more than just a pretty design and decent specs if it wants to charge a premium price. Compared to the flagship models offered by Samsung, Apple, LG, and Sony, the U Ultra doesn't offer anything unique or special, and it lacks features like an IP68 build that have become standard on many high-end phones. Its two big selling points, the secondary display, and AI Sense Companion aren't new or even well executed, and we've already seen similar features done better on older phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 60% performance: 65% workmanship: 80%
Source: Alphr EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are significant differences between the two phones under the hood as well. Where the Ultra gets a 2.15GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 processor, the Play is equipped with a MediaTek Helio P10 processor, and it’s only available in 32G and 64GB flavours. Both phones have microSD slots for storage expansion up to a theoretical 2TB.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All things considered, the U Ultra is a mix bag. HTC has done a great job in terms of built quality. At the same time, it is quite big for comfortable one-handed use and the secondary screen is nothing more than a gimmick. What's worse is that the phone's battery life is quite disappointing. Camera too leave a lot to be desired.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, the U Ultra is an excellent phone. The biggest thing it has against it at this point is HTC’s unwillingness to market its devices properly. The smartphone market is full of fierce competition, and year after year, HTC just seemingly cannot keep up. The U Ultra is a phenomenal phone, but because of this, it’ll unfortunately be forgotten in no time and won’t be competing with the big players. HTC really needs to change their approach there, and hopefully they do by the time the HTC U 11 comes out.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC has confused me with this phone. The HTC 10 fixed the problems of the One M9 but the U Ultra is a Frankenstein device. When a phone gives a better impression powered off than on, you know you’re in trouble. It’s not a bad phone full stop, but it does a lot to an unacceptably middling standard.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, the U Ultra is a phone that doesn’t really know where it sits in the market, and it’s hard to fathom who it was built for. It takes a lot of what made the HTC 10 a great device and sprinkles on a little extra, but the design is very different, and it all comes at a higher price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Quest EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The beautiful phone is prone to smudge that steals its beauty, but it combines powerful hardware and great cameras at both ends. Boasting interesting 'U' features, this is one of the good choices, but LG V20 is one of the strong competitor with dual-lens at the back and wide-angle selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 90%
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are too many problems with the HTC U Ultra for me to recommend it. It has a larger-than-average screen that will appeal to those who prefer big phones, but I see no reason to purchase this handset over alternatives like the LG V20 and Huawei Mate 9.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 45%
Source: iTech Post EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Another annoying thing about the HTC U Ultra is that the expenses don't stop at $750. The handset has no traditional 3.55mm headphone jack and an adapter for it does not come with the box. Those who prefer using traditional headphones must buy HTC's own adapter for $11.99. Furthermore, you'll also need HTC's own USB-C headphones if you don't want to get its adapter.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I’ve been using the U Ultra for a solid 3 weeks now, and it’s not been the handset that I wanted it to be. There’s been some performance issues, I’ve found the camera to not be quite at the level that I was expecting, it has the feel of an older model design styling and there’s no waterproofing. Overall it’s not been the exciting device I wanted.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 61% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Maybe HTC’s next phone (which is rumored to just be called the "HTC U") will right some of the U Ultra’s mistakes, but until it arrives, the only HTC-made phone you should consider is the Google Pixel, which doesn’t even have HTC’s name on it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a looker, and it has all – well, most – the makings of a flagship smartphone, but these are all marred by questionable hardware choices. The U Ultra’s secondary display isn’t groundbreaking in any way, and its battery life is underwhelming for a device of its class and price point. Plus, removing the headphone jack on a device this big is inexplicable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Cybershack EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
And despite the Ultra’s large size yet apparent lightness, it is an easy phone to hold, carry and use, not to mention it also looks cooler than just about any other phone on currently on the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we’ve tried to be as objective as we can with this review. On its own, the HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous device, with one of the best screens I’ve used, and an awesome camera combo..
