Huawei P8 lite 2017
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 52 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P8 lite 2017
精简版旗舰2.0。 华为P8 Lite实际上是华为第二款旗舰手机的精简版。然而,它已经重新被设计,包括跟新为全高清面板和许多方面的改进。我们的评测将说明P8 lite(2017)是否是一个很好的选择。
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Ultimately, while the P8 Lite is a very capable and affordable smartphone (even more so since we first reviewed it, in the latter case), it’s hard to fully recommend when less flawed alternatives exist. If you want the very best battery life, choose the Lenovo P2; if you want the best all-rounder with the best camera, the Moto G4 is the one for you.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While Android 7 phones are still in the minority this offering from Huawei has it. Until last year Huawei was a name I had not heard of. A huge launch brought the P9 to the world’s attention and although this was launched much later this is the latest version of the P8.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P8 may be an old phone by today’s standards, but that doesn’t seem to stop Huawei from releasing an updated 2017 Lite variant for consumers. The last Lite variant was released in 2015, around the same time as the flagship P8 was unleashed. Carrying slimmed down hardware and a more affordable price-tag, this cut-down flagship looks to offer mid-tier performance on a budget. It brings an updated design more akin to the Honor 8 that will no doubt appeal to the fashion concious. With the lower tier now incredibly cramped and full of competition, does it have what it takes to stand out? Let’s find out…
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P8 Lite is a decent mid-range phone. If picking one up on Vodafone for £150, it actually offers superb value. Its attractive built quality and decent battery life make it an excellent choice. However, if you’ve found a handset online from another retailer that’s priced closer to £200, consider the Motorola Moto G4 or Lenovo P2 instead; the Moto G4 has a better camera and the Lenovo P2 superior battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P8 Lite 2017 Review: Huawei’s first affordable phone of the year is a revamped version of the P8 Lite, and for just £185 in the UK it’s a seriously strong rival to similar budget blowers. Here’s our full Huawei P8 Lite 2017 review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 51% display: 82% mobility: 39% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 89% features: 72% display: 85% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit - 3/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Newesc ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 77% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 91% features: 82%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 86% features: 77% display: 86% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 78% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: Consumentenbond NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/08/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 655:
基于ARM的八核系统芯片(8个ARM Cortex-A83内核,4个1.7倍节能核心和4个最高2.1 GHz的高性能核心)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.