Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc A370M

Intel A370M

Intel Arc A370M 是基于 Xe HPG 微架构的笔记本电脑专用移动入门级显卡。它采用 ACM-G11 芯片,提供全部 8 个 Xe 核心(128 个 ALU)、8 个光线追踪单元和一条 64 位显存总线,可支持 4GB GDDR6 显存。该芯片集成了 72 亿个晶体管,芯片尺寸为 157 平方毫米。

其性能处于 2022 年笔记本电脑专用显卡的入门级水平。AMD 曾发布过一些游戏基准测试,在 5 款游戏的中等设置下显示 Radeon RX 6500M明显更快。英特尔只将 A370M(CPU 速度更快)与速度较慢的 i7-1280P 的 Iris iGPU 进行了比较(见下文)。(由于多了 2 个内核和更高的时钟频率,入门级 Arc A350M明显落后。

该芯片还集成了两个媒体引擎,用于 VP9、AVC、HEVC 和 AV1 8k en- 解码。4 个显示管道通过 DMI 2.0B 或 DisplayPort 2.0 10G 支持多达 4x 4k120 HDR。

A370M 采用台积电 6 纳米(N6 工艺)制造,支持与第 12 代英特尔 CPU(Alder Lake)动态功耗共享(使用 Deep Link)。

Arc Series

Arc B580
Arc A770 4096 @ 2.1 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A750 3584 @ 2.05 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A580 3072 @ 1.7 - 2 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A770M 4096 @ 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A730M 3072 @ 1.1 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A570M 16 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A550M 16 @ 0.9 - 2.01 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A530M 12 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A370M 8 @ 1.55 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Arc A380 1024 @ 2 GHz96 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A310 6 @ 2 GHz64 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A350M 6 @ 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameAlchemist
ArchitectureXe HPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed1550 MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB, L2: 4 MB
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth112 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count7.2 Billion
Die Size 157 mm²
technology6 nm
PCIe4 8x
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 2.0 10G Ready
Date of Announcement30.03.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3505     avg: 4023     median: 4255 (12%)     max: 4308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3167     avg: 3650     median: 3885 (10%)     max: 3899 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
3324 -9%
3364 -8%
3430 -6%
3492 -4%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 -4%
3526 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 -2%
3601 -1%
3610 -1%
Intel Arc A370M
3650
3689 1%
3867 6%
3883 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3960 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
4155 14%
4209 15%
4256 17%
4372 20%
4448 22%
...
19434 432%
max:
36259 893%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27250     avg: 28035     median: 28128 (27%)     max: 28727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 33721     avg: 36141     median: 35604 (9%)     max: 39098 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7699     avg: 7735     median: 7717 (13%)     max: 7789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8015     avg: 8157     median: 8149 (9%)     max: 8307 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12308     avg: 12563     median: 12520.5 (16%)     max: 12902 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11748     avg: 12066     median: 12089.5 (10%)     max: 12338 Points
171.8 -99%
...
11119 -8%
11171 -7%
11305 -6%
11314 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -5%
11796 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -1%
11915 -1%
11984 -1%
Intel Arc A370M
12066
12289 2%
12460 3%
12479 3%
12583 4%
12797 6%
12801 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 9%
13515 12%
13524 12%
...
59943 397%
max:
104201 764%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
60.4 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
2 fps (0%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
30.2 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
28 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
75.1 fps (9%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
3.9 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
61.1 fps (9%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
85.8 fps (10%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
62.7 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
20.9 fps (4%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
1.9 fps (0%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
13.1 fps (9%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
3.9 fps (3%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
15.7 fps (10%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
20.3 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 125.4     avg: 148.3     median: 129.1 (8%)     max: 190.4 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.7     avg: 68.1     median: 58.8 (8%)     max: 87.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.3     avg: 70.4     median: 65 (9%)     max: 85 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 65     avg: 73.1     median: 68.8 (15%)     max: 85.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3014     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (35%)     max: 0.3846 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3035     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (34%)     max: 0.4078 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
55.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
73.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
70 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
127.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
2.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
77.4
low 1920x1080
95.6 97.5 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.3 69.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55 57.6 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7 41.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.3 34.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
35 35.2 35.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30 31.2 31.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24 25.4 25.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 18 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12 12.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
15
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
54
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
192  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 63 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
117
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
85.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
52.5
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
80.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
189  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
76.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
64.6
low 1280x720
92.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
67  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
175.8 175.9 184.8 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.2 73.9 76.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.4 62 64.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1 52.5 54.3 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
87 90 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48 49 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45 46 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
34.7 36.9 43.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.4 27.8 34.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.9 24 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.9 70.3 70.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.4 37.9 38.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.6 26.3 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.4 19.3 19.8 37.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
82.6 99.1 104.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.2 83.5 92.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.2 68.4 72.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.7 66.3 68.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
121 166.7 168.8 ~ 152 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
87 98.9 100 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45 53 55.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 25.8 26.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
145.4 148.6 157.2 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
135.1 136.9 148.3 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5 40.7 41.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 16.2 16.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.7 10.7 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
117.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
141.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo 467.160.939.2
Star Wars Jedi Survivor2319.719.217.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake45.726.311.63.52
Company of Heroes 355.747.837.237.1
Sons of the Forest27.617.411.511.4
Atomic Heart55.542.42420.2
Returnal27262210
Hogwarts Legacy43.230.319.612.7
Dead Space Remake22.617.812.18.86
High On Life73.444.640.832.6
A Plague Tale Requiem22.919.516.614.3
FIFA 237062404130
F1 22127.249.546.3332.85
Vampire Bloodhunt12787625534
Cyberpunk 2077 1.646.137.125.421
GRID Legends9769564233
God of War3531251912
Guardians of the Galaxy231412
Far Cry 686443624
F1 2021192896225
Hitman 385.754.95046.223.4
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla6233201813
Dirt 580.440.73223.115.2
Watch Dogs Legion7745341511
Horizon Zero Dawn5740353123
Gears Tactics18976.848.838.427.7
Borderlands 376.447.529.52214.5
Metro Exodus92.144.131.325.519.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6749413220
Strange Brigade17975635337.2
Far Cry 58949464329
X-Plane 11.1138302622.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark69372423
Middle-earth: Shadow of War44
Dota 2 Reborn9582686439.5
The Witcher 3152955126
GTA V150140411110
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
8
15
7
7
19
9
1
15
18
4
19
12
1
14
4

