Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 2500

Intel HD Graphics 2500

显卡Intel HD Graphics2500(或英特尔图形媒体加速器HD2500或GMA HD2500),是一个集成的图形卡,代号为Ivy Bridge的处理器。它继承了英特尔HD Graphics2000在Sandy Bridge处理器和执行之间的旧的HD 2000和3000 GPU(根据命名)。相比更快的高清显卡4000,2500功能执行单位(6%比16),只有一个纹理采样器。因此,性能应该清楚地差,只适合低苛刻的游戏。英特尔一个高10%至15%的性能相比老的Sandy Bridge HD显卡2000。因此,只有低需求的休闲游戏,播放HD2500。集成视频解码器称为多格式编解码器引擎(MFX)也得到了改善和4K应该允许甚至simultaneus的视频解码。 DXVAChecker列表MPEG2,VC1,WMV9,H264支持的编解码器。 QuickSync快速转码的视频进行了优化,以更高的性能和更好的图像质量。另一项新功能是支持多达3个独立的显示器(也许只有一个DisplayPort)为AMD提供了与他们的Eyefinity技术支持(最多6个显示器)。由于3D三栅极的22nm生产工艺,应该是比较低的功耗(每瓦特性能)的发展重点。

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameIvy Bridge GT1
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed650 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11.0, Shader 5.0
technology22 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.04.2012
CPU in HD Graphics 2500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-35504 x 3300 MHz, 77 W650 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-34704 x 3200 MHz, 77 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i3-32202 x 3300 MHz, 55 W650 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.650 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.1 pt (0%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -54%
...
0.09931 -31%
0.102 -30%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.1025 -29%
AMD Radeon HD 8210
0.1034 -29%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
0.1155 -20%
0.1159 -20%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
0.1189 -18%
0.1301 -10%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
0.1332 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 2500
0.1449
0.149 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8280
0.1494 3%
0.1562 8%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
0.1599 10%
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
0.1651 14%
0.1651 14%
0.1699 17%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
0.1767 22%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
0.1827 26%
...
21.1 14462%
max:
33.3 22881%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1906     avg: 2659     median: 2817 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2301     avg: 2584     median: 2604.5 (1%)     max: 2825 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 257     avg: 293.3     median: 294.5 (1%)     max: 327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 289     avg: 319.5     median: 318 (0%)     max: 353 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 21978     avg: 23693     median: 24058 (3%)     max: 24676 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 374     avg: 419     median: 430 (1%)     max: 449 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 321     avg: 349     median: 350.5 (0%)     max: 374 Points
171.8 -51%
...
232.3 -33%
251.8 -28%
AMD Radeon HD 8180
268 -23%
301 -14%
310.6 -11%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
319.9 -8%
330.4 -5%
341.1 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8210
344.5 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 2500
349
379 9%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
389.9 12%
415 19%
415.3 19%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
422.5 21%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
427.5 22%
443 27%
453 30%
467 34%
...
59943 17076%
max:
106023 30279%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1375     avg: 1849     median: 1930.5 (1%)     max: 2068 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1115     avg: 1369     median: 1400.5 (1%)     max: 1561 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -95%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8250
1113 -19%
1144 -16%
1186 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
1192 -13%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
1247 -9%
1282 -6%
1295 -5%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
1328 -3%
1331 -3%
Intel HD Graphics 2500
1369
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
1379 1%
1380 1%
1484 8%
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
1486 9%
1504 10%
1507 10%
1512 10%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
1513 11%
1516 11%
...
132443 9574%
max:
170928 12386%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
20814 Points (22%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
10138 Points (5%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6341     avg: 6627     median: 6627 (7%)     max: 6913 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -98%
...
6355 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
6397 -3%
6421 -3%
6443 -3%
6469 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
6475 -2%
6555 -1%
6580 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
6600 0%
Intel HD Graphics 2500
6627
6662 1%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
6666 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
6669 1%
NVIDIA GeForce G210M
6720 1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700
6729 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
6755 2%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
6853 3%
6928 5%
6991 5%
...
68064 927%
max:
87172 1215%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3300     avg: 3933     median: 3816 (5%)     max: 4442 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
1.6 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
2.7 fps (2%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.8 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1.9 fps (2%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
12.9 fps (10%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
15.6 fps (17%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
2.4 fps (1%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
0 fps (0%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3409     avg: 5543     median: 6037 (4%)     max: 6687 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 9.09     avg: 10.6     median: 10.8 (4%)     max: 11.98 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 30     avg: 31     median: 31 (0%)     max: 32 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 47     avg: 50     median: 50 (0%)     max: 53 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 282     avg: 287.3     median: 286 (0%)     max: 294 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
43 46.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
18 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.4 20.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.7 11.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
29.7 99 101 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.6 51 52 60 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2 28 31.2 32 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
37 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
37  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
77 82 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 20.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
21.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
46  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
48.8 52.8 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
20.2 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
104  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Metro: Last Light11.079.849.64
BioShock Infinite17.6686.96
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm1452613.74.3
SimCity14.88
Tomb Raider20.110.97.1
Crysis 313.8
Dead Space 34518.813.57.3
Far Cry 31911.9
Assassin´s Creed III13.8
Hitman: Absolution19113.81.9
Call of Duty: Black Ops 218
Fifa 1377472714.5
F1 201239242212
Guild Wars 2378
Counter-Strike: GO80381911.7
Sleeping Dogs21.715.5
Anno 207023.159.785.23
Battlefield 316.811
Supreme Commander - FA Bench4622.218.77.6
Crysis - GPU Benchmark5121123
World of Warcraft10429
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
11
5
3
1
16
2

13


8








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 05. 01:01:59

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:31:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.043s ... 0.044s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.044s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.045s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.046s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.047s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.047s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#27 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 2887 +0.029s ... 0.075s

#29 got single benchmarks 2887 +0.017s ... 0.092s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.438s ... 0.53s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +0.091s ... 0.621s

#33 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.621s

#34 Got 80 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.627s

#35 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.627s

#36 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.64s

#37 benchmarks composed for output. +0.617s ... 1.257s

#38 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.26s

#39 return log +0s ... 1.26s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Arc 130V *
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter