Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2
Price comparison
Average of 32 scores (from 59 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Chinese luxury. Huawei used to be content with being low-end. However, now it is entering the high-end sector. The MediaPad M5 10.8 is the current top-end tablet from Huawei. Here, the manufacturer shows off its confidence when it comes to the asking price: Even the new iPad is cheaper under certain circumstances. So the question we have here is two-fold: Is Huawei asking too much for the new slate or is its new high-end tablet really that good?
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has a contender with the M5 Pro, thanks to the tablet's great battery life, nice display and good performance. The MediaPad M5, however, is sunk by its short battery life and comparatively small sound.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2019
Source: Techaeris EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M5 is really a top-notch piece of hardware. Holding an iPad alongside the M5, you probably wouldn’t be able to tell much of a difference in build quality and looks. The biggest factor for many will be the usability and look of Android apps on this device. You may or may not be bothered by the user experience when it comes to Android. I’d recommend finding a store that sells the M5 and take a look for yourself. Overall, this is a solid device when it comes to hardware. You will have to decide if the software experience fits into your workflow and if your favorite apps are optimized enough for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% price: 90% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Some might say that Huawei created the MediaPad M5 for the sake of creating a tablet as it comes with the previous generation Kirin 960 processor and marketing it as a media tablet but limiting how we consume media by removing the headphone jack. However, it is one of the better Android tablets out there and for the price of RM1,499, it is definitely a good option if you are looking for an Android tablet, as long as you can live with the compromises.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% performance: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having said that, it’s rather unfortunate that Huawei is making consumers choose one feature over another. Instead of coming up with multiple variants, Huawei should’ve concentrated their efforts to craft the perfect smartphone – one that would overthrow the competition in one fell swoop, and one that embodies all the great features of both the Mate 10 and Mate 10 Pro.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’ll update this hands-on review with a proper verdict once we’ve had time to fully benchmark the tablets and also test the new Desktop View mode. Until then, initial impressions are mixed. The standard version could be a good mid-range tablet, but the Pro may struggle against its Windows-based rivals.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei's Mediapad M5 could have been the product to face down the $329 iPad, but the larger model costs at least $70 more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei's new MediaPad 5 devices look to be a new range of premium Android tablets that offer top-end specs, but whether they will be worth picking up depends on pricing.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The new MediaPad M5 high-end Android tablets deliver good performance for the expected price (to date, rumored at around $400). The slim and elegant form factor is a little thicker than the Samsung Tab S3 but for the 10.8-inch form factor is larger.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: hifitest.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 93%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80%
Source: Der Standard DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/28/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% price: 92% performance: 96% features: 84% display: 94% mobility: 96% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2018
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2018
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 84% mobility: 76% workmanship: 97% ergonomy: 94%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% mobility: 84%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/15/2019
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/31/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/05/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2018
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 78% display: 80% mobility: 75%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2018
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 60% features: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 50%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/09/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 60%
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 96% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
ARM Mali-G71 MP8:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 960s: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
10.80":
这是在平板电脑和小型变形本中常见的屏幕尺寸。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.