Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

Intel Arc 8-Core

配备 8 个内核的 Intel Arc iGPU（ID 7D55）是Meteor Lake SoC 中的一款集成显卡，基于 Xe LPG 架构（与专用 Arc GPU 相似，但更注重效率）。它提供全部 8 个 Xe 内核（128 个 Xe 向量引擎）、8 个光线追踪单元、8 个采样器和 4 个像素后端。

只有在双通道模式下使用至少 16GB 内存时，才能使用 Arc 名称。否则，唯一的 iGPU 被称为"Intel Graphics"，而且速度也明显较慢。

据英特尔公司称，与上一代产品相比，性能提高了一倍（可能还在 Alder Lake 阶段）。

iGPU 支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate（可能与桌面 Arc GPU 一样支持 DX 12_2）。图形处理器还支持 XeSS AI 超级采样。

Meteor Lake 的媒体引擎位于 SOC 芯片中，支持高达 8k60 10 位 HDR 的 MPEG2、AVC、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 编码和解码。显示引擎也在 SoC 芯片中，支持 HDMI 2.1 和 DisplayPort 2.1 20G，最高支持 8K60 HDR。

Meteor Lake 芯片的 GPU 芯片在台积电以 5 纳米（5N 工艺）制造。

Arc LPG Series

Arc 8-Core 8 @ 2.3 GHz
Arc 7-Core 7 @ 2.2 GHz
Graphics 4-Core 4 @ 1.95 GHz
CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2300 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.0 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 8-CoreGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H16 x 3800 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2200 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.8 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.44 -9%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.5 -7%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.53 -7%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.59 -5%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65 -3%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.74 -1%
Intel Arc A310
3.74 -1%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.78
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.96 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.09 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4.11 9%
AMD Radeon 890M
4.23 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
4.28 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
4.39 16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.46 18%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 440%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 781%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2178     avg: 3553     median: 3627.5 (10%)     max: 4176 Points
+ 40 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2018     avg: 3231     median: 3277 (9%)     max: 3770 Points
+ 42 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
Intel Arc A350M
2993 -7%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 -7%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3075 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3155 -2%
AMD Radeon 880M
3197 -1%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3231
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3242 0%
Intel Arc A310
3269 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
3324 3%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
3364 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3430 6%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
3492 8%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 8%
AMD Radeon 890M
3526 9%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 10%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 501%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
36259 1022%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 397122     avg: 410287     median: 408060 (41%)     max: 427906 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 78589     avg: 142909     median: 159691 (19%)     max: 163878 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18794     avg: 31259     median: 31963 (30%)     max: 37020 Points
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 31876     avg: 43407     median: 44226 (11%)     max: 52200 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5203     avg: 7620     median: 7879 (13%)     max: 9084 Points
+ 39 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5568     avg: 8302     median: 8561 (10%)     max: 9692 Points
+ 39 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 88046     avg: 177853     median: 190075 (21%)     max: 215292 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4294     avg: 6018     median: 6363 (7%)     max: 6686 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 13461     avg: 25851     median: 27400 (26%)     max: 29487 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 25821     avg: 33139     median: 34198.5 (13%)     max: 36983 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7756     avg: 11999     median: 12415 (16%)     max: 13943 Points
+ 35 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8064     avg: 11984     median: 12375 (11%)     max: 13716 Points
+ 35 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
10952 -9%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
11119 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11171 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305 -6%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
11314 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
11796 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -1%
Intel Arc A310
11915 -1%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11984
Intel Arc A370M
12066 1%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
12289 3%
AMD Radeon 780M
12467 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
12479 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
12583 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
12797 7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12801 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13515 13%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 400%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
104201 770%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 38739     avg: 41084     median: 41223 (12%)     max: 43259 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 33028     avg: 36137     median: 36546 (20%)     max: 39184 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33321 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
33740 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
33810 -6%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
33936 -6%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
34680 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
34951 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
35209 -3%
AMD Radeon 780M
35269 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
35807 -1%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36137
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
36214 0%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
36405 1%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
37644 4%
AMD Radeon 890M
37785 5%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
38502 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
38910 8%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 8%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132443 267%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
170928 373%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 42967     avg: 47870     median: 47115 (52%)     max: 53214 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 -21%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
38073 -20%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38999 -19%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39066 -18%
Intel Arc A730M
43138 -10%
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 -9%
AMD Radeon 680M
43633 -9%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
44877 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46269 -3%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47870
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48758 2%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
50971 6%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
52117 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
