Huawei Nova Plus
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (定焦)
Price comparison
Average of 35 scores (from 71 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Nova Plus
4K视频拍摄终于到来! 华为Nova Plus是一台具备高端质感的主流机型,它也是来自这家中国生产商的第一台支持UHD视频拍摄的智能手机。不过,华为并没有为它搭配自己的麒麟处理器,而是选择了高通的一块芯片。这台智能手机在400欧元价位市场中的表现怎么样呢?
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all it’s a solid, good looking device that will meet the needs of the vast majority of users and perhaps most importantly at an outright price that won’t break the bank. I’d seriously consider purchasing this as a backup device personally and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it to the majority of my family and friends who are on the hunt for a new device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 offers a much more reasonable comparison at about $430. However, it’s only available online — which negates the opportunity to get it for a reduced rate upfront from a carrier and may not provide the same quality of warranty when bought from a carrier. Meanwhile, the Nova Plus can be picked up at Rogers, Fido and Virgin for $0 down on a two-year contract. While the bloated UI may be enough to turn some off of the phone, the steady capability of this well-designed device makes it a great contender in the mid-range space.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei has released in Australia its latest smart phone from its new Nova series, the Huawei Nova Plus. (I say giant” because it’s true: $US60 billion in revenues last year!) Priced at $549, it’s available now at Harvey Norman and Officeworks.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/24/2016
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei’s Nova Plus is something of a jack of all trades. There’s little it can’t do and it uses the latest, second-tier components. The problem is that it’s still competing with many of the best last-gen phones which are still better and have reduced prices.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: New Atlas EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We enjoyed our time with these two phones and they tick a lot of the right boxes – particular in design and battery life – but we don't think Huawei has quite done enough to make an impact in a very congested market. If it can build on what it's done with the Nova and Nova Plus, and get European and US carriers more interested in the coming months, then the 2017 editions could be much more appealing propositions.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Brighthand EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei nova plus has an excellent design and fantastic finish. This convincing craftsmanship is its chief selling point. The display, chipset, and camera performance are just good enough not to drag it down.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Huawei Nova Plus certainly looks the part with a premium design and a bright, crisp display, the internals let it down. Despite featuring an improved camera with OIS, the photos produced by the smartphone are barely improved when compared to the Nova. However, we could look past the camera if it wasn’t for the sub-par CPU and GPU, which produce fairly disappointing results when compared to other mid-range Android smartphones. While the Nova Plus isn’t a terrible mid-range smartphone, there are better options on the market.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 60% features: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: International Business Times EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are perfectly capable mid-range handsets from Huawei that offer solid specs at a reasonable price point. While they lack imagination from a design perspective, both are well-built and premium-looking, at times echoing the phones Huawei hopes to replace at the top of the smartphone pecking order. However, there's nothing on offer here to tip them much above the average mark, and once again Huawei's software prevents the smartphones from feeling like something that could pose a serious threat to its Android rivals. And in the mid-range smartphone market, Huawei has a lot to contend with.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, neither of these phones is likely to steer you wrong, especially if you're not demanding a ton from your smartphone – and if you want a handset that feels great to hold, and has a battery that won't leave you hanging, either makes a really nice choice. But there's also not a lot here that screams THIS is the mid-priced phone to get. As a result, we'd definitely recommend considering these two Novas – but maybe check out some phones from the competition, as well.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Even so, that puts the Nova Plus at a bit of a disadvantage, for while its screen, performance and camera are all fantastic, the OnePlus 3 does everything a lot better for less. I’d definitely recommend the Nova Plus over the regular Nova, but if you’re looking for a great mid-range phablet, the OnePlus 3 is still the way to go – not only is it considerably faster, but its battery life is also significantly better.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nova Plus is yet another 5.5-inch mighty mobile, which is elevated by some seriously impressive battery life. Media fans will love the spacious Full HD screen, but the likes of the OnePlus 3 and Samsung’s Galaxy A7 2016 boast the same strengths as the Nova Plus, at a lower asking price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Headlines EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All-in-all, I think the Nova Plus is a device that Huawei has mis-positioned a little bit. In all of the above, we have established that the Nova Plus is a great smartphone, which it is. There’s no denying that, but with a price tag of €429, Huawei have priced it a little higher than I thought they would. Sure, the build quality and design here is great, and that fingerprint sensor is certainly a great luxury to have included, but the rest of the Nova Plus is pretty standard.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/03/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei phones tend to deliver the same old story: great hardware, poor software. It's no different than with the Nova Plus which, at its €429 price point, makes it hard to recommend over a faster, more powerful OnePlus 3 or more exciting-looking Honor 8 (which, in essence, is from Huawei anyway!).
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With 3GB of RAM, 32GB of internal storage, 4K video recording and Full HD displays then the nova and nova plus certainly have the hallmarks of couple of upper mid-range devices. That is even more so for the nova plus with its built-in OIS and larger display. The main weaknesses are the the processor package, and the camera setup.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are two excellent, if slightly overpriced mid-range phones. As always with Huawei, the build quality is excellent and performance is just fine, but software remains a sticking point. If you can get past (or even learn to like) EMUI, both phones deliver exceptional battery life, pretty good cameras and a choice of two form factors: The regular Nova is svelte and pocket-friendly, while the Nova Plus packs in a significant camera upgrade and a small battery bump alongside its bigger display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei's on an upward trend and its recent phones are consistently showing it. The attention to detail on the exterior has been matched on the inside and the polished software is one of Huawei's definite strengths. This is really where the EMIUI is shining lately: innovative and helpful gestures, clean yet customizable interface and top-notch camera processing algorithms. The Huawei nova plus was developed and built to a high standard. The airplane-grade aluminum has made it reasonably lightweight but sturdy, and it feels quite convincingly premium in terms of both hand feel and performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While we’ve only had a limited time with the Huawei Nova Plus, we’re fairly happy with what we see. The display is bright and crisp, and the build quality is similar to that of a flagship smartphone. The 16Mp rear-facing snapper with OIS is also an attractive point, allowing users to take crisp, sharp and detailed photos and smooth videos. The biggest question is – is it worth the money? While no UK pricing has been announced, the 429 Euro price tag makes it more expensive than the OnePlus 3, which offers a more powerful processor and more RAM – but we’ll hold our reservations until we get one back to PC Advisor towers and put it through its paces. Make sure you check back soon for a more thorough verdict!
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Nova Plus gives Huawei a larger screened mid-range handset to rival some of the popular devices out there, like the offering from Moto. The Nova's strength is really in its premium metal bodywork, giving you a phone that looks the part.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Available in silver, grey or gold, the Huawei Nova+ is, like the Huawei Nova, a very competent device – and if the price isn't too extravagant it could be a top budget choice. However, there are some issues with the speed of the mid-range processor in our early testing, which causes a slight flicker of worry – but then these aren't retail-ready models, so performance could very well be optimised by the time they hit the stores.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the smaller dimensions of the Nova make that handset stand out, the larger Plus model sort of fades into the mass of 5.5-inch phones on the market. Its design is less interesting than the Nova's, but it packs a good selection of specs nonetheless. The camera needs work, though, and this could the Nova Plus' downfall.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: International Business Times EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are unlikely to shake things up at the high end of the smartphone spectrum, but that's not the intention anyway. Instead, the devices are an attempt to tap into a burgeoning middle tier dominated by the likes of Samsung, Sony and LG and prove that no place is safe from the Chinese manufacturer's onslaught. On the other hand, despite their solid hardware and (mostly) good looks, there's no escaping the fact that the Nova and Nova Plus are two more additions to an ocean of mid-range smartphones.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2016
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 77% display: 78% mobility: 84%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Arturogoga ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/21/2016
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 78% display: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2016
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Source: Stockisti IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/23/2016
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% display: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 70% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Geeks.hu HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Mobilenet.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fony.sk SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2016
Source: Moj Android SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 87% mobility: 88% workmanship: 85%
Source: Reviewzat →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/08/2016
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.