Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 5300

Intel HD Graphics 5300

英特尔HD Graphics 5300 (GT2)是一款集成的Braodwell架构显卡,在2014年末发布。它主要使用于酷睿M超低电压处理器中如酷睿M-5Y70。尽管这款显卡的超低功耗让人眼前一亮,但它的基础性能也很低,对于现代游戏仅可勉强应付。

架构和特性

Broadwell处理器集成显卡采用了基于英特尔第八代(Gen8)架构,在各方面相比之前的Gen7.5(Haswell)有了优化。除此之外,称作“子片”(subslice)的着色器阵列获得了重新设计,现在各提供了8个执行单元(EU)。三个子片组成一个“片”(slice),共计24个执行单元。加上其他改进如更大L1缓存和优化的前端等,这块集成相比前代产品速度更快、更加高效。

HD Graphics 5300是Broadwell系列显卡的中端版本,包括一组共24个执行单元。除此之外,它也有一个低端(GT1,12个EU)和一个高端版本(GT3/GT3e,48个EU+eDRAM)。

所有Broadwell显卡都支持OpenCL 2.0和DirectX 11.2。它的视频引擎现在可以同时使用固有硬件以及可用的处理器着色器协同解码H.265视频。最多三个显示器可以通过DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3(最大3840×2160 @ 60Hz)或HDMI 1.4a(最大3840×2160 @ 24Hz)连接。但是它并不支持HDMI 2.0。

性能

根据处理器型号的不同,它的最高核心频率在800和900MHz之间。由于较低的TDP,在3D应用中的平均运行频率将会显著降低。因此,HD 5300只能勉强胜过前代HD 4000或HD 4200,但在相同的性能下消耗的能量也更低。

