Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel i7-12800H

英特尔酷睿 i7-12800H是一款基于 Alder Lake 架构的笔记本电脑高端移动 CPU。它于 2022 年初发布,提供 6 个高性能核心(P 核心,Golden Cove 架构)和 8 个高效核心(E 核心,Gracemont 架构)。P 核心支持超线程技术,与 E 核心结合可支持 20 个线程。高性能集群的时钟频率为 2.4 至 4.8 GHz,高效集群的时钟频率为 1.8 至 3.7 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧的 Skylake 核心类似(与酷睿 i7-6920HQ 相比 酷睿 i7-6920HQ).所有内核均可使用多达 24 MB 三级缓存。与 12900H12800H 时钟更低,还具有全套 "企业 "vPro 功能(用于远程管理)。

功能特点

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型,最高可达 DDR5-4800、DDR4-3200、LPDDR5-5200 和 LPDDR4x-4267。线程指令(硬件)可支持操作系统决定在性能核心或高效核心上使用哪个线程,以获得最佳性能。对于人工智能任务,CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost(通过 AVX2)。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同,支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 仅支持 PCIe 4.0(一个 GPU x8,两个 SSD x4)。

集成图形适配器基于 Xe 架构,提供 96 个 EU(执行单元),工作频率高达 1.4 GHz。

性能

我们数据库中 12800H 的平均性能与 Ryzen 9 6900HS酷睿 i9-11900H的多线程性能。截至 2022 年年中,这已经相当令人印象深刻了。

ZBook Studio 16 G9 采用了体面的冷却解决方案,CPU 的长期功率限制为 70 W。 ZBook Studio 16 G9是我们所知的最快的 12800H 笔记本电脑之一。截至 2023 年 8 月,它在 CPU 负载工作负载中的速度比我们数据库中采用相同芯片的最慢系统快约 70%。

功耗

这款酷睿 i7 系列芯片的 "最低保证 "功耗为 35 W,基础功耗为 45 W。英特尔建议的最大 Turbo 功耗为 115 W。

i7-12800H 采用英特尔第四代 10 纳米制程,市场上称为英特尔 7,平均能效(截至 2023 年初)。

SeriesIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-H

Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H

Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1800 - 4800 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.2 MB
Level 2 Cache11.5 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads14 / 20
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/04/2022
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
38.7 pt (64%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9777     avg: 14387     median: 15283 (14%)     max: 16597 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1796     avg: 1824     median: 1828 (78%)     max: 1859 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 703     median: 706 (78%)     max: 714 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3741     avg: 5443     median: 5731 (14%)     max: 6433 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1566     avg: 2236     median: 2222 (14%)     max: 2697 Points
0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 242     avg: 260     median: 265 (74%)     max: 269 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 44553     avg: 59950     median: 62100 (36%)     max: 68930 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5726     avg: 5835     median: 5820 (69%)     max: 5976 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 16.3     median: 16.8 (30%)     max: 19.4 fps
051015202530Tooltip
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 192     avg: 233.2     median: 222 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4442     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4715 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15130     avg: 21336     median: 22022 (56%)     max: 24746 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79353 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12719     avg: 17648     median: 18989 (48%)     max: 19895 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21866     avg: 27059     median: 27907 (50%)     max: 29584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9325     avg: 11508     median: 11786 (50%)     max: 13353 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1739     avg: 1790     median: 1771 (69%)     max: 1842 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9607     avg: 11957     median: 12434 (22%)     max: 12940 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 510     avg: 520     median: 513 (1%)     max: 542 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 284     avg: 294.8     median: 294.5 (54%)     max: 306 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1768     avg: 1800     median: 1790 (69%)     max: 1843 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.7     avg: 108.7     median: 118 (20%)     max: 126 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 84.3     avg: 135.4     median: 143 (26%)     max: 158 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 14.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 10:17:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.013s ... 0.014s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14045 +0.016s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 14045 +0.019s ... 0.049s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.528s ... 0.577s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.577s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.577s

Reviews for the Intel Core i7-12800H processor

惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9笔记本电脑评测。配备120赫兹DreamColor显示屏的工作站

惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9笔记本电脑评测。配备120赫兹DreamColor显示屏的工作站

对于第九代ZBook Studio移动工作站,惠普在16:10的外形尺寸中使用了更大的16英寸显示屏,DreamColor屏幕现在以120赫兹运行。酷睿i7-12800H和专业的Nvidia RTX A2000提供足够的性能。 ...
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Razer Blade 17笔记本电脑回顾。RTX 3070 Ti或RTX 3080 Ti--哪个是卓越的刀片?

Razer Blade 17笔记本电脑回顾。RTX 3070 Ti或RTX 3080 Ti--哪个是卓越的刀片?

配备RTX 3070 Ti的Razer Blade 17比配备RTX 3080 Ti的便宜整整800欧元(约842美元)。由于刀片的外壳很薄,你真的能注意到有利于更昂贵的GPU的性能差异吗?我们将在我们的评论中对此进行探讨。...
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022评测 - 具有快速显示功能的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022评测 - 具有快速显示功能的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

新的Razer Blade 15配备了全新的第12代英特尔处理器和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti。再加上快如闪电的360赫兹面板,这保证了令人难以置信的流畅显示。在下面的评论中,看看这个小机箱是如何应对强大的硬件的。...
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Razer Blade 17 2022 Core i7 RTX 3080 Ti笔记本电脑评测。超强的性能

Razer Blade 17 2022 Core i7 RTX 3080 Ti笔记本电脑评测。超强的性能

最初的Blade 17设计是在2019年推出的,目标TGP只有100W。用户可以期待更多耗电的内部设备带来的任何影响吗?
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.7 kg
英特尔酷睿i7-12800H首次亮相。Razer Blade 15笔记本电脑评测

英特尔酷睿i7-12800H首次亮相。Razer Blade 15笔记本电脑评测

由于英特尔新的第12代酷睿平台和Nvidia的移动RTX Ti系列,Razer正在将其三年前的Blade 15设计的极限推向更高的水平。因此,预计功耗会比前几代机型高一些。...
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.1 kg

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9, i7-12800H RTX A4500: NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Studio 16 G9, i7-12800H RTX A4500

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)

Dell Precision 14 5470, i7-12800H RTX A1000: NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 14 5470, i7-12800H RTX A1000

Razer Blade 15 2022: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 2022

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5, i7-12800H RTX 3070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5, i7-12800H RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGD3-R3G1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGD3-R3G1

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti

Razer Blade 17 RZ09-0423PGD3-R3G1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 17 RZ09-0423PGD3-R3G1

Razer Blade 17 RZ09-0423PGD3: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 17 RZ09-0423PGD3

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Alder Lake-P

» Intel Core i9-12900HK
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12900H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12650H
   10x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12600H
   12x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12500H
   12x 1.8 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1280P
   14x 1.3 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1270P
   12x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1260P
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12450H
   8x 1.5 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-1250P
   12x 1.2 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-1240P
   12x 1.2 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i3-1220P
   10x 1.1 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
   12x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
   11x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12650HX
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
- Intel Core i5-13600HX
   14x 1.9 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-27)