1
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 16:35:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.037s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#18 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 11306 +0.014s ... 0.051s

#20 got single benchmarks 11306 +0.018s ... 0.068s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.518s ... 0.586s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.586s

#24 Got 232 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.621s

#25 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.621s

#26 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 0.645s

#27 benchmarks composed for output. +1.607s ... 2.253s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.257s

#29 return log +0s ... 2.257s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc A370M graphics card

宏碁Swift X 16 (2022),配备英特尔A370M处理器

Acer Swift X 16 (2022)回顾。具有强大更新的16英寸笔记本电脑

宏碁Swift X 16 (2022)是一款轻型16英寸笔记本电脑,具有额外的图形性能。明亮的显示屏最终以16:10的格式出现,并提供高分辨率。英特尔的Alder Lake P-Core i7 CPU帮助这款多媒体笔记本电脑形成了强大的性能。但是,英特尔的A370M表现如何?...
Intel Core i7-1260P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G回顾:平衡效率和性能的笔记本电脑

宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G回顾:平衡效率和性能的笔记本电脑

由于额外的英特尔Arc A370M图形处理器,宏碁的笔记本承诺在图像和视频编辑方面有明显更好的性能--甚至在游戏方面。即便如此,这些功能似乎也令人印象深刻,并满足了很高的期望。不幸的是,细节上的一些缺陷破坏了整体印象,否则就是好的。...
Intel Core i5-1240P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
英特尔A370M首次亮相。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD二合一评测

英特尔A370M首次亮相。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD二合一评测

Zenbook Flip 15又采用了第12代英特尔酷睿H CPU和新的英特尔Arc A370M GPU,分别取代去年的Core U选项和GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q。虽然CPU的性能对于可折叠机来说快得惊人,但也许GeForce MX550会是更好的举措。...
Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Arc A370M | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Dell XPS 15 9530, Intel Arc A370M: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9530, Intel Arc A370M

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H: Intel Core i5-12500H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H

HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng: Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter