Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 615

Intel HD Graphics 615

英特尔HD Graphics 615(GT2)是一块低端集成显卡,它可以在很多Kaby Lake架构的Y系列处理器中找到。而“GT2”版本提供24个执行单元(EU),主频最高可达1050 MHz的(取决于CPU型号)。由于缺少独立显存或eDRAM缓存,HD 615需要访问主内存(2×64位 DDR3L/ LPDDR3)。

性能

HD 615的3D性能取决于CPU型号和笔记本电脑散热/ TDP设置。此外,所使用的主内存(单通道,DDR3(L),容量)也都会影响性能。平均来说,HD graphics 615应该比上一代的HD Graphics 515快大约20%至30%。因此,它甚至可能达到HD Graphics 520的性能水平。因此,一些要求较低的游戏可以流畅运行。

特性

改进后的视频引擎现在可以更加高效地硬件解码H.265 / HEVC Main10和10位色彩。此外,谷歌VP9编解码器也将可以通过硬件解码。它的第一批型号不支持HDCP 2.2,因此不支持Netflix 4K。2017年的新批次应该会增加这项支持。

功耗

HD Graphics 615搭配于一些4.5瓦TDP(笔记本电脑生产商可以自行定制)Y系列处理器中,因此它将适合于非常轻薄的被动散热式二合一笔记本电脑或平板电脑中。

Gen. 9.5 Series

Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby-Lake GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9 Kaby Lake
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement30.08.2016
CPU in HD Graphics 615GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-7Y752 x 1300 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i5-7Y572 x 1200 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz950 MHz
Intel Core i5-7Y542 x 1200 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz850 - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -83%
...
0.3489 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
0.3498 -7%
Intel HD Graphics 520
0.3549 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
0.3617 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
0.3631 -4%
0.3639 -3%
0.3661 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.3732 -1%
0.3759 0%
Intel HD Graphics 615
0.3768
AMD FirePro M4100
0.3785 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
0.3803 1%
0.386 2%
0.3865 3%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
0.388 3%
0.3962 5%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
0.3997 6%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
0.4015 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.4021 7%
...
20.4 5314%
max:
33.3 8738%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 180     avg: 277.2     median: 296.5 (1%)     max: 327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 157     avg: 243.7     median: 261 (1%)     max: 288 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -54%
...
101.5 -58%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -56%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -54%
168.2 -31%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
194 -20%
194.5 -20%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
205 -16%
Intel HD Graphics 530
235 -4%
Intel HD Graphics 615
243.7
Intel UHD Graphics 615
244.7 0%
254.5 4%
255 5%
Intel HD Graphics 520
263 8%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
274 12%
281 15%
Intel UHD Graphics 617
299 23%
312 28%
320 31%
...
19434 7875%
max:
36259 14779%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 55271     avg: 69892     median: 70743 (7%)     max: 79719 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 28302     avg: 34366     median: 33200.5 (4%)     max: 42163 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4050     avg: 4904     median: 4893 (5%)     max: 5828 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5478     avg: 6502     median: 6387 (2%)     max: 7839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 582     avg: 750     median: 762 (1%)     max: 861 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 647     avg: 830     median: 853 (1%)     max: 965 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 45589     avg: 54672     median: 50760 (6%)     max: 69035 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
3735 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
4380 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2461 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
2800 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1141     avg: 1350     median: 1362.5 (2%)     max: 1514 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1032     avg: 1233     median: 1242.5 (1%)     max: 1384 Points
171.8 -86%
...
NVIDIA Quadro K610M
1144 -7%
1147 -7%
1148 -7%
1152 -7%
1161 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
1175 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
1179 -4%
1179 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 M230
