Huawei P Smart 2019
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 55 scores (from 81 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P Smart 2019
The new smartphone from Huawei, the P Smart 2019, can be described with these three words. The performance has been increased significantly and the smartphone runs the latest version of Android (9.0 Pie). However, in the course of our review, we observed several drawbacks that we also saw in our review of the predecessor.
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Coming in at less than £200, the Huawei P Smart 2019 is a surprisingly robust smartphone experience wrapped up in an eye-catching "ceramic-like" finish. While the cost may be low, the P Smart 2019 packs in a surprising amount of features that let this handset punch above its weight. Most impressive is its dual 13/2-megapixel primary camera, which packs in a surprising amount of features and can even take usable low-light photos. With the latest version of Android, which comes with an impressive set of additional features, a large battery and decent processor, this is an impressive phone at a very reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Opening the latest smartphone offering from Vodafone was a little confusing. I was expecting the product to be a Huawei P smart 2019 handset which Huawei was targeted at users who were looking for a reasonably price handset, with a price tag of sub-£200, but the box containing the handset was embellished with the letters “VX” along with the Huawei logo and the year 2019. However further checking of the box revealed a label stating that this was the Midnight Black version of the Huawei P smart 2019. Other colour scenes available include Aurora Blue and Turquoise Blue.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It is not often that I review the same phone twice; however a lot has changed in this offering since my initial review last May. So it’s probably best to call this a new phone that just happens to have the same name as an earlier version.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Selling for a recommended R4 999, the Huawei P Smart is very reasonable when compared to other Android smartphones. What makes it particularly good value for money is that it features specifications and components that one may see in more expensive mid-range phones. As such you're getting far more bang for your buck.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart 2019 is a great option for the budget conscious and also for a first phone for a teenager. It ticks all the major boxes whilst not excelling at any one particular thing. I am impressed as to what Huawei has managed to cram into the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 85% mobility: 83% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P Smart 2019 has a display that stands out with chart-topping accuracy but is distinctly good enough in other respects. Battery life is solid and charging speed isn't as slow as the pedestrian adapter would have suggested. Image quality is not flagship grade, but it'll do. It runs the latest OS in a world of generally outdated software. And all of this comes at a very reasonable price, which is often sweetened further by carrier subsidies. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is classier-looking than last year’s phone of the same name. There’s an awful lot of good choices at around this price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To kick things off for 2019, I have got a new phone from Huawei which went on sale with Vodafone (other networks are available) this morning.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A surprisingly robust smartphone experience for the price wrapped up in an inoffensive design that should appeal to anyone looking for a capable budget handset.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Given the similarities to the Honor 10 Lite and the 8Mp rather than 24Mp selfie camera, you might wonder why it’s worth buying the P Smart 2019 instead. And that, ultimately, is the biggest problem for Huawei’s latest budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hartware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Connect - 3/19
Comparison, , Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 76% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android User DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 99%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 83% features: 75% display: 84% mobility: 89%
Source: Hardware-Mag.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 87% performance: 79% mobility: 89% workmanship: 58%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Source: Arturogoga ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 68% mobility: 80% workmanship: 69%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 82% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 79% features: 81%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 78% display: 79% mobility: 88% workmanship: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/28/2019
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G51 MP4:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 710:
基于ARM的八核SoC,包含四个用于执行性能任务的Cortex-A73内核(高达2.2 GHz)和四个Cortex-A53内核(高达1.7 GHz)以节省功耗。此外,SoC集成了LTE无线电(低600 MBps)和ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU。 SoC以台积电(TSMC)12纳米制程生产。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.20":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.