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, HTC has tried to make project itself in a different perspective with a new design language. The smartphone has its hits and misses, which place it in no man’s land, especially with a price tag of Rs 59,990. It’s like its strong and weak points goes hand in hand. On one side, it comes with a good display, but flawed by the reflective screen, a good camera but flawed by some oversaturation, a good performer but flawed by overheating and last but not the least, a good user interface flawed by Sense Companion app.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra isn't a bad phone, but it just doesn't offer enough to justify its S$898 price tag. With the rise of brands like OnePlus and Xiaomi, HTC needs to offer more than just a pretty design and decent specs if it wants to charge a premium price. Compared to the flagship models offered by Samsung, Apple, LG, and Sony, the U Ultra doesn't offer anything unique or special, and it lacks features like an IP68 build that have become standard on many high-end phones. Its two big selling points, the secondary display, and AI Sense Companion aren't new or even well executed, and we've already seen similar features done better on older phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It may not sound like it right now, I concede, but I do consider myself an HTC fan. Like many who have been following the smartphone space as we currently know it since pretty much its inception, HTC earned itself a special place with clever, well-designed, and generally innovative devices at the cutting edge, particularly as it wholeheartedly embraced Android. It may not have the scale or marketing budget of Samsung, or the parts supply chain of LG, but it was the plucky underdog which produced devices that were more than the sum of their parts.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra isn’t bad, it’s just not great – and with pricing starting at a whopping $749 (around £649), it feels a little overpriced.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When we take a look at the phones that you can buy today for Rs. 20,000 - 45,000, it's really hard to justify spending just under Rs. 60,000 on something like the HTC U Ultra. It looks unique and has a fabulous camera, but how much are those things really worth? For that kind of money, the Google Pixel and iPhone 7 series seem like better all-rounders, even though they're both several months old now. There's also the fact that the LG G6, Samsung Galaxy S8, and other 2017 flagships will be launching soon - plus of course, models that won't be announced till the Snapdragon 835 is ready.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a missed opportunity. The display is decent in terms of colour performance, but is less brighter than other flagships. Overall performance falls short when it comes to battery life, and even overall performance is comparatively lower than present generation flagships. The U Sonic app is good, but the U Ultra loses out majorly because of the USB-C adapter. The front camera is good, but the rear camera is noticeably poorer than the likes of Google Pixel and Apple iPhone 7 Plus. Numerous scratches and fingerprints do give you an insurance policy, but that is not very convenient. The HTC U Ultra is not a practical recommendation over other flagships, all of which makes it a missed opportunity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 63%
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Galaxy S8 will surely best the U Ultra and other 821 phones once it gets benchmarked in a few weeks, I suspect most users won’t see a major performance difference between the two chips.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Galaxy S8 will surely best the U Ultra and other 821 phones once it gets benchmarked in a few weeks, I suspect most users won’t see a major performance difference between the two chips.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC U Ultra currently retails in the US for $749USD or Php37,500. Once it hit Philippine shores, the price can fluctuate at least around Php3000.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC’s new U Ultra smartphone oozes style, and for the most part it’s a very speedy, very well built flagship. That said, the company made some puzzling decisions here. This is a big phone with a big screen, but HTC fitted it with a relatively small 3,000mAh battery. The secondary screen above the main display falls short of being useful. The 12-megapixel camera can be quite good at times, but it’s easily outclassed by rival devices. The kicker is how much it costs: We’re being asked to pay $750 for a device that, in many ways, doesn’t feel completely thought through. It’s clear HTC paid close attention to the U Ultra’s fit and finish -- we just wish the rest of the phone were subject to the same level of scrutiny.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Just to be clear, this is not a bad phone by any stretch of the imagination. In this day and age, it is getting harder and harder to find a phone that is truly poor, but we’ve also gotten to the point where factors like unique features and value for money are what make for compelling smartphones, and unfortunately, the HTC U Ultra doesn’t quite fit the bill.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 88% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The U Ultra is a fully capable device. The 5.7-inch Quad HD display is gorgeous, the speakers are loud and the fingerprint sensor is fast. The camera is decent and while the Snapdragon 821 processor may not be the latest and greatest, the phone's performance was never an issue. It all comes down to the price and size of the device. It's simply too big to hold comfortably and too expensive for what it offers. When you pay a premium price, you expect premium features. This isn't the case with the U Ultra.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If HTC only approached the U Ultra with a slightly, slightly different set of priorities, this handset could have been a real win, and help hold us over until the more obvious HTC 10 follow-up is ready to land. For now, though, this is just one phone that's really tricky to recommend. There are too many compromises, and too much other competition that's more worthy of your smartphone-buying dollar.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: iTech Post EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Though many smartphones out there don't have most of the specs and features mentioned, they are cheaper, unlike the U Ultra. For tech enthusiasts who would buy a $750 smartphone, they expect the device to offer that premium experience which the U Ultra lacks significantly.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We think it's fair to say we've always liked the HTC phones, but never at the price HTC intended for them. The HTC U Ultra is a perfect example of that - it's a solid phone, but in the US it is a whopping $200 more than an LG V20. Is it better than the V20? "Yes" in some areas (and "no" in others), but we can't justify the massive price premium.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: iTech Post EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As ZDNet explained, the HTC U Ultra is not a bad device, but in a market that is strictly competitive in terms of price and features, it just does not work well. The flagship is a great looking device and is available in a sapphire blue color that is equally eye catching and unique. However, there are other models available that simply offer more for a lower cost.