Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (Full-HD-Video)
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 60 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Chunky mainstream. Apart from the display size, the Huawei Mate 10 Lite does not have much in common with its namesake, the Mate 10 Pro. The Lite costs less than half as much as the Pro and is a very alluring mid-range smartphone. Our extensive review is going to reveal not only its strengths but also its flaws.
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, 'you get what you pay for' is true for smartphones in this day and age as a general rule. There are exceptions, but the Mate 10 Lite isn't one of them. Life with it won't be entirely niggle-free, but if your tolerance is pretty high it will make for a good companion.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The rest are annoyances rather than big issues: the outdated microUSB port used instead of the newer USB-C, the slightly clunky looks of the Emotion UI interface, the lack of the latest Android version and certainty about future updates, the just-okay battery life and the slow charging, and the lack of extras like water-proofing and wireless charging. If some of these sound a bit nit-picky for an affordable phone, it is because… well, the Mate 10 Lite is actually quite a good phone. Ultimately, it is a safe recommendation if you are looking for a well-rounded phone that does not break the bank.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The OnePlus 5T is still the midrange king, but Huawei’s Mate 10 Lite is a great choice if you can get it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 10 Lite gets some good stuff from the Mate 10 in terms of screen, imaging experience and battery backup. A Mate in looks and a Lite in price sounds like the right balance and the output is well up to standard. Worth a try.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei Mate 10 Lite is one of the finest smartphones for the mid-range customers. From its display to camera section and its processor, it has worked amazing in every part. I didn’t get any major bad point for this device and if you are seeking a good smartphone under 30K then you must look at Huawei Mate 10 lite- won’t disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the time we spent with the Honor 9i/Mate 10 Lite, we did come to appreciate many things about it. The design is really quite impressive and makes the device stand out in its segment. The so-called FullView display is also quite nice and apart from the novelty is actually useful since it shows a lot more content. The software experience and general performance was also quite good.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 91%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 91%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 59% features: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 83% mobility: 84%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2018
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/20/2017
Source: Saggiamente IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/13/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 68% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/26/2018
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2017
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2017
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Dinside NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2017
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80%
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 95% performance: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 659: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.90":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.