54320 13%
AMD Radeon 780M
54811 14%
Intel Arc A770M
55811 17%
AMD Radeon 890M
58138 21%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61850 29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61993 30%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
68064 42%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
87172 82%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 34184     avg: 36714     median: 36636.5 (48%)     max: 38214 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 17.1     avg: 19     median: 19.5 (6%)     max: 20.1 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 42.7     avg: 42.9     median: 42.9 (11%)     max: 43 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.29     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.56 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (4%)     max: 19.9 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 15.9     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (4%)     max: 16.9 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 54.9     avg: 56.5     median: 56.5 (15%)     max: 58 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.67     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.91 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 22.7     avg: 22.9     median: 22.9 (9%)     max: 23.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 48.2     avg: 49.8     median: 49.8 (8%)     max: 51.3 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 49.7     avg: 49.8     median: 49.8 (9%)     max: 49.8 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 44.8     avg: 45.2     median: 45.2 (12%)     max: 45.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.43 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (4%)     max: 19.9 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 25     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (6%)     max: 29.7 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 59.5     avg: 61     median: 61 (7%)     max: 62.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 5.27     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (2%)     max: 5.69 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 29.3     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (4%)     max: 29.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 71.6     avg: 74.2     median: 74.2 (8%)     max: 76.8 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 46.4     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (8%)     max: 48.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.56     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.94 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 14.7     avg: 16.7     median: 17.6 (12%)     max: 17.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9     avg: 88.1     median: 87.6 (10%)     max: 89.9 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 5.5     avg: 6.1     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 6.4 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 24.5     avg: 26     median: 26 (13%)     max: 27.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 17.7     avg: 18.4     median: 18.1 (11%)     max: 19.5 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 22.6 (7%)     max: 26.1 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 11     avg: 11.6     median: 11.6 (3%)     max: 12.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 5.37     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 6.24 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 4.23     avg: 5.8     median: 5.7 (5%)     max: 7.07 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 35.4     avg: 38     median: 37.7 (6%)     max: 41 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 4.25     avg: 5     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 6.03 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 17.9     avg: 18.6     median: 18.5 (9%)     max: 19.8 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 10     avg: 11.1     median: 11.2 (7%)     max: 11.7 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 12.9     avg: 14.4     median: 14.8 (6%)     max: 15.5 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 15690     avg: 18034     median: 18344 (13%)     max: 19892 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 97.07     avg: 107     median: 108 (36%)     max: 115.68 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 132.8     avg: 152.3     median: 152.6 (9%)     max: 176.3 fps
+ 40 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 40 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 36.6     avg: 39.6     median: 40.5 (16%)     max: 41.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 83.4     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (16%)     max: 91.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -26%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
65.5 -25%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -17%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -15%
AMD Radeon 880M
78.4 -10%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
78.8 -10%
Intel Arc A310
80.5 -8%
AMD Radeon 890M
84.6 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87.1 0%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
87.5
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
89.3 2%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
93.2 7%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
94.7 8%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 10%
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
96.8 11%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 16%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 18%
Qualcomm Adreno 830
104 19%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 513%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 206.4     avg: 216.5     median: 210 (16%)     max: 233.2 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
167.1 fps (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
817 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 282.3     median: 295.5 (2%)     max: 1992 fps
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 18.7     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 176.8 fps
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 17911     avg: 32332     median: 34782 (10%)     max: 39941 points
+ 41 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 16515     avg: 31483     median: 33364 (9%)     max: 37129 points
+ 40 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 549     avg: 670     median: 683.5 (2%)     max: 747 Samples/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2319     avg: 2665     median: 2671.5 (5%)     max: 2927 Samples/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6270     avg: 7207     median: 7537 (8%)     max: 7963 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35     avg: 50.7     median: 50.3 (7%)     max: 69.6 Watt
+ 31 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27     avg: 44.2     median: 44.1 (6%)     max: 61 Watt
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 29.7     avg: 47.7     median: 46.7 (10%)     max: 64.6 Watt
+ 21 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3826     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (45%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4246     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 38.8     avg: 58.8     median: 55.5 (18%)     max: 76.7 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 58.8     median: 56.3 (7%)     max: 74.1 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.1867     avg: 0.3     median: 0.2 (35%)     max: 0.4816 fps per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 27     avg: 38.1     median: 38 (61%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46.2
EA Sports FC 25

EA Sports FC 25

2024
low 1920x1080
75.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Settings 1280x720
119.2
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
12
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
28.7
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
26.8
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
23.8
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
33
low XeSS 68 1280x720
48
Once Human

Once Human

2024
low 1920x1080
35.6 44.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.2 29.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.6 28.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.5 24.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
76.5
62.5
The First Descendant

The First Descendant

2024
low 1920x1080
40.7 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.6 33.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3 27.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
72.3
60.2
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
65.6 66.5 71.8 75.2 82 84.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56 56.3 57.1 64.7 66.2 73.8 74 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.7 43 48.4 48.7 53 54.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12.2 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.5
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 30.6 52 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1 34 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 29 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 25 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
0 (!)
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
45.8 73.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9 46.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 40.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
59.3
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
152.6 183.9 208 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
111.5 128.6 142.8 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.6 120.9 134.2 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
82.7 93.1 101.4 116 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5 70.6 74.8 77.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6 53.6 53.6 58.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5 40.6 47 52 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
136.5
167.2
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
111.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
11.3 16.7 18.5 21.7 23.3 23.3 23.6 27.6 27.8 29.4 29.4 29.5 29.8 30.9 31 31.5 31.5 31.7 32 32.4 32.9 33.9 34.1 34.3 34.3 34.7 34.7 35.7 36.4 36.4 36.5 37.9 38 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4 15.2 16.3 19 23.8 24.2 24.8 25.1 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.7 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.7 26.8 27.8 27.9 28 28.4 28.9 29.5 29.5 29.6 30.2 31 31.4 31.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3 14.3 14.8 15.1 16.3 16.9 17.8 20.4 21.5 21.9 21.9 22.1 22.5 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.9 22.9 23.4 23.4 23.9 24 24 24 24.1 24.6 25 25.2 26 26.2 26.7 27.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 13.5 14.2 18.4 18.9 19.5 19.7 19.8 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.9 22 22 22.1 23.3 23.7 23.8 24.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 13.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
53.8
49
46.1
37.3
44.3
45.6
47.6
34.5
38
48.9
47.4
50.5
48.3
58
48.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.3
Steam Deck 1280x720
34.1
52
48.8
41.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
16.8
22.3
13.8
13.1
18.9
21.9
18.6
20.5
19.6
9.6
19.5
22.1
20.3
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
21 22.1 23 24.5 29.1 29.3 30.8 30.9 31.7 31.9 32.4 32.9 33.7 33.8 34.6 36.9 36.9 37.9 39.3 39.6 40.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3 17.6 20.6 22.8 22.9 23.5 24.2 24.3 24.8 25 25.6 25.9 27.4 28.2 28.8 29.6 29.7 29.7 30.2 30.3 30.7 31.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.4 15.8 16.5 20.6 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.7 22.9 23.7 24.1 25 25.2 25.3 25.4 26.7 26.8 27.5 27.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 14.7 19 19.1 19.9 20.3 20.4 20.7 21 21.1 22 22.1 23.4 23.6 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 25.2 25.7 26.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.4 14 17.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.6
52.2
33.8
46.7
42.2
53.9
48.5
48.1
57.6
56.4
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armored Core 6

Armored Core 6

2023
low 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Atlas Fallen

Atlas Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart

2023
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
15.2 17.3 37.4 44.1 48.6 48.6 57.3 57.3 64.4 64.6 67.9 68.2 68.2 69.8 70.9 71.5 71.5 71.9 72.3 73.1 73.4 77 80.1 82.1 83.2 89.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 25.1 35.4 36.3 52.5 52.5 59 59.4 59.5 60.5 61.2 62.1 62.9 63.1 65.1 65.6 65.8 66.8 66.9 70.2 74.2 75.3 76.3 79.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6 25.6 26.6 27.1 35.5 35.5 35.9 37.6 38.7 39.5 40.7 41.1 41.2 43.1 44.8 44.9 46.1 47.1 47.5 50.4 50.7 50.9 54.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 10 10.7 11.4 11.5 11.8 12.1 12.2 12.6 12.7 13.5 14 14.3 14.7 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
93.7
110.9
73.4
72.4
113.9
88.3
88.3
123.1
115.7
113.4
Resident Evil 4 Remake

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023
low 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3

2023
low 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sons of the Forest

Sons of the Forest

2023
low 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Atomic Heart

Atomic Heart

2023
low 1920x1080
45.7 61 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.4 44.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.6 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 22.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
69
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy

2023
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
56.2 59.1 68.8 71 72.1 72.4 72.7 73.1 73.9 76.3 77.2 77.7 78.2 78.3 80.6 84.9 96.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 53.9 57.5 62.2 65.1 65.6 66.6 67 68.6 70.8 70.9 71.4 71.6 71.7 73.8 77 87 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.9 43.5 46.7 51.1 52.9 53.3 53.7 55 55.1 55.7 55.9 56.2 65.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 9.3 11.9 14 14.1 14.4 14.7 14.9 15 15.3 16.1 16.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
127.2
86.6
120.3
107.7
120.5
113.4
120.8
107.4
136
120.1
104.5
120.9
115.8
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
44.9 47.3 47.4 49 49.2 50.4 50.8 51.2 53.3 53.8 54.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3 36.3 37.3 39.5 40.6 41.2 42.6 42.7 43.4 44.5 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7 25.7 26.4 27 29.1 29.9 30 30.1 30.7 31.5 31.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 20.2 21.2 21.9 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 25 25.1 25.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
87
81.2
82.5
80.8
83.8
82.1
96.1
86.6
80
77.4
84.4
GRID Legends

GRID Legends

2022
low 1920x1080
67.7 73 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.8 56.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.6 39.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80
86.6
Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2

2022
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
God of War

God of War

2022
low 1920x1080
27 33.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 31.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3 24 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.2
38.7
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
61.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
42.9
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
94.8 143.5 143.6 145.9 147.5 161.1 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.8 73.9 75.9 80.4 80.6 83.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3 56.4 60 63.2 63.8 65.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3 26.2 26.9 28.8 29.6 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

2020
low 1280x720
0 (!) 58 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 (!) 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
139.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
68.5 93 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5 41.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7 28.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 22.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
55.8
65.7
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
65 69 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
low 1280x720
52.2 63.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.9 37.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25 27.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
69 79.3 131.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 38.3 62.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 35.8 49.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 30.5 48.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
88.4
63.2
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
121 121 124.9 129.8 131.8 141 141.6 141.9 144 145.6 146.1 147.3 151.6 154.8 156 159.4 162.1 163 165.4 165.9 166 168 171 173.8 176 177.4 178 179.5 188 188.9 189 190.2 204 205 207 208 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.1 52.7 53 54 56 57 59 60.6 61.9 66 67.6 67.7 67.8 68 70 70.5 70.6 71 71 71.1 71.8 72 72.5 73 73.4 75.4 76 77.4 78 80.3 82 84 85.2 86 87.7 88 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 40 41 41.4 43.8 48 50.4 52 52.4 53.3 54 54.9 55.4 56.4 57.2 57.8 57.8 58.9 59 59 59 59 59.1 59.6 59.7 61.4 61.7 62 64 64 66.7 69 69.3 71 72.3 74 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1 31 32 33.4 35 35.6 37.4 38.8 38.9 40.7 41 41 43.2 43.8 44 44.3 45.4 46 46.1 46.7 46.8 47 47 47.3 48.5 48.9 49 50 50.3 52 52.5 53 53.2 55 56 58 58.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 25.7 34.9 42 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 51 54 54 56 57 59 61 62 63 63 63 63 65 67 67 68 68 69 69 69 72 76 77 79 84 91 91 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30 31 33 33 35 36 36 36 37 37 37 38 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 42 43 44 45 45 46 47 48 52 54 54 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 28 29 30 31 32 33 33 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 36 36 37 37 37 37 38 40 41 41 42 43 43 45 48 49 50 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 26 27 28 28 31 31 32 32 32 32 32 33 33 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 36 38 38 38 39 40 40 41 45 46 46 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 32 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
38
45
50
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
46.1 47.1 47.4 47.5 47.6 49 49.3 49.9 50.3 50.5 50.8 50.9 51.4 51.6 52 52.2 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.7 53 53.4 53.9 54 54.4 54.5 54.9 55 55.4 55.4 56 56.1 56.9 58 58.7 61.5 63.1 64.9 65.5 66.4 66.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.1 31.2 35.8 36 36 37.7 38.3 38.7 38.8 38.9 39.2 39.4 39.8 39.9 39.9 40.1 40.4 40.4 40.6 40.7 40.8 40.8 41 41.1 41.1 41.3 41.6 42 42.5 44 45.1 45.1 46 46.4 46.6 46.7 46.9 47.4 47.6 49.7 49.8 51.9 52.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 29.9 30.2 30.2 30.8 30.8 31.2 31.3 31.6 31.7 32 32.1 32.1 32.4 32.7 33.4 33.5 33.5 33.7 33.8 34.1 34.5 34.6 35 35.7 35.8 36.1 36.8 36.9 37.6 37.8 37.8 38.2 38.2 38.9 39.5 40.1 40.5 40.5 42.2 42.3 43.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.3 34.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
35.6 42.8 43.8 45.2 45.5 47.6 51.5 51.9 52.8 56.6 56.9 57.2 58.1 58.5 59.1 61 61.3 63 63.3 64 64.8 65 65.3 66.1 66.8 68.4 69.1 69.3 70 73.6 75.3 77 79.2 80.1 82.9 83.3 84.1 85.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 28.2 28.7 29.7 29.7 30.3 31.6 32.1 32.1 33 33.5 34.8 35.8 35.9 36 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.5 36.5 36.8 37 37.3 37.4 37.6 37.9 38 38 38 38.8 40.2 40.3 40.3 41 41.3 43.4 45 45.2 45.3 45.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7 17 18.2 18.4 19.2 19.2 19.4 20.9 21 21.2 21.8 23.2 23.9 24.1 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.6 24.9 25.4 26.1 26.1 26.4 26.4 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.8 27 27.2 27.5 28.6 28.9 29.2 30.5 30.6 30.6 30.8 31.6 31.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.6 13.4 14 15.9 19.8 20.5 23 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.7 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
78.3 89.9 91.5 92.1 95.1 98.4 98.4 98.6 98.9 98.9 98.9 99.3 99.4 100.3 100.9 100.9 101.1 101.2 101.2 101.5 101.5 101.7 101.8 102.4 102.5 102.7 103.2 103.2 103.5 103.8 104.1 104.6 104.7 105 105.7 106.2 106.5 106.5 106.8 107.4 110.5 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.2 54.2 55.8 58.2 62.8 69.4 71.4 75.6 75.9 76.9 78 79.2 80.6 81.9 82.3 83 83.2 83.4 84.1 84.3 89.4 89.8 90.4 90.8 90.9 92.6 92.8 92.9 93.1 93.3 93.5 94 94.1 94.1 94.9 95.3 95.5 96.5 96.9 97.4 99.9 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 39.8 47 54.8 57.7 61.5 61.9 62.6 63.2 64.1 64.1 66.8 67.2 67.2 67.4 69.3 70.3 72 72.3 74 74.5 74.9 74.9 75.7 76 76.5 76.7 76.8 77.3 77.8 77.9 78.4 79 79.1 80.6 83 83.3 84.6 85.2 85.2 87.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.2 41.8 43.7 45.5 53.3 56.8 59.6 60.3 60.4 60.6 60.8 62.1 63.6 63.6 63.9 65.2 66.5 66.6 67.1 68.3 71.1 71.1 72.3 73.2 73.4 73.6 73.6 74 74 74.4 74.4 74.6 75.4 75.6 76 78 79.8 80.2 80.5 80.6 80.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.9 31.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
92 120 126 126 128 131 131.2 131.3 132 132.9 133 135 135.1 135.6 140.2 141 141.5 142.7 152 152 156 157 157 158 160 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
59 68 73 76.8 78 78 79.1 80 80 81.2 85.1 88.1 88.2 88.4 89 89 91.5 92 93 97 97 99 100 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36 40 40 40.4 42 42.4 44 44.5 44.8 46.8 47 48 48 49 50 51 51 51.7 54.1 54.3 54.3 56 57 57 58 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5 18.4 19.2 20.1 20.4 20.5 20.8 20.8 20.9 21.8 22.6 23 23.1 23.3 23.8 23.9 24 24 24.5 24.5 24.6 25.1 25.2 25.5 25.5 25.6 25.9 26 26.1 28 43.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
53.8
51.7
53.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
99.1 101.3 102.4 110.5 124.1 126.5 133.8 134.9 136.9 139.1 141 144 144.9 145.4 147.3 152.9 153.3 157.8 158.1 158.8 160.3 160.3 161 162.9 162.9 163.3 163.6 165.2 166.5 166.9 169.3 171.5 174.1 175 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9 85.7 90.4 93.8 107.7 111 114 120.8 121.7 124.1 129.8 131.5 131.8 133.9 134.8 135.8 139.5 139.5 140.1 147.9 148 148.1 148.2 151.8 151.9 152.8 154.1 154.9 156.7 158.8 160.2 160.9 164.4 168.4 169.3 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1 22.6 24.2 24.3 26.2 31.3 32.2 32.3 32.8 33.1 33.4 33.5 33.9 34.5 34.8 35.2 35.9 36.2 36.3 36.9 37.5 37.6 39.6 39.9 40.3 40.6 41.2 41.2 41.3 43.2 43.5 43.5 44.7 48.6 48.9 51.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 10 10.3 11 11.4 12.1 12.3 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.7 13.8 13.9 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.6 14.7 14.7 15.8 15.9 15.9 16 16.2 16.5 16.6 17.1 17.5 17.8 18.3 19.2 20.2 20.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
5
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
121.8
108.9
118.4
156
139.7
90.4
69.3
123.9
111
101
120.9
111.9
124.3
119.9
109.8
127.9
123.7
112.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
130.9
130.5
128.3
167.5
152.7
62.9
138.3
119.5
122.2
134.6
107.4
131.8
142.8
131.1
121.4
138.3
134.6
124.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Until Dawn40.227.218.914
EA Sports FC 2575.855.44543.1
God of War Ragnarök10.610.410.110
Final Fantasy XVI20.319.116.115.4
Space Marine 219.316.51614.7
Star Wars Outlaws16.515.91310.8
Black Myth: Wukong2016127
Once Human40272522
The First Descendant45302421
F1 2474644813
Senua's Saga Hellblade 217.814.912.1
Ghost of Tsushima33.62825.219
Dragon's Dogma 21814.5
Horizon Forbidden West28312421
Alone in the Dark69564929
Last Epoch60464034
Skull & Bones36322721
Helldivers 239.23027.527.2
Enshrouded272216.8
Palworld40.637.129.527.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown182128121
Ready or Not60.446.945.832.5
The Finals99.568.960.546.4
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora18161411
EA Sports WRC35.826.624.722.4
Lords of the Fallen20.21816.314.2
Total War Pharaoh98715344
Assassin's Creed Mirage34333025
Counter-Strike 2111.184.552.131.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty3026222011
Baldur's Gate 332262322145.42
Lies of P56.948.141.733.2
The Crew Motorfest32302521
Starfield11.5
Armored Core 65040.136.232.2
Atlas Fallen45.945.739.529.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart28.42925.921.1
F1 2363594012
Resident Evil 4 Remake39.630.526.718.4
Company of Heroes 362.250.13938.6
Sons of the Forest29.82119.418.7
Atomic Heart53402820
Returnal37363228
Hogwarts Legacy25.719.315.6
F1 2275685213
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands5041292316.6
GRID Legends70544338
Dying Light 231.129.9
God of War30282115
Far Cry 661.937.732.127.2
F1 2021139745827
Horizon Zero Dawn29342927
F1 2020139.176.960.541.2
Borderlands 381402822
Total War: Three Kingdoms130594633
Far Cry New Dawn67403836
Metro Exodus58362621
Shadow of the Tomb Raider93453935
Strange Brigade1637057453215
Far Cry 56741373531
X-Plane 11.1154423527
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark633725178
Dota 2 Reborn10184716731
The Witcher 3138854824
GTA V1481353615119.14
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		13
22
19
6		20
32
10
2		34
26
3
1		40
16
1
1		6
2

5
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 19:53:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12086 +0.028s ... 0.055s

#10 got single benchmarks 12086 +0.141s ... 0.196s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.196s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +1.178s ... 1.375s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 1.375s

#14 Got 1710 rows for game benchmarks. +0.261s ... 1.636s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.636s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.046s ... 1.682s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +2.454s ... 4.136s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.008s ... 4.144s

#19 return log +0s ... 4.144s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU graphics card

华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 迷你 PC 评测--仅重 622 克的潜在台式机杀手

华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 迷你 PC 评测--仅重 622 克的潜在台式机杀手

华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 承诺在小巧的外形下提供令人印象深刻的性能，配备最新的处理器和强大的动力。但它在日常使用中的表现如何呢？在这篇评测中，我们将对 NUC 14 Pro+ 进行测试，看看它是否兑现了自己的承诺，能否真正成为台式机的有效替代品。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 622 g
Geekom GT1 Mega 回顾

Geekom GT1 Mega 评测：Geekom 的首款 AI 迷你 PC 在各方面都不尽如人意

Geekom GT1 Mega 承诺在迷你 PC 外形中提供强大的性能，面向在最小空间内需要大量性能的用户。Geekom GT1 Mega 配备了英特尔酷睿超 9 185H，首次安装了带有专用 NPU 的流星湖处理器。在本次测试中，我们将从功能、性能和散热等多个方面来了解 Geekom GT1 Mega 是否令人信服。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 693 g
联想 ThinkBook Plus 5 代混合型二合一电脑评测：双启动 Windows 11 和Android 13

联想 ThinkBook Plus 5 代混合型二合一电脑评测：双启动 Windows 11 和Android 13

Windows-Android 混合方式可以有效地一次性取代现有的笔记本电脑和平板电脑。不过，就电池寿命和重量而言，二合一联想机器并不一定比独立的笔记本电脑和独立的平板电脑更好。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 14.00" | 1.7 kg
Khadas Mind 2 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 7 155H、雷电 4 和 USB4 的便携式迷你 PC

Khadas Mind 2 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 7 155H、雷电 4 和 USB4 的便携式迷你 PC

凯达斯正在更新其目前的 Mind 系列机型，并配备了新的英特尔处理器。我们将对搭载英特尔酷睿 7 155H 处理器的 Khadas Mind 2 进行近距离观察，并根据大量测量和基准测试对其性能进行评估。事实证明，制造商不仅更新了 SoC。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 437 g
Honor MagicBook Art 14 笔记本电脑 - 配备蒸发腔和创新摄像头的 OLED 超薄笔记本电脑

Honor MagicBook Art 14 笔记本电脑 - 配备蒸发腔和创新摄像头的 OLED 超薄笔记本电脑

Honor 新推出的 MagicBook Art 14 是一款配备了高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏和 Meteor Lake 处理器的优秀超极本。可连接的网络摄像头也是一项真正的创新，效果极佳。散热由蒸汽室提供。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 14.60" | 1 kg

Medion S17431-MD62640: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.30", 2.1 kg
  Review » Medion S20 笔记本电脑评测：配备 Intel Core Ultra 7 处理器的 17 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑

HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 Elite x360 1040 G11 二合一笔记本评测：适合商务人士使用

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  Review » Framework 13.5 Core Ultra 7 笔记本电脑评测：全新 2.8K 120 Hz 显示屏与 Arc 8 图形处理器

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24): Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.30", 1.7 kg
  Review » 申克 XMG Evo 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测 - 拥有明亮显示屏和出色维护选项的德国超极本

Medion S10 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Medion S10 OLED 评测：配备 OLED 面板和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 16 英寸可转换机上的迷你 LED：戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 评测

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 小米 RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测--性能强劲、价格实惠的超极本

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » LG gram Pro 二合一 16T90SP 评测--轻巧、功能强大

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  Review » 微星Claw评测--搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra处理器的游戏掌上电脑令人失望

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.20", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华为 MateBook 14 (2024) 3:2 屏幕笔记本电脑评测--一些小问题让人失望

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.20", 1 kg
  Review » 华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本，令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.9 kg
  Review » Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 与 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 评测：配备触摸显示屏、摄像头和 OCuLink 的 AI 迷你 PC

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 13 9340 笔记本电脑评测--运行时间长、缺陷多的紧凑型超极本

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测--配备 120 Hz 显示屏和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 评论--配备 OLED 触摸屏的昂贵日常笔记本电脑

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » LG Gram 17 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测--小幅改进和全新酷睿 Ultra 7

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9 评测：更小、更轻、更快的 Arc 图形处理器

Acemagic F2A: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » Acemagic F2A 评测：AI 迷你 PC 配备英特尔流星湖酷睿 7 155H 处理器、32 GB DDR5 内存和 Wi-Fi 7

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测： MacBook Air 15 的三星替代产品Apple

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » AcePC Wizbox AI mini PC 评测：英特尔流星湖迷你电脑

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 笔记本电脑评测：放弃GeForce RTX，采用集成式英特尔弧光灯

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G9 笔记本电脑评测：全新小尺寸，集成 Co-Pilot 键

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 Arc 对决 Radeon 780M

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  Review » 微星 Prestige 13 AI Evo 笔记本电脑评测--酷睿至尊 7 处理器和 OLED 显示屏，重量不足 1 千克

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) 可折叠本评测：配备酷睿 Ultra 9 的多任务处理冠军

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 二合一可折叠 HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：功能强大的酷睿-超强全能型 OLED 笔记本电脑

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 笔记本电脑评测：三年来首次重大更新

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测--配备 120Hz OLED 和酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器、重量仅 1.2 千克的超轻型笔记本电脑

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 Spectre x360 14 评测--配备更大的 120-Hz OLED 的高端可折叠设备

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 微星 Prestige 16 B1MG 笔记本电脑评测：从酷睿 i7 Xe 到酷睿 Ultra 7 Arc

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift Go 14 评测--Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 的人工智能内核令人印象深刻

  Review » 英特尔流星湖分析 - 酷睿至尊 7 155H 仅在 GPU 性能方面令人信服

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  Review » 英特尔流星湖分析 - 酷睿至尊 7 155H 仅在 GPU 性能方面令人信服

HP Elite x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x360 1040 G11

LG Gram SuperSlim 15 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram SuperSlim 15 2024

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH9

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 IML: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 IML

Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H

HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11

Honor MagicBook Art 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.60", 1 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Art 14

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9

Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML

Asus Vivobook S15 S5506: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S15 S5506

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-73: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-73

Panasonic Toughbook 40 Mk2: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Panasonic Toughbook 40 Mk2

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72, Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72, Core Ultra 7 155H

Medion S10 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Medion S10 OLED

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 7 155H

MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG

HP EliteBook 1040 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 1040 G11

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6+ IMH: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6+ IMH

MSI Prestige 16 AI EVO B1MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI EVO B1MG

Acer Swift Go 14 OLED SFG14-73: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 OLED SFG14-73

Asus VivoBook S 16 OLED S5606MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 16 OLED S5606MA

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H

MSI Summit E13 AI Evo A1M: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit E13 AI Evo A1M

Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9

Huawei MateBook 14 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.20", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2024

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA, Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA, Ultra 7

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.20", 1 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9

Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7

Dell XPS 14 9440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14 9440

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425

LG gram Pro 17Z90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 17Z90SP

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72

Medion E15443: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Medion E15443

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA

Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.50", 1.4 kg
   » Framework 笔记本电脑砖系统可利用乐高脚垫、轮子、电缆支架等扩展笔记本电脑

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.9 kg
   » Minisforum 曝光支持 OCuLink、液冷和高达 64 GB 内存的 AMD AtomMan X7 Pt

   » Minisforum 推出全 AMD AtomMan G7 Pt 迷你 PC，配备 16 核 Ryzen 9、RX 7600M XT 独立 GPU 和高达 96 GB 内存

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 太贵且内存仅限 16GB

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED（2024）目前是市场上最好的多屏设备

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 32-core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon 890M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
Arc 8-Core *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
Arc 130V *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Radeon 740M *
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter