Huawei P9 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED 闪光灯, f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 34 scores (from 58 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P9 Lite
产品维护。 华为为它的P9系列增添了一台经典设计中端智能手机P9。这台5.2寸安卓设备在测试中展现了足以继承销量冠军P8 Lite的潜力。
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A sleek and capable budget phone, let down by a lacklustre camera and poor battery life
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Review Zat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a time when the market for wearable tech is ever growing, one’s ownership of a smart bracelet or watch is becoming a more common thing. However, the price is what draws away many users and they ask the fair question of whether the features of these devices are worth the investment. With the new offer combining a smartphone and a smart bracelet, Huawei is trying to make us think twice. The company has put together the stylish and powerful Huawei P9 lite and the smart bracelet.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/18/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The "diet" label usually comes with a warning: "does not replace an exercise routine." In similar fashion, the Huawei P9 lite has to do the work, it just can't cut back on the sugar and call it a day. And it does deliver. It has a sweet display, the build quality, chipset and battery life proved quite tasty as well. The camera is good if not great while the software is an acquired taste, which some of you may already have.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So while it might be a low calorie take on the P9, sometimes the skimmed option does everything that you want: which is exactly the point of the P9 Lite. Fair price, fair performance and more than fair design lead the way here, the big difference being the shedding of those dual Leica cameras to the rear.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/03/1999
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 87% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% mobility: 77%
Source: Ocaholic.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90% performance: 93% features: 64% display: 91% mobility: 64%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2016
Source: eTest DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/14/2016
Source: Smart Web DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 89% display: 82%
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Technik Surfer - Heft 08/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 12/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 92% features: 96% display: 93% mobility: 98%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 95% features: 93% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 93%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% display: 88% mobility: 83%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2016
Source: Kelisto.es ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Techné ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Wintech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2016
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recensione.biz IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PurePC PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% features: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 30%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2016
Source: Geeks.hu HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2016
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 650: 麒麟650
基于ARM的八核处理器(8个Cortex-A53核心)。四个频率最高可达1.7 GHz的节能核心和四个频率最高可达2 GHz的高性能核心。这颗处理器还集成了Mali-T830 MP2显卡和LTE模组。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.