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC made about 80% of a great flagship smartphone, but is choosing to sell it for 100% of a flagship price. Time after time, HTC continues to absolutely nail the basics: excellent design, perfect hardware execution, a top-notch display, great internals and fast software are all here. But then there are odd stumbles: no headphone jack, puzzlingly weak low-light camera performance, a small battery and distractingly tacked-on "artificial intelligence" software.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Droid Life EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As for what’s good about the U Ultra, you might be surprised to know that quite a bit of it is good. From the really, really nice LCD display to the external speakers with BoomSound and one of the best smartphone cameras around, there are some things to like. Unfortunately, there are just as many drawbacks, like the ridiculous size of the phone at a time when everyone else is shrinking bodies, how easy it scratches and smudges, the lack of a headphone jack (or a 3.5mm adapter), a smallish battery, and again, the lack of availability coupled with that high price and the limited connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC's flagship device did live up to our expectations. Although it has a heavy price tag of Rs 59,990, the diverse array of features make the package worth it. We loved the software tweaks, the design and of course, the display(s). The camera, performance and fingerprint sensor are all good as well.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've had to charge the HTC U Ultra during the day to ensure I can make it through my full 18-19 hour day. If the HTC U Ultra was about the size of the LG G6, had water resistance, and a 3.5mm headset jack then I would likely pick one up for myself. As it is, there are just too many compromises at the $749 price for me to commit to one now.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a drop dead gorgeous phone. If nothing else, the design alone is something that truly sets is apart. From the beautiful blue color and the ultra glossy back panel, the U Ultra almost looks like a piece of jewellery. Unfortunately, that’s more or less the best aspect of the HTC U Ultra.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous looking phone, and it works like a charm. It comes with the latest Android Nougat 7.0 with the Assistant already here on this phone. The camera is great, though not yet in the iPhone league.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous phone with a unique jewel-like finish, top-notch performance and one of the best selfie cameras you can get on a phone right now. I also like the handy second screen and small touches, like BlinkFeed and HTC's Themes app. Plus, HTC's stereo BoomSound speakers remain some of the best in the biz. But with a starting price of $749, the U Ultra is quite expensive, too.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC's flagship phone brings some interesting features to the top of the market including great looks and 24-bit audio. But there's better value elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous phone with powerful hardware and some unique features. But it doesn't feel finished. It doesn't ship with a headphone adapter, HTC's Sense Companion isn't ready yet, and camera performance clearly needs some fine-tuning. Even if all of these issues are addressed in software updates, the U Ultra still lags behind other $750 phablets like the Google Pixel XL and the LG V20. Both of those phones have equally powerful hardware, better camera performance, and a friendlier user experience all around. And keep in mind HTC makes the Pixel XL, so if you're a fan of the company's build quality, the choice is clear.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phone Scoop EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The U Ultra has a solid screen, excellent voice and data performance, and solid battery life. The new BoomSound speakers sound very good, as do the boxed headphones. Android 7 and HTC's Sense interface run perfectly on the phone and ensure you can personalize nearly every facet of the phone. The camera is great. Then there are the "buts": The phone is huge, making it somewhat unwieldy. The extra display is nice, but the phone would probably be smaller (and possible more appealing) without it. The U Ultra lacks a headphone jack, and I found the USB port was incompatible with several USB-C-to-3.5mm dongles I have on hand. And, in what may be the ultimate dealbreaker, the U Ultra is barely water resistant, let alone waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We've seen some great phones in recent months, including the Huawei Mate 9 and Google Pixel XL but not one that we could call perfect. We're not going to suggest that this might be what we've been missing - it doesn't have a headphone jack. We're blaming Apple for that one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The U Ultra by all means isn't a perfect smartphone, just like the ones I mentioned above. It has all the bells and whistles of a top-tier flagship, and it's safe to say that it delivers on almost every front as well (save the battery life, which honestly sucks). Problem is, it is a little late to the party. The LG G6 is coming and so is the Samsung Galaxy S8 and both these phones could spoil HTC's fortunes. Remember how I said the 10 was probably the best Android phone that no one was buying? A similar fate awaits the U Ultra as well. Still, I hope HTC never quits trying.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC is showing success with the HTC Vive VR headset, but continues to struggle to solidify a position in the smartphone market. The HTC U Ultra brings together all the best of HTC, but given the stiff competition from others and HTC's minimal market share, I don't think we will see wide adoption of this new phone. HTC fans will be pleased, but that may be it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As good of a phone the U Ultra is, the biggest challenge for HTC is getting the phone to as many consumers hands as it can in March. By April, we’re expecting the LG G6 and the Samsung Galaxy S8 take over store shelves which will steal the limelight. But until that happens, the HTC Ultra U takes the top spot as the best phone currently available.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 85% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra sets out its stall in a strange position. It's a big screen phone from HTC that part embodies some of the company's previous traits (it's a Sense experience that's well-built), while introducing a new, unique finish. It's certainly striking to look at.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The mid-range U Play will follow sometime in March (an exact launch date hasn't been announced yet) for S$548. The 5.2-inch U Play has a Full HD Super LCD display and is powered by a Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 processor.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC is known to price their smartphones on the higher extreme and the U Ultra is yet another fruit to the basket. Priced at Rs 59,990, HTC U Ultra is a beautiful piece of hardware combined with an evenly beautiful software in the name of HTC Sense, however, the price is what will raise few eyebrows. Premium smartphones are getting extremely cheap these days and HTC has done only the half bit here. Well, we don't really know how will the audience in India react to the U Ultra, we still wished it to come at a lower price point.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC U Ultra review: The phablet arena is pretty quiet right now, most notably occupied by the Huawei Mate 9 (in the UK at least) but HTC might have a new noteworthy entrant to consider if you’re after a supersized, super-powerful smartphone, and it's called the U Ultra.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous smartphone to behold. If all you want from a phone is for it to look good in your hands, then you cannot do better than this device. Even though you’ll need to treat it carefully to avoid all manner of cracks, chips and smudges.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Powering the U Ultra is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 processor with 4GB RAM. While this is currently Qualcomm's top of the line processor, it's due to be replaced by the Snapdragon 835 within the next few months. Inside the U Play is the mid-range Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 processor and 3GB RAM. Both phones come with 64GB internal storage, and you also get a microSD card slot that is compatible with cards up to 2TB.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is a gorgeous smartphone to behold. If all you want from a phone is for it to look good in your hands, then you cannot do better than this device. Even though you’ll need to treat it carefully to avoid all manner of cracks, chips and smudges.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We do still feel like the HTC U Ultra is missing the "wow" factor, though. While its design is cool and its software different, we're not totally convinced that this will be enough to persuade buyers away from the latest from the likes of Samsung or Huawei.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While pricing and availability are yet to be announced for the HTC U Ultra, you shouldn’t have to wait long to get your hands on this phone. Even more intriguingly, the Ultra only represents the first big step change from HTC this year with its flagship replacement for the HTC 10 still to come. For now, this is a very exciting handset and that's not something you could say about last year’s HTCs. Here's hoping it lives up to expectations in our full review soon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra is, really, the HTC 10 Ultra – a more powerful, phablet version of that flagship phone from 2016, which gives us hope that we’re still going to see the HTC 11 later this year.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As for HTC’s offering, we’re eager to test out the new Sense Companion to see just how smart it really is in the real world, and if having an AI assistant actually has any significant impact on our daily routine in the long run.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We like the U Ultra. It's a refreshing device for those who might have become bored with HTC's metal devices, but it needs to come in cheaper than the Pixel XL.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Silicon Republic EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra will be available to purchase, sim-free, on the HTC e-store from €749. No sim-free options are currently available on the Play device, with Three yet to reveal its pricing.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I was immediately taken with the design of HTC’s new phone, but I'll need to see a lot more of the AI-based software to know whether it’ll be a vital addition or something I'll quickly turn off.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The HTC U Ultra sees the firm going in a different direction and the result is a striking smartphone. The specs are solid and that second display should come in handy along with the Companion AI. However, the glossy glass design won't suit everyone. Stay tuned for a full review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
HTC's 2017 strategy so far appears to be "get some phones out the door before everyone manages to steal the spotlight from us." That's not reassuring, and neither of the products they've unveiled seem a resounding vindication of that approach. We'll have to wait for a review to really get our opinions firm, but I can't say I'm optimistic.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's hard to say how beneficial this is in real life. We got about an hour to take photos and glance at the prefinal software, but there's really no way that you can set up and train the U Ultra's AI tool without logging in to the phone and using it as your own.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As much as I love the new HTC U smartphones, I am still a little disappointed and have hoped for more, apart from being the first smartphone to have AI, which is still a untested feature, HTC has made just another new flagship smartphone that probably isn’t going to WOW the smartphone industry like it did with the One M7. HTC says the U Ultra and Play are just the very beginning of what they have to offer, and there will be more exciting models to come later this year. I certainly can’t wait to see what HTC has to offer, especially the rumoured Vive capable smartphone, the company really needs to shine beyond just making beautiful smartphones, and I can’t wait to perform a full review on the U Ultra and U Play.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At CES 2017, HTC hurriedly patched together a press briefing ahead of its 12 January unveiling of its latest devices, inviting members of the press who were already present for CES. The two new devices, the U Ultra and the lower-end U Play, represented a big, bold move away from the HTC designs we’ve known for years.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 96% features: 83% display: 86% mobility: 85%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 91% display: 92% mobility: 87%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Computerbild - 6/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 98% features: 100% mobility: 89%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Putoinformatico ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 65% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 65% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 68% display: 89% mobility: 69% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Diskidee.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Erenumerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 65% workmanship: 90%
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Teknolojioku TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2017
Source: Teknolojioku TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Source: Tinh Te VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2017
Source: Tinh Te VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: TechTimes VN VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 821: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.70":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.