1203 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 615
1233
1245 1%
1259 2%
1261 2%
1286 4%
Intel HD Graphics 520
1296 5%
1307 6%
1328 8%
1346 9%
1349 9%
...
59943 4762%
max:
104201 8351%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4081     avg: 4102     median: 4102 (1%)     max: 4123 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3514     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (2%)     max: 3561 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -98%
...
3255 -8%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
3265 -8%
AMD Radeon HD 6570M
3272 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
3357 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
3374 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
3375 -5%
3414 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
3463 -2%
3509 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 615
3538
3544 0%
NVIDIA Quadro K610M
3592 2%
3600 2%
3610 2%
Intel HD Graphics 5000
3639 3%
3647 3%
3677 4%
3679 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
3700 5%
...
132443 3643%
max:
170928 4731%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
19381 Points (20%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
16620 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
8649 Points (9%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -98%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
8176 -5%
8276 -4%
8296 -4%
8358 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
8387 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
8436 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
8450 -2%
8495 -2%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
8577 -1%
Intel HD Graphics 615
8649
Intel HD Graphics 4400
8674 0%
8696 1%
8746 1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
8769 1%
8810 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
8816 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
8844 2%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
8856 2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
8935 3%
...
68064 687%
max:
87172 908%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6299     avg: 7294     median: 7399 (10%)     max: 7991 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
6524 Points (9%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
17.4 fps (3%)
0.6 -97%
...
16.5 -5%
16.5 -5%
16.6 -5%
16.6 -5%
16.62 -4%
Intel HD Graphics 515
16.85 -3%
16.95 -3%
17.1 -2%
17.37 0%
Intel HD Graphics 615
17.4
17.65 1%
17.67 2%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
17.85 3%
17.9 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 5%
18.7 7%
18.8 8%
19.03 9%
...
532 2957%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5363     avg: 6543     median: 6470 (5%)     max: 7323 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 23.45     avg: 28.6     median: 27.8 (9%)     max: 32.97 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 24.79     avg: 33.1     median: 35 (2%)     max: 37.62 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7     avg: 97.9     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
42.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
76.3 fps (1%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
59.8 fps (99%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
33662 Points (76%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
42892 Points (95%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
38.3 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.4 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 145     avg: 181     median: 185 (1%)     max: 213 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 281     avg: 365.3     median: 369 (1%)     max: 446 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 447     avg: 654     median: 693 (1%)     max: 783 points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
18536 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2667 Points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.8 Watt (3%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
630 MHz (25%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
64.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1xAF 1920x1080
44.9
low 1280x720
17.8   fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fall Guys

Fall Guys

2020
low 1280x720
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
79  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
21.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
106  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
14.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
11.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
45.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
31.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.4 41.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
13.3
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
14.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
16.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
70.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1920x1080
5.2
low 1024x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
36.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.6 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
28.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
12.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11 12.9 13 13.8 14.2 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 9.1 9.1 9.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.4 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
49.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
23.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
50.4 57.4 57.4 59.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.6 31.9 31.9 52.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.7 15.7 15.7 27.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 14.1 14.1 25.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
71.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
19.9 24.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7 23.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
17.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
18.3
low 1024x768
19.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
13.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
147.3 155.1 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90 94.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.5 43.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.4 29.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
74.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.3 29.4 31.2 32.7 37.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.6 (!) 18.3 19.8 22.7 26.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.8 (!) 17.6 18.3 18.9 19.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.4 31.5 32 38.4 40.4 40.6 41.5 42 42.6 48.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6 18.8 19.3 20.4 21 22.4 25.1 25.2 25.8 28.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.2 16.1 17.8 19 19.3 20.5 20.8 21.7 24.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6 4.6 6 6 6.1 6.4 6.7 7.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
51.8 61.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.6 28.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16 18.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
99.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
55.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
88.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
83.2  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
60.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Outriders12.4
F1 202012.5
Valorant64.425.4
Gears Tactics17.8
Hearthstone27.6197.99
Fall Guys34.215.8
FIFA 20
F1 201918.1
League of Legends79625148.634.4
Total War: Three Kingdoms21.76.5
Strange Brigade18.288.812.1
The Crew 211.9
Far Cry 59
World of Tanks enCore10613.45.8
X-Plane 11.1118.812114.3
Kingdom Come: Deliverance8.3
Fortnite35.3
Star Wars Battlefront 214.6
Need for Speed Payback8.9
Call of Duty WWII15.2
Assassin´s Creed Origins7
Destiny 211.2
ELEX8.8
The Evil Within 28.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War15
FIFA 1845.2
F1 201721
Dirt 431.4
Rocket League3419.4
Prey14.36.6
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III11.64
Ghost Recon Wildlands9.84
For Honor16.86.2
Resident Evil 722.29.5
Titanfall 219.915.9
Farming Simulator 1770.245.1
Battlefield 1139.1
Civilization VI20.69.2
FIFA 1736.829.6
Deus Ex Mankind Divided9.1
Mirror's Edge Catalyst15.59
Overwatch28.221.9
Doom12.910.1
Ashes of the Singularity8.2
The Division15.1
Far Cry Primal125
Rise of the Tomb Raider139
Rainbow Six Siege24.616.2
Star Wars Battlefront19.811.5
Fallout 410.1
Call of Duty: Black Ops 38.4
Anno 220515.910.2
World of Warships49.930.2
Metal Gear Solid V23.420.87.6
Dota 2 Reborn56361816
The Witcher 311.9
Dirt Rally71.616.26
GTA V22206.14
Battlefield Hardline19.715.5
Dragon Age: Inquisition17.612.2
F1 20145534
Alien: Isolation26.3199.7
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor23.513.76.8
Sims 4151924329
GRID: Autosport74.924.6
Thief13.99.2
Battlefield 43121176.4
Metro: Last Light20.2
BioShock Infinite3922196
Tomb Raider572617
Crysis 32112.7
Hitman: Absolution21.9147.6
Counter-Strike: GO99.957.339.521.9
Diablo III55.836.330.117.8
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim35.1187.9
World of Warcraft88.983.260.97.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
51
14
8
1
40
6
3
13
4
1
9
1


1

2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 18. 20:53:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:32:18 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#18 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 7441 +0.029s ... 0.056s

#20 got single benchmarks 7441 +0.059s ... 0.115s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.758s ... 0.874s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.874s

#24 Got 231 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.893s

#25 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.893s

#26 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.046s ... 0.939s

#27 benchmarks composed for output. +1.493s ... 2.432s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.437s

#29 return log +0s ... 2.437s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 615 graphics card

联想Yoga Book C930(i5-7Y54, LTE, E-Ink)二合一笔记本评测

联想Yoga Book C930(i5-7Y54, LTE, E-Ink)二合一笔记本评测

新的Yoga Book配备了一块电子墨水屏而,不是一块实体键盘,我们可以认为这是笔记本电脑,平板电脑和电子阅读器的组合。最重要的是,您还可以使用这个多面手来进行数字化文本书写和绘图。该设备与其2016年的前身在设计上基本相同,但提供了许多变化和改进,例如,它提供了更好的性能,但也至少放弃了一个功能。2018年的Yoga...
Intel Core i5-7Y54 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | 10.80" | 778 g
微软 Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB) 变形本简短评测

微软 Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB) 变形本简短评测

平价Surface!虽然现在已经是2017的下半年了,微软推出的这款节能型酷睿m3处理器笔记本,它的连接性依然需要重做。 快从评测中了解到它的续航能力如何,以及大品牌是否足以吸引用户。...
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | 12.30" | 1.1 kg
酷比魔方 Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测

酷比魔方 Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测

经济版Surface 笔记本电脑。 来自远东的笔记本电脑已经越来越好,至少在他们的外观和特色方面是。其中一个中国高端机代表是酷比魔方Thinker,它配有优雅的铝合金外壳和Surface一样的屏幕。但是,性能能否和店面里的介绍一样?...
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | 13.50" | 1.7 kg
Apple MacBook 12 (2017)

苹果 MacBook 12 (2017) 笔记本电脑简短评测

有新变化? 就像是更新后的Air 13那样,MacBook 12拥有一个新的处理器和更快的固态硬盘。苹果的目标是“超前”。 “是和谁或是什么作比较呢?”你可能会问。或许是和设计要素还停留在2012年的Air 13相比。那么它是成功的,某些方面的成功。...
Intel Core m3-7Y32 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | 12.00" | 920 g
联想 ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (i5-7Y54) 平板电脑简短评测

联想 ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (i5-7Y54) 平板电脑简短评测

进步而非革新。 联想的ThinkPad X1 Tablet第一代表现十分不错,但也存在不少问题。一年之后的这个最新版本得到了芯片组和其他一部分硬件的升级。不过这足够让它保持竞争力吗?...
Intel Core i5-7Y54 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | 12.00" | 1.1 kg

Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 13 9365 (7Y54, QHD+) 变形本简短评测

Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 13 9365 2-in-1 变形本简短评测

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Swift 7 SF713-51 笔记本电脑简短评测

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » 宏碁 Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D 变形本简短评测

Chuwi UBook XPro: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Chuwi UBook XPro

Asus Chromebook C425TA-H50039: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook C425TA-H50039

Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M4JV: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M4JV

Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M3EW: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M3EW

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3

Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M16F: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T-M16F

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-EC067T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-EC067T

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-DHM4T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-DHM4T

Acer Swift 7 Sf714-51t-m64v: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 Sf714-51t-m64v

Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 10.80", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F

Samsung Chromebook Plus XE521QAB-K01US: Intel Celeron 3965Y, 12.20", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Chromebook Plus XE521QAB-K01US

Microsoft Surface Go MCZ-00002: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, 10.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go MCZ-00002

HP Chromebook x2 12-f015nr: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook x2 12-f015nr

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-EC011T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-EC011T

Wortmann Terra Pad 1270: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 12.10", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Wortmann Terra Pad 1270

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-DHM6T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401CA-DHM6T

Chuwi CoreBook 13: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Chuwi CoreBook 13

Teclast F6 Pro: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Teclast F6 Pro

Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T

Dell Latitude 7285-8718: Intel Core i5-7Y57, 12.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 7285-8718

Asus Zenbook UX330CA-FC106T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX330CA-FC106T

Google Pixelbook: Intel Core i5-7Y57, 12.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Google Pixelbook

Dell Latitude 7285: Intel Core i5-7Y57, 12.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 7285

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017, Core i5-7Y57: unknown, 12.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017, Core i5-7Y57

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M8MF: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M8MF

Cube i35 Thinker: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 13.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Cube i35 Thinker

Samsung Galaxy Book 10.6 W627N LTE: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 10.60", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book 10.6 W627N LTE

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017, Core i7-7Y75: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 12.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017, Core i7-7Y75

Apple MacBook 12 2017: Intel Core m3-7Y32, 12.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook 12 2017

Huawei Matebook E: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 12.10", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Matebook E

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3: Intel Core m3-7Y32, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)

Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9365-4537

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M90J: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M90J

Lenovo Yoga 710-11IKB-80V6001RGE: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 11.60", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 710-11IKB-80V6001RGE

Dell Inspiron 11 3179: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 11 3179

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M2SB: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M2SB

Asus Zenbook Flip UX360CA-C4171T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Flip UX360CA-C4171T

Cube Mix Plus: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 10.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Cube Mix Plus

Dell XPS 13 9365-4544 2-in-1: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9365-4544 2-in-1

HP Pro x2 612 G2: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.10", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pro x2 612 G2

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.20", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2017

Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13-9365

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M2LH: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF713-51-M2LH

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M37P: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M37P

Asus Transformer 3 T305CA-GW019T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer 3 T305CA-GW019T

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M339: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M339

Dell XPS 13 2-in-1: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 2-in-1

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M4YD: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M4YD

Asus Zenbook UX360CA-C4172T: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX360CA-C4172T

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D

Acer Aspire R14 R7-471T-M613: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire R14 R7-471T-M613

Asus Transformer 3 T305CA-GW015T: Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer 3 T305CA-GW015T

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M6LT: Intel Core i7-7Y75, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M6LT

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51: Intel Core i5-7Y54, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF713-51

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 40-core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter