Huawei MediaPad M3 Series
Processor: Kirin 950, Qualcomm Snapdragon 435Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T880 MP4, Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 8.00 inch, 8.40 inch, 10.10 inch
Weight: 0.31kg, 0.46kg
Price: 200, 349 euro
Average of 123 scores (from 201 reviews)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchProcessor: Kirin 950
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T880 MP4
Display: 8.40 inch, 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixels
Weight: 0.31kg
Price: 349 euro
Links: Huawei homepage MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
进化。 2015年推出的MediaPad M2的后续机型终于现身了:请欢迎MediaPad M3的出场。这台新机型在测试成绩上和前代机型几乎相同,不过搭配了更大尺寸更高分辨率的屏幕,更强劲的处理器和指纹感应器。我们将会通过详尽评测考察华为究竟带来了怎样的一款产品。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The tablet’s performance is pretty good, especially with games like Mobile Legends since the tablet didn’t show any signs of slowing down during the impromptu tournament that Huawei held at the launch with members of the media. Audio output is pretty good as well, along with the performance of that essentially 2K display. The large 5100mAh battery will probably power this tablet for quite a bit before needing to be recharged.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The tablet’s performance is pretty good, especially with games like Mobile Legends since the tablet didn’t show any signs of slowing down during the impromptu tournament that Huawei held at the launch with members of the media. Audio output is pretty good as well, along with the performance of that essentially 2K display. The large 5100mAh battery will probably power this tablet for quite a bit before needing to be recharged.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2017
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall I really liked the MediaPad M3. I consider myself “techie-frugal”, in that I like nice stuff that works consistently, but I’ll be darned if I’m paying what the likes of Apple is demanding.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 90%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall I really liked the MediaPad M3. I consider myself “techie-frugal”, in that I like nice stuff that works consistently, but I’ll be darned if I’m paying what the likes of Apple is demanding.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 90%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Aside from its should-be-better battery life and a power button that's way too easy to whack accidentally, we found little not to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It's one of the few flagship-class Android tablets to make its way to our test bench in many a month, and its screen, speakers, metal shell, and excellent fingerprint sensor all impressed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Aside from its should-be-better battery life and a power button that's way too easy to whack accidentally, we found little not to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It's one of the few flagship-class Android tablets to make its way to our test bench in many a month, and its screen, speakers, metal shell, and excellent fingerprint sensor all impressed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Every tech reviewer wants to find the perfect device and for a little while the Huawei MediaPad M3 certainly seemed like that device, except if you’re hoping to do some 2K pixel resolution gaming. In everything else, like media playback or productivity on the go it is superb, especially with the nice artificial leather case, which looks stylish and can be used as a stand. If you’re looking for a tablet for those purposes, it should fit in most handbags and pouches.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Every tech reviewer wants to find the perfect device and for a little while the Huawei MediaPad M3 certainly seemed like that device, except if you’re hoping to do some 2K pixel resolution gaming. In everything else, like media playback or productivity on the go it is superb, especially with the nice artificial leather case, which looks stylish and can be used as a stand. If you’re looking for a tablet for those purposes, it should fit in most handbags and pouches.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On top of everything, the MediaPad M3 is only $299. It’s insane that you can get this much performance and quality out of a device that seems like it should cost twice as much, but Huawei pulled it off. If more manufacturers can release tablets anywhere close to the MediaPad M3, 2017 will be a fantastic year for Android tablets.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On top of everything, the MediaPad M3 is only $299. It’s insane that you can get this much performance and quality out of a device that seems like it should cost twice as much, but Huawei pulled it off. If more manufacturers can release tablets anywhere close to the MediaPad M3, 2017 will be a fantastic year for Android tablets.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei MediaPad M3 is a premium device, one where the price tag seems reasonable, if you go by the eBay listing. Huawei will bring the device to India, and the pricing should be closer to this range.With the MediaPad M3, you have solid device for media consumption; it is fast, packs a stunning display and has great sound output. Frankly for most regular users tablets have become entertainment consumption devices, and the Huawei MediaPad M3 delivers very well on that front.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei MediaPad M3 is a premium device, one where the price tag seems reasonable, if you go by the eBay listing. Huawei will bring the device to India, and the pricing should be closer to this range.With the MediaPad M3, you have solid device for media consumption; it is fast, packs a stunning display and has great sound output. Frankly for most regular users tablets have become entertainment consumption devices, and the Huawei MediaPad M3 delivers very well on that front.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is not a bad tablet, in fact, it’s a really great choice if you want a well-built device for browsing the web and watching movies, but until it gets some much needed software tweaks, I’d suggest looking elsewhere for a more refined experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is not a bad tablet, in fact, it’s a really great choice if you want a well-built device for browsing the web and watching movies, but until it gets some much needed software tweaks, I’d suggest looking elsewhere for a more refined experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's not much else out there at the top-end, with Samsung's Galaxy Tabs hoovering up most of the people that refuse to jump ship to iOS and the iPad, but this could have what it takes to carve out its own little niche. Brilliant build quality makes it perfect for carrying around everywhere. That great screen and fantastic sound help it eat up just about any video or music you can through at it, too. Gaming performance is a little iffy, and that camera isn't much to write home about though.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's not much else out there at the top-end, with Samsung's Galaxy Tabs hoovering up most of the people that refuse to jump ship to iOS and the iPad, but this could have what it takes to carve out its own little niche. Brilliant build quality makes it perfect for carrying around everywhere. That great screen and fantastic sound help it eat up just about any video or music you can through at it, too. Gaming performance is a little iffy, and that camera isn't much to write home about though.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The MediaPad M3 should wow users with its fast speed, high-res display and powerful speakers. The device costs more than most Android tablets, but you get what you pay for. Overall, the MediaPad M3 is an attractive option for Android users looking for a high-performing tablet with a beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a stagnated market, the Huawei MediaPad M3 initially feels a little underwhelming. After extended use though, we reckon it’s a cut above the mid-range, but then again, from €349, you are paying for it. It’s a good alternative to an iPad if you want an Android tablet that’s bigger than an iPad mini but smaller than an iPad Air 2. But, who is specifically looking for that? The MediaPad is excellent and we recommend it, but it lacks a certain ‘wow’ factor that's largely down to the high number of existing Android tablets. The MediaPad 3 is a cut above, but you should also consider Samsung’s Galaxy Tab series for a similarly excellent Android tablet experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% features: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The MediaPad M3 should wow users with its fast speed, high-res display and powerful speakers. The device costs more than most Android tablets, but you get what you pay for. Overall, the MediaPad M3 is an attractive option for Android users looking for a high-performing tablet with a beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a stagnated market, the Huawei MediaPad M3 initially feels a little underwhelming. After extended use though, we reckon it’s a cut above the mid-range, but then again, from €349, you are paying for it. It’s a good alternative to an iPad if you want an Android tablet that’s bigger than an iPad mini but smaller than an iPad Air 2. But, who is specifically looking for that? The MediaPad is excellent and we recommend it, but it lacks a certain ‘wow’ factor that's largely down to the high number of existing Android tablets. The MediaPad 3 is a cut above, but you should also consider Samsung’s Galaxy Tab series for a similarly excellent Android tablet experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% features: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei hasn't announced a U.S. price or release date for the Mediapad M3, and price is going to matter a lot here. With its sharp screen and light, single-handed form factor, the M3 looks like an excellent tablet for reading comics and watching video. But this is a highly competitive market. Looking at tablets with similar high-res screens, the Asus ZenPad Z8 runs for $249 from Verizon, and the iPad mini 4 starts at $299. The M3 has a better aspect ratio than the Z8 does for reading and the iPad mini offers more apps. It's going to have to fit into that price range to be competitive. Check back soon for price and release details, as well as a full review of the final hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Alphr EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
However, when I first wrote this review, we had no pricing information. Now we have it, it does take a little sheen off the tablet as it's in direct competition with the iPad Mini 4 which is a tough old battle to win. We've only been sent pricing in Euros, but even with an optimistic conversion it's a premium price to match the product. For the 32GB WiFi model, it'll set you back €349. Assuming they go by the standard conversion trick of calling it £299, that's only slightly undercutting the iPad Mini 4. It only gets pricier from there. The LTE 32GB model comes in at €399, as does the 64GB WiFi version. The 64GB LTE version hits €449.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It's well built and a pleasure to use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is a tablet with lots of admirable qualities. High screen resolution, ultra-low weight and speakers that go loud enough to become an anti-social menace in some situations earn a big thumbs-up. It's a pity, then, that the M3 is thrown off balance quite so dramatically by oddly poor gaming performance with high-end titles. The casual games everyone gets obsessed with for weeks at a time run fine, but those with console-like graphics tend to struggle to an extent that's quite rare for a tablet of this quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I do like the Huawei MediaPad M3, but it’s far from an essential purchase. It doesn’t do anything that a cheaper Android slate doesn’t; it just does those things with an added hit of style. The screen is decent, if overly reflective, and the metal-clad chassis is thin and light yet maintains a solid feel. The speakers, too, are superb for a small tablet.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 8.4in screen is the big highlight, and if you excuse the slight dip in gaming prowess, the Kirin 950’s sheer processing oomph knocks its rivals for six. Battery life also takes a bit of a hit as a result, but if you want a powerful, compact, premium-feeling Android tablet, then the MediaPad M3 is going to take some beating.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 offers an immersive display, great audio and long-lasting battery life and while gaming can be somewhat choppy, it is capable of playing high-end 3D games with few issues. You can also make phone calls with it and performance is a breeze but a generic design, average cameras and a questionable interface mean this won't be a tablet for everyone. If you can get past those shortcomings, it could be one of the best Android tablets currently available.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 87% display: 90% workmanship: 83%
