Honor 5C
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 27 scores (from 52 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor 5C
这是我们的荣耀。 一块绚丽的屏幕和不错的相机搭配金属机身——售价仅不足200欧元(约1461人民币),荣耀5C给了我们很好的第一印象。请阅读我们的评测了解为什么这台5.2寸智能手机如此出色。
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As with all modern phones it has front and back cameras the front often called a Selfie camera is a respectable 8MP while the rear camera is mounted 1.5cm down from the top of the back and has an LED flash by its side. The camera resolution is 13MP and takes good images but not up to the superb standard of the Huawei P9 but then the unit costs only 1/3 of the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're looking for a phone with a bit of high-end flavour on a super-tight budget, the Honor 5C is an excellent choice. As long as you don't mind the Honor software approach, there's nothing major to complain about here. The main consideration is whether you might prefer the Moto G4, which costs £20 more but has a bigger screen, and a very pure take on Android.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For RM799, the Honor 5C is a perfectly decent mid-range smartphone that does almost everything you need out of it. However, the problem the Honor 5C has is that its just not that interesting as a whole. There are no particularly standout features about the phone that makes the Honor 5C a must buy, and in a market that is highly saturated, the Honor 5C could potentially be lost in the shuffle.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C’s performance is more than adequate especially when compared against similarly priced handsets. Loading apps and scrolling through images and websites was fine although I would have preferred more of a reluctance of the screen to gather finger smears.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 100%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I was a bit worried taking a punt on this device. I normally recommend a Moto G for people in this segment and had the G4 been smaller, I would’ve bought that for my mother without any hesitation. But this phone really surprised me. Frankly this is the best budget phone on the market now. Sure, as a phone-nerd it doesnt have the features and power that I want for all the things I do with my phone. But for a lot of people, it really is all the phone they’d ever need. Everyday tasks are done easily with good performance, a good screen, good battery life, decent camera and a surprisingly enjoyable software experience.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% mobility: 93% workmanship: 87%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nevertheless, the Honor 5C is a decent entry-level phone with a few standout features — solid, multi-day battery life, a touch of class with that metal back panel, expandable storage and easy dual-SIM connectivity. And if you're looking for an affordable Android phone which covers all the major bases, it's definitely worth a look.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C excels when it comes to speed, but fails to excel in any other regard. Even its camera, which is arguably the phone's only other strong suit, is rather hit and miss depending on lighting conditions. The biggest issue here, though, is the quality of the competition. When you consider that the Moto G4 costs just £20 more yet comes with a better screen, longer-lasting battery and vastly superior build quality, the Honor 5C simply can't compete.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a good smartphone that gets a lot right, but unfortunately, does not really have anything that sets it apart in competition. It offers good performance, camera, ergonomics, battery life, and is an overall pleasant device. The lack of frills make it a very simple, easy to use and convenient device, and is worthy of being considered at Rs. 10,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite quite a lot being written about the 13MP and 8MP cameras on the 5C, I found them a bit wanting. They do both shoot video at 1080p, and there's anF2.0 aperture and 78° wide-angle 5-element (5P) macro lens, but I found photos ready to pixelate under many conditions. Image reproduction was good, but the fuzziness and noise set the camera at standard average budget for me. The camera app, on the other hand, is rather nice and easy to use.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C offers a blend of good design, appealing UI and a capable hardware. It is definitely a good update over its predecessor, the Honor 4C, and feels as good as the Honor 5X. There are minor software issues but nothing that a quick update can’t fix. Having said that, the smartphone doesn’t offer anything unique or a differentiating factor that would set it apart from the competition. It’s a plain Jane phone which will struggle to survive in the market. The only reason one might just go for the Honor 5C is for its smaller display, as there are some consumers who don’t want to go beyond the 5.0-5.2 inch screen size.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% features: 70% display: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C presents itself as an unassuming, middling Android handset, but you’ll quickly realise that it’s full of surprises. Great performance, battery life and cameras elevated the 5C above our expectations and at £149 it undercuts other top affordable offerings like the new Moto G4 giving it a serious edge.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5c is Huawei’s second entrant into the rapidly growing sub-15k smartphone segment in India. The handset does a lot of things right that the Honor 5x got wrong – especially with respect to software and performance. However, I cannot help but feel that Honor/Huawei should have also launched a 32GB/3GB RAM variant of the 5c at a slightly higher price as it would have then better sufficed the needs of customers who want a phone with dual-SIM capabilities. The sub-par GPU and multitasking performance also immediately rule out the phone for any power user.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Tech Critter EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Apart from the SoC efficiency, the battery life is also affected by the smart app & battery management under EMUI and they're not so smart if you left it in default. The OS would automatically choose which app is more critical and set it as "protected" app which allows it to run after the screen is turned off.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/23/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a mid-tier phone through and through. If we cast our minds back to 2013 we could almost say the same of the iPhone 5C. It was placed just below the more powerful 5S, and both served as updates to the ageing iPhone 5. Ultimately, either would make a great second, standby handset. The choice might be easier to make if you're tied to one ecosystem, but if we have one concern it would be the age of the iPhone 5C.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C improves ever so slightly on its predecessor, thanks to a more capable SoC and small improvements to the camera. The design and build have also been bettered, and Android Marshmallow adds a few features and tweaks to the software. There isn't much to complain about here, especially at this price. Unfortunately, the 5C still lacks any wow factor. Nothing in the phone stands out, and this is in all ways an average phone that does what it does capably, but not exceptionally well. The pricing is competitive, but a lower price would have suited this phone much more. Buyers are likely to prefer other products in the same price range, such as the Redmi Note 3 or Lenovo Zuk Z1.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is undeniably excellent value for money as a piece of hardware. It has internal specs that match, if not beat, the Moto G4's. But its use of Huawei’s Emotion skin will be a sticking point for many buyers. I can’t help but feel Honor should follow Motorola’s example and load its handsets with an unskinned version of Android.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Honor 5C looks set to be a cracking deal for £150, falling in between the £116 Vodafone Ultra 6 and £170 Moto G4. With a metal build, G4-matching specs, and a price that won’t destroy your wallet, Honor could have a real winner on its hands here. Stay tuned for our full review, to see if we’ll be crowning it our new budget smartphone champion.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the low asking price of £149, you really do get quite a lot of phone for your money in the Honor 5C. That's the aim of Honor - giving good value for money without making too many compromises. The only real omission on the spec sheet is the lack of a fingerprint scanner. With most devices offering this technology, both in the top and mid ranges, it would have been more appealing if that had been offered.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: eTest DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 15/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60%
Source: Honor News Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2016
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 93% features: 94% display: 91% mobility: 98%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% features: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2016
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 79% display: 83% mobility: 79%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/21/2016
Source: Golem DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2016
Source: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/02/2016
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: price: 90% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 85% display: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 79%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 650: 麒麟650
基于ARM的八核处理器(8个Cortex-A53核心)。四个频率最高可达1.7 GHz的节能核心和四个频率最高可达2 GHz的高性能核心。这颗处理器还集成了Mali-T830 MP2显卡和LTE模组。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.