2014/2015年的游戏中仅有很少可以在低设置下流畅运行,如Dota 2或模拟人生4。

功耗

采用了新的14纳米工艺,酷睿M整个芯片的TDP仅为4.5瓦,因此适用于被动散热的平板电脑中。它的TDP可以定制,能够降低或提高,这会对性能有显著影响。

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT2
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed100 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3
Transistor Count1.3 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement05.09.2014
CPU in HD Graphics 5300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core M-5Y712 x 1200 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core M-5Y512 x 1100 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core M-5Y702 x 1100 MHz, 4.5 W100 MHz850 MHz
min. - max.100 - 300 MHz800 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.2 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -67%
...
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
0.1601 -17%
0.1647 -15%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
0.1714 -12%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
0.1771 -9%
0.1802 -7%
0.1853 -4%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
0.1906 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.1912 -1%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
0.1915 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 5300
0.1939
Intel UHD Graphics 605
0.2005 3%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
0.2045 5%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
0.2052 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
0.2098 8%
0.212 9%
0.2195 13%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
0.2259 17%
0.2261 17%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
0.2275 17%
...
20.4 10421%
max:
33.3 17074%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 39138     avg: 55907     median: 59555 (6%)     max: 65380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 19630     avg: 24597     median: 24597 (3%)     max: 29564 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1361     avg: 3085     median: 3041 (3%)     max: 4274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2895     avg: 3862     median: 3720 (1%)     max: 5512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 327     avg: 413.8     median: 407 (1%)     max: 620 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 352     avg: 453.8     median: 439 (0%)     max: 671 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 27164     avg: 35716     median: 34405 (4%)     max: 48901 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 498     avg: 721     median: 731 (1%)     max: 973 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 458     avg: 648     median: 647 (1%)     max: 885 Points
171.8 -73%
...
585 -10%
597 -8%
599 -8%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
611 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
615 -5%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
624 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
624 -4%
632 -2%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
641 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 5300
648
650 0%
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
650 0%
656 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
678 5%
685 6%
700 8%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
701 8%
721 11%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
731 13%
...
59943 9150%
max:
104201 15980%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2966     avg: 3104     median: 3104 (1%)     max: 3242 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2538     avg: 2914     median: 2913.5 (2%)     max: 3289 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3951     avg: 5044     median: 4775 (6%)     max: 6754 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
7.6 fps (3%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 0.97     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (1%)     max: 8.44 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 1.07     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.28 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 2.69     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (1%)     max: 6.69 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 0.58     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 2.13     avg: 4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.79 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.04     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (4%)     max: 9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 0.91     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 4.73 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
5.5 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2978     avg: 4412     median: 4018 (3%)     max: 6679 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.6     avg: 16.4     median: 15.9 (5%)     max: 23.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 16.04     avg: 19     median: 18.4 (1%)     max: 23.64 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 98.1     median: 98 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 26.7     avg: 30.3     median: 30.1 (2%)     max: 34.1 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 39.4     avg: 54.4     median: 55 (0%)     max: 66.2 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 93     avg: 116.7     median: 112 (0%)     max: 145 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 180     avg: 228.7     median: 210 (0%)     max: 296 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 460     avg: 519     median: 518.5 (1%)     max: 577 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
12.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
5.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
26.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11 11.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.6 8.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3 3.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
33 34 39 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20 20 25 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 13 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.8 20.1 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.6 13.9 15.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6 7.6 8.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3 14.2 16.7 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
4.7 7.9 9.3 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.3 5 5.3 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
19.1 21.1 28.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.8 16.2 21.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
48.3 48.6 51.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 16.2 16.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 12.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
11.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
8.3 9.3 9.5 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.1 5.3 5.5 6.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2 2.2 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
91.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
24.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
33.1 48 50.9 51.2 53.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
21.4 23.2 26.7 28.6 29.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 12.2 14.9 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.5 24.7 27.1 27.4 27.8 28.2 30.8 33.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.2 12.3 14.3 14.4 14.6 14.8 15 15.6 18.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.4 10.6 10.8 11.2 11.8 11.9 12.6 13 15.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.9 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
99.5 143.4 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.3 35.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23 24.5 27.1 28.9 31 31.3 31.5 35.9 37.4 37.5 39.9 40.3 40.8 49.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.7 14 15 15.4 15.7 16.2 16.3 18.1 18.8 18.8 19.8 20 20.5 25.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6 9.1 9.8 10.2 10.6 10.6 10.7 11.8 12.3 12.6 12.8 13.5 14.7 16.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 5.4 6.1 7.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
53.5 62 73 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.7 49.7 51 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.7 25.1 38 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 19.8 23 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
20.2 21.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1 7.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21 28.5 57.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17 21.3 31.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12 18 28.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 20 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
11.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
40.5 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.5 20.1 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.6 11.6 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
57.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
18.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
20.3 60 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
14.5 22.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
48.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
188  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
52.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
39 43.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
12.6 31 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mirror's Edge Catalyst12.26.9
Need for Speed 20169.17.7
Hitman 20164.72.1
The Division10.87.3
Far Cry Primal83
XCOM 25.72.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider6.63.9
Rainbow Six Siege13.28.55
Just Cause 39.97.7
Star Wars Battlefront13.87.4
Anno 220510.66.1
FIFA 1626.315.3
World of Warships2617.78.4
Metal Gear Solid V20.612.4
Batman: Arkham Knight54
The Witcher 36.23.7
Dirt Rally4112.5
Battlefield Hardline15.31153.1
Evolve75.12.81.1
Dragon Age: Inquisition11831.6
Far Cry 49.26.83.51.7
Civilization: Beyond Earth21.28.85.84.5
F1 201435221312
The Evil Within86.5
Ryse: Son of Rome7.14.6
Alien: Isolation211484.63
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor1585
Fifa 1523178.3
Sims 49117.68.56.6
Risen 3: Titan Lords17.311.74.6
GRID: Autosport50161312.5
Wolfenstein: The New Order18.311.17.6
Thief9642
X-Plane 10.2526.710.73.93.4
Battlefield 415.211.67.5
Fifa 1491.448.845.221.6
Total War: Rome II24.917.4133.6
Splinter Cell: Blacklist18.211.7
Dota 2472613
Company of Heroes 28.3
GRID 24121.3415
Metro: Last Light13.310.16.13.2
BioShock Infinite2815123
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm12132196.5
SimCity2612.48
Tomb Raider3418126
Crysis 312.57.54.21.7
Dead Space 335.918.313.97.1
Far Cry 319.412.66.5
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2332411.8
Borderlands 220.211.39.54
Guild Wars 246.612.95.6
Counter-Strike: GO63462918
Sleeping Dogs21167
Diablo III36232015
Alan Wake11.26.4
Anno 20704321124.8
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim19.59.25.83.2
Battlefield 316.312.79.7
Deus Ex Human Revolution40.921.5
Dirt 357.426.516.7
Mafia 218.915.413.48.8
Metro 2033168.14.7
Battlefield: Bad Company 233.12516
Risen401916
Resident Evil 548.121.410.3
Trackmania Nations Forever18852.321.8
World of Warcraft9241228
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
46
16
4
2
57
4

46
2

31








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 03:35:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.087s ... 0.088s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.088s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.088s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.089s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.09s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.091s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.091s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.091s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.092s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.092s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.092s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.092s

#28 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.092s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 5939 +0.045s ... 0.137s

#30 got single benchmarks 5939 +0.106s ... 0.244s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.244s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +1.326s ... 1.569s

#33 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.569s

#34 Got 360 rows for game benchmarks. +0.376s ... 1.946s

#35 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.946s

#36 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.061s ... 2.007s

#37 benchmarks composed for output. +7.414s ... 9.421s

#38 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.007s ... 9.428s

#39 return log +0s ... 9.428s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 5300 graphics card

联想 Yoga 3 11 变形本简短评测

联想 Yoga 3 11 变形本简短评测

多模式。 像亚笔记本一样易用,与平板一样轻薄。它的紧凑尺寸处于目前便携和办公之间的最优点。Core M处理器保证了长电池续航,而IPS屏幕则提供了优秀的显示效果。请阅读我们的评测以了解这款设备为何没能完全征服我们。...
Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 11.60" | 1.1 kg
Apple MacBook 12 (2015年初) 1.1 GHz 简短评测

Apple MacBook 12 (2015年初) 1.1 GHz 简短评测

精简的艺术。 有的时候少反而是多,这可能是Apple在设计超便携的MacBook 12时的想法。除了不必要的重量,他们也移除了(几乎)所有的接口。这样特别的概念可能不会适合所有人——但也会启发一些人。...
Intel Core M-5Y31 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 12.00" | 920 g
东芝 Portege Z20t-B 变形本简短评测

东芝 Portege Z20t-B 变形本简短评测

昂贵续航旗舰。 东芝为他们的最新商务变形本的最高配置定价高达2000欧元(约13864人民币)——相对地,用户可以得到一台功能全面而电池续航超长的商务设备。由于采用了抗反射触控屏幕,Portege Z20t也可以在户外使用。...
Intel Core M-5Y71 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 12.50" | 1.5 kg
惠普 EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 超极本简短评测

惠普 EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 超极本简短评测

小而精。 生产商将他们全新的Elitebook描述为一台坚固的旅行设备。它的机身工艺和温度噪音控制十分优秀,不过相比同类产品在性能上略有欠缺。...
Intel Core M-5Y51 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 12.50" | 1.2 kg
华硕 Transformer Book T300 Chi 变形本简短评测

华硕 Transformer Book T300 Chi 变形本简短评测

Chi帮你寻找内心的“禅”。 Zenbook超极本和Transformer变形本的一举成功让华硕决定创造Transformer之下的一个全新变形本系列,Chi。T300 Chi是其中性能最高的机型,搭配的2560x1440分辨率屏幕也十分优秀。...
Intel Core M-5Y71 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 12.50" | 1.4 kg

Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook UX305 亚笔记本简短评测

Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12 变形本简短评测

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad Helix 2 平板电脑简短评测

Dell Latitude 13 7350: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Latitude 13 7350 变形本简短评测

Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 10.80", 1.4 kg
  Review » 戴尔 Venue 11 Pro 7140 变形本简短评测

HP Envy x2 15-c000ng: Intel Core M-5Y10, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » 惠普 Envy x2 15-c000ng 变形本简短评测

HP Envy X2-j001ng: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  Review » 惠普 Envy x2-j001ng 变形本简短评测

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga 3 Pro 变形本简短评测

Fujitsu Stylistic Q665: Intel Core M-5Y31, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Stylistic Q665

Asus UX305FA-FB033H: Intel Core M-5Y71, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB033H

Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-63NV: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-63NV

HP EliteBook Folio 1020, Core M-5Y71: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook Folio 1020, Core M-5Y71

Asus UX305FA-FB012H: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB012H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG0019GE: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG0019GE

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10E: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10E

Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet

Acer Aspire Switch 11V-SW5-173-62J8: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11V-SW5-173-62J8

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C

HP Elite x2 1011 G1: Intel Core M-5Y51, 11.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x2 1011 G1

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG001BMH: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG001BMH

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-107: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-107

Acer Aspire Switch 11 V SW5-173: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11 V SW5-173

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FB033H: Intel Core M-5Y71, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FB033H

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10

HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10G: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10G

Asus UX305FA-FB041H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB041H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2-20CHS02A00: Intel Core M-5Y70, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2-20CHS02A00

HP Pavilion 11-n108TU x360: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 11-n108TU x360

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-103: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-103

Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE001H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE001H

Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE

HP Elite x2 1011 G1-L8D67UT: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 0.9 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x2 1011 G1-L8D67UT

Lenovo Yoga 3 11: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 11

Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 10.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140

Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi

Samsung 930X2K-K02US: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.20", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung 930X2K-K02US

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC007H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC007H

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz

HP Envy x2 15-c000ng: Intel Core M-5Y10, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x2 15-c000ng

Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC008H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC008H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B2112: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B2112

Acer Aspire Switch 12: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 12.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12

HP Envy X2-j001nf: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy X2-j001nf

Dell Latitude 13 7350: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 13 7350

Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE010H: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE010H

HP Elitebook Folio 1020: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Elitebook Folio 1020

HP Envy X2-j001ng: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy X2-j001ng

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro

Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook UX305

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 20-core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter