Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU

Intel Arc 7-Core

配备 7 个内核的英特尔 Arc iGPU 是基于 Xe LPG 架构的集成显卡（与专用 Arc GPU 相似，但更注重效率）。它提供8 个 Xe 内核中的 7 个（112 个 Xe 向量引擎）、7 个光线追踪单元、7 个采样器，可能还有 4 个像素后端。

只有在双通道模式下使用至少 16GB 内存时，才能使用 Arc 名称。否则，iGPU 只能称为"Intel Graphics"，而且速度也会大大降低。

据英特尔公司称，与上一代产品（可能仍在 Alder Lake 中）相比，性能提高了一倍。

iGPU 支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate（可能与桌面 Arc GPU 一样支持 DX 12_2）。图形处理器还支持 XeSS AI 超级采样。

Meteor Lake 的媒体引擎位于 SOC 芯片中，支持高达 8k60 10 位 HDR 的 MPEG2、AVC、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 编码和解码。显示引擎也在 SoC 芯片中，支持 HDMI 2.1 和 DisplayPort 2.1 20G，最高支持 8K60 HDR。

Meteor Lake 芯片的 GPU 芯片在台积电以 5 纳米（5N 工艺）制造。

Arc LPG Series

Arc 8-Core 8 @ 2.3 GHz
Arc 7-Core 7 @ 2.2 GHz
Graphics 4-Core 4 @ 1.95 GHz
CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed2200 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.3 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 7-CoreGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.6 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.24 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.3 -8%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.36 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.44 -4%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.5 -3%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.53 -2%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.59
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65 2%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.74 4%
Intel Arc A310
3.74 4%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.78 5%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.96 10%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 14%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.09 14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4.11 14%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 468%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 828%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3121     avg: 3379     median: 3378.5 (10%)     max: 3658 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2796     avg: 3075     median: 3102.5 (8%)     max: 3319 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon 780M
2717 -12%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2766 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2805 -9%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
2864 -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -5%
Intel Arc A350M
2993 -3%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 -3%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3075
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139 2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3155 3%
AMD Radeon 880M
3197 4%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3231 5%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3242 5%
Intel Arc A310
3269 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
3324 8%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 532%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
36259 1079%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
396714 Points (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 145414     avg: 146731     median: 146731 (17%)     max: 148048 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 28997     avg: 29674     median: 29573 (28%)     max: 30553 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 39695     avg: 41850     median: 41030.5 (10%)     max: 45644 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6548     avg: 7232     median: 7349 (12%)     max: 7929 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7047     avg: 7945     median: 8133 (9%)     max: 8531 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 158643     avg: 181910     median: 159017 (18%)     max: 228069 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5654     avg: 5699     median: 5699 (7%)     max: 5744 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 25271     avg: 25991     median: 25990.5 (25%)     max: 26710 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 30252     avg: 31507     median: 31507 (12%)     max: 32762 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10634     avg: 11347     median: 11233.5 (14%)     max: 12140 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10303     avg: 11314     median: 11497.5 (10%)     max: 12061 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
10498 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -7%
Intel Arc A350M
10730 -5%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
10774 -5%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
10818 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
10952 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
11119 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11171 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305 0%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
11314
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 5%
Intel Arc A310
11915 5%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11984 6%
Intel Arc A370M
12066 7%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
12289 9%
AMD Radeon 780M
12467 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
12479 10%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 430%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
104201 821%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 35885     avg: 38156     median: 37719 (11%)     max: 41299 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 30937     avg: 33936     median: 34042 (19%)     max: 36721 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
31800 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 -5%
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
32473 -4%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
32473 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
33179 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33321 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
33740 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
33810 0%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
33936
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
34680 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
34951 3%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
35209 4%
AMD Radeon 780M
35269 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
35807 6%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36137 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
36214 7%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
36405 7%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132443 290%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
170928 404%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 41203     avg: 44877     median: 44876.5 (49%)     max: 48550 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
AMD Radeon 610M
36628 -18%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
36878 -18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 -16%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
38073 -15%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38999 -13%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39066 -13%
Intel Arc A730M
43138 -4%
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 -3%
AMD Radeon 680M
43633 -3%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
44877
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46269 3%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47870 7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48758 9%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
50971 14%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
52117 16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54320 21%
AMD Radeon 780M
54811 22%
Intel Arc A770M
55811 24%
AMD Radeon 890M
58138 30%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
68064 52%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
87172 94%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 38905     avg: 40397     median: 40216 (53%)     max: 42252 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 16.9     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (6%)     max: 20.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.65     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.97 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 12.3     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (9%)     max: 14.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 68.4     avg: 71.8     median: 71.8 (8%)     max: 75.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 4.61     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (3%)     max: 5.08 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 20.2     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (10%)     max: 20.3 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 15.5     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (10%)     max: 16.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.8     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (6%)     max: 21.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 5.54     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.82 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (5%)     max: 5.87 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 32.8     avg: 33.8     median: 33.8 (5%)     max: 34.7 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 3.38     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.81 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 15.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (7%)     max: 15.4 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 9.7     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (7%)     max: 10.4 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 13.2     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (6%)     max: 14.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 15394     avg: 15881     median: 15688.5 (11%)     max: 16752 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 92.81     avg: 95.4     median: 95.6 (31%)     max: 97.61 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 132.66     avg: 139.4     median: 138.5 (8%)     max: 145.06 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 25.5     avg: 29.7     median: 29.7 (12%)     max: 33.9 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 77.4     avg: 78.8     median: 78.8 (14%)     max: 80.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -96%
...
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 -20%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 -20%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 -19%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 -18%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -18%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
65.5 -17%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -8%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -6%
AMD Radeon 880M
78.4 -1%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
78.8
Intel Arc A310
80.5 2%
AMD Radeon 890M
84.6 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87.1 11%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
87.5 11%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
89.3 13%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
93.2 18%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
94.7 20%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 22%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 580%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
193.7 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
155.8 fps (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 203.3     median: 196.8 (1%)     max: 315 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 26624     avg: 29363     median: 29263 (8%)     max: 33039 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 26482     avg: 30465     median: 29526 (8%)     max: 34230 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 708     avg: 757     median: 755.5 (3%)     max: 809 Samples/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1926     avg: 2453     median: 2538.5 (4%)     max: 2807 Samples/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5613     avg: 6364     median: 6471.5 (7%)     max: 6899 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.1     avg: 49.9     median: 48.3 (7%)     max: 57.4 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.7     avg: 42.6     median: 41.9 (6%)     max: 46.3 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 44.4     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (10%)     max: 47.7 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3987     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (48%)     max: 0.545 fps per Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4368     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (47%)     max: 0.589 fps per Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.7     avg: 56.3     median: 57.1 (7%)     max: 59.1 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.8     avg: 38.4     median: 38.5 (62%)     max: 40 dB(A)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
64.3 66.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.6 57.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7 43.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
28.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
90.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
23.2 29.2 29.5 30.1 30.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.8 21.7 24.3 25.2 25.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6 19.1 20.6 21.3 21.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8 16.4 18.8 18.8 19.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
45.5
46.3
46.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
17
18.5
18.7
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
29.9 30.2 33.5 33.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2 25.9 26.4 27.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.5 22.4 22.8 24.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.5 21.5 21.8 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45
50.2
50.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armored Core 6

Armored Core 6

2023
low 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Atlas Fallen

Atlas Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

2023
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
58.7 68 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.5 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.3 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 4 Remake

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3

2023
low 1920x1080
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sons of the Forest

Sons of the Forest

2023
low 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atomic Heart

Atomic Heart

2023
low 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy

2023
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
130.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
89
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

2022
low 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
133 141 148.6 149 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63 63.9 68 69.5 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 53.5 54 57.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 43.5 44 47.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37 64 71 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34 37 40 41 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31 35 37 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31 35 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
59
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
47.1 47.5 47.5 52 52.2 57 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.9 38.3 38.5 40.1 40.3 44.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.3 31.5 32.9 33.4 34.2 37.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
52.1 58.3 59.6 59.8 60.6 64.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.4 32.9 33.3 33.4 35.4 35.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2 22.3 23.4 25.3 25.3 25.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
93.5 93.8 94.3 95.5 97.1 97.7 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70.5 77.8 79.2 83 83.1 89.2 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.3 68.4 73.6 75.6 75.8 75.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7 64.9 70.5 72.9 73 73.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
126 136 138 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
80 85 88 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 51 52 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 23.4 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
116.9 127.2 132.4 143.6 153 156.3 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
106.4 119.9 125.5 143.3 148.8 151.6 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 32.4 33.6 34.1 38.9 39.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 13.7 13.7 14.8 15.3 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
128.7
115.2
117.6
95.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
140
127.8
129.8
118.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2465574311.4
Last Epoch53.838.73325.3
Skull & Bones33312418
Helldivers 232.12522.721.7
Enshrouded21.518
Palworld34.832.625.223.4
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown215127120
Ready or Not62.748.344.534.5
The Finals7047.739.734.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora1514129
EA Sports WRC28.62119.217.9
Alan Wake 215.8
Lords of the Fallen17.111.711.410.8
Total War Pharaoh95.556.835.628.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage333127
Counter-Strike 290.257.937.624.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty29232018
Baldur's Gate 332262221
Lies of P4633.832.627.1
The Crew Motorfest26242017
Starfield19.116.513.210.7
Armored Core 639.732.628.523.5
Atlas Fallen40.540.336.626.4
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
F1 236357390
Resident Evil 4 Remake36.125.123.6
Company of Heroes 351.545.433.933.3
Sons of the Forest24.917.315.515.2
Atomic Heart40.731.922.816.4
Returnal30292723
Hogwarts Legacy3126.517.313.2
F1 2279.471.952.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands50.739.426.822.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.631.62722.621.6
Strange Brigade143665444
Far Cry 562383534
X-Plane 11.11514033
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark593424
Dota 2 Reborn95807369
The Witcher 3133844923
GTA V1381333514
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		9
18
9
3		14
19
4
2		20
16
1
1		25
5
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 16:09:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12257 +0.029s ... 0.057s

#10 got single benchmarks 12257 +0.028s ... 0.085s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.862s ... 0.947s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.948s

#14 Got 294 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.979s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.979s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.025s ... 1.004s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +1.446s ... 2.449s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.454s

#19 return log +0s ... 2.454s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU graphics card

GMK NucBox K9 迷你电脑评测：配备 Arc 7 图形处理器的酷睿 5 125H

GMK NucBox K9 迷你电脑评测：配备 Arc 7 图形处理器的酷睿 5 125H

酷睿至尊 5 125H 可以让电脑变得更智能，但并不一定意味着速度更快。原始性能远远落后于更老更便宜的 Ryzen 7 7840HS。
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | 528 g
华硕 NUC 14 Pro 评测：配备 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H、快速 Intel Arc iGPU 和 2x Thunderbolt 4 的 NUC 迷你 PC

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 评测：配备 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H、快速 Intel Arc iGPU 和 2x Thunderbolt 4 的 NUC 迷你 PC

华硕接管了英特尔的 NUC 部门，现在提供配备英特尔流星湖处理器的流行迷你 PC。这不仅为小型台式电脑提供了更强大的 CPU 能力，而且由于改进了 iGPU，还能显著提高 3D 性能。我们对搭载英特尔酷睿 5125H 处理器的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 进行了详细测试，并根据大量测量和基准测试对其性能进行了评估。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | 525 g
Minisforum UH125 Pro 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H、32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 AI 迷你 PC，价格不菲

Minisforum UH125 Pro 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H、32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 AI 迷你 PC，价格不菲

Minisforum 正在更新其基于英特尔流星湖处理器的机型系列：UH125 Pro 基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H。您还可以期待丰富的连接功能，目前最先进的连接功能包括 USB4 和 OCuLink。我们对该设备进行了详细了解，并根据大量测量和基准测试分析了其性能。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | 797 g
联想 ThinkBook 13x G4 笔记本电脑评测：除键盘外最好的笔记本之一

联想 ThinkBook 13x G4 笔记本电脑评测：除键盘外最好的笔记本之一

联想的 ThinkBook 13x G4 是一款高品质的紧凑型子笔记本电脑，几乎在所有领域都有出色的表现。3:2 格式的 IPS 屏幕亮度高，频率为 120 Hz，酷睿 5125H 处理速度快，电池续航时间也不错。不过，ThinkBook 在键盘和维护选项方面存在不足。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | 13.50" | 1.2 kg
三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 - 配备酷睿Ultra 5和120 Hz AMOLED的超薄二合一机型

三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 - 配备酷睿Ultra 5和120 Hz AMOLED的超薄二合一机型

三星为其Galaxy Book4 机型配备了英特尔新款 Meteor Lake 处理器，16 英寸二合一Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 配备了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 处理器和高分辨率 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | 16.00" | 1.7 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的成功全能型产品

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML, Ultra 5 125H

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew1000: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew1000

LG gram 14 2-in-1 14T90S: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram 14 2-in-1 14T90S

Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9, Ultra 5 125H

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 5 125H

MSI Prestige 14 AI Evo C1MG: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI Evo C1MG

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, Ultra 5: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, Ultra 5

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 5: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 5

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 32-core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon 890M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
Arc 8-Core *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
Arc 130V *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Radeon 740M *
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter