Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

英特尔图形媒体加速器HD显卡,英特尔高清显卡,GMA HD(或GMA5700MHD)是一个捆绑包中的新的Arrandale双核心CPU即将到来的2010年第一季度的笔记本电脑,主机板/共享内存显卡。根据GMA HD的CPU型号,主频为166和500 MHz(通过Turbo Boost最高。500-766兆赫)。相比,在45nm和32nm制程的CPU芯片,GPU和内存控制器。相比当前的GMA 4500MHD图形适配器,图形媒体加速器HD有两个领先的12个执行单元的着色器(或统一的着色器核心)。相同的英特尔高清显卡中的入门级Sandy Bridge处理器是这​​款显卡的继任者,并提供了一​​个更好的架构,因此速度更快。新的图形媒体加速器HD图形卡的性能比老GMA 4500MHD(由于人数的增加着色器,在某些情况下,还时钟速率)是noticable。在一些游戏中,甚至是尽可能快的GeForce 9400M / ION芯片组的GMA HD。平均而言,它应该是尽可能快地HD四千二百分之三千二百的由ATI,因此允许用户播放和要求不高的游戏中低设置。仍然还不如Nvidia和AMD显卡的驱动程序支持。此外,低电压和超低电压酷睿处理器含有较低的主频GMA HD显卡,因此速度较慢。此外,OpenGL性能仍然不是很好。例如老Doom 3和Quake 4的游戏不会运行得很流利。类似的4500MHD,还提供GMA HD高清视频硬件加速功能的芯片。 DXVA检查器列出支持MPEG2(VLD,IDCT,MoComp,A,C),H264(VLD,MoComp,IDCT),WMV9(MoComp,IDCT)和VC1(MoComp,IDCT)72x480,1280×720和1920×1080。大巴克兔子(1080P,H.264)解码一个东芝Tecra A11笔记本电脑采用酷睿i5-430M的CPU使用的是Windows媒体播放器使用显卡与CPU负载只有0-1%。当使用VLC不支持使用图形卡,CPU负载显着高于8-17%,在我们的测试。用同样的方法发现WMV视频(3-5%和7-12%的飞行法宝,1080)和VC-1视频(大象之梦1080p的5-8%和8-15%)。新的Arrandale处理器的Turbo Boost功能,还可以自动超频的GPU核心。显卡超频的CPU不满载,并,TDP是没有充分利用。高端酷睿​​i5 520M,540M,酷睿i7 620M:500-766 MHzLow结束:酷睿i3 330M,350M:500-677 MHzLow电压:酷睿i7 620LM,640LM:266-566 MHzUltra低的电压:酷睿i5-520UM,i5的620UM,640UM:166-500兆赫这是值得商榷的,如果TURBO是真的经常被用来在当前的游戏,大多数游戏也使用了大量的CPU时间。因此,UM和LM的GMA HD版本应该是慢了很多,因为基本速度慢266分之166兆赫。

CodenameGMA HD
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale
Pipelines12 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology45 nm
Date of Announcement10.01.2010

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 119     avg: 267.6     median: 297.5 (0%)     max: 394 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 90     avg: 202.7     median: 225 (0%)     max: 299 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -69%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
96 -53%
112 -45%
172 -15%
179 -12%
179.5 -11%
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
202.7
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
204 1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
234 15%
281 39%
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
286 41%
363 79%
414 104%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
465 129%
466 130%
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
512 153%
...
132443 65239%
max:
170928 84226%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 4735     avg: 8113     median: 8301.5 (9%)     max: 10934 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2681     avg: 3981     median: 3988 (2%)     max: 5007 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1093     avg: 2790     median: 2748 (3%)     max: 3429 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -95%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
2284 -18%
ATI Radeon HD 3200
2324 -17%
2365 -15%
ATI Mobility Radeon X700
2381 -15%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5000
2400 -14%
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400
2517 -10%
2622 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
2671 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce G 102M
2723 -2%
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
2790
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600
2800 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
2800 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
2872 3%
2926 5%
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
2943 5%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3002 8%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
3091 11%
3100 11%
3127 12%
...
68064 2340%
max:
87172 3024%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 1076     avg: 1436     median: 1389 (2%)     max: 2013 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 994     avg: 1476     median: 1420 (2%)     max: 1968 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
min: 1120     avg: 1461     median: 1402.5 (2%)     max: 1919 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 1122     avg: 1610     median: 1680.5 (2%)     max: 2119 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1152x864 +
3DMark 06
1599 Points (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 3.2     avg: 4.9     median: 5.1 (65%)     max: 5.3 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 2.4     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (51%)     max: 4.8 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 62     avg: 1720     median: 1790 (1%)     max: 3036 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 0.68     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.86 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
10.3 23 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.2 14 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
63.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
22 58.2 80.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
14 30 43.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
5 24.6 33.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
-1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11 26 27.9 31 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
5 6 10 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
4 5 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
26  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
20 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
33.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
-1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
-1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
21.6 26 26 27 30 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
82.1 89 91 96 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29.7 32 34 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
53  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
-1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
92.3  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
28.3 47 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
13.2 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
18.1 19.3 20.6 21.7 21.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
9.8 11.7 11.9 12.1 12.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
low 640x480
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
97 98 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
32 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
22  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
21.8  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
21.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
155  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo III201210
Anno 20701795
Fifa 1263.430.2
Deus Ex Human Revolution21
Dirt 3863
Total War: Shogun 21810
Fifa 1154292121.07
Mafia 2-1
StarCraft 22475
Metro 203313
Battlefield: Bad Company 21253
CoD Modern Warfare 226
Risen21
Resident Evil 533.810.2
Need for Speed Shift-1
Colin McRae: DIRT 2-1
Anno 140426
Sims 3903321
F.E.A.R. 24512
Left 4 Dead5323
Far Cry 225.76.4
Crysis Warhead15-1
Trackmania Nations Forever92.321.915
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare3815
Supreme Commander - FA Bench2012
Crysis - GPU Benchmark23
Crysis - CPU Benchmark23
World in Conflict - Benchmark39138
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark47.44
Quake 412
World of Warcraft98347
Counter-Strike Source79
Doom 32221.821.621.2
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo155
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
18
6
4
12
3

14
1
1
1
3








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 00:07:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1549 +0.014s ... 0.046s

#8 got single benchmarks 1549 +0.385s ... 0.431s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.431s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.402s ... 0.833s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.833s

#12 Got 105 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.854s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.854s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.869s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.669s ... 1.538s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.541s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.541s

Notebook reviews with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 15: Intel Core i3-350M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 15

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 20-core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)