Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900HX

Intel i9-12900HX

英特尔酷睿 i9-12900HX是一款基于 Alder Lake 架构的笔记本电脑高端移动 CPU。它于 2022 年中期发布,提供 8 个高性能内核(P-cores,Golden Cove 架构)和 8 个高效内核(E-cores,Gracemont 架构)。P 核心支持超线程技术,与 E 核心结合可支持 24 个线程。性能集群的时钟频率为 2.3 至 5 GHz,效率集群的时钟频率为 1.7 至 3.6 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧的 Skylake 核心类似(与酷睿 i7-6920HQ 相比 酷睿 i7-6920HQ).所有内核均可使用多达 30 MB 三级缓存。作为 HX 变体,CPU 提供开放式倍频器,因此可以对 CPU 内核进行超频。与类似的 i9-12950HX 相比,12900HX 不支持 vPro 或 ECC 内存。

功能特点

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型,最高可达 DDR5-4800 和 DDR4-3200。线程指令(硬件)可支持操作系统决定在性能核心或高效核心上使用哪个线程,以获得最佳性能。针对人工智能任务,CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost(通过 AVX2)。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同,支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 支持 48 条 PCIe 通道,包括 16 条 Gen5(x16 或 2x8)、20 条 Gen4 和 12 条 Gen3。

集成图形适配器基于 Xe 架构,提供 32 个 EU(执行单元),工作频率高达 1.55 GHz。

性能

在我们的数据库中,12900HX 的平均性能与 i7-12800HXi7-13700HX的性能,但比 Ryzen 7 7745HX有明显优势。

Ryzen Legion 7 16IAX7是我们所知的最快的 12900HX 笔记本电脑之一。与我们数据库中采用相同芯片的最慢系统相比(截至 2023 年 8 月),它能长时间保持约 90 W 的 CPU 功耗,多线程性能最多可提升 20%。

功耗

该芯片的 "最低保证 "功耗为 45 W。其 Turbo 功耗不应超过 157 W,基本功耗应在 55 W 左右。

这款酷睿 i9 系列处理器采用英特尔第四代 10 纳米制造工艺,市场上称为英特尔 7,平均能效(截至 2023 年初)。

CodenameAlder Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-S

Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake-HX

Intel Core i9-12950HX1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HX « 1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12850HX1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800HX1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650HX1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600HX1.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450HX1.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1700 - 5000 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.4 MB
Level 2 Cache14 MB
Level 3 Cache30 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 24
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date05/10/2022
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42 pt (70%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 18337     avg: 22529     median: 23150 (21%)     max: 23482 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1897     avg: 1917     median: 1912.5 (81%)     max: 1936 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 728     avg: 738     median: 739 (82%)     max: 745 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7037     avg: 8602     median: 8842.5 (22%)     max: 9042 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2830     avg: 3493     median: 3566 (23%)     max: 3652 Points
018537055574092511101295148016651850203522202405259027752960314533303515Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274     avg: 278     median: 278 (78%)     max: 282 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.5 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9509 points (57%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
245.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 69778     avg: 84614     median: 86541 (50%)     max: 88128 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6165     avg: 6293     median: 6336 (75%)     max: 6358 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
185.5 fps (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
313.7 fps (72%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.6     avg: 25     median: 26 (46%)     max: 26.6 fps
0510152025303540Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 261     avg: 277.5     median: 267 (3%)     max: 358 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 144     avg: 154.4     median: 148.6 (1%)     max: 201 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4242 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17459     avg: 17668     median: 17668 (38%)     max: 17877 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
379.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
88577 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20782     avg: 23514     median: 22972 (58%)     max: 26386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 100525     avg: 101928     median: 101928 (83%)     max: 103331 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 100362     avg: 101890     median: 101890 (83%)     max: 103418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 96923     avg: 99059     median: 99450 (82%)     max: 100413 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18927     avg: 20662     median: 19881 (50%)     max: 23351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29204     avg: 32485     median: 32071 (57%)     max: 36791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12600     avg: 14855     median: 14895 (63%)     max: 17144 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1874     avg: 1909     median: 1906.5 (75%)     max: 1949 points
AMD E1-2100
125 -93%
...
1855 -3%
1858 -3%
1866 -2%
1884 -1%
1888 -1%
1891 -1%
1894 -1%
1895 -1%
1901 0%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1909
1913 0%
Apple M2
1914 0%
1915 0%
1917 0%
1920 1%
1933 1%
1934 1%
1937 1%
1939 2%
...
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2555 34%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15116     avg: 16247     median: 16311.5 (29%)     max: 16925 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1821     avg: 1848     median: 1848 (8%)     max: 1875 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16305     avg: 16488     median: 16487.5 (52%)     max: 16670 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8112     avg: 8182     median: 8182 (82%)     max: 8252 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 58195     avg: 58846     median: 58845.5 (59%)     max: 59496 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488     avg: 492.5     median: 492 (1%)     max: 498 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
77.4 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 94901     avg: 95303     median: 95387 (80%)     max: 95620 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 268     avg: 279     median: 275 (77%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 293     avg: 317.2     median: 317.5 (58%)     max: 341 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2108     avg: 2147     median: 2150.5 (82%)     max: 2170 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139.4     avg: 168.5     median: 161.6 (28%)     max: 204 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 113.7     avg: 187.6     median: 207 (38%)     max: 225 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
25.6 Watt (17%)
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
17.7 Watt (20%)
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.6     avg: 19.5     median: 16.6 (12%)     max: 32.1 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 22. 06:00:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:30:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.016s ... 0.017s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.018s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.018s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14401 +0.018s ... 0.036s

#13 got single benchmarks 14401 +0.027s ... 0.063s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.026s ... 1.089s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.089s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.089s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-12900HX processor

联想Legion 7 16IAX7笔记本电脑评论。快速的16英寸游戏机,165赫兹的显示屏

联想Legion 7 16IAX7笔记本电脑评论。快速的16英寸游戏机,165赫兹的显示屏

联想Legion 7 16提供了游戏玩家渴望的一切。除了英特尔最快的移动处理器,还有GeForce RTX 3080 Ti和快速的165 Hz显示屏。冷却系统也能保持硬件的冷却,但4499欧元(约合4500美元)的价格,对高端玩家来说绝不是一个便宜货。...
Intel Core i9-12900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
微星Titan GT77 12UHS 4K评论。UHD DTR笔记本电脑中的精英

微星Titan GT77 12UHS 4K评论。UHD DTR笔记本电脑中的精英

微星Titan GT77是目前性能最好的笔记本电脑之一。酷睿i9-12900HX和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti可以进行4K游戏、视频编辑和渲染。在最近审查了带有FHD面板的Titan GT77之后,我们现在已经拿到了带有4K显示屏的最高规格型号。...
Intel Core i9-12900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 3.4 kg
微星Titan GT77的回顾。(图片来源:微星)

微星Titan GT77 12UHS笔记本电脑评测。桤木湖-HX的海报儿童,具有无阻碍的桌面级性能

经过两年的休整,微星泰坦GT77标志着该公司复活了其标志性的旗舰笔记本电脑阵容。泰坦GT77采用酷睿i9-12900HX,175W RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU,以及包括大量NVMe存储、DDR5-4800内存和高触感Cherry MX机械键盘在内的其他优点--几乎是发烧级玩家所渴望的一切。泰坦GT77...
Intel Core i9-12900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 3.3 kg
Aorus 17X XES回顾。配备i9-12900HX的游戏笔记本提供顶级性能

Aorus 17X XES回顾。配备i9-12900HX的游戏笔记本提供顶级性能

凭借其360赫兹面板、RGB键盘和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti,技嘉笔记本电脑完全为游戏而设计。同时,使用的英特尔处理器和内存数量也提供了丰富的动力。具体结果如何,将由我们的基准测试和游戏测试显示。...
Intel Core i9-12900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.7 kg
微星Raider GE77 HX 12UHS在审查中。具有顶级性能的4K游戏笔记本

微星Raider GE77 HX 12UHS在审查中。具有顶级性能的4K游戏笔记本

凭借酷睿i9-12900HX和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti,这台微星笔记本电脑为4K游戏、视频编辑和渲染提供了足够的性能。事实上,它经常达到我们迄今为止看到的这种GPU的最佳基准测试结果。...
Intel Core i9-12900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 3.1 kg

MSI Vector GP68 HX 12VH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector GP68 HX 12VH

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS-066RU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan GT77 12UHS-066RU

HP Omen 17-ck1098ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 17-ck1098ng

MSI CreatorPro X17-A12U, i9 RTX A5500: NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » MSI CreatorPro X17-A12U, i9 RTX A5500

MSI Raider GE67 HX 12UHS-026: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider GE67 HX 12UHS-026

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan GT77 12UHS

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS-010: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan GT77 12UHS-010

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Alder Lake-S

» Intel Core i9-12900K
   16x 3.2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12900
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12950HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12900HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12700K
   12x 2.7 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12850HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12800HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12700F
   12x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12700
   12x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12600K
   10x 2.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12650HX
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12700H
   14x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12600HX
   12x 1.8 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12450HX
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12400F
   6x 2.5 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
   12x 3 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-14700HX
   20x 3.9 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-13850HX
   20x 1.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-12950HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12900HX
   16x 1.7 GHz - 5 GHz
- Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
   14x
- Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
   14x - 4.5 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 16-Core
   16x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-12-31)