Source: International Business Times EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Our first impressions of the Huawei MediaPad M3 are mostly very good. The hardware is excellent and a match for anything else on the market (Apple included), and while performance seems good, Huawei's software is as always its weakest point.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It’s well built and a pleasure to use.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei hasn't announced a U.S. price or release date for the Mediapad M3, and price is going to matter a lot here. With its sharp screen and light, single-handed form factor, the M3 looks like an excellent tablet for reading comics and watching video. But this is a highly competitive market. Looking at tablets with similar high-res screens, the Asus ZenPad Z8 runs for $249 from Verizon, and the iPad mini 4 starts at $299. The M3 has a better aspect ratio than the Z8 does for reading and the iPad mini offers more apps. It's going to have to fit into that price range to be competitive. Check back soon for price and release details, as well as a full review of the final hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Alphr EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
However, when I first wrote this review, we had no pricing information. Now we have it, it does take a little sheen off the tablet as it's in direct competition with the iPad Mini 4 which is a tough old battle to win. We've only been sent pricing in Euros, but even with an optimistic conversion it's a premium price to match the product. For the 32GB WiFi model, it'll set you back €349. Assuming they go by the standard conversion trick of calling it £299, that's only slightly undercutting the iPad Mini 4. It only gets pricier from there. The LTE 32GB model comes in at €399, as does the 64GB WiFi version. The 64GB LTE version hits €449.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It's well built and a pleasure to use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is a tablet with lots of admirable qualities. High screen resolution, ultra-low weight and speakers that go loud enough to become an anti-social menace in some situations earn a big thumbs-up. It's a pity, then, that the M3 is thrown off balance quite so dramatically by oddly poor gaming performance with high-end titles. The casual games everyone gets obsessed with for weeks at a time run fine, but those with console-like graphics tend to struggle to an extent that's quite rare for a tablet of this quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I do like the Huawei MediaPad M3, but it’s far from an essential purchase. It doesn’t do anything that a cheaper Android slate doesn’t; it just does those things with an added hit of style. The screen is decent, if overly reflective, and the metal-clad chassis is thin and light yet maintains a solid feel. The speakers, too, are superb for a small tablet.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 8.4in screen is the big highlight, and if you excuse the slight dip in gaming prowess, the Kirin 950’s sheer processing oomph knocks its rivals for six. Battery life also takes a bit of a hit as a result, but if you want a powerful, compact, premium-feeling Android tablet, then the MediaPad M3 is going to take some beating.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 offers an immersive display, great audio and long-lasting battery life and while gaming can be somewhat choppy, it is capable of playing high-end 3D games with few issues. You can also make phone calls with it and performance is a breeze but a generic design, average cameras and a questionable interface mean this won't be a tablet for everyone. If you can get past those shortcomings, it could be one of the best Android tablets currently available.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 87% display: 90% workmanship: 83%
Source: International Business Times EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Our first impressions of the Huawei MediaPad M3 are mostly very good. The hardware is excellent and a match for anything else on the market (Apple included), and while performance seems good, Huawei's software is as always its weakest point.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It’s well built and a pleasure to use.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 96%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 96%
Source: PC Magazin - 01/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: PC Magazin - 01/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: c't - Heft 24/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: c't - Heft 24/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% performance: 80% features: 1% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% performance: 80% features: 1% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 60%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 83% mobility: 81% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 95%
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 83% mobility: 81% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 95%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 77% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 77% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 83% mobility: 89% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 83% mobility: 89% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 75% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 75% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2016
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 93% display: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 93% display: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2016
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei MediaPad M3 LiteProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 10.10 inch, 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixels
Weight: 0.46kg
Price: 349 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
内置扬声器。华为为MediaPad M3 Lite,配备了四个扬声器,以产生生动而强大的声场。也就是说,乍一看,该设备是一个典型的中档平板电脑,还有几个开口。
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Perspective EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the price, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 10 is a tablet worth considering with a few caveats. In combination with EMUI 5.1, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 CPU and 3GB of flash memory make for a tablet that’s responsive, even after extended periods of use. It’s front-facing camera has a higher megapixel count than many others in the sub-$300 range, which makes this a good device for Skyping with family over a long distance. The speakers and beautiful IPS LCD screen also make consuming content easy to enjoy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: PC Perspective EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the price, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 10 is a tablet worth considering with a few caveats. In combination with EMUI 5.1, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 CPU and 3GB of flash memory make for a tablet that’s responsive, even after extended periods of use. It’s front-facing camera has a higher megapixel count than many others in the sub-$300 range, which makes this a good device for Skyping with family over a long distance. The speakers and beautiful IPS LCD screen also make consuming content easy to enjoy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For $250, the Huawei MediaPad Lite 10 is a sleek tablet with a big, crisp screen and booming speakers at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, it's just not reasonable enough to compete with the Amazon Fire HD 10, which is available for $100 less and offers the same performance. It's also uncomfortably close in price to the $329 Apple iPad, which offers a faster processor, a sharper screen, and access to Apple's App Store, which still has an advantage over Android when it comes to quality tablet apps. So unless you absolutely need access to Google Play, you're better off paying a lot less for the Fire HD 10 or a bit more for the iPad.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For $250, the Huawei MediaPad Lite 10 is a sleek tablet with a big, crisp screen and booming speakers at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, it's just not reasonable enough to compete with the Amazon Fire HD 10, which is available for $100 less and offers the same performance. It's also uncomfortably close in price to the $329 Apple iPad, which offers a faster processor, a sharper screen, and access to Apple's App Store, which still has an advantage over Android when it comes to quality tablet apps. So unless you absolutely need access to Google Play, you're better off paying a lot less for the Fire HD 10 or a bit more for the iPad.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Although the 10-inch Huawei M3 Lite cuts a stylish frame, it's not just about looks. The tablet packs impressive battery life and a crisp display, although it's no benchmark speed demon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Although the 10-inch Huawei M3 Lite cuts a stylish frame, it's not just about looks. The tablet packs impressive battery life and a crisp display, although it's no benchmark speed demon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've always been a fan of using tablets for consumption tasks. Historically, I've used an iPad for this, but iPads are getting really expensive, given that Apple keeps adding 'pro' features. Indeed, it seems that the era of consumption tablets is behind us, so I found the MediaPad M3 Lite to be refreshing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've always been a fan of using tablets for consumption tasks. Historically, I've used an iPad for this, but iPads are getting really expensive, given that Apple keeps adding 'pro' features. Indeed, it seems that the era of consumption tablets is behind us, so I found the MediaPad M3 Lite to be refreshing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: e-media - 10/17
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: e-media - 10/17
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 97% price: 93% performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 97% price: 93% performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 73% features: 78% display: 75% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 73% features: 78% display: 75% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 86% mobility: 100%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 86% mobility: 100%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 8.00 inch, 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixels
Weight: 0.31kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Mini Me(diaPad). The 8-inch variant of the MediaPad M3 Lite brings a lot of polish and panache to the Android ecosystem. Despite its mid-range specifications, the M3 Lite proves to be a capable media machine. Is this the affordable compact tablet to get?
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At $200, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8 offers a higher-quality build and sharper screen than you get with sub-$100 tablets. But I can't quite say it's worth more than twice the price of the Amazon Fire HD 8. The Fire HD 8 offers better parental controls, and while it lacks access to Google Play, Amazon's software is more intuitive and easier to use than stock Android, especially if you use other Amazon services. The MediaPad is a welcome entry in the midrange tablet department, but it's also an example of why lower-cost options are dominating the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So that's it, did we miss out any other features that should be on this list? Let us know in the comments below. The Mediapad M3 lite is now available in space grey and gold with a free case at every Huawei Experience Store, authorised sellers across the nation and online on Vmall.my, thanks for reading and stay tuned for more tech articles from TechNave.com.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2018
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite delivers a premium display at a price that won’t burn your budget. Pick this tablet if you plan to do a lot of reading on your 8-inch slate, and want the sharpest, brightest display you can buy for the dollar. Others will beat it on performance and battery life, but if you prefer not to see the pixels that make up text letters, then this is the best full-bore 8-inch Android tablet for the price. Just count on carrying a power pack or battery backup if you’re on the road.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As a mid-range tablet, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite certainly ticks a few boxes for what it is meant to be, it has a great pair of features, decent enough everyday performance and battery life, all of this would cost you a RM999 price tag, which is pretty affordable and it does serve as a serious contender to Samsung's Galaxy Tab A tablets.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 80% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Comment
Huawei:
ARM Mali-T880 MP4:
平板电脑和智能手机显卡,搭配于海思麒麟950等ARM处理器中。
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
:
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
81.41%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.